header advert
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 17 - 17
1 May 2016
Hafez M Ali S
Full Access

Aim: To compare between the number of steps and instruments required for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using 3 different techniques. The proposed techniques were conventional technique, conventional technique with patient-specific pin locators and CAOS technique using patient-specific templates (PST). Patients and methods: Zimmer/Nexgen was used as the standard implant and templating system for TKA. A Comparison was done on the number of steps and instruments required for TKA when performed with conventional technique, conventional technique with patient-specific pin locators and CAOS technique with patient-specific templates (PST) used as cutting guides. Results: The essential steps and instruments required for conventional TKA without surgical approach or bone exposure were average 70 steps with 183 different instruments; for conventional technique with patient-specific pin locators, they were average 20 steps with 40 instruments and two templates; for CAOS technique using PST, they were average 10 steps with two templates and 15 accessory instruments. CAOS PST technique required an average of 4 days for preoperative preparation and templates fabrication. Conclusion: CAOS technique using PST could make TKA less complicated in light of essential steps and instrumentation required. Although this technique required accurate preoperative preparation, it could offer less technical errors and shorter operative time compared to conventional TKA techniques. The errors’ rate for each technique was still depending on the surgeon's skills and training; however, CAOS technique with PST required shorter learning curve.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 17 - 17
1 Jun 2015
Ward J MacLean S Starkey K Ali S
Full Access

A retrospective review of 57 military patients undergoing ankle arthroscopy between 1999 and 2011 was performed. A case-note review of medical records was undertaken pertaining to military role, ankle injury sustained, mechanism, presenting symptoms and their duration. Arthroscopic findings were compared to findings on radiographs and MRI scans. At first presentation 23 patients had features of arthritis on radiographs. We found MRI was both highly sensitive (97.7%) and specific (93.4%) in detecting osteochondral defects (OCD). 16 of the patients had evidence of osteochondral injury. All OCDs picked up on MRI were confirmed at arthroscopy. Ankle injury may not be a benign injury in military personnel, with over half of these young patients having radiological features of osteoarthritis at presentation. We found MRI an effective tool for identifying occult injuries not seen on radiographs. Lateral ligament injury with associated gutter scarring can be successfully treated with arthroscopic debridement. This suggests pseudoinstability rather than a true mechanical instability as the main cause for patient's symptoms in this cohort.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 199 - 199
1 Jan 2013
Alvand A Khan T Al-Ali S Jackson W Price A Rees J
Full Access

Introduction

Restrictions placed on the working hours of doctors have led to increasing time-pressures on surgical training. Consequently, there has been growing interest in developing new techniques to teach and assess technical skills. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether a novel set of visual parameters assessing visuospatial ability, fine motor dexterity and gaze control could objectively distinguish between varying levels of arthroscopic experience. The secondary aim was to evaluate the correlations between these new parameters and previously established technical skill assessment methods.

Methods

27 subjects were divided into a “novice” group (n=7), “trainee” group (n=15) and expert group (n=5) based on previous arthroscopic experience. All subjects performed a diagnostic knee arthroscopy task on a simulator. Their performance was assessed using new simple visual parameters that included “prevalence of instrument loss,” “triangulation time” and “prevalence of look downs”. In addition, performance was also evaluated using previously validated technical skill assessment methods (a global rating scale and motion analysis).