Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 20 of 44
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 147 - 147
1 May 2016
Garcia-Rey E Garcia-Cimbrelo E
Full Access

Background and aim. Recent proposals have been introduced to modify stem design and/or femoral fixation in total hip replacement (THR). New designs need to consider previous design features and their results. The aim of this study has been to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of six different designs of tapered uncemented stems implanted in our Institution. Methods. 1918 uncemented hips were prospectively assessed from 1999 to 2011 (minimum follow-up of five years for the unrevised hips). All hips had a 28 or 32 mm femoral head and metal-on-polyethylene or alumina-on-alumina bearing surface. Six uncemented femoral designs that shared a femoral tapered stem incorporating a coating surface were included in the study. The different design features included the type of coating, metaphyseal filling, and sectional shape. Results. Intra-operative proximal femoral crack was 6.7% in one of the designs (p=0.01), univariate analysis showing a lower risk of crack in the other designs. The position of the stem was neutral in 80% of the cases for all designs. Femoral canal filing was related to the stem design (p<0.001 at the three levels) and to the femoral level assessed (subset alpha=0.005). Twelve stems were revised for aseptic loosening (6 from two different designs). The survival rate for femoral aseptic loosening at 15 years was 96.6% (95% CI 93.8 to 99.4) for one of these two designs ad 97.4% (95% CI95.5 to 99.6) for the other. Regression analysis showed that stem design was the only factor related to aseptic loosening when adjusted for femoral canal filling (at the three levels) stem position (neutral or not) and femoral type (cylindrical or not). Conclusion. Tapered uncemented stems consistently provide excellent bone fixation. New designs need to avoid changing successful features and concentrate on the less successful aspects


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 60 - 60
1 Feb 2012
Aldinger P Jung A Gatermann S Ewerbeck V Thomsen M Parsch D
Full Access

Introduction. Up to date there are only few reports in literature on the long term survival of uncemented stems. As for cemented THA, 10 year survival of at least 90% is required for any THA. Materials and methods. We followed the first 354 consecutive implantations of an uncemented, straight femoral stem (CLS, Zimmer Inc, Warsaw, USA) in 326 patients. Mean time of follow-up evaluation was 17 years (range, 15-20 years). Results. At follow-up, 84 patients (88 hips) had died, and 12 (12 hips) were lost to follow-up. 34 hips underwent femoral revision: 8 for infection, 8 for periprosthetic fracture, 1 for traumatic loosening and 17 for aseptic loosening of the stem. Overall survival was 89% at 17 years (95%-confidence limits, 87%-92%), survival with femoral revision for aseptic loosening as an end point was 94% at 17 years (95%-confidence limits, 92%-95%). The mean Harris Hip Score at follow-up was 83 points. 220 hips were available for radiolographic evaluation. None of the femoral components showed signs of loosening. Radiolucent lines (<2mm) in Gruen zones 1 and 7 were present in 14.1% (31 hips) and 15.0% (33 hips) respectively. Radiolucencies in zones 2-6 were found in 0.5% (1 hip)-1,8% (4 hips) on ap x-rays. Only one case of distal osteolysis was found after a previous Wagner resurfacing. No case of severe femoral osteolysis was found. The only strong predictor for aseptic loosening was undersizing of the stem with a canal fill index of <75%. Conclusions. The long-term results for this uncemented stem are encouraging and compare favorably with those achieved in primary cemented total hip arthroplasty in this age group


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 32 - 32
1 May 2016
Hashimoto S Hayashi S Kanzaki N Chinzei N Kuroda R Kurosaka M
Full Access

Introduction

The advance of surgical technique and implant design have led to improvement in total hip arthroplasty (THA), and short stem THA is now gaining number as a treatment option for younger patients to preserve bone in the proximal femur for a future revision. The SMF stem is shorter stem, and requires a slightly higher neck resection and implanted in slight varus to contact at lateral cortex. Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most common cause to hip osteoarthritis (OA) in Japan, and the morphology of the dysplastic femur is narrow canal and increased anteversion. Thus, the purpose of this study is to evaluate the SMF stem design can fit for Japanese patients, using CT based 3-D template planning.

Methods

We evaluated 30 patients who required THA in our institution. Inclusion criteria are hip OA, but cases with post-trauma, post-osteotomy, and any other hip disease in childhood are excluded. Patients were selected with their femoral anteversion, based on the dispersion of anteversion in dysplastic hip population, which was reported by Noble and collegues in 2003. Preoperative planning with ZedHip software (Lexi, Japan) was performed by established protocol. The center of socket was placed at 15mm proximal from teardrop and medialized to primary acetabulum, with 40° of radiographic inclination and 20° of anteversion. Neck resection of femur was 20mm proximal from the top of smaller trochanter, and stem was placed with lateral fit at distal and medial fit at calcar with appropriate size. Stem offset was selected by leg extension and balanced shenton line. Finally, ROM simulation was performed and the socket anteversion was arranged to achieve the optimal ROM. And then, SMF stem alignment and appropriate fitting was evaluated in Japanese OA cases.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 68 - 68
1 May 2019
Gustke K
Full Access

