Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 8 of 8
Results per page:

Introduction. The available scoring methods and outcome analysis methods in lower extremity skeletal trauma with vascular injuries are not always specific. Biochemical parameters like venous blood lactate, bicarbonate and serum CPK (at the time of admission and serial monitoring) were measured to assess whether they supplement clinical parameters in predicting limb salvageability in lower extremity skeletal trauma with vascular injuries. Materials and methods: 74 adult patients with long bone fracture of lower limb associated with vascular injury (open and closed) were included in the study group. Patients with significant head injury (who cannot provide informed consent) and those with mangled extremities (MESS score>8) were excluded. Methodology. Pre-operative requirement for fasciotomy was recorded. A vascular surgery consultation was obtained. CT angiography and DSA were performed if needed only. Venous blood samples from the injured limb were withdrawn for lactate and bicarbonate analysis. Serum CPK was estimated at the time of admission and repeated at 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 hours after admission. A record was maintained about the type and duration of surgery, blood loss, type of anaesthesia used and fasciotomy in the post-operative period. Results. Of the 74 patients included in the study, 55 patients were taken up for a revascularization procedure, 13 patients for primary amputation and in remaining six patients, no vascular surgery was required. If the level of bicarbonate in the injured limb was less than 16.5 mmol/L, pH < 6.89 the probability of survival of the limb after a revascularization procedure is low and the injured limb will need an amputation eventually. Lactate levels and creatinine kinase were not of any predictive value regarding the outcome of the injured limb. Conclusion. Along with clinical signs, low levels of bicarbonate (<16.5 mmol/L), pH (<6.89), and high levels of pCO2, base deficit in the injured limb at the time of presentation were associated with the less favorable outcome-amputation


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_10 | Pages 30 - 30
1 Jul 2014
McGoldrick N Butler J Sheehan S Dudeney S O'Toole G
Full Access

The purpose of this study is to present a series of soft tissue sarcomas requiring complex vascular reconstructions, and to describe their management and outcomes. Soft tissue sarcomas are rare mesodermal malignancies accounting for approximately 1% of all cancers diagnosed annually. Sarcomas involving the pelvis and extremities are of particular interest to the orthopaedic surgeon. Tumours that encase and invade large calibre vascular structures present a major surgical challenge in terms of safety of excision with acceptability of surgical margins. Technical advances in the fields of both orthopaedic and vascular surgery have resulted in a trend towards limb salvage with vascular reconstruction in preference to amputation. Limb-salvage surgery is now feasible due to the variety of reconstructive options available to the surgeon. Nevertheless, surgery with concomitant vascular reconstruction is associated with higher rates of complications including infection and amputation. We present a case series of soft tissue sarcomas with vascular compromise, requiring resection and vascular reconstruction. We treated four patients (n = 4, three females, and one male) with soft tissue masses, which were found to involve local vascular structures. Histology revealed leiomyosarcoma (n = 2) and alveolar soft part sarcomas (n = 2). Both synthetic graft and autogenous graft (long saphenous vein) techniques were utilised. Arterial reconstruction was undertaken in all cases. Venous reconstruction was performed in one case. One patient required graft thrombectomy at one month post-operatively for thrombosis. We present a series of complex tumour cases with concomitant vascular reconstructions drawn from our institution's experience as a national tertiary referral sarcoma service


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_19 | Pages 38 - 38
1 Dec 2014
Maqungo S Martin C Thiart G McCollum G Roche S
Full Access

Background:. Injuries inflicted by gunshot wounds (GSW) are an immense financial burden on the South African healthcare system. The cost of treating an abdominal GSW has previously been estimated at R30 000 per patient. No study has been conducted to estimate the financial burden from an orthopaedic perspective. Objective:. To estimate the average cost of treating GSW victims requiring orthopedic interventions in a South African tertiary level hospital. Methods:. The study surveyed over 1,500 orthopedic admissions to our institution during 2012 to indentify GSW patients. A folder review yielded data on theatre time, implant cost, duration of admission, diagnostic-imaging studies performed, blood products used, laboratory costs and medicines issued to analyze costs. Results:. A total of 111 patients with an average age of 28 years (range 13–74) were identified. Each patient was hit by an average of 1.69 bullets (range 1–7). One hundred and forty seven fractures were sustained. Ninety-five patients received surgical treatment for a total of 128 orthopedic procedures, 15 concurrent general/vascular surgery procedures, and a cumulative surgical time of 198 hours 42 minutes. Cumulative anaesthetic time was 277 hours 33 minutes. Theatre costs (excluding implants) were estimated to be in excess of ten million rands. Ninety three of the patients received an implant during surgery which raised theatre costs even more. Total costs were in excess of R130 000.00 forward admissions, R180 000.00 for imaging, R190 000.00 for blood products, R16 000.00 for laboratory investigations and R16 000.00 for discharge medication. Conclusion:. Using varying calculations it was estimated that on average an orthopaedic GSW patient costs about R100 000.00 to treat, utilises about 2 hours of theatre time per operation and occupies a bed for an average period of 9 days


