Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 1 of 1
Results per page:
Applied filters
Research

Include Proceedings
Dates
Year From

Year To
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 12 - 12
1 Jan 2019
Sanghani-Kerai A Achilleos A Lanchashire H Coathup M Blunn G
Full Access

During remodelling, osteoclasts produce discrete bone cavities filled with bone and this is associated with the dimensions of the cavity. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of pores of similar size to those produced by osteoclasts on the morphology, proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) in vitro. The hypothesis is that a porous surface similar in morphology to a bone surface prepared by osteoclasts will increase cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of MSCs.

Sheep BMSCs were seeded onto plain titanium surfaces and 100µm, 250µm and 500µm discrete pores surfaces. Cell metabolic activity was investigated using Presto Blue on days 3, 7 and 10. Bone mineralisation was quantified by Alizarin red staining at days 3, 7 and 14. Cell morphology was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data was statistically analysed using one-way analysis of variance and a Bonferroni correction method.

Cells on porous discs had a three dimensional phenotype and aligned on the circumference of each pore. Metabolic activity was significantly higher by day 10 on plain discs compared to all porous discs. Bone mineralization was significantly higher on 100µm pores by day 3 (0.545mM±0.66; p=0.047) than plain discs and significantly higher on both 100µm and 250µm pores by day 7(p=0.000 and p=0.005) than plain discs. Substantial mineralised bone matrix was found on 100µm discs without being treated with osteogenic supplements, compared to other control disc types (p=0.043, p=0.003, p=0.000).

The different topographies altered cell behaviour and migration.100µm pores demonstrated earlier and enhanced bone mineralisation even in the absence of osteogenic supplements. This pore size is aligned to the size of individual resorption bays that osteoclasts produce on bone surfaces and is considerably lower than the pore sizes used to enhance osteo-integration of implant surfaces.