Latarjet procedure (transfer of coracoid process to the anterior glenoid rim) has been widely used for severe anterior shoulder instability. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the intraarticular stress distribution after this procedure to clarify the pathomechanism of its postoperative complications. CT-DICOM data of the contralateral healthy shoulder in 10 patients with unilateral anterior shoulder instability (9 males and 1 female, age: 17–49) was used for the present study. Three-dimensional finite element models of the glenohumeral joint was developed using software, Mechanical Finder (RCCM, Japan). In each shoulder, a 25% bony defect was created in the anterior glenoid cavity, where coracoid process was transferred using two half-threaded screws. The arm position was determined as 0-degree and 90-degree abduction. While medial margin of the scapula was completely constrained, a standard compressive load (50 N) toward the centre of the glenoid was applied to the lateral wall of the greater tuberosity. A tensile load (20N) was also applied to the tip of coracoid process along the direction of conjoint tendon. Then, elastic analysis was performed, and the distribution pattern of Drucker-Prager equivalent stress was investigated in each model. The proximal half of the coracoid represented significantly lower equivalent stress than the distal half (p < 0.05). In particular, the lowest mean equivalent stress was seen in its proximal-medial-superficial part. On the other hand, a high stress concentration newly appeared in the antero-inferior aspect of the humeral head exactly on the site of coracoid bone graft. We assumed that the reduction of mean equivalent stress in the proximal half of the coracoid was caused by the stress shielding, which may constitute one of the pathogenetic factors of its osteolysis. A high stress concentration in the humeral head may eventually lead shoulder joint to osteoarthritis.
High-resolution micro-computed tomography ([mu]CT) imaging have been instrumental in providing true quantitative and qualitative three-dimensional data on baseline bone morphology
The glenoids were cut at the glenoid neck and at the base of the coracoid process. The total, trabecular, and cortical BMDs of the 5 regions of the glenoids were determined by use of peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) (Xtrem Ct;Scanco, Zurich, Ch) Each glenoid was fixed horizontally in a custom-made jig, and axial pQCT scans (pixel size,1536/1536; slice thickness 80 microns), perpendicular to the articular surface, were obtained at the level of each area. From the resulting binarized three-dimensional reconstruction, Scanco software was used to calculate the bone volume per tissue volume; mean trabecular separation; mean trabecular number, connectivity density.
The mean total BMD in different regions of 20 glenoid specimens ranged from 0,243 to 0,489 g/cm2. The center of the glenoid was surprisingly poor in trabecular structures as we found a bony gap at 8 mm of distance from the articular surface.
In the future, component design should use areas of stronger subchondral bone. Posterior and superior bone area could be another alternative for fixation in decreasing glenoid-loosening rates. As the inferior center of the glenoid is an area devoided of trabecular bone, center-keel design component doesn’t seem to be the best choice.
Clinical experience has shown that estimating a 30 angle in space is definitely not easy even with the help of diverse goniometers.
The measures were made by taking into account of the humerus axis, the plan of condyles and angle of inclination of the collar, given by the angle of cutting. Three barycentres of the three humeral sections have determined the humeral axis. The condylar axis is determined from the 2 barycentres of the digitalized points on the anterior articular condylar surfaces. These 2 axis determine the frontal plane on which a reference mark R(x, y, z) is attached with Z lined up with the humeral shaft and X lined up on the condyles. Different angles could then be determined. In the sagittal plan (perpendicular in the humeral axis), the retroversion angles of the prosthesis and the angle of cutting are calculated.