Introduction:. The Best Practice Tariff (BPT) for hip fractures was introduced in April 2010 to promote a number of quality markers, including surgery within 36 hours. We conducted an audit to see whether the introduction of the BPT has had an inadvertent adverse effect on delay to fixation of unstable ankle fractures. Method:. We compared the delay to surgery for 50 consecutive patients with unstable ankle fractures in the 2009 financial year with another 50 patients treated in the 2011 financial year, ie one year after the introduction of the BPT. There were no other changes in service in our department in this period. All radiographs were reviewed and classified using the Lauge-Hansen system by 2 surgeons. Excel was used for data analysis using unpaired T-Test and chi-squared test to assess significance. Results:. 2 patients with pilon fractures were excluded from each group. Demographics and fracture pattern between the remaining 48 patients in each group were similar. The mean delay to surgery before BPT was 2.2 days compared with 3.8 days after its introduction (p = 0.01). 7 patients waited more than 5 days for surgery before BPT compared with 17 patients after its introduction (p < 0.001). There was 1 manipulation under anaesthetic (MUA) before BPT and 8 MUAs in 7 patients after its introduction (p < 0.001). Conclusion:. There is a significant association between the introduction of BPT for hip fractures and an increase in the delay to surgery for patients with unstable ankle fractures by an average of 1.6 days. More patients waited more than 5 days for surgery and there were more MUAs. We postulate that in a resource-limited NHS, prioritizing one patient group inevitably disadvantages others. Orthopaedic trauma services must adapt to national guidance to ensure all patients are treated in a timely fashion

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to present the mid-term follow-up of a multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT) which compared the functional outcome following routine removal (RR) to the outcome following on-demand removal (ODR) of the syndesmotic screw (SS).

Aims

The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ) is an anatomically specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) currently used to assess a wide variety of foot and ankle pathology. It consists of 16 items across three subscales measuring distinct but related traits: walking/standing ability, pain, and social interaction. It is the most used foot and ankle PROM in the UK. Initial MOxFQ validation involved analysis of 100 individuals undergoing hallux valgus surgery. This project aimed to establish whether an individual’s response to the MOxFQ varies with anatomical region of disease (measurement invariance), and to explore structural validity of the factor structure (subscale items) of the MOxFQ.

Aims

Surgical reconstruction of deformed Charcot feet carries a high risk of nonunion, metalwork failure, and deformity recurrence. The primary aim of this study was to identify the factors contributing to these complications following hindfoot Charcot reconstructions.

Aims

The aim of this study was to investigate whether on-demand removal (ODR) is noninferior to routine removal (RR) of syndesmotic screws regarding functional outcome.

Introduction:. We present the early results of 220 Rebalance Total Ankle Replacements performed in 6 centres in 4 different countries. Methods:. The Rebalance Total Ankle Replacement is a new 3 component uncemented mobile bearing prosthesis with a surface coating of ‘bonemaster’ and an ‘e’ poly bearing. The prosthesis was released in a limited way in May 2011. Since then 220 replacements have been implanted in 218 patients in 6 centres in 4 different countries (UK, Sweden, Canada, Czech Republic). All the x-rays and case notes were reviewed.63 prostheses have a minimum follow up of 2 years. Outcome measures included revision of the prosthesis, and the incidence of progressive and non-progesssive radiolucent lines around the prosthesis. Results:. 7 patients underwent revision or are awaiting revision of their prosthesis. Reasons for revision included loosening(2), infection(1), malposition(2), periprosthetic fracture(1), impingement(1). 9 patients had non-progressive radiolucent lines and 2 patients had progressive radiolucent lines. 1 patient with progressive radiolucent lines is waiting revision for suspected infection. 8 patients suffered fractures to the lateral malleolus and 4 to the medial malleolus. There were no cases of balloon osteolysis. 29 patients had pre-op AOFAS scores= 41(12–67). 21 had 1 year post-op AOFAS scores= 73.5(26–100). 12 had 2 year AOFAS scores= 75.5(50–100). Conclusion:. The early results are encouraging and we believe support its wider use

Aims

We report the medium-term outcomes of a consecutive series of 118 Zenith total ankle arthroplasties (TAAs) from a single, non-designer centre.

Ankle fractures account for 10% of all fractures. Most deformed looking ankles are manipulated in the emergency departments (ED) on clinical judgement in order to improve the outcome and avoid skin complications. It is accepted that significantly displaced ankle injuries with neurovascular (NV) compromise or critical skin should be reduced prior to imaging. However, is it really possible to understand the injury to an ankle without an x-ray or other imaging? The other possible injuries around the ankle, presenting with swelling and deformity of the ankle region, may include a ligamentous, talar, subtalar, Chopart joint or calcaneal injury. Does the risk of waiting for the imaging outweigh the benefit of manipulation of an undiagnosed injury?. This prospective study involved the analysis of all patients with ankle injuries referred to orthopaedics between November 2009 and February 2010. Results: Over the audited period 100 referrals were identified (43 male, 57 female). The average age was 50.4 years (range 5–89). Only 2% of fractures were open. Manipulation in the ED was performed for 44% of patients. Of these, 39% (17 cases) were manipulated and supported in plaster slab without an initial x-ray; 3 due to vascular deficit, 2 due to critical skin and 12 with no documented reason!. Re-manipulation in the ED as well as definitive open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) were significantly lower in those patients who had an x-ray prior to manipulation (p < 0.05). ORIF was performed in 68% of all patients. Importantly, 80% of ankles manipulated in ED went on to have ORIF which was significantly higher than the 47% in the non-manipulation cohort (p < 0.05). We conclude that taking ankle injury radiographs prior to any attempt at manipulation, in the absence of NV deficit or critical skin, will constitute best practice

Aims

The primary objective was to determine the incidence of COVID-19 infection and 30-day mortality in patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery during the global pandemic. Secondary objectives were to determine if there was a change in infection and complication profile with changes introduced in practice.

Aims

The objective of this double-blind randomised controlled trial was to assess whether ultrasound guidance improved the efficacy of corticosteroid injections for Morton’s neuroma (MN).

Clinicians are often asked by patients, “When can I drive again?” after lower limb injury or surgery. This question is difficult to answer in the absence of any guidelines. This review aims to collate the currently available evidence and discuss the factors that influence the decision to allow a patient to return to driving. Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, and EMBASE were searched using the following terms: ‘brake reaction time’, ‘brake response time’, ‘braking force’, ‘brake pedal force’, ‘resume driving’, ‘rate of application of force’, ‘driving after injury’, ‘joint replacement and driving’, and ‘fracture and driving’. Of the relevant literature identified, most studies used the brake reaction time and total brake time as the outcome measures. Varying recovery periods were proposed based on the type and severity of injury or surgery. Surveys of the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency, the Police, insurance companies in the United Kingdom and Orthopaedic Surgeons offered a variety of opinions.

There is currently insufficient evidence for any authoritative body to determine fitness to drive. The lack of guidance could result in patients being withheld from driving for longer than is necessary, or returning to driving while still unsafe.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:290–4.