Introduction

Postoperative pain following the 3 component ankle arthroplasty (AA) (Mobility™) is a recognised problem without any apparent cause. This study aimed to determine pattern of postoperative pain following Total Ankle Arthroplasty (TAA) and its management options.

Introduction and Aims: To determine if the surface area of partial thickness (< 50%), Bursal side tears of the cuff influence outcome following Subacromial Decompression.

Method: Shoulder function using Constant score (CS) was recorded before and a minimum of one year after Arthroscopic Subacromial Decompression (ASD) in patients undergoing surgery for primary impingement. In patients who had partial thickness, Bursal side tears (BT), the length of the tear in its largest dimension (surface area) was measured. These patients were divided into two groups according to the tear surface area (≤9 mm and ≥10mm) .To determine whether having a BT (< 50% thickness) or its surface area affect pre- and post-operative CS, t-tests were performed.

Results: 110 patients underwent ASD over a one-year period for primary impingement. Twenty-two patients with partial thickness BT and 18 patients with intact rotator cuff were included in this study. In 10 patients, the BT was ≤9 mm (mean 7 mm) and in 12 patients BT was ≥10mm (mean 13 mm).

Statistical analysis of pre- and post-operative Constant scores showed that, in ≤9 mm group CS increased significantly by 21.5, p=0.02, 95% CI (4.9, 38.1). CS increased in ≥10mm group by 22.8, p< 0.01, 95%(11.5, 34.1). Comparing the change in CS between these two groups with different tears size, there was no significant difference (2-sample t-test, t=0.15, 20df, p=0.88).

To determine whether having BT tear affects pre- and post-operative Constant scores, all BTs were grouped together and compared with the group of patients with intact cuff.

In the group with BTs, average Constant scores increased significantly (paired t-test, t=5.24, 21df, p< 0.01) by 22.2 with 95% CI (13.4, 31.0).

In the group with no tears, average Constant scores increased significantly (paired t-test, t=5.17, 17df, p< 0.01) by 26.6, 95% CI (15.8, 37.5).

Comparing the levels of absolute change in Constant scores from pre- to post-operation between the two groups there is no difference in outcome between patients with a tear and those without a tear (2-sample t-test, t=1.03, 38df, p=0.31).

Conclusion: We conclude that ASD yields satisfactory results in patients with BTs involving < 50% thickness, irrespective of the surface area of the tear.

Introduction and Aims: To determine the increased complications of spinal surgery done in non-specialised units for acute spinal injury patients.

Method: Retrospective analysis of all admissions to NSIC from February 1999 to August 2000.

Results: To hundred and forty-three patients admitted to NSIC over 18 months. Fifty-five patients underwent surgical interventions. Majority of patients were male, average age 36 years. Commonest cause of injury is RTA (45%). A complete injury (ASIA A) occurred in (54.5%) of patients.

Primary interventions were done in NSIC, with no major complication, for 36 patients. Nineteen patients operated on in the referring hospital (non-specialised units) before transfer to our centre. Early corrective surgery required for 10 of the total 19 patients due to spinal instability in five patients, non-union in two patients, CSF leak, infection in two patients and wrong level in one patient.

A comparison between primary and corrective surgery performed in NSIC by the same surgical team showed that the average length of corrective surgery was 240 minutes, with 150 minutes for primary procedure. Blood loss: 1750 mls on average for corrective surgery, compared to 600 mls for primary intervention. Post-op mobilisation started on average five days after primary surgery and 20 days after corrective surgery. Period of rehabilitation – 16 weeks on average after primary surgery in NSIC, compared to 40 weeks after corrective surgery.

Conclusion: Our results showed that early transfer to spinal injury unit and early spinal decompression and stabilisation performed by an experienced spinal surgeon, in a spinal injury centre would prevent complications and delays in rehabilitation.

To determine if the surface area of partial thickness (< 50%), Bursal side tears of the cuff influence outcome following Subacromial Decompression.

Shoulder function using Constant score (CS) was recorded before and a minimum of one year after Arthroscopic Subacromial Decompression (ASD) in patients undergoing surgery for primary impingement. In patients who had partial thickness, Bursal side tears (BT), the length of the tear in its largest dimension (surface area) was measured. These patients were divided into two groups according to the tear surface area (≤9 mm and ≥10mm) .To determine whether having a BT (< 50% thickness) or its surface area affect pre and postoperative CS, t-tests were performed.

110 patients underwent ASD over a one-year period for primary impingement. 22 patients with partial thickness BT and18 patients with intact rotator cuff were included in this study. In 10 patients, the BTwas ≤9 mm (mean7mm) and in 12 patients BTwas ≥10mm(mean13mm). Statistical analysis of Pre-& postoperative Constant scores showed that, in ≤9 mm group CS increased significantly by 21.5, p=0.02, 95% CI (4.9, 38.1). CS increased in ≥10mm group by 22.8, p< 0.01, 95%(11.5, 34.1). Comparing the change in CS between these two groups with different tears size, there was no significant difference (2-sample t-test, t=0.15, 20df, p=0.88).

To determine whether having BT tear affects pre- and post-operative Constant scores, all BTs were grouped together and compared with the group of patients with intact cuff.

In the group with BTs, average Constant scores increased significantly (paired t-test,t=5.24,21df,p< 0.01) by 22.2 with 95% CI (13.4, 31.0). In the group with no tears, average Constant scores increased significantly (paired t-test,t=5.17,17df,p< 0.01) by 26.6, 95% CI (15.8, 37.5).

Comparing the levels of absolute change in Constant scores from pre- to post-operation between the two groups there is no difference in outcome between patients with a tear and those without a tear (2-sample t-test, t=1.03, 38df, p=0.31).

We conclude that ASD yields satisfactory results in patients with BTs involving < 50% thickness, irrespective of the surface area of the tear.