Stems provide short- and long-term stability to the femoral and tibial components. Poorer epiphyseal and metaphyseal bone quality will require sharing or offloading the femoral and tibial component interfaces with a stem. One needs to use stem technique most appropriate for each individual case because of variable anatomy and bone loss situations. The conflict with trying to obtain stability via the stem is that most stems are cylindrical but femoral and tibial metaphyseal/diaphyseal areas are conical in shape. Viable stem options include fully cemented short and long stems, uncemented long stems, offset uncemented stems, and a hybrid application of a cemented proximal end of longer uncemented diaphyseal engaging stems. Stems are not without their risk. The more the load is transferred to the cortex, the greater the risk of proximal interface stress shielding. A long uncemented stem has similar stress shielding as a short cemented stem. Long diaphyseal engaging stems that are cemented or uncemented have the potential to have end of stem pain, especially if more diaphyseal reaming is done to obtain greater cortical contact. A conical shaped long stem can provide more stability than a long cylindrical stem and avoid diaphyseal reaming. Use of long stems may create difficulty in placement of the tibial and femoral components in an optimal position. If the femoral or tibial components do not allow an offset stem insertion, using a long offset stem or short cemented stem is preferred. The amount of metaphyseal bone loss will drive the choice of stem used. Short cemented stems will not have good stability in poor metaphyseal bone without getting the cement out to the cortex. Long cemented stems provide satisfactory survivorship, however, most surgeons avoid cementing long stems due to the difficulty of removal, if a subsequent revision is required. If the metaphyseal bone is excellent, use of a short cemented stem or long uncemented stem can be expected to have good results. Long fully uncemented stems must have independent stability to be effective, or should be proximally cemented as a hybrid technique. Cases with AOI type IIb and III tibial and femoral defects are best managed with use of metaphyseal cones with short cemented stems or long hybrid straight or offset stems. Some studies also suggest that if the cone is very stable, no stem may be required. My preference is to use a short cemented stem or hybrid conical stem in patients with good metaphyseal bone. If significant metaphyseal bone loss is present, I will use a porous cone with either a short cemented stem, hybrid cylindrical or offset stem depending on the primary stability of the cone and whether the femoral or tibial component can be placed in an optimal position in patients with good metaphyseal bone


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 97 - 97
10 Feb 2023
Gibbons J Bodian C Powell A Sharr J Lash N
Full Access

PFFs are an increasing burden presenting to the acute trauma services. The purpose of this study is to show that cemented revision for Vancouver B2/B3 PFFs is a safe option in the geriatric population, allows early pain-free weight bearing and comparable to a control-group of uncemented stems with regard to return to theatre and revision surgery. A retrospective review was conducted of all PFFs treated in a Level 1 trauma centre from 2015-2020. Follow up x-rays and clinical course through electronic chart was reviewed for 78 cemented revisions and 49 uncemented revisions for PFF. Primary endpoints were all cause revision and return to theatre for any reason. Secondary endpoints recorded mobility status and all-cause mortality. In the cemented group there were 73 Vancouver B2, 5 Vancouver B3 PFF; the mean age was 79.7 years and mean radiological follow-up of 11.9 months. In the cementless group there were 32 Vancouver B2 and 17 Vancouver B3 PFFs; with all 49 patients undergoing distally bearing uncemented revision, the mean age was 72.7 years and mean radiological follow-up of 21.3 months. Patients treated with a cemented prosthesis had significantly higher ASA score (2.94 -v- 2.43, p<0.001). The primary endpoints showed that there was no significant difference in all cause revision 3/78 and 5/49 p=0.077, or return to theatre 13/78 -v- 12/49 p=0.142. Secondary endpoints revealed no significant difference in in-hospital mortality. The cementless group were more likely to be mobilising without any aid at latest follow-up 35/49 -v- 24/78 p<0.001. The use of cemented revision femoral component in the setting of PFFs is one option in the algorithm for management of unstable PFFs according to the Vancouver classification. Evidence from this case-control study, shows that the all-cause revision and return to theatre for any cause was comparable in both groups


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 23 - 23
1 May 2019
Jobin C
Full Access

Durable humeral component fixation in shoulder arthroplasty is necessary to prevent painful aseptic loosening and resultant humeral bone loss. Causes of humeral component loosening include stem design and material, stem length and geometry, ingrowth vs. ongrowth surfaces, quality of bone available for fixation, glenoid polyethylene debris osteolysis, exclusion of articular particulate debris, joint stability, rotator cuff function, and patient activity levels. Fixation of the humeral component may be achieved by cement fixation either partial or complete and press-fit fixation. During the past two decades, uncemented humeral fixation has become more popular, especially with short stems and stemless press fit designs. Cemented humeral component fixation risks difficult and complicated revision surgery, stress shielding of the tuberosities and humeral shaft periprosthetic fractures at the junction of the stiff cemented stem and the remaining humeral shaft. Press fit fixation may minimise these cemented risks but has potential for stem loosening. A randomised clinical trial of 161 patients with cemented vs. press fit anatomic total shoulder replacements found that cemented fixation of the humeral component provided better quality of life, strength, and range of motion than uncemented fixation but longer operative times. Another study found increased humeral osteolysis (43%) associated with glenoid component loosening and polyethylene wear, while stress shielding was seen with well-fixed press fit humeral components. During reverse replacement the biomechanical forces are different on the humeral stem. Stem loosening during reverse replacement may have different factors than anatomic replacement. A systemic review of 41 reverse arthroplasty clinical studies compared the functional outcomes and complications of cemented and uncemented stems in approximately 1800 patients. There was no difference in the risk of stem loosening or revision between cemented and uncemented stems. Uncemented stems have at least equivalent clinical and radiographic outcomes compared with cemented stems during reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Durable humeral component fixation in shoulder arthroplasty is associated with fully cemented stems or well ingrown components that exclude potential synovial debris that may cause osteolysis