Introduction. Around the knee high-energy fractures/dislocation may present with vascular injuries. Ischaemia time i.e. the time interval from injury to reperfusion surgery is the only variable that the surgeon can influence. It has been traditionally taught that 6-8 hours is revascularisation acceptable. There are only limited case series that have documented the time-dependent lower limb salvage rate (LSR) or the lower limb amputation rate (LAR). We have conducted a meta-analysis to look at LSR and LAR to inform clinical standard setting and for medicolegal purposes. Methods. Two authors conducted an independent literature search using PubMed, Ovid, and Embase. In addition the past 5 years issues of Journal of Trauma, Injury and Journal of Vascular surgery were manually scrutinised. Papers included those in the English language that discussed limb injuries around the knee, and time to limb salvage or amputation surgery. The Oxman and Guyatt index was used to score each paper. Results. 21 retrospective case series articles were identified from 8 different journals. A total of 1575 patients were compiled, 92 patients were lost or died. 263 lower limbs underwent amputation and 1220 limbs were salvaged. 984 lower limbs were salvaged within the 8 hours. The LAR increased with time from 3% with reperfusion surgery in less than 4 hours to 13% at 6 hours and 32% at 8 hours. A lower LAR of 20% for patients presenting after 12 hours was seen


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 2, Issue 3 | Pages 181 - 190
1 Mar 2021
James HK Gregory RJH

The imminent introduction of the new Trauma & Orthopaedic (T&O) curriculum, and the implementation of the Improving Surgical Training initiative, reflect yet another paradigm shift in the recent history of trauma and orthopaedic training. The move to outcome-based training without time constraints is a radical departure from the traditional time-based structure and represents an exciting new training frontier. This paper summarizes the history of T&O training reform, explains the rationale for change, and reflects on lessons learnt from the past.

Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2021;2-3:181–190.


Bone & Joint Open
Vol. 1, Issue 5 | Pages 98 - 102
6 May 2020
Das De S Puhaindran ME Sechachalam S Wong KJH Chong CW Chin AYH

The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted all segments of daily life, with the healthcare sector being at the forefront of this upheaval. Unprecedented efforts have been taken worldwide to curb this ongoing global catastrophe that has already resulted in many fatalities. One of the areas that has received little attention amid this turmoil is the disruption to trainee education, particularly in specialties that involve acquisition of procedural skills. Hand surgery in Singapore is a standalone combined programme that relies heavily on dedicated cross-hospital rotations, an extensive didactic curriculum and supervised hands-on training of increasing complexity. All aspects of this training programme have been affected because of the cancellation of elective surgical procedures, suspension of cross-hospital rotations, redeployment of residents, and an unsustainable duty roster. There is a real concern that trainees will not be able to meet their training requirements and suffer serious issues like burnout and depression. The long-term impact of suspending training indefinitely is a severe disruption of essential medical services. This article examines the impact of a global pandemic on trainee education in a demanding surgical speciality. We have outlined strategies to maintain trainee competencies based on the following considerations: 1) the safety and wellbeing of trainees is paramount; 2) resource utilization must be thoroughly rationalized; 3) technology and innovative learning methods must supplant traditional teaching methods; and 4) the changes implemented must be sustainable. We hope that these lessons will be valuable to other training programs struggling to deliver quality education to their trainees, even as we work together to battle this global catastrophe.


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 98-B, Issue 1_Supple_A | Pages 23 - 26
1 Jan 2016
Whiteside LA

An extensive review of the spinal and arthroplasty literature was undertaken to evaluate the effectiveness of local antibiotic irrigation during surgery. The efficacy of antibiotic irrigation for the prevention of acute post-operative infection after total joint arthroplasty was evaluated retrospectively in 2293 arthroplasties (1990 patients) between January 2004 and December 2013. The mean follow-up was 73 months (20 to 139). One surgeon performed all the procedures with minimal post-operative infection.

The intra-operative protocol included an irrigation solution of normal saline with vancomycin 1000 mg/l and polymyxin 250 000 units/l at the rate of 2 l per hour. No patient required re-admission for primary infection or further antibiotic treatment. Two morbidly obese patients (two total hip arthroplasties) developed subcutaneous fat necrosis requiring debridement and one was revised because the deep capsular sutures were contaminated by the draining subcutaneous haematoma. One patient who had undergone total knee arthroplasty had unrecognised damage to the lateral superior geniculate artery and developed a haematoma that became infected secondarily four months after the surgery and underwent revision.

The use of antibiotic irrigation during arthroplasty surgery has been highly effective for the prevention of infection in the author’s practice. However, it should be understood that any routine prophylactic use of antibiotics may result in resistant organisms, and the wise stewardship of the use of antibiotics is an important part of surgical practice.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B(1 Suppl A):23–6.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 87-B, Issue 4 | Pages 556 - 559
1 Apr 2005
Al-Maiyah M Bajwa A Finn P Mackenney P Hill D Port A Gregg PJ

We conducted a randomised, controlled trial to determine whether changing gloves at specified intervals can reduce the incidence of glove perforation and contamination in total hip arthroplasty. A total of 50 patients were included in the study. In the study group (25 patients), gloves were changed at 20-minute intervals or prior to cementation. In the control group (25 patients), gloves were changed prior to cementation. In addition, gloves were changed in both groups whenever there was a visible puncture. Only outer gloves were investigated.

Contamination was tested by impression of gloved fingers on blood agar and culture plates were subsequently incubated at 37°C for 48 hours. The number of colonies and types of organisms were recorded. Glove perforation was assessed using the water test. The incidence of perforation and contamination was significantly lower in the study group compared with the control group. Changing gloves at regular intervals is an effective way to decrease the incidence of glove perforation and bacterial contamination during total hip arthroplasty.