The National Joint Registry (NJR) for England & Wales provides a useful reference for hospitals to assess and compare their current practice with national figures. We aimed to identify patient and surgical factors at time of primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) responsible for the revision. A retrospective case note review was performed of all revision TKAs performed at Musgrove Park Hospital 2005–2010. Exclusion criteria included primary TKA performed elsewhere. 38 TKAs and 13 unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) were revised. Mean time to revision was 1.8 years and 2.1 years respectively. Reason for revision was pain or disease progression in 54% revised UKAs and infection in 53% revised TKAs. 35% infected cases were therapeutically anticoagulated, 75% ASA 3 and 50% had a BMI >30. No problems were identified with surgeon grade or level of supervision. 5 cases of revision were of a trial primary prosthesis. There were large numbers of high risk patients (increased BMI, ASA grade or on anticoagulants), which may contribute to increased infection rates and subsequent revision. We suggest avoiding trial prostheses and recommend delaying anticoagulation reintroduction until the wound is fully healed. This information may be useful for aiding with patient selection and consent

The main purpose of the present study was to determine long-term implant fixation of 15 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKAs) with an all-poly tibial component using Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) at a mean 10-year follow-up. The secondary purpose was to investigate whether the progressive loss of implant's fixation correlates with a reduction in Knee society score (KSS). Fifteen non-consecutive patients with primary knee osteoarthritis received a UKA with an all-poly tibial component were assessed using KSS scores pre-operatively and post-operatively and RSA on day 2 after surgery, then at 3, 6, and 12 months and yearly thereafter. The mean last follow-up was 10 years. An increase in maximum total point motion (MTPM) values from 6 months to 1 year post-operatively was found respect to post-operative reference. Implants’ displacement values were always 2 mm during the first 6 months, and then, two different trends were noticed in revised and non-revised implants. MTPM increase between 1 and 2 years of follow-up in non-revised UKAs was always 0.2 mm, whereas it was [0.2 mm in revised UKAs. A linear and negative correlation with statistical significance was found between MTPM and both clinical and functional KSS scores (p 0.001). Also in a long-term follow-up evaluation, RSA is an effective tool to predict functional results after an all-poly UKA providing also a relevant predictive value at 1 year follow-up, and this can be very useful for both patients and surgeons