Purpose: The use of UHMW polyethylene acetabular liners is known to cause polyethylene wear related osteolysis, the major limiting factor in its use in the younger active patient. Modern alumina ceramic articulations have been developed in order to reduce wear and avoid polyethylene debris. This prospective randomized long-term study aims to compare the outcome between an alumina ceramic-on-ceramic (CC) articulation with a ceramic on UHMW polyethylene articulation (CP).

Method: Fixty-six hips in 55 patients with mean age 42.2 (range 19–56) each received uncemented components (Wright Medical) and a 28mm alumina head with acetabular liner selected via sealed envelope randomization following anesthetic induction. Subsequent regular clinical and radiologic follow up measured patient outcome scores and noted any radiological changes.

Results: Twenty-six CP hips and 30 CC hips were evaluated. One failure required revision in each group. Mean St Michael’s outcome score for each group with up to 10 years follow-up (median 8 years, range 1–10) was 22.8 and 22.9 respectively (p=0.057). Radiographs with a minimum 5 years post-operative follow-up were analyzed in 42 hips (23 CC and 19 CP). The mean time of wear measurement for the CC group was 8.3 years (SD 1.3, Range 4.8–10.1 years) and for the CP group was 8.1 years (SD 0.9, Range 6.1–9.2 years)(p=0.471). Wear was identified in all but one CP hip but in only 12 of 23 CC replacements. Mean wear in the CP group was 0.11mm per year and 0.02mm per year in the CC group (p< 0.001).

Conclusion: To our knowledge this is the first long term randomized trial comparing in-vivo ceramic-on-ceramic with ceramic-on-polyethylene hip articulations. Other than significantly greater wear in the polyethylene group there was no significant difference in long-term outcome scores between the two groups with up to 10 years of follow-up. The use of a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing is a safe and durable option in the young patient avoiding the concerns of active metal ions and osteolytic polyethylene debris.

Total hip replacement in the young active patient remains one of the major challenges in orthopaedics today. The use of ultra high molecular weight (UHMW) polyethylene acetabular liners is known to cause polyethylene wear related osteolysis, the major limiting factor in its use in the younger active patient. Modern alumina ceramic articulations have been developed in order to reduce wear and avoid polyethylene debris. This prospective randomized long-term study aims to compare the outcome between an alumina ceramic-on-ceramic (CC) articulation with a ceramic on UHMW polyethylene articulation (CP). In the younger active patient, is one option superior to the other with regard to patient satisfaction, osteolysis and implant longevity?

56 hips in 55 patients with mean age 42.2 (range 19–56) each received uncemented components (Wright Medical) and a 28mm alumina head with acetabular liner selected via sealed envelope randomization following anesthetic induction. Subsequent regular clinical and radiologic follow up measured patient outcome scores and noted any radiological changes.

26 CP hips and 30 CC hips were evaluated. One failure required revision in each group. Mean St Michael’s outcome score for each group with up to 10 years follow-up (median 8 years, range 1–10) was 22.8 and 22.9 respectively (p=0.057). Radiographs with a minimum 5 years post-operative follow-up were analyzed in 42 hips (23 CC and 19 CP). Radiolucency of all 3 acetabular zones was identified in one of the CP hips. There was no evidence of osteolysis or loosening identified in the remaining hips. The mean time of wear measurement for the CC group was 8.3 years (SD 1.3, Range 4.8–10.1 years) and for the CP group was 8.1 years (SD 0.9, Range 6.1–9.2 years)(p=0.471). Wear was identified in all but one of the CP replacements but only 12 of 23 CC articulations. The mean wear for the CC group was 0.14 mm (SD 0.16, Range 0–0.48 mm) and for the CP group was 0.89 mm (SD 0.6, Range 0–2.43 mm)(p< 0.001). Extrapolating the annual wear rate from these figures, the respective wear is 0.02mm for the CC group compared to 0.11mm per year for the CP group.

To our knowledge this is the first long term randomized trial comparing in vivo ceramic-on-ceramic with ceramic-on-conventional polyethylene hip articulations. Other than significantly greater wear in the polyethylene group there was no significant difference in long-term outcome scores between the two groups with up to 10 years of follow-up. The use of a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing is a safe and durable option in the young patient avoiding the concerns of active metal ions and osteolytic polyethylene debris. These patients remain under review.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the feasibility and early outcomes of one- and two-level lumbar decompression performed as an outpatient procedure.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed comparing lumbar “laminoplasty” (bilateral decompression from a unilateral approach) using a minimally invasive (MIS-group) technique (MetRxTM tubular retractor system) to open laminoplasty (Open Group). Comparison between groups was performed for patient demographics, radiographic and operative parameters, postoperative pain (VAS), analgesic use and adverse events.

Results: A total of 67 (Open–n=37/ MIS-n=30 [n=20: out patients] patient with a minimum follow-up of 6 months were analyzed. There was no statistically significant difference between groups for age, sex, BMI and radiographic parameters. The MIS group demonstrated a statistically significant reduction (mean = 24minutes) in operative time, estimated blood loss (63mls vs. 227mls), recovery room VAS scores (1.4 vs. 4.4) and total analgesic requirements by %50. None of the MIS group procedures performed on an outpatient basis required readmission. The length of stay for the n=10 inpatient MIS group (elderly patients) was also reduced compared to the open group (2.6 vs. 4.7 days, P= 0.035). The groups were comparable in operative and postoperative adverse events. No progression of preexisting spondylolisthesis has been noted in either group during the follow-up period. Furthermore, only one patient has required reoperation for mechanical low back pain in the MIS group and one patient for recurrent leg pain in the open group.

Conclusions: Minimally invasive outpatient decompression for 1–2 level spinal stenosis is feasible, provides acute perioperative patient and resource utilization benefits and appears to have comparable short-term clinical efficacy compared to open decompression. Long-term follow-up and validated outcomes assessments are currently being assessed.

Funding : Commerical funding

Funding Parties : Medtronic-Sofamor Danek