In a single-blind, randomised series of knee replacements in 116 patients, we used radiostereometric analysis (RSA) to measure micromotion in three types of tibial implant fixation for two years after knee replacement. We compared hydroxyapatite-augmented porous coating, porous coating, and cemented fixation of the same design of tibial component. At one to two years, porous-coated implants migrated at a statistically significantly higher rate than hydroxyapatite-augmented or cemented implants. There was no significant difference between hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented implants. We conclude that hydroxyapatite augmentation may offer a clinically relevant advantage over a simple porous coating for tibial component fixation, but is no better than cemented fixation.
To assess migration of the tibial component we used roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis in 40 patients who had had a total knee arthroplasty after failure of a closing wedge osteotomy and compared them with 40 matched patients after primary total knee arthroplasty. We found no difference in migration over time or in the tendency for continuous migration between the two groups. There were no differences in alignment or position of the knee prosthesis or in the clinical outcome. Our findings show that revision of a failed high tibial osteotomy to a total knee arthroplasty is effective.
