This study aims to report the radiological corrections achieved and complication profile of Peri-Acetabular Osteotomy (PAO) undertaken through the minimally invasive approach. 106 PAOs were performed in 103 patients, by senior author, using a minimally invasive approach from 2007 to 2015. Pre- and post-operative radiographs were reviewed and the degree of acetabular re-orientation was analysed. Case notes were examined retrospectively to identify haemoglobin levels and complications across two sites.Purpose
Method
We report the radiological outcomes, and short-term clinical results, of 47 periacetabular osteotomies undertaken through both the traditional bikini incision, and a minimally invasive approach. 47 periacetabular osteotomies have been undertaken in 45 patients, by the senior author, between 2005 and 2013. There were 10 male and 35 female patients. The mean age at operation was 28.2 years. Since 2010 surgery has been performed through a 7-cm skin incision (31 hips), an incision coined as minimally invasive by Søballe et al when they described their trans-sartorial approach for acetabular surgery. Clinical data was collected prospectively; primary outcome measures included the young adult hip score and the hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. Pre- and post-operative radiographs were analysed for achieved acetabular reorientation. At the time of follow-up the median young adult hip score had improved significantly from pre-operative values. Mean scores were 35.4 pre-operatively, and 64.25 post-operatively. Improvement in the anterior and lateral centre-edge angle was 32 and 32.9 degrees respectively through a traditional incision, and 27.1 and 30 degrees through the minimally invasive approach (p>0.05). No major complications occurred in any patient. Four patients complained of lateral cutaneous nerve hypoaesthesia, in two patients there was delayed union of the pubic osteotomy and in one non-union. Two patients have gone on to total hip replacement. The minimally invasive approach is safe and allows for accurate reorientation of the acetabulum whilst minimizing tissue damage. The scar is cosmetically appealing to patients, especially the predominantly female group treated with this condition. We did not see the evidence of reduced surgical stay that has been reported by other groups utilizing a minimally invasive approach. Level of evidence: II