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_12 | Pages 27 - 27
1 Dec 2022
Falsetto A Bohm E Wood G
Full Access

Recent registry data from around the world has strongly suggested that using cemented hip hemiarthroplasty has lower revision rates compared to cementless hip hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck hip fractures. The adoption of using cemented hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture has been slow as many surgeons continue to use uncemented stems. One of the reasons is that surgeons feel more comfortable with uncemented hemiarthroplasty as they have used it routinely. The purpose of this study is to compare the difference in revision rates of cemented and cementless hemiarthroplasty and stratify the risk by surgeon experience. By using a surgeons annual volume of Total Hip Replacements performed as an indicator for surgeon experience. The Canadian Joint Replacement Registry Database was used to collect and compare the outcomes to report on the revision rates based on surgeon volume. This is a large Canadian Registry Study where 68447 patients were identified for having a hip hemiarthroplasty from 2012-2020. This is a retrospective cohort study, identifying patients that had cementless or cemented hip hemiarthroplasty. The surgeons who performed the procedures were linked to the procedure Total Hip Replacement. Individuals were categorized as experienced hip surgeons or not based on whether they performed 50 hip replacements a year. Identifying high volume surgeon (>50 cases/year) and low volume (<50 cases/year) surgeons. Hazard ratios adjusted for age and sex were performed for risk of revision over this 8-year span. A p-value <0.05 was deemed significant. For high volume surgeons, cementless fixation had a higher revision risk than cemented fixation, HR 1.29 (1.05-1.56), p=0.017. This pattern was similar for low volume surgeons, with cementless fixation having a higher revision risk than cemented fixation, HR 1.37 (1.11-1.70) p=0.004 We could not detect a difference in revision risk for cemented fixation between low volume and high volume surgeons; at 0-1.5 years the HR was 0.96 (0.72-1.28) p=0.786, and at 1.5+ years the HR was 1.61 (0.83-3.11) p=0.159. Similarly, we could not detect a difference in revision risk for cementless fixation between low volume and high volume surgeons, HR 1.11 (0.96-1.29) p=0.161. Using large registry data, cemented hip hemiarthroplasty has a significant lower revision rate than the use of cementless stems even when surgeons are stratified to high and low volume. Low volume surgeons who use uncemented prostheses have the highest rate of revision. The low volume hip surgeon who cements has a lower revision rate than the high volume cementless surgeon. The results of this study should help to guide surgeons that no matter the level of experience, using a cemented hip hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck fracture is the safest option. That high volume surgeons who perform cementless hemiarthroplasty are not immune to having revisions due to their technique. Increased training and education should be offered to surgeons to improve comfort when using this technique


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_12 | Pages 1 - 1
1 Dec 2022
Falsetto A Bohm E Wood G
Full Access

Recent registry data from around the world has strongly suggested that using cemented hip hemiarthroplasty has lower revision rates compared to cementless hip hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck hip fractures. The adoption of using cemented hemiarthroplasty for hip fracture has been slow as many surgeons continue to use uncemented stems. One of the reasons is that surgeons feel more comfortable with uncemented hemiarthroplasty as they have used it routinely. The purpose of this study is to compare the difference in revision rates of cemented and cementless hemiarthroplasty and stratify the risk by surgeon experience. By using a surgeons annual volume of Total Hip Replacements performed as an indicator for surgeon experience. The Canadian Joint Replacement Registry Database was used to collect and compare the outcomes to report on the revision rates based on surgeon volume. This is a large Canadian Registry Study where 68447 patients were identified for having a hip hemiarthroplasty from 2012-2020. This is a retrospective cohort study, identifying patients that had cementless or cemented hip hemiarthroplasty. The surgeons who performed the procedures were linked to the procedure Total Hip Replacement. Individuals were categorized as experienced hip surgeons or not based on whether they performed 50 hip replacements a year. Identifying high volume surgeon (>50 cases/year) and low volume (<50 cases/year) surgeons. Hazard ratios adjusted for age and sex were performed for risk of revision over this 8-year span. A p-value <0.05 was deemed significant. For high volume surgeons, cementless fixation had a higher revision risk than cemented fixation, HR 1.29 (1.05-1.56), p=0.017. This pattern was similar for low volume surgeons, with cementless fixation having a higher revision risk than cemented fixation, HR 1.37 (1.11-1.70) p=0.004 We could not detect a difference in revision risk for cemented fixation between low volume and high volume surgeons; at 0-1.5 years the HR was 0.96 (0.72-1.28) p=0.786, and at 1.5+ years the HR was 1.61 (0.83-3.11) p=0.159. Similarly, we could not detect a difference in revision risk for cementless fixation between low volume and high volume surgeons, HR 1.11 (0.96-1.29) p=0.161. Using large registry data, cemented hip hemiarthroplasty has a significant lower revision rate than the use of cementless stems even when surgeons are stratified to high and low volume. Low volume surgeons who use uncemented prostheses have the highest rate of revision. The low volume hip surgeon who cements has a lower revision rate than the high volume cementless surgeon. The results of this study should help to guide surgeons that no matter the level of experience, using a cemented hip hemiarthroplasty for acute femoral neck fracture is the safest option. That high volume surgeons who perform cementless hemiarthroplasty are not immune to having revisions due to their technique. Increased training and education should be offered to surgeons to improve comfort when using this technique


