Introduction and Objective. Wide awake local anaesthetic no tourniquet (WALANT) is being used for a wide variety of hand and wrist surgery. It has recently been used in distal radius fracture fixation. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of the WALANT technique in open reduction internal fixation. Materials and Methods. Pubmed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched on 02/03/21 with the following search terms: radius, WALANT, local anesthetic, wide awake surgery. The primary outcome measure was conversion to general anaesthetic and mean intra-operative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores. Secondary measures were operative times, mean intraoperative blood loss, post-operative functional and radiological outcomes. Results. 110 articles were identified; eight studies were deemed eligible with 212 in the WALANT group and 247 in the comparative groups of regional anaesthesia and general Anaesthesia (GA). Two patients in the WALANT group required conversion to general anaesthesia due to anxiety rather than pain. Intra-operative VAS pain scores in the WALANT and regional anaesthetic group were 1.75 and 2.86 respectively (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in Q-DASH scores, range of motion or radiological outcomes. There was a slight increase in mean blood loss in the WALANT group compared with those given a GA or regional anaesthetic with tourniquet (22.5ml vs 12.15ml, p<0.001). Conclusions. The WALANT technique is a viable option for anaesthetic when performing distal radius fracture fixation. It is well tolerated, giving similar post-operative outcomes to other anaesthetic methods. It is a potentially useful technique in a centre with an underresourced anaesthetic department or for patients who may not tolerate regional and general anaesthetic methods. Adequate patient counselling prior to the procedure should be performed with appropriate patient selection

Introduction and Objective. Osteoarthritis of the knee joint is common in old age population in every part of world. Pain is the major source of disability in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Subchondral bone marrow is richly innervated with nociceptive pain fibers and may be a source of pain in patients with symptomatic degenerative joint disease. Current therapy for managing bone marrow oedema is core decompression (CD), combining core decompression and injection of hydroxyapatite cement or autologus chondrocyte supplementtion. But all of this work has been done in femoral head and authors documented good result with minimal complication. There are various studies in literature suggesting treatment to repair BME by restoring support and relieving abnormal stresses with accepted internal fixation and bone stimulating surgical techniques in relieving knee OA pain. In this study, we present efficacy of knee arthroscopy with adjunctive core decompression and supplementation with structural scaffold to improve self-rated visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, rate of conversion to arthroplasty, and patient satisfaction levels. Materials and Methods. The study included patients aged between 40 and 75 years old, with pain in the knee for at least six months, associated with high-signal MRI lesion on T2 sequences, on the tibia or femur. Trephine was used as the bone decompression instrument. Trephine has a diameter of 8–10 mm and operation with trephine requires that a cortical incision window be made prior to decompression treatment, thus necessitating strict disinfection. This procedure was done under spinal anesthesia. After diagnostic arthroscopy, decompression was done under C –ARM in desired area on MRI. After decompression, defect was filled with Poly ester urea's scaffold impregnated with BMAC. Results. Patients were assessed using the visual analog pain scale and the KOOS score, one week before surgery and one, three, six, 12, and 24 weeks after the procedure. MRI images were analyzed Lesions were mapped and measured in the axial, coronal, and sagittal views to plan the injection site and the trajectory of the cannula used for the procedure. Radiographs using anteroposterior, profile, and Rosenberg views of the knee and lower limb were performed to classify the lesion according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification and to assess lower limb alignment. Evaluation using the KOOS showed a mean total score in the preoperative period of 38.44 points and of 60.7, 59.08, 56.92, 64.40, and 71.36 points at one, three, six, 12, and 24 weeks after surgery, respectively. In the VAS assessment, mean was 7.8 points preoperatively and 2.8, 2.6, 2.5, 1.3, and 0.5 points in the same periods. Conclusions. Hence it can be Concluded that this new innovative technique has provided significant improvements in the parameters of pain and functional capacity in the short-term assessment

Introduction. Progressive resistance training (PRT) as a mean to reduce symptoms in patients with hip dysplasia (HD) has not yet been tried out. The aim of this study was to examine if PRT is feasible in patients with HD. A secondary purpose was to report data on changes of patient reported outcomes, muscle performance and hip muscle strength following PRT. Materials and methods. Patients diagnosed with HD on the waiting list for a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) were offered to participate in a PRT feasibility study. The PRT intervention consisted of 8-weeks of supervised PRT consisting of 20 training sessions with exercises for the hips and knees. Feasibility was evaluated as adherence, the number of dropouts and adverse events. Furthermore, pain was reported after each exercise and one day after a training session using a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS). Pain was categorized as “safe” (VAS ≤20), “acceptable” (VAS >20–50) and “high risk” (VAS >50). Pre- and post the intervention patients completed the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS), performed two hop-tests on each leg and had their peak torque of the hip extensors and flexors assessed by isokinetic dynamometry. Results. 16 patients, mean age 28 (range 22–40) years, completed the PRT intervention. Adherence was high (90.3% ±9.0%). Acceptable pain levels (VAS ≤50) were reported on average of 95% during the completed PRT sessions and after 92.3% of the sessions when assessed on the following day. Four out of six HAGOS subscales improved (P <0.05) after the intervention, as did standing distance jump and countermovement jump (8.3 cm 95% CI [1.2, 15.3], 1.8 cm [0.7, 2.9]) on the affected side. Dynamometry showed significant improved peak torque during isokinetic concentric hip flexion (15.8 Nm 95% CI [5.9, 25.8]) on the affected side. A similar improvement was seen during isometric hip flexion on the non-affected side. Conclusion. Supervised preoperative PRT is feasible in terms of drop outs, adherence, adverse events and pain levels in patients with HD scheduled for PAO. Furthermore, this feasibility study suggests that PRT may improve pain levels, patient reported outcomes, functional performance and hip flexion muscle strength

The use of a tourniquet during total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is controversial. Return to function and pain are believed to be affected by the use of a tourniquet. The hypothesis of this study was that use of a tourniquet (T) would delay postoperative functional recovery and increase pain as compared to no tourniquet use (NT). 200 patients were recruited for this prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. All surgeries were performed by one of two fellowship trained arthroplasty surgeons at our institution. Patients were randomized to either undergo TKA with T or NT and blinded to group allocation. An otherwise standardized perioperative protocol was followed. The primary outcome measures were functional assessment testing using the timed up-and-go (TUG) and stair-climb (SC) tests and visual analog scale pain (VAS-P) scores. Secondary outcome measures included blood loss and range-of-motion (ROM). Patients completed outcomes measures preoperatively, in hospital, and postoperatively at 4–6 weeks and 6–8 months. Minimal detectable change (MDC) and Student's T-test, alpha of p < 0.05, were used to determine significance. No significant differences were seen in postoperative TUG, SC, VAS-P, or ROM at any time point. NT patients were seen to have significantly more calculated blood loss (means: T 1,370.04mL, NT 1,743.85mL; p < 0.001), without a significant increase in transfusion events. Tourniquet use during TKA significantly decreases blood loss and does not adversely affect early postoperative outcomes. Tourniquet use during routine TKA is safe and effective and concerns over deleterious effects on function and pain may not be justified

Aim. To identify differences in hip muscle strength, knee valgus during a single leg squat (SLS),and function between subjects with Greater Trochanter Pain Syndrome (GTPS) and healthy(H) subjects. To determine associations between pain, function, hip strength and SLS in GPTS subjects. Study Design: Observational study of 14 (3 male 11 female) PFP patients (mean symptom duration 17 months), matched for age height and weight with 14 healthy (H) subjects, All subjects fulfilled specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Appropriate Ethical approval was obtained. Measures for both groups were Knee valgus angle during SLS using 2D motion capture and SiliconCoach software for measurement of knee valgus angles, hip abduction, internal and external rotation muscle strength using hand held dynamometry, visual analogue scale for pain. Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). All measures were taken on the affected leg for GPTS subjects and matched for the equivalent leg in healthy group. Strength was reported as a percentage of body weight. SiliconCoach was reliable for intra-rater reliability of knee valgus angle (ICC.996). Results. There were no significant differences in age, height and weight (p=.85,.57,.51 respectively). Significant differences existed in hip abduction strength p=.005(GPTS13.72 (7.65), H21.49 (5.55)) and LEFS p=0.001(GPTS 57.28(16.55), H76.92(4.44)). There were no significant differences in internal and external rotation and knee valgus angles p=.509, p=.505, p=.159 respectively. There was a negative correlation between pain and function r=.879) p=0.001) and a moderate positive correlation between function and hip abduction strength r=.428 (p=.127). This preliminary study shows that patients with GPTS have reduced strength in hip abductor musculature when compared to healthy subjects. This may be due to pain inhibition; however the true causes of pain need to be determined. Pain and to a lesser extent hip abductor strength appears to have an effect on function in GPTS patients. In summary the results indicate that hip abductor muscle strengthening and management strategies to reduce pain should be included in the rehabilitation programmes of patients with GPTS. Further research with larger numbers of subjects should be developed to investigate this subject

