Background

Implant stability and is an important factor for adequate bone remodelling and both are crucial in the long-term clinical survival of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Assessment of early bone remodelling on X-rays during the first 2 years post-operatively is mandatory when stepwise introduction of a new implant is performed. Regardless of fixation type (cemented or cementless), early acetabular component migration is usually the weakest link in THA, eventually leading to loosening. Over the past years, a shift towards uncemented cup designs has occurred. Besides the established hydroxyapatite (HA) coated uncemented cups which provide ongrowth of bone, new uncemented implant designs stimulating ingrowth of bone have increased in popularity. These cups initiate ingrowth of bone into the implant by their open metallic structure with peripheral pores, to obtain a mechanical interlock with the surrounding bone, thereby stabilising the prosthesis in an early stage after implantation. This retrospective study assessed bone remodelling, osseointegration and occurrence of radiolucency around a new ingrowth philosophy acetabular implant.

Abstract. Background. Optimal acetabular component position in Total Hip Arthroplasty is vital for avoiding complications such as dislocation, impingement, abductor muscle strength and range of motion. Transverse acetabular ligament (TAL) and posterior labrum have been shown to be a reliable landmark to guide optimum acetabular cup position. There have been reports of iliopsoas impingement caused by both cemented and uncemented acetabular components. Acetabular component mal-positioning and oversizing of acetabular component are associated with iliopsoas impingement. The Psoas fossa (PF) is not a well-regarded landmark to help with Acetabular Component positioning. Our aim was to assess the relationship of the TAL and PF in relation to Acetabular Component positioning. Methods. A total of 12 cadavers were implanted with the an uncemented acetabular component, their position was initially aligned to TAL. Following optimal seating of the acetabular component the distance of the rim of the shell from the PF was noted. The Acetabular component was then repositioned inside the PF to prevent exposure of the rim of the Acetabular component. This study was performed at Smith & Nephew wet lab in Watford. Results. Out of the twelve acetabular components that were implanted parallel to the TAL, all had the acetabular rim very close or outside to the psoas notch with a potential to cause iliopsoas impingement. Alteration of the acetabular component position was necessary in all cadavers to inside the PF to prevent iliopsoas impingement. It was evident that the edge of PF was not aligned with TAL. Conclusion. Optimal acetabular component position is vital to the longevity and outcome following THA. TAL provides a landmark to guide acetabular component position. We feel the PF is a better landmark to allow appropriate positioning of the acetabular component inside bone without exposure of the component rim and thus preventing iliopsoas impingement at the psoas notch. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Background. Dissociation of the polyethylene liner is a known failure mechanism of the Harris Galante I and II uncemented acetabular components. The outcomes of revision surgery for this indication and the influence of time to diagnosis are not well described. Methods. We report a series of 29 cases revised due to this failure mechanism. Results. The median time from primary to revision surgery was 13 years. At a median of 4 years follow up, the mean OHS was 34 (range 6–48) but results were poorer (mean 29, range 6–45) when the diagnosis and revision was delayed compared to when it was not (mean 39, range 20–48). A large proportion of our patients (n=14) presented with sudden onset of symptoms with or without trauma. Osteolysis was common in this series but the cup was well fixed in 20/29 cases. There was macroscopic damage to the shell in all cases. Conclusion. In our experience, prompt revision of liner dissociation optimises outcomes in this group of patients and radiology reporting alone is not sufficient to identify these cases. Level of evidence. 4

Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) is now a common used bearing surface in total hip arthroplasty. Current studies report superior wear rates with the use of HXLPE in total hip arthroplasty. However, there are few studies to support its long term use. The aim of this study is to measure the long term wear of HXLPE and evaluate patient satisfaction at more than 10 years follow up. 44 total hip arthroplasties were performed through a direct lateral approach by a single surgeon. All patients received the same uncemented acetabular component, mean liner thickness was 6.91mm (SD= 0.68). 16 of the femur components were cemented. Outcomes analysed include wear rates, osteolysis, revision rates, SF12 and Oxford hip scores. Wear rate was calculated using computer software (Polyware®) using edge detection software. Mean age at surgery was 58.9 years (SD= 11.67). The mean follow up was 11.3 years (SD= 1.19). There was no evidence of osteolysis and none had undergone revision surgery. Mean two dimensional wear was 0.38mm (SD= 0.25) and mean wear rate per year was 0.03mm (SD= 0.02, range 0.009 to 0.078). Oxford hip score at last follow up indicated satisfactory joint function (mean= 42 SD= 6.2). Our results support the use of highly cross-linked polyethylene in primary total hip replacements. The absence of osteolysis and need for revision surgery over a mean of 11.3 years is very encouraging

We used a biodegradable mesh to convert an acetabular defect into a contained defect in six patients at total hip replacement. Their mean age was 61 years (46 to 69). The mean follow-up was 32 months (19 to 50). Before clinical use, the strength retention and hydrolytic in vitro degradation properties of the implants were studied in the laboratory over a two-year period. A successful clinical outcome was determined by the radiological findings and the Harris hip score.

All the patients had a satisfactory outcome and no mechanical failures or other complications were observed. No protrusion of any of the impacted grafts was observed beyond the mesh. According to our preliminary laboratory and clinical results the biodegradable mesh is suitable for augmenting uncontained acetabular defects in which the primary stability of the implanted acetabular component is provided by the host bone. In the case of defects of the acetabular floor this new application provides a safe method of preventing graft material from protruding excessively into the pelvis and the mesh seems to tolerate bone-impaction grafting in selected patients with primary and revision total hip replacement.