10% of patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) have disease confined to the patellofemoral joint (PFJ). The main surgical options are total knee replacement (TKR) and PFJ replacement (PFJR). PFJR has advantages over TKR, including being less invasive, bone preserving, allowing faster recovery and better function and more ‘straight forward’ revision surgery. We aim to compare the clinical results of revised PFJR with primary TKR taking into consideration the survival length of the PFJR. Twenty-five patients (21 female) were retrospectively identified from our arthroplasty database who had undergone revision from PFJR to TKR (2006–2019). These patients were then matched with regards to their age at their primary procedure, sex and total arthroplasty life (primary PFJ survival + Revision PFJ time to follow up) up to point of follow-up with a group of primary TKRs implanted at the same point as the primary PFJR.Abstract
INTRODUCTION
METHODOLOGY
Isolated patellofemoral joint(PFJ) osteoarthritis affects approximately 10% of patients aged over 40 years and treatment remains controversial. Our aim was to evaluate long term functional and radiological outcomes following PFJ arthorplasty with the Femoro Patella Vialli (FPV) prosthesis as this evidence is lacking in literature. A retrospective review of prospectively collected PROMS in patients undergoing Patellofemoral arthroplasty. Single centre trial. Between 2004 and 2008, 101 FPV patellofemoral arthroplasties were performed in 80 patients with isolated patellofemoral joint osteoarthritis. Data was collected as a part of routine follow-up for up to 6 years and additional long term data was collected at 16 years.Abstract
Introduction
Methodology
Bone loss in the proximal tibia and distal femur
is frequently encountered in revision knee replacement surgery.
The various options for dealing with this depend on the extent of
any bone loss. We present our results with the use of cementless
metaphyseal metal sleeves in 103 patients (104 knees) with a mean
follow-up of 43 months (30 to 65). At final follow-up, sleeves in
102 knees had good osseointegration. Two tibial sleeves were revised
for loosening, possibly due to infection. The average pre-operative Oxford Knee Score was 23 (11 to 36)
and this improved to 32 (15 to 46) post-operatively. These early
results encourage us to continue with the technique and monitor
the outcomes in the long term. Cite this article:
This study was undertaken to evaluate the early results of a new implant system - the metaphyseal sleeve - in revision total knee replacement. The femoral and tibial metaphyseal sleeves are a modular option designed to deal with metaphyseal bone loss and achieve cementless fixation over a relatively wide area in the metaphysis. Over three years, femoral and/or tibial metaphyseal sleeves were implanted in 104 knees in 103 patients (54 male and 49 female). The clinical notes and radiographs of these patients were reviewed retrospectively. Thirty one patients had revision for infection, 42 for aseptic loosening, and 31 for instability, pain or stiffness. Eighty nine knees were revised as a single stage and 15 were done as two stage procedure. Minimum follow up is 12 months (average 18.5 months).Purpose of the study
Methods
Release of tight lateral structures is an integral part of balancing the valgus knee during knee replacement surgery. The posterolateral capsule is released through an inside-out technique. The common peroneal nerve is in close proximity to the capsule during this step. This study was undertaken to determine the distance of the nerve and the safe level for the posterolateral release. MR scans of the knee of 100 patients were evaluated. The age range of selected patients was 50 to 70 years. The distance of the nerve was measured to the closest point on the posterolateral capsule. Two separate measurements were taken - one 9mm above the joint line indicating the distal femoral resection level and the other 9mm distal to the joint line indicating the level of tibial resection. A third point was at the joint line level. The position of the nerve was also recorded in relation to the cross section of the femur/tibia on a ‘clock-like’ reference.Purpose of the study
Methods
