Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 2 of 2
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIX | Pages 228 - 228
1 Sep 2012
MacGregor R Abdul-Jabar H Sala M Al-Yassari G Perez J
Full Access

We completed a retrospective case study of 66 consecutive isolated closed 5th metacarpal neck fractures that presented to our Hospital between September 2009 and March 2010. Their management was established by referring to outpatient letters and A&E notes. The aim of the study was to establish if it would be more efficient and cost effective for these patients to be managed in A&E review clinic without compromising patient care.

Of these 66 patients, 56 were males and the mean age was 26 years (12–88 years). Four fractures were not followed up at our Trust, six did not attend their outpatient appointment, one did not require follow up.

Of the remaining 55, reviewed at a fracture clinic, all but two were managed conservatively, with 47% requiring one outpatient appointment only. The cost of a new patient Orthopaedic outpatient appointment is £180 with subsequent follow up appointments costing £80 per visit, in contrast to an A&E review clinic appointment at a cost of £60.

In view of the small percentage in need of surgical intervention: we highlight the possibility for these patients to be managed solely in the A&E department with a management plan made at the A&E review clinic with an option to refer patients if necessary, and the provision of management guidelines and care quality assurance measures.

This, we believe, would maintain care quality for these patients, improve efficiency of fracture clinics and decrease cost. We calculate that even if only all the patients that required one follow up appointment could have been managed by A&E alone then the saving to the local health commissioning body over a six month period from within our trust alone, would have been £3000, which across all trusts providing acute trauma services within the NHS would amount to a substantial saving nationwide.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 93-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 302 - 302
1 Jul 2011
Khokhar R Colegate-Stone T Tavakkolizadeh A Al-Yassari G Roslee C Compson J
Full Access

Aims: To assess the usefulness of wrist arthroscopy in the assessment of symptomatic scaphoid non-unions and associated injuries and to evaluate the implications on the definitive treatment.

Methods: A prospective cohort study of patients undergoing wrist arthroscopy with established scaphoid non-union was performed between January 2006 and April 2009. This study included 17 men and 6 women with a mean age of 39 years.

Results: Majority of the study population (61%) had normal radiocarpal articular cartilage. Articular cartilage wear was mostly limited to the radial styloid and could be effectively debrided. Injuries to the TFCC (39%) followed by the LT joint (35%) and the SL joint (26%) were the most common arthroscopic findings. Other identified pathologies included: Loose bodies, protruding Herbert screw from previous fixation, Chondrocalcinosis, Distal Radio-ulnar joint (DRUJ) instability, Capitohamate (CH) instability and Ulnar styloid fracture non-union. Assessment of the state of the fracture union was best done from the mid carpal joint rather than the radiocarpal joint due to a more prominent fibrocartilage covering of the fracture site from the radiocarpal side Concomitant procedures performed during the wrist arthroscopy included debridement of synovitis (48%) and TFCC repair (4%). Post wrist arthroscopy 6 patients (26%) required a further course of conservative treatment (Physiotherapy +/− local anaesthetic and steroid injection) prior to discharge. In the remaining patients, based upon clinical and arthroscopic findings, a range of other therapeutic and salvage procedures were performed.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates an important role for the wrist arthroscopy in patients with symptomatic scaphoid non-union and in assessing the true extent of the articular cartilage wear and associated carpal injuries. Further it helped in most cases with the decision making in choosing the appropriate definitive surgical option when required.