Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 8 of 8
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 8 - 8
10 Feb 2023
Brennan A Blackburn J Thompson J Field J
Full Access

Thumb carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) arthritis is a common and debilitating condition. The mainstay of surgical management is Trapeziectomy. Concerns about possible functional implications of collapse of the metacarpal into the arthroplasty space as well as the potential for scaphometacarpal led to the development of techniques to try and prevent this. The purpose of this study was to investigate if there were any significant differences in the long-term outcomes of patients who participated in a randomized trial of trapeziectomy alone compared with trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI). Sixty-five patients participated in our original trial, the 1 year findings of which were published in 2007. These patients were invited for a follow-up visit at a mean of 17 years (range 15–20) postoperatively. Twenty-eight patients attended, who had 34 operations, 14 trapeziectomy alone and 20 with LRTI. Patients were asked to complete a visual analogue scale (VAS) for satisfaction with the outcome of their procedure, rated on a scale from 0 (most dissatisfied) to 100 (most satisfied). They also completed the short version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (QuickDASH) at their appointment. They underwent a functional assessment with a hand therapist and had a radiograph of the thumb. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of satisfaction with surgery or functional outcomes, with most measurements showing minimal or no differences in means between the two groups. There was no difference in the space between the metacarpal and scaphoid on radiograph. Radial abduction was the only parameter that was significantly greater in the patients with simple trapeziectomy (median 79°) compared with trapeziectomy with LRTI (median 71°) (p = 0.04). Even at 17 years there is no significant benefit of LRTI over trapeziectomy alone for thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 104-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 4 - 4
1 Dec 2022
Thatcher M Oleynik Z Sims L Sauder D
Full Access

Trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI) with the flexor carpi radialis (FCR) tendon is one of the most common procedures for the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) arthritis. An alternative method involves trapeziectomy alone (TA). The trapeziectomy with LRTI procedure was developed to theoretically improve biomechanical strength and hand function when compared to TA, which leaves an anatomical void proximal to the first metacarpal. The LRTI procedure takes longer to perform and includes an autologous tendon graft. The goal of this retrospective cohort study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of trapeziectomy with or without LRTI at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. A total of 43 adult patients who had underwent a total of 58 (TA=36, LRTI=22) surgical procedures for CMC arthritis participated in the study. This single surgeon retrospective cohort study sampled patients who underwent CMC arthroplasty with either TA or LRTI techniques between 2008 and 2020 with a minimum time of 1 year post-operatively. The patients were evaluated subjectively (The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire) and objectively (hand/thumb strength, pre/post-operative hand radiographs). Both the TA and LRTI procedures provided good pain relief, motion, strength, and stability without any severe complications. There was no statistically significant difference in hand or thumb strength between the two groups. Radiography showed that compared to the preoperative status, the trapezial space decreased similarly between the two groups. There was no difference in size of collapse between TA and LRTI post-operatively. The TA procedure had similar outcomes to LRTI and has the advantages of shorter surgical time, less incision length, and lower surgical complexity. TA provided equivalent trapezial space to LRTI after the operation. Future study should investigate these two procedures in a head-to-head comparison rather than longitudinally where both surgeon experience and time since procedure at follow-up may have impacted results


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XVII | Pages 31 - 31
1 May 2012
Carter N Martin A
Full Access

The comparison between surgical outcomes of trapeziectomy versus trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction (LRTI) is well documented in the literature. We could not find any literature comparing these two procedures from a ‘patient-based outcome scoring’ perspective. The Patient Outcomes Of Surgery (POS) hand/arm questionnaire was used in order to assess the outcomes of 33 patients (23 Trapeziectomy and 10 LRTI). All surgery was carried out by the same hand surgeon. A telephone questionnaire was performed on each patient. The mean time post surgery was 15 months (range 1 to 27) and 20 months (range 7 to 30) for the Trapeziectomy and LRTI group respectively. There was statistically significant improvement in both groups for symptoms, physical activities and psychological functioning/cosmetic appearance. The Trapeziectomy alone group scored higher in all groups though this did not show statistical significance. There were statistically significant higher rates of complications in the LRTI group. LRTI surgery increased the tourniquet time by 28 minutes on average. Patient overall satisfaction was higher (85/100) in the trapeziectomy alone group than that of the LRTI group (75/100). Both trapeziectomy and trapeziectomy with LRTI offer a reliably way of treating arthritis of the carpometacarpal joint. In our study, Trapeziectomy alone resulted in better overall patient satisfaction with lower complication rates and reduced operating time


