Aims. Currently, there is no single, comprehensive national guideline for analgesic strategies for total joint replacement. We compared inpatient and outpatient opioid requirements following total hip arthroplasty (THA) versus total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in order to determine risk factors for increased inpatient and outpatient opioid requirements following total hip or knee arthroplasty. Methods. Outcomes after 92 primary total knee (n = 49) and hip (n = 43) arthroplasties were analyzed. Patients with repeat surgery within 90 days were excluded. Opioid use was recorded while inpatient and 90 days postoperatively. Outcomes included total opioid use, refills, use beyond 90 days, and unplanned clinical encounters for uncontrolled pain. Multivariate modelling determined the effect of surgery, regional nerve block (RNB) or neuraxial anesthesia (NA), and non-opioid medications after adjusting for demographics, ength of stay, and baseline opioid use. Results. TKAs had higher daily inpatient opioid use than THAs (in 5 mg oxycodone pill equivalents: median 12.0 vs 7.0; p < 0.001), and greater 90 day use (median 224.0 vs 100.5; p < 0.001). Opioid refills were more likely in TKA (84% vs 33%; p < 0.001). Patient who underwent TKA had higher independent risk of opioid use beyond 90 days than THA (adjusted OR 7.64; 95% SE 1.23 to 47.5; p = 0.01). Inpatient opioid use 24 hours before discharge was the strongest independent predictor of 90-day opioid use (p < 0.001). Surgical procedure, demographics, and baseline opioid use have greater influence on in/outpatient opioid demand than RNB, NA, or non-opioid analgesics. Conclusion. Opioid use following TKA and THA is most strongly predicted by surgical and patient factors. TKA was associated with higher postoperative opioid requirements than THA. RNB and NA did not diminish total inpatient or 90-day postoperative opioid consumption. The use of acetaminophen, gabapentin, or NSAIDs did not significantly alter inpatient opioid requirements. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-7:398–404

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) remains one of the most challenging complications to manage following total joint arthroplasty (TJA). There is a paucity of published data on the management of PJI in smaller, rural hospital settings. In this study, we investigate [1] the success rate of surgical management for PJI following TJA and [2] the microbiology of infecting organisms in this unique geographical environment. We performed a retrospective single-centre study at a rural hospital (Southland Hospital, Invercargill, New Zealand) over a 3-year period (2019 to 2022). All patients presenting with a first episode of PJI fulfilling Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria after hip or knee arthroplasty were included. All patients had a minimum follow up of 6 months. Treatment success was defined eradication of infection. Twenty-one cases (14 hips and 7 knees) were identified. These were managed with Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) procedure (n=14, 67%), single-stage revision (n=6, 29%), or long-term suppressive antibiotics (n=1, 4%). Of the DAIR patients, infection recurred in 50% and underwent subsequent revision. Of the single-stage revision patients, 17% failed and underwent subsequent revision. The overall success rate was 90%. Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was the most isolated pathogen (57%,) with no methicillin-resistance Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) identified. Overall, 90% of infecting organisms were cefazolin sensitive. These results suggest that management of PJI is a safe and viable treatment option when performed in a rural hospital setting, with comparable treatment success rates to urban centres. The incidence of MRSA is low in this setting. Rates of antibiotic resistance were relatively low and most organisms were sensitive to cefazolin, the routine antibiotic used in prophylaxis

Dysglycemia in the post-operative period has been associated with increased rates of infection following total joint arthroplasty. Additionally, patients without clinical diagnosis of diabetes with hemoglobin A1c% values between 5.7% and 6.4% have been shown to be dysglycemic in the peri-operative period. This study examines the influence of post-operative blood glucose management on rates of re-operation for infection in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty in diabetic, and clinically non-diabetic patients. We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data, for all primary, elective total hip and total knee arthroplasties performed at The Ottawa Hospital between April 2010 and October 2017. Kaplan-Meier survivorship, and mutivarient regression analysis were used to determine predictors of infection based on pre-operative diabetes status, HbA1c%, and post-operative insulin management. 4159 joints met inclusion criteria. Patients with HbA1c 5.7–6.4% had lower rate of revision for infection if they received post-operative blood glucose management (0.80%), vs without glucose management (1.20%). Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis showed this difference to be insignificant (p=0.23). Patients with DM1 had statistically worse survivorship when compared to other groups (p=0.010). Patients with undiagnosed perioperative dysglycemia may be at a greater predisposition for developing infection, requiring re-operation, following total joint arthroplasty. This study may be underpowered due to overall low rates of revision. More rigorous peri-operative glucose management strategies may be required for patients, who otherwise receive no glycemic management outside of hospital. This is more pertinent with trends towards decreasing post-operative lengths-of-stay

Background. Non-invasive hemoglobin measurement was introduced to potentially eliminate blood draws postoperatively. We compared the accuracy and effectiveness of a non-invasive hemoglobin measurement system with a traditional blood draw in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty. Methods. After IRB approval, 100 consecutive patients undergoing primary total hip or knee arthroplasty had their hemoglobin level tested by both traditional blood draw and a non-invasive hemoglobin monitoring system. Results were analyzed for the entire group, further stratifying patients based on gender, race, surgery (THA versus TKA), and post-operative hemoglobin level. Finally, we compared financial implications and patient satisfaction with the device. Paired t-test with 0.05 conferring significance was used. Stratified analyses of the absolute difference between the two measures were assessed using Mann- Whitney test. To assess the level of agreement between the two measures, the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was calculated. Results. Mean blood-draw hemoglobin value on POD1 was 11.063 ± 1.39 g/dL and 11.192 ± 1.333 g/dL with the non-invasive device. For all patients, the mean absolute difference between the two methods was 0.13 g/dL (p = 0.30). The CCC between the two methods was 0.58, conferring a moderate to strongly positive linear relationship (Figure 1). Non-invasive measurement was preferred by 100% of patients with a mean VAS score of 0/10. Additionally, the cost savings with the non-invasive system was $16.50 per patient. Discussion. Overall, there was no significant difference between the hemoglobin level obtained by traditional laboratory methods versus the Masimo Radical-7 system on post-operative day #1 in patients who underwent total joint arthroplasty. In the minority of patients (19%) who had a hemoglobin level of less than 10 g/dL, the difference between the two methods was statistically significant. Additionally, 100% of patients preferred the Masimo device to a traditional blood draw and the Masimo device was substantially cheaper. While further investigation of non-invasive hemoglobin monitoring systems is necessary, particularly in patients with a post-operative hemoglobin of less than 10 g/dL, our study shows that the Masimo Radical-7 device provides an accurate, preferable, and less expensive alternative to a traditional blood draw after total joint replacement. Conclusion. Overall, the non-invasive hemoglobin monitoring system offered a similar hemoglobin reading to the standard lab-draw reading, while improving satisfaction and lowering cost. The system relies on adequate perfusion for measurement, and our study demonstrated that lower hemoglobin values may reduce finger-tip perfusion and affect the hemoglobin reading

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common form of arthritis and one of the ten most disabling diseases in developed countries. Total joint replacement (TJR) is considered by far as the most effective treatment for end-stage OA patients. The majority of patients achieve symptomatic improvement following TJR. However, about 22% of the TJR patients either do not improve or deteriorate after surgery. Several potential non-genetic predictors for the TJR outcome have been investigated. However, the results were either inconclusive or had very limited predictive power. The aim of this study was to identify genetic variants for the poor outcome of TJR in primary OA patients by a genome-wide association study (GWAS). Study participants were total knee or hip replacement patients due to primary OA who were recruited to the Newfoundland Osteoarthritis Study (NFOAS) before 2017. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) was used to assess pain and functional impairment pre- and 3.99±1.38 years post-surgery. Two non-responder classification criteria were used in our study. One was defined by an absolute WOMAC change score. Participants with a change score less than 7/20 points for pain were considered as pain non-responders; and those with less than 22/68 points for function were classified as function non-responders. The second one was the Outcome Measures in Arthritis Clinical Trials and the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) criteria. Blood DNA samples were genotyped using the Illumina GWAS microarrays genotyping platform. The quality control (QC) filtering was performed on GWAS data before the association of the genetic variants with non-responders to TJR was tested using the GenABEL package in R with adjustment for the relatedness of the study population and using the commonly accepted GWAS significance threshold p < 5*10. −8. to control multiple testing. In total, 316 knee and 122 hip OA patients (mean age 65.45±7.62 years, and 58% females) passed the QC check. These study participants included 368 responders and 56 non-responders to pain, and 364 responders and 68 non-responders to function based on the absolute WOMAC point score change classification. While 377 responders and 56 non-responders to pain, and 366 responders and 71 non-responders to function were identified by the OMERACT-OARSI classification criteria. Interestingly, the same results were obtained by both classification methods, and we found that the G allele of rs4797006 was significantly associated with pain non-responders with odds ratio (OR) of 5.12 (p<7.27×10. -10. ). This SNP is in intron one of the melanocortin receptor 5 (MC5R) gene on chr18. This gene plays central roles in immune response, pain sensitivity, and negative regulation of inflammatory response to antigenic stimulus. The A allele of rs200752023 was associated with function non-responders with OR of 4.41 (p<3.29×10. -8. ). The SNP is located in intron three of the RNA Binding Fox-1 Homolog 3 (RBFOX3) gene on chr17 which has been associated with numerous neurological disorders. Our data suggested that two chromosomal regions are associated with TJR poor outcomes and could be the novel targets for developing strategies to improve the outcome of the TJR

Same day home (SDH) discharge in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has increased in popularity in recent years. The objective of this study was to evaluate the causes and predictors of failed discharges in planned SDH patients. A consecutive cohort of patients who underwent total knee (TKA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA) that were scheduled for SDH discharge between April 1, 2019 to March 31, 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, causes of failed discharge, perioperative variables, 30-day readmissions and 6-month reoperation rates were collected. Multivariate regression analysis was undertaken to identify independent predictors of failed discharge. The cohort consisted of 527 consecutive patients. One hundred and one (19%) patients failed SDH discharge. The leading causes were postoperative hypotension (20%) and patients who were ineligible for the SDH pathway (19%). Two individual surgeons, later operative start time (OR 1.3, 95% CI, 1.15-1.55, p=0.001), ASA class IV (OR 3.4, 95% CI, 1.4-8.2; p=0.006) and undergoing a THA (OR 2.0, 95% CI, 1.2-3.1, p=0.004) were independent predictors of failed SDH discharge. No differences in age, BMI, gender, surgical approach or type of anesthetic were found (p>0.05). The 30-day readmission or 6-month reoperation were similar between groups (p>0.05). Hypotension and inappropriate patient selection were the leading causes of failed SDH discharge. Significant variability existed between individual surgeons failed discharge rates. Patients undergoing a THA, classified as ASA IV or had a later operative start time were all more likely to fail SDH discharge

Purpose. Total and partial joint arthroplasty has been clinically proven to successfully relieve pain and improve function in patients with hip and knee degenerative arthrosis. It has been shown that early return to ambulation correlates well with functional scores. Moreover, the benefits of reduced narcotic use are multi-fold and range from reduced risk of addiction, gastrointenstinal and cardiopulmonary side effects. Establishing realistic pre-operative expectations regarding functional improvement and pain control will nevertheless impact patient satisfaction. Thus, the purpose of this study was to establish safe, achievable and data-driven benchmarks for post-operative ambulation and pain control in patients undergoing elective total joint arthroplasty. Methods. A retrospective chart review was performed for of all patients who underwent elective primary total or partial joint replacement by a single fellowship trained academic joint replacement surgeon from 2/1/2015 to 2/29/16. Patients under the age of 18 as well as those who underwent arthroplasty to treat a traumatic injury or to revise an arthroplasty were excluded. Charts were reviewed for the method of ambulation (no ambulation, wheelchair, assistive devices, no devices) and use of prescription pain medications by 6 weeks post-operatively. Results. 82 patient undergoing elective primary arthroplasty were identified and included in the analysis. 38% of patients underwent TKA (31 of 82) and 62% of patients (51 of 82) underwent THA via the direct anterior approach. Post-operatively 63% (52 of 82) patients were ambulating without assist device. An additional 24% (20 of 82) of patients were ambulating with a single point assist device by 6 weeks. 77% (63 of 82) of patients were pain free by 6 weeks post operatively and denied taking any prescription pain medications. Conclusions. Our analysis demonstrates that approximately 80% of patients undergoing elective total joint arthroplasty can be pain free without a need for prescription pain medication by 6 weeks post operatively. Moreover, while close to 90% of patients can expect to ambulate with at most, a single point assist, the majority (62%) can reliably expect to ambulate freely just 6 weeks after surgery. These results aid our understanding of post-operative return to function, and pain control. What is more, these data can inform a clinician in setting realistic, data-driven goals and expectations with patients undergoing elective total joint arthroplasty, thereby ultimately improving patient satisfaction with these commonly performed procedures

Summary. A meta-analysis was performed to compare rate of SSI after application of chlorhexidine vs. iodine in total joint arthroplasty. Chlorhexidine had significantly lower odds of SSI. Introduction. Surgical site infections (SSI) are a significant source of morbidity and mortality. The optimal preoperative skin preparation in lower extremity total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains debatable between chlorhexidine and iodine-containing solutions. This meta-analysis sought compare SSI rates between chlorhexidine cloth application the night before surgery plus povidone-iodine-alcohol (povidone-iodine) solution at surgery or only povidone-iodine at surgery. Methods. A structured literature search was performed using Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and comparative studies that evaluated preoperative chlorhexidine-gluconate versus iodine-alcohol exclusively in TJA patients. Databases were searched from database inception to January 2, 2018, and studies were included if they had specific aims and 1) compared preoperative chlorhexidine-gluconate cloths to povidone-iodine at surgery, or 2) if they compared preoperative chlorhexidine-gluconate cloths and povidone-iodine at surgery, to solely povidone-iodine at surgery. The main outcome was deep or superficial SSI at or before 1 year postoperatively. If multiple studies reported the same patient cohort, the more recent study was used. To compare the chlorhexidine versus povidone-iodine groups, pooled odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were used to calculate odds of SSI. Results. Four studies involving 2,997 TJA patients were included in this meta-analysis. Three were retrospective cohort studies, and one was a RCT. One retrospective cohort study assessed chlorhexidine to povidone-iodine using a historical control. One RCT compared chlorhexidine to povidone-iodine. The remaining two studies compared chlorhexidine in addition to povidone-iodine, to only povidone-iodine. Bias analysis showed low-to-moderate quality cohort studies and one moderate-quality RCT. Chlorhexidine had significantly lower odds of SSI compared to povidone iodine (OR=0.28; 95%CI: 0.15–0.51; p<0.0001). Conclusion. Preoperative chlorhexidine-gluconate was superior at reducing SSI risk in patients who underwent lower extremity TJA, compared to povidone-iodine. This can potentially lead to decreased morbidity and lower surgical revision rates for infections. For any figures or tables, please contact authors directly

Background. Intravenous and topical tranexamic acid (TXA) has become increasingly popular in total joint arthroplasty to decrease perioperative blood loss. In direct comparison, the outcomes and risks of either modality have been found to be equivalent. In addition, current literature has also demonstrated that topical TXA is safe and effective in the healthy population. To our knowledge, there is a scarcity of studies demonstrating the safety of topical TXA in high risk patient populations undergoing total joint arthroplasty or revision joint arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to determine the safety of topical TXA in patients undergoing total or revision arthroplasty that are also on chronic anticoagulant or anti-platelet therapy. Methods. We performeded a retrospective review of patients undergoing primary and revision total hip or knee arthroplasties that received topical TXA (3g/100mL NS) from November 2012 to March 2015. All patients, regardless of co-morbidities, were included in the study population. Patients were divided into 3 groups:. Group 1: Patients without any antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy within 90 days of surgery. Group 2: Patients receiving antiplatelet therapy (Aspirin and/or Plavix) within 90 days of surgery. Group 3: Patients receiving anti-coagulant therapy within 90 days of surgery (low molecular weight heparin, unfractionated heparin, warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban). Chart review analyzing ICD-9 and ICD-10 coding was then utilized to establish any peri-operative complications within the 30 day post-operative period in all groups. Complications amongst the groups were evaluated via chi-squared testing as well as multivariate linear regression. Review of current literature and CMS protocols were used to establish reportable peri-operative complications. Wound infections, thromboembolic events and vascular complications such as myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, deep venous thrombosis, stroke, aortic dissection were included. Results. During the study period, a total 1471 total joint arthroplasties were performed on 1324 patients (88.7% knee arthroplasty, 11.3% hip arthroplasty). Group 1 included 1033 patients who were not on any prior anti-platelet or anticoagulant therapy. Group 2 included 254 patients receiving chronic antiplatelet therapy 90 days prior to surgery. Group 3 included 184 patients receiving chronic anticoagulant therapy 90 days prior to surgery. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups for any of the included peri-operative complications. The most common complication occurring amongst all the groups was superficial wound infection, which occurred in a total of 60 (4.1%) patients in contrast to 18 (1.2%) patients who sustained an acute deep peri-prosthetic infection. Twenty (1.4%) patients sustained an ultrasound proven deep vein thrombosis, with the highest prevalence occurring in those patients receiving no anticoagulation prior to surgery (15/20, 75%), however this was not statistically significant following linear regression analysis. Conclusions. To our knowledge, this is the first study that demonstrates that topical tranexamic acid is safe to use in so-called high risk patients who are being treated prior to surgery with anti-platelet or anti-coagulation therapy

While total joint replacement (TJR) is considered as an effective intervention to relieve pain and restore joint function for end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) patients, a significant proportion of the patients are dissatisfied with their surgery outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify genetic factors that can predict patients who do or do not benefit from these surgical procedures by a genome-wide association study (GWAS). Study participants were derived from the Newfoundland Osteoarthritis Study (NFOAS) which consisted of 1086 TJR patients. Non-responders to TJR was defined as patients who did not reach the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) based on the self administered Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) in terms of pain reduction or function improvment. DNA was extracted from the blood samples of the study participants and genotyped by Illumina GWAS genotyping platform. Over two million single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across the genome were genotyped and tested for assocition with non-responders. 39 non-responders and 44 age, sex, and BMI matched responders were included in this study. Four chromosome regions on chromosomes 5, 7, 8, and 12 were suggested to be associated with non-responders with p < 1 0–5. The most promising one was on chromosome 5 with the lead SNP rs17118094 (p=1.7×10–6) which can classify 72% of non-responders accurately. The discriminatory power of this SNP alone is very promising as indicated by an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 with 95% confidence interval of 0.63 to 0.81, which is much better than any previously studied predictors mentioned above. All the patients who carry two copies of the G allele (minor allele) of rs17118094 were non-responders and 75% of those who carry one copy of the G allele were non-responders. The discriminatory ability of the lead SNPs on chromosomes 7 and 12 were comparable to the one on chromosome 5 with an AUC of 0.74, and 88% of patients who carry two copies of the A allele of rs10244798 on chromosome 7 were non-responders. Similarly, 88% of patients who carry two copies of the C allele of rs10773476 on chromosome 12 were non-responders. While the discriminatory ability of rs9643244 on chromosome 8 was poor with an AUC of 0.26, its strong association with non-responders warrants a further investigation in the region. The study identified four genomic regions harboring genetic factors for non-responders to TJR. The lead SNPs in those regions have great discriminatory ability to predict non-responders and could be used to create a genetic prediction model for clinical unitilty and application

Introduction. Despite the widespread use of opioids for pain control in post-operative joint arthroplasty patients, data regarding actual opioid consumption in opioid-naive patients during the recovery period are limited. We sought to determine postoperative opioid consumption for opioid-naïve patients undergoing total knee and hip arthroplasty (THA and TKA) procedures. Methods. The study cohort consisted of 55 patients (29 females, 26 males) who underwent either primary unilateral TKA (n=28) or THA (n=27). Prior to discharge, patients were provided with a medication log on which to track daily consumption of pain medicine. Patients were asked to provide details regarding the type of pain medication, quantity and frequency of use, and pain score at the time of use. Patients were contacted weekly by a member of the study team to monitor compliance. Specific opioid prescription information was acquired for each subject using their electronic medical record. Subjects returned the completed logs once they ceased opioid use post-operatively. Daily quantity was converted to daily Morphine Equivalent Dose (MED). Average daily, weekly, and total post-operative use was calculated for all opioid data variables. Descriptive statistics (mean, frequency, deviation) were used to analyze opioid data. All dependent variables were compared between TKA and THA patients using separate independent samples t-tests or Chi-square tests. Results. Overall, patients undergoing joint arthroplasty procedures were prescribed an average of 66.8±44.6 opioid pills during the post-operative period, with higher prescribed amounts for TKA patients compared to THA patients (42.5±8.7 vs. 86.6±51.9; p=0.01). However, patients reported consuming only an average of 31.1±36.8 pills for a total of 214.1±259.5 MED during the post-operative period, with higher consumption for TKA versus THA patients (100.5±112.2 vs. 323.6±311.8;p=0.005). The median number of unused pills was 32 for TKA patients and 27.5 for THA patients. Patients reported an average pain score of 4.3 at the time of consumption and stated that pain relief lasted an average of 4.9 hours. TKA patients reported higher pain scores compared to THA patients (p=0.032). On average, patients ceased opioid usage at 14.5±7.5 days post-operatively, with no patients requiring opioids past 31 days post-surgery. There were 13 patients (8 THA, 5 TKA) who utilized only acetaminophen for pain control, stating that they did not require opioids for pain management. Conclusion. Following total joint arthroplasty, patients consume an average of 31 opioid pills postoperatively, which is less than half of the average prescription quantity. Given the current opioid crisis in society, reducing the number of unused opioids is imperative. Our data show that opioid requirements for pain management following arthroplasty procedures are well below prescription rates. Our results can be used to help develop standardized opioid prescribing guidelines following joint replacement and help educate patients on proper pain control