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 27 - 27
1 Aug 2020
Abdic S Athwal G Wittman T Walch G Raiss P
Full Access

The use of shorter humeral stems in reverse shoulder arthroplasty has been reported as safe and effective. Shorter stems are purported to be bone preserving, easy to revise, and have reduced surgical time. However, a frequent radiographic finding with the use of uncemented short stems is stress shielding. Smaller stem diameters reduce stress shielding, however, carry the risk of varus or valgus malalignment in the metadiaphyseal region of the proximal humerus. The aim of this retrospective radiographic study was to measure the true post-operative neck-shaft (N-S) angle of a curved short stem with a recommended implantation angle of 145°. True anteroposterior radiographs of patients who received RTSA using an Ascend Flex short stem at three specialized shoulder centres (London, ON, Canada, Lyon, France, Munich, Germany) were reviewed. Radiographs that showed the uncemented stem and humeral tray in orthogonal view without rotation were included. Sixteen patients with proximal humeral fractures or revision surgeries were excluded. This yielded a cohort of 124 implant cases for analysis (122 patients, 42 male, 80 female) at a mean age of 74 years (range, 48 – 91 years). The indications for RTSA were rotator cuff deficient shoulders (cuff tear arthropathy, massive cuff tears, osteoarthritis with cuff insufficiency) in 78 patients (63%), primary osteoarthritis in 41 (33%), and rheumatoid arthritis in 5 (4%). The humeral component longitudinal axis was measured in degrees and defined as neutral if the value fell within ±5° of the humeral axis. Angle values >5° and < 5 ° were defined as valgus and varus, respectively. The filling-ratio of the implant within the humeral shaft was measured at the level of the metaphysis (FRmet) and diaphysis (FRdia). Measurements were conducted by two independent examiners (SA and TW). To test for conformity of observers, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated. The inter- and intra-observer reliability was excellent (ICC = 0.965, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.911– 0.986). The average difference between the humeral shaft axis and the humeral component longitudinal axis was 3.8° ± 2.8° (range, 0.2° – 13.2°) corresponding to a true mean N-S angle of 149° ± 3° in valgus. Stem axis was neutral in 70% (n=90) of implants. Of the 34 malaligned implants, 82% (n=28) were in valgus (mean N-S angle 153° ± 2°) and 18% (n=6) in varus position (mean N-S angle 139° ± 1°). The average FRmet and FRdiawere 0.68 ± 0.11 and 0.72 ± 0.11, respectively. No association was found between stem diameter and filling ratios (FRmet, FRdia) or cortical contact with the stem (r = 0.39). Operative technique and implant design affect the ultimate positioning of the implant in the proximal humerus. This study has shown, that in uncemented short stem implants, neutral axial alignment was achieved in 70% of cases, while the majority of malaligned humeral components (86%) were implanted in valgus, corresponding to a greater than 145° neck shaft angle of the implant. It is important for surgeons to understand that axial malalignment of a short stem implant does influence the true neck shaft angle


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 73 - 73
1 Nov 2015
Gehrke T
Full Access

Generally cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become an extremely successful operation with excellent long-term results. Although it always remained a popular choice for the elderly patients in many countries, recent trends show an increased use of noncemented stems in all age populations in many national registries. So far, there has been no clear age associated recommendation, when a cemented stem should be used. Described major complications including periprosthetic fractures are usually associated with age >75 years, in many registries. Uncemented stems perform better than cemented stems in recent registries; however, unrecognised intra-operative femoral fractures may be an important reason for early failure of uncemented stems. Experimental studies have indicated that intra-operative fractures do affect implant survival, it has been shown that intra-operative and direct post-operative fractures increase the relative risk of revision during the first 6 post-operative months significantly. In addition it has been clearly shown, that uncemented stems were more frequently revised due to periprosthetic fracture during the first 2 post-operative years than cemented stems. Based on the overall femoral bone quality, especially in female patients >70 years, cemented fixation has a lower fracture risk. Based on the implant fixation type: metaphyseal vs. diaphyseal of various uncemented stems, major attention should be drawn to the intra-operative bone quality during the broaching process, especially for metaphyseal fixation stem types. Although cementless distal fixation can be achieved in thick cortices still in many patients, the incidence of associated thigh pain needs to be considered for some implant types. Furthermore small femoral canals might generate certain implant-bone size mismatch in relation to the proximal femur. In any cemented THA, a proper cementing technique is of major importance to assure longevity of implant fixation. This also includes proper implant sizing/templating, ensuring an adequate cement mantle thickness, which might be restricted in a small diameter femur. The desired outcome is a cement interdigitation into cancellous bone for 2–3 mm and an additional mantle of 2 mm pure cement. Consequently proper planning in small diameter patients, prevents sizing problems, while in few cases special/individualised stem sizes might be considered


