The number of rotator cuff repairs that are undertaken is increasing. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is the procedure of choice for patients with rotator cuff arthropathy. We sought to determine whether patients who underwent rotator cuff repair and subsequent RSA had different outcomes compared with a matched control group who underwent RSA without a previous rotator cuff repair. All patients with a history of rotator cuff repair who underwent RSA between 2000 and 2015 with a minimum follow-up of two years were eligible for inclusion as the study group. Outcomes, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, were compared with a matched control group of patients who underwent RSA without having previously undergone rotator cuff repair.Aims
Patients and Methods
Few studies have evaluated the relationship between patients’
pre-operative expectations and the outcome of orthopaedic procedures.
Our aim was to determine the effect of expectations on the outcome
after primary anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). We hypothesised
that patients with greater expectations would have better outcomes. Patients undergoing primary anatomical TSA completed the Hospital
for Special Surgery’s Shoulder Expectations Survey pre-operatively.
The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Shoulder Activity
Scale (SAS), Short-Form-36 (SF-36), and visual analogue scale (VAS)
for pain, fatigue, and general health scores were also collected
pre-operatively and two years post-operatively. Pearson correlations
were used to assess the relationship between the number of expectations
and the outcomes. Differences in outcomes between those with higher
and lower levels of expectations for each expectation were assessed
by independent samples Aims
Patients and Methods
This study compared the clinical outcomes following
mini-open rotator cuff repair (MORCR) between early mobilisation
and usual care, involving initial immobilisation. In total, 189
patients with radiologically-confirmed full-thickness rotator cuff
tears underwent MORCR and were randomised to either early mobilisation
(n = 97) or standard rehabilitation (n = 92) groups. Patients were
assessed at six weeks and three, six, 12 and 24 months post-operatively.
Six-week range of movement comparisons demonstrated significantly
increased abduction (p = 0.002) and scapular plane elevation (p
= 0.006) in the early mobilisation group, an effect which was not
detectable at three months (p >
0.51) or afterwards. At 24 months
post-operatively, patients who performed pain-free, early active mobilisation
for activities of daily living showed no difference in clinical
outcomes from patients immobilised for six weeks following MORCR.
We suggest that the choice of rehabilitation regime following MORCR
may be left to the discretion of the patient and the treating surgeon. Cite this article:
In this study we evaluated whether the Instability
Severity Index Score (ISIS) and the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability
Index (WOSI) could detect those patients at risk of failure following
arthroscopic Bankart repair. Between April 2008 and June 2010, the
ISIS and WOSI were recorded pre-operatively in 110 patients (87
male, 79%) with a mean age of 25.1 years (16 to 61) who underwent
this procedure for recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. A telephone interview was performed two-years post-operatively
to determine whether patients had experienced a recurrent dislocation
and whether they had returned to pre-injury activity levels. In
all, six (5%) patients had an ISIS >
6 points (0 to 9). Of 100 (91%)
patients available two years post-operatively, six (6%) had a recurrent dislocation,
and 28 (28%) did not return to pre-injury activity. No patient who
dislocated had an ISIS >
6 (p = 1.0). There was no difference in
the mean pre-operative WOSI in those who had a re-dislocation and
those who did not (p = 0.99). The pre-operative WOSI was significantly
lower (p = 0.02) in those who did not return to pre-injury activity, whereas
the ISIS was not associated with return to pre-injury activity (p
= 0.13). In conclusion, neither the pre-operative ISIS nor WOSI predicted
recurrent dislocation within two years of arthroscopic Bankart repair.
Patients with a lower pre-operative WOSI were less likely to return
to pre-injury activity. Cite this article:
Some surgeons are reluctant to perform a reverse
total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) on both shoulders because of concerns
regarding difficulty with activities of daily living post-operatively
as a result of limited rotation of the shoulders. Nevertheless,
we hypothesised that outcomes and patient satisfaction following
bilateral RTSA would be comparable to those following unilateral
RTSA. A single-surgeon RTSA registry was reviewed for patients who underwent
bilateral staged RTSA with a minimum follow-up of two years. A unilateral
RTSA matched control was selected for each shoulder in those patients
undergoing bilateral procedures. The Constant–Murley score (CMS), American
Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, Subjective Shoulder Values
(SSV), visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, range of movement and
strength were measured pre- and post-operatively. The mean CMS,
ASES, SSV, VAS scores, strength and active forward elevation were
significantly improved
(all p <
0.01) following each operation in those undergoing bilateral
procedures. The mean active external rotation (p = 0.63 and p =
0.19) and internal rotation (p = 0.77 and p = 0.24) were not significantly
improved. The improvement in the mean ASES score after the first
RTSA was greater than the improvement in its control group (p =
0.0039). The improvement in the mean CMS, ASES scores and active
forward elevation was significantly less after the second RTSA than
in its control group (p = 0.0244, p = 0.0183, and p = 0.0280, respectively).
Pain relief and function significantly improved after each RTSA
in those undergoing a bilateral procedure. Bilateral RTSA is thus a reasonable form of treatment for patients
with severe bilateral rotator cuff deficiency, although inferior
results may be seen after the second procedure compared with the
first. Cite this article:
