Summary. Our meta-analysis showed that pooled mean blood loss during spinal tumour surgeries was 2180 ml. Standardised methods of calculating and reporting intra-operative blood loss are needed as it would be beneficial in the pre-operative planning of blood replenishment during surgery. Introduction. The vertebral column is the commonest site of bony metastasis, accounting for 18,000 new cases in North America yearly. Patients with spinal metastasis are often elderly, have compromised cardiovascular status, poor physiological reserve and altered immune status, all of which render them more susceptible to the complications of intra-operative blood loss and associated transfusion. Currently no consensus exists regarding the expected volume of blood lost during metastatic spine tumour surgery with various papers quoting anywhere between 1L to 6L. Knowledge of the expected blood loss prior to surgery however is important as it facilitates pre-operative planning, intra- and post-operative management of fluid balance and blood transfusion. We conducted a meta-analysis of published literature on spine tumour surgery to answer the question: “What is the expected blood loss in major spinal tumour surgery for metastatic spinal disease?”. Methods. A comprehensive online search of the English literature using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed. We included articles published from 31 January 1992 until 31 January 2012. This initial online search yielded 98 relevant articles. Two senior investigators independently reviewed all abstracts. The full text of articles that were deemed eligible for further consideration obtained and reviewed. Eighty five articles were excluded at this stage, largely due to lack of clear blood loss data, leaving 13 eligible articles. A hand search of the reference lists of relevant articles yielded 5 more articles. A total of 18 articles were included in the final meta-analysis of blood loss data. Disagreements regarding eligibility of articles for analysis were resolved by consensus. Selected articles for final analysis were independently graded according to the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (CEBM) Levels of Evidence. We evaluated the possibility of publication bias by obtaining a funnel plot (created by plotting the sample size against the effect estimate). The Egger's regression asymmetry test was used to assess the existence of publication bias. Results. Eighteen selected articles had a total of 785 patients who had undergone major spine tumour surgery for metastatic spinal disorders. The pooled estimate of the blood loss occurring during spinal tumour surgeries was calculated to be 2180ml (95%CI: 1805–2554ml). Apart from two studies which reported significant mean blood loss of more than 5500 ml, the resulting funnel plot suggested absence of publication bias. This was confirmed by Egger's test which did not show any small-study effects (p=0.119). However, there was strong evidence of heterogeneity between studies with I2=90% (p<0.001). Conclusions. The expected blood loss of a patient undergoing major surgery for spinal tumour constitutes more than a third of the circulating blood volume in a typical cancer patient with significantly impaired physiological reserve. Moreover, cases of catastrophic blood loss exceeding 5L exist in almost every series evaluated in this paper, with some reaching as much as 17–18L. Blood loss is a significant problem during spine tumour surgery and concerted effort is needed to address it

Summary. This is the first ever study to report the successful elimination of malignant cells from salvaged blood obtained during metastatic spine tumour surgery using a leucocyte depletion filter. Introduction. Catastrophic bleeding is a significant problem in metastatic spine tumour surgery (MSTS). However, intaoperative cell salvage (IOCS) has traditionally been contraindicated in tumour surgery because of the theoretical concern of promoting tumour dissemination by re-infusing tumour cells into the circulation. Although IOCS has been extensively investigated in patients undergoing surgery for gynaecological, lung, urological, gastrointestinal, and hepatobiliary cancers, to date, there is no prior report of the use of IOCS in MSTS. We conducted a prospective observational study to evaluate whether LDF can eliminate tumour cells from blood salvaged during MSTS. Patients & Methods. After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, 21 consecutive patients with metastatic spinal tumours from a known epithelial primary (defined as originating from breast, prostate, thyroid, renal, colorectal, lung, nasopharyngeal) who were scheduled for MSTS were recruited with informed consent. During surgery, a IOCS device (Dideco, Sorin Group, Italy) was used to collect shed blood from the operative field. Salvaged blood was then passed through a leucocyte depletion filter (RS1VAE, Pall Corporation, UK). 15-ml specimens of blood were taken from each of three consecutive stages: (i) operative field prior to cell saver processing (Stage A); (ii) transfusion bag post-cell saver processing (Stage B); (iii) filtered blood after passage through LDF (Stage C). Cell blocks were prepared by the pathology department using a standardised laboratory protocol. From each cell block, 1 haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slide, and 3 slides each labelled with one of the following monoclonal mouse cytokeratin antibodies AE1/3, MNF 116 and CAM 5.2 were prepared. The cytokeratin antibodies are highly sensitive and specific markers to identify tumour cells of epithelial origin. These slides were read by one of two consultant pathologists who were provided full access to information on operative notes, but were blinded to the actual stages from which the slides were derived. Results. One case was excluded when the final diagnosis was revised to infection instead of metastatic spine tumour. Of the remaining cases, 7/21 tested positive for tumour cells in Stage A, 2 positive in Stage B. No specimen tested positive for tumour cells in Stage C. In 5 cases, posterior instrumentation without tumour manipulation was performed. Discussion/Conclusion. In this first-ever study of cell saver use in spine tumour surgery, we prove that leucocyte-depletion filters (LDF) can effectively eliminate tumour cells from blood salvaged during MSTS. It is now possible to conduct a clinical trial to evaluate IOCS-LDF use in MSTS. Our results are consistent with published results of similar studies performed on IOCS and LDF use outside the field of orthopaedic surgery. Spinal metastases originate from a myriad of primary cancers across various organ systems. If LDF can remove tumour cells from blood salvaged during surgery for spinal metastasis of different histological origin, then the finding can likely be extrapolated to several other fields of surgery where IOCS and LDF have not yet been attempted such as: neurosurgery, otolaryngology and general musculoskeletal oncology. Our results form a proof-of-concept for a paradigm shift in thinking regarding autotransfusion during spine tumour surgery

Summary. There is emerging evidence of successful application of IOCS and leucocyte depletion filter in removing tumour cells from blood salvaged during various oncological surgeries. Research on the use of IOCS-LDF in MSTS is urgently needed. Introduction. Intra-operative cell salvage (IOCS) can reduce allogeneic blood transfusion requirements in non-tumour related spinal surgery. However, IOCS is deemed contraindicated in metastatic spine tumor surgery (MSTS) due to risk of tumour dissemination. Evidence is emerging from different surgical specialties describing the use of IOCS in cancer surgery. We wanted to investigate if IOCS is really contraindicated in MSTS. We hereby present a systematic literature review to answer the following questions: 1. Has IOCS ever been used in MSTS? 2. Is there any evidence to support the use of IOCS in other oncologic surgeries?. Methods. A systematic review of the English literature was conducted using computer searching of databases: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for articles published between 1 January 1986 and 31 Dec 2012. Results. Question 1: A comprehensive literature search did not provide any publication describing the use of IOCS in MSTS. The application of IOCS in MSTS has never been described before. Question 2: Our systematic review shows that the use of IOCS has been extensively investigated in patients undergoing surgery for gynaecological, lung, urological, gastrointestinal, and hepatobiliary cancers. The literature review considered 281 abstracts from the initial search. After consideration by consensus, 30 articles were included in the final analysis. We included in our review -prospective, retrospective studies and in vitro studies. The selected articles were then classified according to the surgical specialty: gynaecological, lung, urological, gastrointestinal, and hepatobiliary cancers and type of studies: reinfusion studies, non-reinfusion studies and in vitro studies. 23 Reinfusion studies: Studies where salvaged blood was actually re-infused into patients and analyzed on the basis of clinical outcomes like survival, recurrence, metastasis rates, and transfusion requirements, etc. IOCS has been extensively investigated in several large cohort studies and large case series with considerable follow-up duration across urological, gynaecological, hepatobiliary and gastrointestinal cancers. Patients receiving salvaged blood have been shown to perform as well or better across a variety of clinical outcome measures as mentioned above. 2 in vitro studies and 5 non-reinfusion studies: Studies where salvaged blood was not re-infused into patients but was analyzed for the presence or viability of tumour cells in the processed blood. They consistently demonstrated the utility of LDF in either greatly reducing the number of tumour cells or even completely eradicating tumour cells from blood-tumour admixtures or salvaged blood. This provides the “proof-of-concept” that LDF is able and is effective in removing tumour cells from blood. Discussion/Conclusion. There is strong evidence that LDF can safely remove tumour cells from salvaged blood. IOCS in patients undergoing cancer surgery is not associated with any adverse clinical outcomes. The reluctance of spine surgeons to use IOCS in MSTS appears to be unsupported. There is ample evidence supporting the use of IOCS in oncological surgeries. Research is needed to evaluate the application of IOCS in MSTS

Primary malignant bone and soft tissue tumours often occur in the lower extremities of active individuals including children, teenagers and young adults. Survivors routinely face long-term physical disability. Participation in sports is particularly important for active young people but the impact of sarcoma treatment is not widely recognised and clinicians may be unable to provide objective advice about returning to sports. We aimed to identify and summarise the current evidence for involvement in sports following treatment of lower limb primary malignant bone and soft tissue tumours.