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 25 - 25
1 Feb 2015
Gehrke T
Full Access

Cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) has become an extremely successful operation with excellent long-term results. Although it always remained a popular choice for the elderly patients in many countries, recent trends show an increased use of non-cemented stems in all age populations in many national registries. So far, there has been no clear age associated recommendation, when a cemented stem should be used. Described major complications such as periprosthetic fractures are usually associated at age >75 years, in many registries. Uncemented stems perform better than cemented stems in recent registries; however, unrecognised intraoperative femoral fractures may be an important reason for early failure of uncemented stems. Experimental studies have indicated that intraoperative fractures do affect implant survival, in addition it has been shown that intraoperative and direct postoperative fractures increase the relative risk of revision during the first 6 postoperative months significantly. Furthermore it has been clearly shown, that uncemented stems were more frequently revised due to periprosthetic fracture during the first 2 postoperative years than cemented stems. Although often associated reduction of femoral bone quality in especially female patients >60 years, uncemented fixation has become the standard in most scenarios worldwide. Based on the implant fixation type: metaphyseal vs. diaphyseal of various uncemented stems, major attention should be, however, drawn to the intraoperative bone quality during the broaching process, especially for metaphyseal fixation stem types. Although cementless distal fixation can be achieved in thick cortices still in many patients, the incidence of associated thigh pain needs to be considered for some implant types. Furthermore small femoral canals might generate certain implant-bone size mismatch in relation to the proximal femur, thus nonoptimal fixation could be achieved. Consequently proper implant planning is mandatory preoperatively. In any cemented THA, a proper cementing technique is of major importance to assure longevity of implant fixation. This also includes proper implant sizing/ templating, ensuring an adequate cement mantle thickness, which might be restricted in a small diameter femur. The desired outcome is a cement interdigitation into cancellous bone for 2–3mm and an additional mantle of 2mm pure cement. Consequently proper planning in small diameter patients, prevents sizing problems, while in few cases special/individualised stem sizes might be considered. In summary attention needs to be drawn on small diameter stems, to prevent fractures and achieve proper implant fixation, in both uncemented and cemented fixation types. Proper implant planning preoperatively might be more important than in usual cases, while sometimes individual /small implant types might become necessary


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 81 - 81
1 Dec 2015
Born P Ilchmann T Zwicky L Graber P Ochsner P Zimmerli W Clauss M
Full Access

To report mid-term results of PJI treated with uncemented stems. : 80 hips of PJI after THA were treated with uncemented stems from 01/1993 to 12/2012 and followed prospectively. Selection occurred for one- (n=27) or two-stage (n=53) exchange according to the Liestal algorithm. Surgical approaches were transfemoral (n=58), transgluteal (n=9) or transtrochanteric (n=13). A monoblock (Wagner SL, n=58) or modular (Revitan, n=22) revision stem was implanted. On the acetabular side 44 Müller rings, 33 Burch-Schneider cages (combined with a cemented PE-cup) and 3 press-fit cups were used. Kaplan-Meier survival was calculated for endpoints (a) persistence of infection, (b) septic/aseptic stem loosening. Radiographs were analysed for (a) subsidence, (b) distal stem integration, (c) changes in cortical thickness, (d) proximal femur restoration, (e) radiolucency around stem/cup. Mean FU was 5.2 (2–15) years. PJI was eradicated in 77 of 80 hips (96%). 3 patients (all two-stage) had a treatment failure. 2 were treated successfully with an additional two-stage exchange. In the 3rd patient we were not able to control infection and exarticulation was performed. Furthermore, one stem was revised for aseptic loosening (5 years), 1 for a broken Wagner stem (7 years) and 1 for subsidence (8 months). Stem survival after 5 years was 93% (SD ±2.5 years). 2 cups were revised for aseptic loosening and 1 for recurrent dislocations. Subsidence ≥5mm was found in 6 hips and occurred always within 3 months after surgery independent of stem type (p=0.947) and approach (p=0.691). Proximal femoral remodelling after transfemoral approach was excellent or good in 71% (32 excellent, 9 good) with no difference between one-/two-stage exchanges (p=0.288). Initial distal stem integration was 65mm medial and 66mm lateral and increased to 8mm medial (p=0.716) and 10mm lateral (p<0.001). Cortical thickness was unchanged over the entire FU period (p=0.493). Radiolucencies were seen around 26 stems, only the stem revised after 5years was rated loose. Eradication of PJI was high using our established protocol even with uncemented revision stems. Mid-term survival was independent from one-/two-stage revision and comparable to results for aseptic loosening revision


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 38 - 38
1 Mar 2021
Tavakoli A Faber K Langohr G
Full Access

