Numerous lumbo-pelvic reconstruction methods based on posterior construct and anterior cages have been proposed for cases involving total sacrectomy and lumbar vertebrectomy. These constructs create long lever arms and generate high cantilever forces across the lumbo-sacral junction resulting in implant failure or breakage. Biomechanical studies have shown that placing implants anterior to lumbo-sacral pivot point provide a more effective moment arm to resist flexion force and improve the ultimate strength of the construct. As a result more emphasis is placed on screws in the pelvis. We report a new and novel technique that allows for the placement of a pelvic ring construct to augment the posterior construct in a lumbo-pelvic reconstruction. In the prone position, two contoured hard rods are passed along the inner table of the pelvis under the iliac muscle from a minor posterior approach. The rods are connected to the posterior lumbo-pelvic construct with T-junction clamps. The patient is turned supine and the anterior ends of the rods are connected to a sub-cutaneously placed hard rod along the anterior abdominal wall with T-junction clamps. This in turn is fixed to the AIIS (anterior inferior iliac spine) with two poly axial screws. The whole construct resembles an oblong ring.Introduction/Aim
Method
Frailty has been gathering attention as a factor to predict surgical outcomes. However, the association of frailty with postoperative complications remains controversial in spinal metastases surgery. We therefore designed a prospective study to elucidate risk factors for postoperative complications with a focus on frailty. We prospectively analyzed 241 patients with spinal metastasis who underwent palliative surgery from June 2015 to December 2021. Postoperative complications were assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification; scores of ≥ Grade II were defined as complications. Data were collected regarding demographics (age, sex, BMI, and primary cancer) and preoperative clinical factors (new Katagiri score, Frankel grade, performance status, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, spinal instability neoplastic score, modified Frailty Index-11 (mFI), diabetes, and serum albumin levels). Univariate and multivariate analyses were developed to identify risk factors for postoperative complications (p < 0.05).Aims
Methods
Objective. To evaluate functional and oncological outcomes following resection of sacral tumours and discuss the strategies for instrumentation. Introduction. Primary malignant tumours of the sacrum are rare, arising from bony or neural elements, or bone marrow in haematological malignancies. Management of such lesions is dictated by anatomy and the behaviour of tumours. Three key issues which arise are the adequacy of tumour resection, mechanical stabilisation and the need for colostomy. Stabilisation is often extensive and can be challenging. Methods. A retrospective review of the surgical management of primary malignant sacral tumours from 2004 - 2009. Results. The study included 46 patients (34 males, 12 females) with an average age of 49 (range 7 – 82). Median duration of symptoms before presentation was 26 months. 25 patients (54%) underwent surgical resection. 8 underwent instrumented stabilisations with fibula strut graft vs. 17 uninstrumented. Mechanical failure of stabilisation was noted in 75% over the follow up period but only one required revision surgery. Colostomy was performed in 10 patients (40%). Mean follow post-operatively was 19.0 months. Wound healing problems were present in 5/25 (20%). There was no difference in infection rates between definitive surgery with and without colostomy. There was one peri-operative death. Local recurrence occurred in 12%(3/25) of operated patients although follow-up period was noted to be short. Conclusions. Mechanical stabilisation for extensive lesions in the sacrum are particularly challenging in
To evaluate functional and oncological outcomes following resection of primary malignant bone tumours. Primary malignant tumours of the sacrum are rare, arising from bony or neural elements, or bone marrow in haematological malignancies. Management of these lesions is dictated by anatomical considerations and the behaviour of tumours. The three key issues which arise are the adequacy of tumour resection, mechanical stabilisation and the need for colostomy. A retrospective review of the surgical management of primary malignant sacral tumours from 2004 - 2009. The study included 46 patients (34 males, 12 females) with an average age of 49 (range 7 – 82). Median duration of symptoms before presentation was 26 months. 10 patients had inoperable tumours at presentation. 6 patients had chemotherapy. 2 patients opted for palliative radiotherapy. 1 patient was unfit for surgery. 25 patients (54%) underwent surgical resection. 8 underwent instrumented stabilisations with fibula strut graft vs. 17 uninstrumented. Colostomy was performed in 10 patients (40%). Mean follow post-operatively was 19.0 months. Wound healing problems were present in 5/25 (20%). There was no difference in infection rates between definitive surgery with and without colostomy. Mechanical failure of stabilisation was noted in 75%. There was one peri-operative death. Local recurrence occurred in 12%(3/25) of operated patients although follow-up period was noted to be short. Mechanical stabilisation for extensive lesions in the sacrum are particularly challenging in
With resumption of elective spine surgery services in the UK following the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, we conducted a multicentre British Association of Spine Surgeons (BASS) collaborative study to examine the complications and deaths due to COVID-19 at the recovery phase of the pandemic. The aim was to analyze the safety of elective spinal surgery during the pandemic. A prospective observational study was conducted from eight spinal centres for the first month of operating following restoration of elective spine surgery in each individual unit. Primary outcome measure was the 30-day postoperative COVID-19 infection rate. Secondary outcomes analyzed were the 30-day mortality rate, surgical adverse events, medical complications, and length of inpatient stay.Aims
Methods
To evaluate the perioperative complications associated with total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) in patients with spinal tumours, based on the extent and level of tumour resection. In total, 307 patients who underwent TES in a single centre were reviewed retrospectively. There were 164 male and 143 female patients with a mean age at the time of surgery of 52.9 years (SD 13.3). A total of 225 patients were operated on for spinal metastases, 34 for a malignant primary tumour, 41 for an aggressive benign tumour, and seven with a primary of unknown origin. The main lesion was located in the thoracic spine in 213, and in the lumbar spine in 94 patients. There were 97 patients who underwent TES for more than two consecutive vertebrae.Aims
Methods
Percutaneous placement of pedicle screws is a
well-established technique, however, no studies have compared percutaneous
and open placement of screws in the thoracic spine. The aim of this
cadaveric study was to compare the accuracy and safety of these
techniques at the thoracic spinal level. A total of 288 screws were
inserted in 16 (eight cadavers, 144 screws in percutaneous and eight
cadavers, 144 screws in open). Pedicle perforations and fractures
were documented subsequent to wide laminectomy followed by skeletalisation
of the vertebrae. The perforations were classified as grade 0: no
perforation, grade 1: <
2 mm perforation, grade 2: 2 mm to 4
mm perforation and grade 3: >
4 mm perforation. In the percutaneous
group, the perforation rate was 11.1% with 15 (10.4%) grade 1 and
one (0.7%) grade 2 perforations. In the open group, the perforation
rate was 8.3% (12 screws) and all were grade 1. This difference
was not significant (p = 0.45). There were 19 (13.2%) pedicle fractures
in the percutaneous group and 21 (14.6%) in the open group (p =
0.73). In summary, the safety of percutaneous fluoroscopy-guided
pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine between T4 and T12
is similar to that of the conventional open technique. Cite this article:
