This short contribution aims to explain how intervertebral disc ‘degeneration’ differs from normal ageing, and to suggest how mechanical loading and constitutional factors interact to cause disc degeneration and prolapse. We suggest that disagreement on these matters in medico-legal practice often arises from a misunderstanding of the nature of ‘soft-tissue injuries’.
The belief that an intervertebral disc must degenerate
before it can herniate has clinical and medicolegal significance,
but lacks scientific validity. We hypothesised that tissue changes
in herniated discs differ from those in discs that degenerate without
herniation. Tissues were obtained at surgery from 21 herniated discs
and 11 non-herniated discs of similar degeneration as assessed by
the Pfirrmann grade. Thin sections were graded histologically, and
certain features were quantified using immunofluorescence combined
with confocal microscopy and image analysis. Herniated and degenerated
tissues were compared separately for each tissue type: nucleus, inner
annulus and outer annulus. Herniated tissues showed significantly greater proteoglycan loss
(outer annulus), neovascularisation (annulus), innervation (annulus),
cellularity/inflammation (annulus) and expression of matrix-degrading
enzymes (inner annulus) than degenerated discs. No significant differences
were seen in the nucleus tissue from herniated and degenerated discs.
Degenerative changes start in the nucleus, so it seems unlikely
that advanced degeneration caused herniation in 21 of these 32 discs.
On the contrary, specific changes in the annulus can be interpreted
as the consequences of herniation, when disruption allows local
swelling, proteoglycan loss, and the ingrowth of blood vessels,
nerves and inflammatory cells. In conclusion, it should not be assumed that degenerative changes
always precede disc herniation. Cite this article:
