The aim of this study was to determine the consensus best practice approach for the investigation and management of children (aged 0 to 15 years) in the UK with musculoskeletal infection (including septic arthritis, osteomyelitis, pyomyositis, tenosynovitis, fasciitis, and discitis). This consensus can then be used to ensure consistent, safe care for children in UK hospitals and those elsewhere with similar healthcare systems. A Delphi approach was used to determine consensus in three core aspects of care: 1) assessment, investigation, and diagnosis; 2) treatment; and 3) service, pathways, and networks. A steering group of paediatric orthopaedic surgeons created statements which were then evaluated through a two-round Delphi survey sent to all members of the British Society for Children’s Orthopaedic Surgery (BSCOS). Statements were only included (‘consensus in’) in the final agreed consensus if at least 75% of respondents scored the statement as critical for inclusion. Statements were discarded (‘consensus out’) if at least 75% of respondents scored them as not important for inclusion. Reporting these results followed the Appraisal Guidelines for Research and Evaluation.Aims
Methods
Iliopsoas tendinopathy occurs due to friction of the iliopsoas tendon on the iliopectineal bar or the hip capsule causing pain and snapping of the hip. In adolescent cases this condition is generally treated conservatively with physiotherapy, stretching and NSAIDs. Our aim was to study the outcome of non-operative management of iliopsoas tendinopathy. A retrospective 4-year study identified adolescent patients with a clinical diagnosis of psoas tendinopathy managed non-operatively. These patients were followed up by postal questionnaire, which included functional assessment using the Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS). A custom study questionnaire assessed current symptoms and the effects of physiotherapy. All patients not treated conservatively were removed from the study.Aim
Method
Circular frames treatment for limb reconstruction involves repeated follow up visits, and a substantial number of these appointments are for pin site review only, and incur a significant cost to the NHS. We advocate ‘Telemedicine’ as a logistically and economically viable option for routine post-operative review of pin-sites. The senior author performs fifty to sixty frame circular frame treatments in adults for trauma every year. For the past 12 months, we have been encouraging our frame patients to take photographs of their pin-sites when they do their weekly dressing changes. This is done with digital cameras by the patients themselves, and the images are then emailed to the senior author on his work email address, and get replied to by the next day. If the images are a cause for concern, further steps are initiated (Images 1 and 2 demonstrate pin-sites before and after a course of antibiotics, started because the first image was a cause for concern). This arrangement is for pin-site reviews only. This method has been used for the post-op pin site review of five patients with circular frames.Statement of purpose
Methods and results