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XXXIX | Pages 135 - 135
1 Sep 2012
Elnikety S El-Husseiny M Kamal T Talawadekar G Triggs N Richards H Smith A
Full Access

Introduction. “No routine post-operative follow up appointments” policy has been implemented in NHS hospitals in different specialties for uncomplicated surgical procedures. In trauma and orthopaedics few studies to date reviewed this practice and reflected on the patients' opinions. Methods. A total of 121 patients were recruited over 2 years, each patient had post operative follow up by the hand therapist for 3 months. 50 patients post Trapeziectomy and 71 patients post single digit Dupuytren's fasciectomy were prospectively surveyed for their opinion on their post operative care and whether they would have liked to be reviewed by the surgeon in a routine post operative follow up appointment or not. All operations were done by one surgeon in one hospital. All patients were reviewed by a hand therapist within 2 weeks post operatively and treatment protocols were followed with all the patients. During their final appointment with the hand therapist all patients completed a questionnaire. Results. 116 patients completed the study, 5 post Dupuytren's fasciectomy patients were lost for follow up. 106 patients (91%) were satisfied with their post operative management and 99 patients (85%) did not want to be reviewed by the surgeon in a post operative outpatient follow up appointment. Discussion. This study reflects the successful application of “Hand therapy led follow up and discharge” policy with no routine post operative review by the surgeon. We succeeded in reducing the waste in the NHS by avoiding at least 215 un-necessary routine follow up appointments over a 2 year period. By applying this policy we also succeeded in avoiding the inconvenience to patients having multiple trips to the hospital. We advise implementing this practice for other common uncomplicated surgical procedures, with the possibility of giving the patient the option to request an appointment with the surgeon if needed


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 24 - 24
10 May 2024
Mikaele S Taylor C Sahakian V Xia W
Full Access

Introduction. Despite the rising popularity of 1st carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) arthrodesis as one of the surgical options for basilar thumb arthritis, the available literature on this is poor. This study aims to investigate post-operative pinch and grip strength following 1st CMCJ arthrodesis, at a minimum of 1 year follow-up. Complication rates, range of motion and patient reported scores were also evaluated. Methods. A retrospective cohort (2012–2020) was used, which included patients who had arthrodesis performed by the Hands surgeons at Counties Manukau DHB. In a 15 minute visit, we took the measurements using our standard dynamometer and pinch gauge, and collected three questionnaires [QuickDASH, PRWHE, PEM]. For analysis, we compared our results to the preoperative measures, contralateral hand, and to a previous study on a similar cohort looking at thumb strength following trapeziectomy. Results. 42 arthrodesis were performed, and 24 were available for follow-up. The average follow-up time was 77 months and the average age was 51 years old. Overall, we found a statistically significant improvement in thumb strength following surgery. Mean preoperative grip strength was 21.4kg and 32.5kg postoperatively (= +11kg). Preoperative pinch strength was 5.5kg and 7kg postoperatively (= +1.5kg). These results were significantly higher compared to the trapeziectomy cohort. We also found an improvement in 1st CMCJ ROM post-operatively. 7 complications were reported (29.1%). 4 were metalware-related and 3 were non-union. QuickDASH score significantly improved from a median of 42.95 to 12.5 while PRWHE from 67.5 to 14.5. Overall patient satisfaction was 87.4%. Conclusion. 1st CMCJ arthrodesis leads to an improvement in thumb function, pain and range of movement and results in high patient satisfaction, and therefore should be recommended for younger patients who need a pain-free and strong thumb


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_III | Pages 84 - 84
1 Feb 2012
Gangopadhyay S McKenna H Davis T
Full Access

