Habitual hip subluxation and dislocation is a potentially disabling feature of Trisomy 21. We describe long-term outcomes following precise use of the femoral varus derotation osteotomy to achieve and maintain hip stability and community ambulation. All individuals with Trisomy 21, who had hip surgery at Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children between 1998 and 2008, were searched using the hospital databases. 16 hips in 9 children aged less than 10 years, were identified. All had a femoral varus derotation osteotomy (VDRO) with a target femoral neck shaft angle (NSA) of 105° and less than 20° external rotation. All were performed by the senior author JHW. The clinical notes and radiographs were reviewed from presentation to final follow up. Continuous variables were assessed for normality with the d'Agostino Pearson test. Normally distributed variables are presented as means with 95% confidence intervals. Pre and postoperative means were compared using the student's t-test for paired samples.Background
Methods
Primary dislocation of the patella is a common acute knee disorder in children, adolescents and young adults. While primary dislocation of the patella has traditionally been treated non-operatively, primary operative repair of the medial patella-stabilizing soft tissues has been popularized more recently and thought to reduce the risk of dislocation. However, several studies have shown substantial rates of redislocation with longer follow-up time, irrespective of treatment. The purpose of this systematic review was to compare operative and non-operative treatment for primary dislocation of the patella, regarding redislocation rates and symptoms. Based on a systematic literature search of the medical literature from 1950 to 2010, three randomized and two quasi-randomized controlled clinical trials comparing surgical stabilization with non-operative treatment for patients with primary patellar dislocation were selected. The Risk of Bias Tool (Cochrane Handbook, 2008) was used to assess the quality of the studies included. Study results were pooled using the fixed-effects and random-effects models with mean differences and risk ratios for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively. Heterogeneity across studies was assessed with Q test and I-square statistic. A sensitivity analysis was performed by assessing the change on effect size by eliminating each single trial.Background
Methods