A comprehensive search strategy was used to identify relevant studies combining the main concepts of interest: (1) Bone/Soft Tissue Tumour, (2) Lower Limb, (3) Surgical Interventions and (4) Sports. Studies were selected according to eligibility criteria with the consensus of three authors. Customised data extraction and quality assessment tools were used.

22 studies were selected, published between 1985 – 2020, and comprising 1005 patients. Fifteen studies with data on return to sports including 705 participants of which 412 (58.4%) returned to some form of sport at a mean follow-up period of 7.6 years. Four studies directly compared limb sparing and amputation; none of these were able to identify a difference in sports participation or ability.

Return to sports is important for patients treated for musculoskeletal tumours, however, there is insufficient published research to provide good information and support for patients. Future prospective studies are needed to collect better pre and post-treatment data at multiple time intervals and validated clinical and patient sports participation outcomes such as type of sports participation, level and frequency and a validated sports specific outcome score, such as UCLA assessment. In particular, more comparison between limb sparing and amputation would be welcome.

We used an in vivo model to assess the use of an autogenous cancellous bone block and marrow graft for augmenting tendon reattachment to metallic implants. We hypothesised that augmentation of the tendon-implant interface with a bone block would enable retention of the graft on the implant surface, enhance biological integration, and result in more consistent functional outcomes compared with previously reported morcellised graft augmentation techniques.

A significant improvement in functional weight-bearing was observed between six and 12 weeks. The significant increase in ground reaction force through the operated limb between six and 12 weeks was greater than that reported previously with morcellised graft augmented reconstructions. Histological appearance and collagen fibre orientation with bone block augmentation more closely resembled that of an intact enthesis compared with the morcellised grafting technique. Bone block augmentation of tendon-implant interfaces results in more reliable functional and histological outcomes, with a return to pre-operative levels of weight-bearing by 24 weeks.

We developed an in vivo model of the attachment of a patellar tendon to a metal implant to simulate the reconstruction of an extensor mechanism after replacement of the proximal tibia. In 24 ewes, the patellar tendon was attached to a hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated titanium prosthesis. In 12, the interface was augmented with autograft containing cancellous bone and marrow. In the remaining ewes, the interface was not grafted.

Kinematic gait analysis showed nearly normal function of the joint by 12 weeks. Force-plate assessment showed a significant increase in functional weight-bearing in the grafted animals (p = 0.043). The tendon-implant interface showed that without graft, encapsulation of fibrous tissue occurred. With autograft, a developing tendon-bone-HA-implant interface was observed at six weeks and by 12 weeks a layered tendon-fibrocartilage-bone interface was seen which was similar to a direct-type enthesis.

With stable mechanical fixation, an appropriate bioactive surface and biological augmentation the development of a functional tendon-implant interface can be achieved.

Allograft bone is widely used in orthopaedic surgery, but peri-operative infection of the graft remains a common and disastrous complication. The efficacy of systemic prophylactic antibiotics is unproven, and since the graft is avascular it is likely that levels of antibiotic in the graft are low.

Using an electrical potential to accelerate diffusion of antibiotics into allograft bone, high levels were achieved in specimens of both sheep and human allograft. In human bone these ranged from 187.1 mg/kg in endosteal (sd 15.7) to 124.6 (sd 46.2) in periosteal bone for gentamicin and 31.9 (sd 8.9) in endosteal and 2.9 (sd 1.1) in periosteal bone for flucloxacillin. The antibiotics remained active against bacteria in vitro after iontophoresis and continued to elute from the allograft for up to two weeks.

Structural allograft can be supplemented directly with antibiotics using iontophoresis. The technique is simple and inexpensive and offers a potential means of reducing the rate of peri-operative infection in allograft surgery. Iontophoresis into allograft bone may also be applicable to other therapeutic compounds.