Altered mechanical loading is a widely suggested, but poorly understood potential cause of cartilage degeneration in osteoarthritis. In rodents, osteoarthritis is induced following destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM). This study estimates knee kinematics and contact forces in rats with DMM to gain better insight into the specific mechanisms underlying disease development in this widely-used model. Unilateral knee surgery was performed in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=5 with DMM, n=5 with sham surgery). Radio-opaque beads were implanted on their femur and tibia. 8 weeks following knee surgery, rat gait was recorded using the 3D²YMOX setup (Sanctorum et al. 2019, simultaneous acquisition of biplanar XRay videos and ground reaction forces). 10 trials (1 per rat) were calibrated and processed in XMALab (Knörlein et al. 2016). Hindlimb bony landmarks were labeled on the XRay videos using transfer learning (Deeplabcut, Mathis et al. 2019; Laurence-Chasen et al. 2020). A generic OpenSim musculoskeletal model of the rat hindlimb (Johnson et al. 2008) was adapted to include a 3-degree-of-freedom knee. Inverse kinematics, inverse dynamics, static optimization of muscle forces, and joint reaction analysis were performed. In rats with DMM, knee adduction was lower compared to sham surgery. Ground reaction forces were less variable with DMM, resulting in less variability in joint external moments. The mediolateral ground reaction force was lower, resulting in lower hip adduction moment, thus less force was produced by the rectus femoris. Rats with DMM tended to break rather than propel, resulting in lower hip flexion moment, thus less force was produced by the semimembranosus. These results are consistent with lower knee contact forces in the anteroposterior and axial directions. These preliminary data indicate no overloading of the knee joint in rats with DMM, compared with sham surgery. We are currently expanding our workflow to finite element analysis, to examine mechanical cues in the cartilage of these rats (Fig1G).
