Introduction and Objective. Wide awake local anaesthetic no tourniquet (WALANT) is being used for a wide variety of hand and wrist surgery. It has recently been used in distal radius fracture fixation. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the effectiveness of the WALANT technique in open reduction internal fixation. Materials and Methods. Pubmed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched on 02/03/21 with the following search terms: radius, WALANT, local anesthetic, wide awake surgery. The primary outcome measure was conversion to general anaesthetic and mean intra-operative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores. Secondary measures were operative times, mean intraoperative blood loss, post-operative functional and radiological outcomes. Results. 110 articles were identified; eight studies were deemed eligible with 212 in the WALANT group and 247 in the comparative groups of regional anaesthesia and general Anaesthesia (GA). Two patients in the WALANT group required conversion to general anaesthesia due to anxiety rather than pain. Intra-operative VAS pain scores in the WALANT and regional anaesthetic group were 1.75 and 2.86 respectively (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in Q-DASH scores, range of motion or radiological outcomes. There was a slight increase in mean blood loss in the WALANT group compared with those given a GA or regional anaesthetic with tourniquet (22.5ml vs 12.15ml, p<0.001). Conclusions. The WALANT technique is a viable option for anaesthetic when performing distal radius fracture fixation. It is well tolerated, giving similar post-operative outcomes to other anaesthetic methods. It is a potentially useful technique in a centre with an underresourced anaesthetic department or for patients who may not tolerate regional and general anaesthetic methods. Adequate patient counselling prior to the procedure should be performed with appropriate patient selection

Introduction and Objective. Osteoarthritis of the knee joint is common in old age population in every part of world. Pain is the major source of disability in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Subchondral bone marrow is richly innervated with nociceptive pain fibers and may be a source of pain in patients with symptomatic degenerative joint disease. Current therapy for managing bone marrow oedema is core decompression (CD), combining core decompression and injection of hydroxyapatite cement or autologus chondrocyte supplementtion. But all of this work has been done in femoral head and authors documented good result with minimal complication. There are various studies in literature suggesting treatment to repair BME by restoring support and relieving abnormal stresses with accepted internal fixation and bone stimulating surgical techniques in relieving knee OA pain. In this study, we present efficacy of knee arthroscopy with adjunctive core decompression and supplementation with structural scaffold to improve self-rated visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, rate of conversion to arthroplasty, and patient satisfaction levels. Materials and Methods. The study included patients aged between 40 and 75 years old, with pain in the knee for at least six months, associated with high-signal MRI lesion on T2 sequences, on the tibia or femur. Trephine was used as the bone decompression instrument. Trephine has a diameter of 8–10 mm and operation with trephine requires that a cortical incision window be made prior to decompression treatment, thus necessitating strict disinfection. This procedure was done under spinal anesthesia. After diagnostic arthroscopy, decompression was done under C –ARM in desired area on MRI. After decompression, defect was filled with Poly ester urea's scaffold impregnated with BMAC. Results. Patients were assessed using the visual analog pain scale and the KOOS score, one week before surgery and one, three, six, 12, and 24 weeks after the procedure. MRI images were analyzed Lesions were mapped and measured in the axial, coronal, and sagittal views to plan the injection site and the trajectory of the cannula used for the procedure. Radiographs using anteroposterior, profile, and Rosenberg views of the knee and lower limb were performed to classify the lesion according to the Kellgren-Lawrence classification and to assess lower limb alignment. Evaluation using the KOOS showed a mean total score in the preoperative period of 38.44 points and of 60.7, 59.08, 56.92, 64.40, and 71.36 points at one, three, six, 12, and 24 weeks after surgery, respectively. In the VAS assessment, mean was 7.8 points preoperatively and 2.8, 2.6, 2.5, 1.3, and 0.5 points in the same periods. Conclusions. Hence it can be Concluded that this new innovative technique has provided significant improvements in the parameters of pain and functional capacity in the short-term assessment

Introduction. Progressive resistance training (PRT) as a mean to reduce symptoms in patients with hip dysplasia (HD) has not yet been tried out. The aim of this study was to examine if PRT is feasible in patients with HD. A secondary purpose was to report data on changes of patient reported outcomes, muscle performance and hip muscle strength following PRT. Materials and methods. Patients diagnosed with HD on the waiting list for a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) were offered to participate in a PRT feasibility study. The PRT intervention consisted of 8-weeks of supervised PRT consisting of 20 training sessions with exercises for the hips and knees. Feasibility was evaluated as adherence, the number of dropouts and adverse events. Furthermore, pain was reported after each exercise and one day after a training session using a 100mm visual analog scale (VAS). Pain was categorized as “safe” (VAS ≤20), “acceptable” (VAS >20–50) and “high risk” (VAS >50). Pre- and post the intervention patients completed the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS), performed two hop-tests on each leg and had their peak torque of the hip extensors and flexors assessed by isokinetic dynamometry. Results. 16 patients, mean age 28 (range 22–40) years, completed the PRT intervention. Adherence was high (90.3% ±9.0%). Acceptable pain levels (VAS ≤50) were reported on average of 95% during the completed PRT sessions and after 92.3% of the sessions when assessed on the following day. Four out of six HAGOS subscales improved (P <0.05) after the intervention, as did standing distance jump and countermovement jump (8.3 cm 95% CI [1.2, 15.3], 1.8 cm [0.7, 2.9]) on the affected side. Dynamometry showed significant improved peak torque during isokinetic concentric hip flexion (15.8 Nm 95% CI [5.9, 25.8]) on the affected side. A similar improvement was seen during isometric hip flexion on the non-affected side. Conclusion. Supervised preoperative PRT is feasible in terms of drop outs, adherence, adverse events and pain levels in patients with HD scheduled for PAO. Furthermore, this feasibility study suggests that PRT may improve pain levels, patient reported outcomes, functional performance and hip flexion muscle strength