Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_6 | Pages 14 - 14
1 Mar 2017
Speranza A Alonzo R De Santis S Frontini S D'arrigo C Ferretti A
Full Access

Femoral neck fractures are the second cause of hospitalization in elderly patients. Nowadays it is still not clear whether surgical treatment may provide better clinical outcome than conservative treatment in patients affected by mental disorders, such as senile dementia.

The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess mortality and clinical and functional outcome after hemi arthroplasty operation following intracapsular neck fractures in patients with senile dementia.

Between 2008 and 2014, 819 patients were treated at our Orthopaedic Institute for neck fracture of the femur (mean age: 83.8 years old). Eighty-four of these showed clear signs of cognitive impairment at time of admission in the Emergency Department. Mental state of patients was assessed in all cases, as routine, at the Emergency Room with the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (Sh-MMT) and the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE).

Patients were divided in two groups depending whether they were surgically treated with hemiarthroplasty (Group B, 46 patients; 35 females, 11 males; mean age: 88.5 y.o.) or conservatively treated (Group C, 38 patients; 28 females, 10 males; mean age: 79.5 y.o.).

These two groups were compared with a matched case-control group of patients surgically treated with no mental disorders (Group A, 40 patients; 34 females, 6 males; mean age: 81.5 y.o.)

Incidence of mortality, systemic or local complications and functional clinical outcomes were evaluated with the ADL score and the Barthel index.

Mortality rate was 35% (14 patients) for Group A, 50% (21 patients) for Group B and 95% (22 patients) for Group C. Paired t-test, with significance rate set at 0.05, showed significant higher mortality rate in Group A compared to both Group B (p:0.02) and Group C (p:0.001), and also between Group B and Group C (p:0.01). Three orthopaedic complications were found in Group B (two cases of infection and one dislocation of the prosthesis) while none in Group A (p<0.001). There have been 14 overall general complication in Group A (33%), 16 in group B (38%) and 15 in Group C (65%), with significant higher rate in Group B vs. Group A (p:0.02) and in group C vs. Group B (p: 0.001)

Activity daily living scale and Barthel Index results showed higher results in Group B than Group C both in terms of recovery of walking ability and daily living (hairdressing, wearing clothes, eating).

For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly (see Info & Metrics tab above).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 15 - 15
1 Jan 2016
Carcangiu A D'arrigo C Bonifazi AM De Sanctis S Alonzo R Setini A Ferretti A
Full Access

Background

Limb length discrepancy after total hip replacement is one of the possible complications of suboptimal positioning of the implant and cause of patients dissatisfaction.

Computer assisted navigation become affirmed in last years for total hip replacement surgery and it is also used for the evaluation of the intra-operative limb length discrepancy.

The purpose of this study is to verify the reliability of a navigation system with a dedicated software in intraoperative evaluation of limb lengthening and offset as compared with manual technique.

Methods

Forty patients who underwent a Total Hip Arthroplasty in our institution were entrolled in this study. Twenty patients were evaluated with pre operative manual planning (group A) and treated with hand positioning of femoral stem. Twenty Patient were evaluated with preoperative manual planning and treated with Computer assisted navigation of Stem (group B).

Mean operating time and blood loss were analyzed. Radiological and clinical follow up was made at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperative to assess any mismatch of implant, complications and clinical results that was measured with Harris Hip Score.