Background. A randomised prospective study has already demonstrated that at 1-year follow-up, palmaris longus interposition or flexor carpi radialis (FCR) ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition do not improve the outcome of trapeziectomy for the treatment of painful osteoarthritis of the trapeziometacarpal joint. This study consisted of 183 thumbs in 162 women. Aims. 114 of the 183 thumbs have now completed their 5-year follow-up and this study reports their results. Patients and methods. The patients had been prospectively randomised for treatment by simple trapeziectomy without interposition or ligament reconstruction (T; n=45), trapeziectomy with palmaris longus interposition (T+PL; n=31) or ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (T+LRTI; n=38) using 50% of the FCR tendon. Each patient had undergone assessments of thumb pain, stiffness and strength pre-operatively, at 3 months, at 1 year and after a minimum of 5 years post-operatively. Results. The three treatment groups were well matched for age and hand dominance. At the 5 year follow-up, 76% (T=80%; T+PL=71%; T+LRTI=76%) of the 114 patients had no pain or only mild pain after use. Thumb key pinch strengths at the 5 year follow-up did not differ significantly between the three procedures [T= 4.0 kg (95%CI, 3.6-4.4); T+PL= 3.6 kg (95%CI, 2.9-4.3); T+LRTI= 3.6 kg (95%CI, 3.1-4.1)]. The tip pinch strengths at 5 years were also similar after each of the operations [T= 2.7 kg (95%CI, 2.4-2.9); T+PL= 2.4 kg (95%CI, 1.9-2.9); T+LTRI= 2.5 kg (95%CI, 2.1-2.9)]. No cases of late deterioration were evident at 5 years. Conclusion. The outcomes of these three variations of trapeziectomy appear identical. Thus at 5 years, there appears to be no benefit to tendon interposition or ligament reconstruction


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_14 | Pages 17 - 17
1 Jul 2016
Edwin J Baskaran D Raja F Ahmed B Verma S Compson J
Full Access

The scaphotrapeziotrapezoid (STT) joint is one of the key link joints between the proximal and the distal carpal rows. We assessed the relationship between the scaphotrapezium (STm) andscaphotrapezoid (STd) joints using computerised tomographyand hypothesised the ratio of STm is =/< STd joint due to which, the possibility of failure of trapeziectomy due to metacarpal collapse is insignificant. We reviewed CT scans of wrist joints of 113 eligible patientsfrom our wrist database between 2009 and 2014 for our study. 31 patients were randomised for interobserver correlation. Reformatted multi-planar sequences were analysed. The ratio of theSTm: STdin sagittal and coronal measurementswas evaluated. Interobserver variations were assessed using the Pearson coefficient. The sex distribution included 68 males and 29 females, 49 left and 64 right wrists. The STm area was larger in 86 (76%) as compared to STd in 27(24%). Average trapezium to trapezoid ratio was 1:1.5. Ratio of area of trapezium: trapezoid joint is 0.30. The anatomic ratio of the STm in the coronal and sagittal planesis 0.3 and that of the STd joint is 0.2. Ratio of the STm: STd in the coronal plane is 0.29. Pearson's coefficient > 0.8. A small subset of patients undergoing trapeziectomy alonefor stage II- IV carpometacarpal arthritis of the thumb are at risk of impingement of the first metacarpal due to collapse. Our assessment of the anatomical relationship of the STT joint with CT scan proves that although the area the STm joint is generally larger than the STd joint, there is no significant correlation on the whole


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 102-B, Issue 12 | Pages 1774 - 1781
1 Dec 2020
Clement ND Hall AJ Makaram NS Robinson PG Patton RFL Moran M Macpherson GJ Duckworth AD Jenkins PJ

Aims

The primary aim of this study was to assess the independent association of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on postoperative mortality for patients undergoing orthopaedic and trauma surgery. The secondary aim was to identify factors that were associated with developing COVID-19 during the postoperative period.

Methods

A multicentre retrospective study was conducted of all patients presenting to nine centres over a 50-day period during the COVID-19 pandemic (1 March 2020 to 19 April 2020) with a minimum of 50 days follow-up. Patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, priority (urgent or elective), procedure type, COVID-19 status, and postoperative mortality were recorded.