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is an effective treatment for end-stage glenohumeral arthritis. The use of high modulus uncemented stems causes stress shielding and induces bone resorption of up to 63% of patients following TSA. Shorter length stems with smaller overall dimensions have been studied to reduce stress shielding, however the effect of humeral short stem varus-valgus positioning on bone stress is not known. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of humeral short stem varus-valgus angulation on bone stresses after TSA. Three dimensional models of eight male cadaveric humeri (mean±SD age:68±6 years) were created from computed tomography data using MIMICS (Materialise, Belgium). Separate cortical and trabecular bone sections were created, and the resulting bone models were virtually reconstructed three times by an orthopaedic surgeon using an optimally sized short stem humeral implant (Exactech Preserve) that was placed directly in the center of the humeral canal (STD), as well as rotated varus (VAR) or valgus (VAL) until it was contacting the cortex. Bone was meshed using a custom technique which produced identical bone meshes permitting the direct element-to-element comparison of bone stress. Cortical bone was assigned an elastic modulus of 20 GPa and a Poisson's ratio of 0.3. Trabecular bone was assigned varying stiffness based on CT attenuation. A joint reaction force was then applied to the intact and reconstructed humeri representing 45˚ and 75˚ of abduction. Changes in bone stress, as well as the expected bone response based on change in strain energy density was then compared between the intact and reconstructed states for all implant positions. Both varus and valgus positioning of the humeral stem altered both the cortical and trabecular bone stresses from the intact states. Valgus positioning had the greatest negative effect in the lateral quadrant for both cortical and trabecular bone, producing greater stress shielding than both the standard and varus positioned implant. Overall, the varus and standard positions produced values that most closely mimicked the intact state. Surprisingly, valgus positioning produced large amounts of stress shielding in the lateral cortex at both 45˚ and 75˚ of abduction but resulted in a slight decrease in stress shielding in the medial quadrant directly beneath the humeral resection plane. This might have been a result of direct contact between the distal end of the implant and the medial cortex under loading which permitted load transfer, and therefore load-reduction of the lateral cortex during abduction. Conversely, when the implant was placed in the varus angulation, noticeable departures in stress shielding and changes in bones stress were not observed when compared to the optimal STD position. Interestingly, for the varus positioned implant, the deflection of the humerus under load eliminated the distal stem-cortex contact, hence preventing distal load transfer thus precluding the transfer of load


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 32 - 32
1 May 2016
Ziaee H McMinn D Daniel J
Full Access

The use of modular systems adds versatility to the implant system, better restoration of hip biomechanics and lower inventory to the hospital. There have been reports of high metal ions, ARMD reactions and high implant failure rates due to potential problems from taper failures. These are more common in metal-on-metal hip replacements, but are being also reported in other bearings. Between 2001 and 2010, we performed 383 consecutive metal-on-metal (MoM) THRs through a posterior approach, using a BHR cup and Birmingham modular head with one of three different stems, all with 12/14 tapers. The earliest 104 hips employed a cemented MS30 stem (Zimmer GmbH, Winterthur, Switzerland). Subsequent 256 were Synergy and then 23 Anthology (both uncemented and both Smith and Nephew Orthopaedics, Memphis TN USA). There was no significant difference in the average age at surgery (65.4 years cemented vs 65.6 uncemented, p = 0.69), gender ratio (1.68 vs 1.89, p = 0.64), or bearing diameter (46.7 vs 46.8, p = 0.31). The earlier 203 Synergy stems were monoblock heads, while the remaining uncemented stems included a tapered sleeve in addition. There were 3 deep infections and 11 debris-related failures (overall revision rate 4.9%). The revision rate from aseptic failures (ALTR, effusion, osteolysis or component loosening) is 2.87%. Kaplan-Meier analysis of the entire cohort showed a 10-year implant survival of 96.8% with revision for any reason as the end-point. Cemented stems had a 100% survival at 10 years and 98.6% at 12 years. The uncemented stems had a 93.8% survival at 10 years. Within the uncemented group, the monoblocks had a 5 and 10-year survival of 99.0% and 96.4% respectively while the sleeved had 98.7% (5 years) and 96.3% (7 years) and 82.5% at 8 years. Retreival analysis showed clear evidence of taper failure. Our experience suggests taper failure leading to ALTRs and its sequelae. Others have reported ALTR type reactions in metal on polyethylene and ceramic on polyethylene bearing types as well in bearing diameters ranging from 28mm to 40mm. There is a need to improve taper design especially for use with large heads, and in high demand patients


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_9 | Pages 137 - 137
1 May 2016
Pramhas D Knahr K Dominkus M
Full Access