Aim. To determine differences in knee valgus angles produced during a single leg squat and hip muscle strength between healthy subjects and patients with patellofemoral pain (PFP). To determine correlations between variables of hip muscle strength, knee valgus angle and pain. Study design: Observational study of 20 (8 male 12 female) healthy (H) subjects, matched for age height and weight with 20 (8 male 12 female) PFP patients (mean symptom duration 46.75 weeks). All subjects fulfilled specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Appropriate Ethical approval was obtained. Measures for both groups were Knee valgus angle during a single leg squat using 2D motion capture and SiliconCoach software for measurement of knee valgus angles, hip abduction, internal and external rotation muscle strength using hand held dynamometry, visual analogue scale for pain. Strength was reported as a percentage of body weight. All measures were taken on the affected leg for PFP subjects and matched for the equivalent leg in healthy group. SiliconCoach was determined to be reliable for intra-rater reliability of knee valgus angle (ICC.996). Results. There were no significant differences in age, height and weight (p=.59,.51,.26 respectively). Significant differences existed in hip abduction strength p=.001(PFP 19.93(9.2), H 32.22(8.26)), Hip internal rotation p=0.001 (PFP 12.94(4.35), H 19.53(6.36)), Hip external rotation p=0.001(PFP 10.00(3.07), H 16.26 (4.62)), Knee Valgus Angles p=0.001(PFP 5.31(2.59), H 2.29 (2.35)). No correlations existed between any of the variables including pain. This preliminary study shows that patients with PFP have larger knee valgus angles when doing a single leg squat and significantly weaker hip muscle strength when compared to healthy subjects. The reason for larger knee angles during single leg squat could be hypothesised as being due to weak hip abductor muscles not sufficiently controlling the alignment of the femur. However no correlations were found for these measures, nor were they found for any of the other variables including pain level. In summary the results indicate that hip musculature strengthening of the rotators and abductors and measures to reduce knee valgus angle should be included in the rehabilitation programme of patients with PFP. Further research with larger numbers of subjects should be developed to investigate this subject

Introduction. For many years, minimally invasive joint-preserving regenerative therapy has been desired for the early stages of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). In an animal study using adult rabbits, we reported that a single local injection of rhFGF-2-impregnated gelatin hydrogel, which has superior slow-release characteristics, suppresses the progression of femoral head necrosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and clinical outcomes of a single local administration of rhFGF-2-impregnated gelatin hydrogel for the precollapse stage of ONFH. Patients and Methods: Ten patients with femoral heads up to precollapse stage 2 underwent a single local administration of 800-µg rhFGF-2-impregnated gelatin hydrogel and were followed up for two years. The eligibility criteria were age between 20 and 80 years and presence of ONFH at precollapse stage 1 or 2 according to the classification system for ONFH developed by the Japanese Investigation Committee of Health and Welfare. Primary outcomes included adverse events and complications. Secondary outcomes included changes in Harris Hip Scores (HHS), visual analog scale pain scores (VAS), the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity rating scores, radiological changes as determined via radiographs, computed tomography (CT) scans, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hip joint. Results: We included five men (five hips) and five women (five hips), with a mean age of 39.8 years (range: 29–53 years) at the time of surgery. Eight patients had bilateral ONFH, three had already undergone THA on the contralateral side. Eight patients were receiving treatment with corticosteroid therapy, and two patients overused alcohol. Stage 1 and 2 disease was present in one and nine patients, respectively. One patient each had type A, type B, and type C1 disease, whereas seven patients had a type C2 lesion. All Adverse events were recovered without problem. The surgery was performed with a minimally invasive technique based core decompression (1 cm of skin incision), and walking was allowed from the day after surgery. Mean clinical scores improved significantly after three year compared with before surgery (before vs. after: VAS for pain, 21.2 vs. 5.3 mm; UCLA activity score 5.5 vs. 6.6; HHS, 81.0 vs. 98.4 points, respectively). There was only one case of femoral head collapse, and it had the greatest necrosis volume fraction and was considered to be in the early collapse stage at the time of operation. The other nine cases did not involve ONFH stage progression, and collapse was prevented. CT images and recent MRI postoperatively confirmed bone regeneration and reduction of the necrotic area. Conclusion: Clinical application of rhFGF-2-impregnated gelatin hydrogel for patients with precollapse stage of ONFH was feasible and safe. Our research is ongoing, further phase II multiple center study has been started in January 2016

Objectives

This study reports on a secondary exploratory analysis of the early clinical outcomes of a randomised clinical trial comparing robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee with manual UKA performed using traditional surgical jigs. This follows reporting of the primary outcomes of implant accuracy and gait analysis that showed significant advantages in the robotic arm-assisted group.