Introduction. The legacy constrained condylar knee prosthesis (LCCK, Zimmer.) is designed for primary and revision total joint arthroplasties that need additional stability due to ligament deficiency and to compensate for bone defects. In this follow-up we present our mid term results. Methods and Material. Between November 1999 and January 2006 59 patients were provided with 67 LCCK knee endoprotheses. 38 prostheses were implanted in cases of revision surgery and 29 as primary implants. The mean patient age was 76 years (range 22–93). Indications for revisions were 20 aseptic loosenings, 11 late infections, 7 instabilities (5 cases due to polyethylene wear). Indications for primary arthroplasties were 16 severe valgus and 7 severe varus deformities, 5 cases of osteoarthritis after infection and 1 posttraumatic deformity. 36 femur components (54%) and 34 tibia components (51%) were augmented. 31 stems were fixed cementless, 15 stems were cemented (6 with an intermedullary plug). We evaluated the results prospectively with a clinical inspection and x-ray. Clinical rating systems used were the Knee society, SF-36 Quality of life and Womac score. The mean follow up was 5.6 years. 42 patients were examined, 10 questioned on the telephone, 3 deceased, 12 had to be revised and 2 were lost for follow-up. Results. We had an increase in ROM from 93° to 110°. The Knee Society score improved from 40 to 75 and the function score improved from 46 to 72. The early complications included 1 peroneal lesion, 1 intraoperative fracture, 7 limitations in movement, 10 wound healing problems and 1 thrombosis. 12 revisions had to be performed. 1 septic loosening, 1 synovectomy, 4 aseptic loosenings, 3 secondary patella replacements, 1 traumatic rupture of the quadriceps muscle, 1 chondrosacroma and 1 revision performed in another clinic. 25 (80%) uncemented stems, 3 (33%) cemented stems and 1 (17%) of the stems cemented with an intramedullary plug showed radiolucencies. Conclusion. The LCCK prosthesis can be recommended as a primary implant and for revisions in cases of severe instability or severe bone loss. Due to the bad general health of the patients and preoperative situation of the knee joints the results are satisfactory. All revisions due to aseptic loosening had to be performed on LCCKs with uncemented stems


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 19 - 19
1 Feb 2015
Berend M
Full Access

Perioperative fracture during routine THA represents one of the “not so fresh” feelings that occur for both patients and surgeons. With the increase in the use of uncemented implants and MIS techniques this truly is a problem on the rise. We have examined and quantified the risk factors associated with proximal femoral fracture during THA. Risk factors (risk ratios) identified were: uncemented stems (8.9), anterolateral approach (7.4) and female gender (2.2). Fortunately, treatment with cerclage wiring for uncemented stems has facilitated excellent stem stability and acceptable survivorship with many different femoral component designs. Reduced proximal geometry stems that better match the endosteal osseous anatomy have reduced fracture rates at our institution and maintained excellent stem survivorship. New data examining this design will be presented. In our series, cemented stems, however, had decreased survivorship in the presence of a proximal femoral fracture. MIS techniques may accelerate rehabilitation but they certainly permit limited visibility of the proximal femoral and acetabular anatomy and may result in less accurate component position. Relatively high fracture rates in series of MIS-THA have been reported. A bigger concern, however, is the unrecognised fracture that displaces postoperatively and requires a return to surgery for treatment with or without revision and mandates that we “see it before it sees us!” Cerclage wiring with looped Luque wires has been our treatment of choice for many years. Wires are significantly less expensive than cables and have proven to be durable in our series. This technique allows intraoperative repositioning and variable tightening in multiple locations. Cable fretting and breakage have been common in our experience with braided cable devices. Acetabular fracture during uncemented THA is most likely an under-reported occurrence and has been associated with elliptical component designs and under-reaming. In the presence of a stable cup, long-term performance has been acceptable


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 19 - 19
1 May 2014
Berend M
Full Access

Peri-operative fracture during routine THA represents one of the “not so fresh” feelings that occur for both patients and surgeons. With the increase in uncemented implants and MIS techniques this truly is a problem on the rise. We have recently examined and quantified the risk factors associated with proximal femoral fracture during THA. Risk factors (risk ratios) identified were: uncemented stems (8.9), anterolateral approach (7.4) and female gender (2.2). Fortunately, treatment with cerclage wiring for uncemented stems has facilitated excellent stem stability and acceptable survivorship with many different femoral component designs. Reduced proximal geometry stems that match the endosteal osseous anatomy have reduced fracture rates at our institution. In our series, cemented stems, however, had decreased survivorship in the presence of a proximal femoral fracture. MIS techniques may accelerate rehabilitation but they certainly permit limited visibility of the proximal femoral and acetabular anatomy and may result in less accurate component position. Relatively high fracture rates in series of MIS-THA have been reported. A bigger concern, however, is the unrecognised fracture that displaces postoperatively and requires a return to surgery for treatment with or without revision and mandates that we “see it before it sees us!” Cerclage wiring with looped Luque wires has been our treatment of choice for many years. Wires are significantly less expensive than cables and have proven to be durable in our series. They allow intraoperative repositioning and variable tightening in multiple locations. Cable fretting and breakage has been common in our experience with braided cable devices. Acetabular fracture during uncemented THA is most likely an under-reported occurrence and has been associated with elliptical component designs and under-reaming. In the presence of a stable cup, long-term performance has been acceptable


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXV | Pages 133 - 133
1 Jun 2012
Madadi F
Full Access

Background. The role of different surgical approaches and types of implant (1-17), surgical technique (9, 10, 21-24), patient's age (6, 8, 31), activity level (5), weight (17) and other demographic factors have been investigated in a lot of studies. The aim of this study is to assess the effect of demographic factors as well as the effect of traditional life-style in patients who had total hip arthroplasty (THA) in our centre within the past 20 years. Materials and Methods. We reviewed the average Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the prosthesis survival in 210 patients including 235 THAs and 49 revisions between 1985 - 2005. The mean F/U was 6.1 years and average HHS was 78.08±15.7. 26 patients were dead and 17 were inaccessible. The effects of traditional life-style and daily activity level on implant loosening were also considered. Findings. Multivariable analysis showed that patient's sex, surgical technique, surgeon, BMI, use of cement weren't related to either implant loosening or HHS. We had 25 prosthesis dislocations, which all happened by trauma. Considering revision surgery as the end point, the following 10-year-survivals were calculated; cemented cup 60%, uncemented cup 85% and both cemented/uncemented stems 80%. Considering radiographic evidence of loosening as the end point, the 10-year-survival of cups was 80% and that of cemented, uncemented stems was 60% and 70%. Conclusion. Delay in performance THA resulted in more limping (because of anatomy deterioration and muscles weakness) and lower HH. Scores. Additionally, the survival of our THAs were generally shorter than literature


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_34 | Pages 463 - 463
1 Dec 2013
Ohmori Y Jingushi S Kawano T Itoman M
Full Access

Purpose:. In order to acquire good stability of an arthroplasty hip, the proper placement of the implants, which prevents impingement between the stem neck and the socket, is important. In general, the anteversion of the uncemented femoral stem depends on the relationship between the three-dimensional structure of the proximal femoral canal and the proximal stem geometry. The exact degree of the anteversion will be known just after broaching during the operation. If the stem anteversion could be forecasted, preoperative planning of the socket placement would be relatively easy. Furthermore, when a high degree of anteversion is forecasted, a special femoral stem to reduce it, such as a modular stem, could be prepared. However, we experienced that the preoperatively measured anteversion of the femoral neck using computer tomography (CT) was sometimes different from that of the stem measured during the operation. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the preoperative measurement would be helpful to predict the stem anteversion by examining the relationship between the anteversion of the femoral neck and the stem. Patients and methods:. A total of 57 primary THAs by one senior surgeon from April 2011 until March 2012 were carried out. Two THAs using a modular stem and one for the hip after previous proximal femoral osteotomy were excluded. The remaining 54 THAs were examined. The used uncemented stems were designed for proximal metaphyseal fixation. CT scans, including the distal femoral condyles as well as the hips, were carried out in all cases preoperatively. The anteversion of the femoral neck was measured as the angle of the maximum longitudinal line of the cross section of the femoral neck to the line connecting the posterior surfaces of both of the distal femoral condyles (Fig. 1). The femoral neck anteversion was measured at three levels (Fig. 1). The stem anteversion was measured just after the femoral broaching during the THA. The relationship between the anteversion angles of the femoral neck and of the stem was examined by using a regression analysis. The institutional review board approved this study. Results:. The anteversion angles of the femoral neck varied widely when they were measured at all of the levels (Table 1). The anteversion angle of the femoral neck was not always identical to that of the stem. There were 32–46% of cases in which the difference between the stem anteversion and the femoral neck anteversion was within 5 degrees. There was a significant relationship between the anteversion of the stem and that of the femoral neck measured at all three levels (Fig. 2). When it was measured just below the femoral head, it was the closest to one, and the p-value was the lowest. Discusssion and Conclusions:. The anteversion of the uncemented stem could be calculated by using the formula to show the relationship between the stem anteversion and the femoral neck antevesion measured preoperatively. The values appeared to be sufficiently correct for making clinical decisions, although a prospective study may be necessary to confirm this


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 101-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 8 - 8
1 Apr 2019
Kiran M Oikonomidis L AlMutani M Armstrong C Kumar G Peter V
Full Access

Background. Modularity in total hip replacement(THR) enables precise recreation of native hip biomechanics. However, there have been concerns about raised metal ion levels with increased number of interfaces. We present the 3 year results of ML taper with Kinectiv technology(MLKT), a modular neck uncemented stem. This system has modular neck options, but has only one [0] head in various diameters. Methods. 97 hips in 97 patients with a MLKT stem and Continuum socket were included in this prospective study. Harris hip score, Oxford hip scores (HHS and OHS) and yearly blood Cobalt(Co), Chromium(Cr) and Titanium(Ti) were recorded. The primary end point was revision for any reason. Paired t- test was used to assess improvement in functional scores. Results. The mean age was 62.1±8.7 years. The mean follow-up was 3.75±0.67years. The mean HHS improved from 45.8±5.1 to 92.6±3.1(p<0.001) and the mean OHS improved form 17.59±4.71 to 43.1±2.2(p<0.001). One hip was revised for deep infection at 2.6 years. The mean Co, Cr and Ti levels at 3 years were 18.45,19.62 and 36.47 nmol/l respectively. The survivorship of the cohort at a minimum follow-up of 3 years was 98.7%. Conclusion. Our study suggests that despite the presence of an additional interface between the neck and the stem, the MLKT stem does not result in increased metal ion levels or higher failure rate. This is a prospective and consecutive series of patients with complete radiological and functional follow-up. The MLKT stem has good functional results with no concerns about raised metal ion levels in the short term