Early mobilization within the first 12 hours (day zero) of total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has been shown to reduce length of stay (LoS) without risking clinical outcomes, patient safety or satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to investigate associations between the degree of mobilization on day zero (i.e., standing at the bedside versus walking in the hallway) and LoS in TJA patients. In addition, we investigated predictors of LoS and day zero mobilization. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of the health records of patients in a community hospital setting who had an elective unilateral primary TJA between June 2015 and May 2017 and had mobilized on day zero. The total sample was 283 patients (184 TKA and 99 THA) across four mobilization categories: Sat on beside (n = 76), Stood by bed/marched in place (n = 83), Walked in the room (n = 79), and Walked in hall (n = 45). Analysis of variance found no significant group differences in age, ASA score, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, anesthesia, surgeon, procedure type, pain medication, and patient reported symptoms recorded by physiotherapists. Significantly more women were in the Sat group and significantly more men were in the Hall group (p < .001). Patient reported symptoms of nausea and drowsiness were significantly greater for the Sat group (p < .001). LoS was also significantly different across the groups. Post hoc Tukey comparisons found the Walked Hall group had significantly shorter LoS (M = 2.7 days) than the Sat group (M = 3.9, p < .001), Stood group (M = 3.4, p = .011), and the Walked Room group (M = 3.5, p = .004). A hierarchical regression was performed to determine predictors of LoS. Block 1 consisted of demographic, medical status, and patient reported symptoms as variables. Mobilization was entered in Block 2. The first model was significant (p < .001) and explained 24% of variance in LoS. The final model was also significant (p < .001), accounting for a total of 26% of the variance in LoS. Thus, block 2 (i.e., mobilization) accounted for a small but significant 2% incremental variance (p = .008) beyond the block 1 variables in the prediction of LoS. With mobilization added, only male gender (p = .002), lower BMI (p = .026), and lower ASA scores (p = .006) remained significant predictors of shorter LoS, and the predictive ability of several of the block 1 variables were reduced to non-significant levels. A simultaneous regression model was then used to predict degree of mobilization. The model accounted for 24% of the variance in mobilization (p < .001). Variables significantly associated with a greater degree of mobilization included: younger age, male gender, lower BMI, and fewer symptoms, namely nausea, numbness, lightheadedness, and drowsiness. This study found length of stay was shorter when patients mobilized farther on the day of surgery. Some factors predictive of mobilization may be modifiable. Focusing on symptom management could increase opportunities for farther mobilization on the day of surgery, and thus decrease length of stay

Surgical site infections constitute the cause of 13% to 18% of readmissions within 90 days of a total hip arthroplasty and are a leading cause of failure of revision total knee arthroplasty. The goals of wound closure are to enhance healing potential, prevent infection, and provide a cosmetic appearance. Traditionally, this has been achieved with the use of interrupted sutures. However, recently “barbed” sutures have been introduced which consist of a solid core with peripheral etched barbs in a helical array. These sutures have been used for both the deep and superficial layers of wound closure in a running fashion with the barbs intended to be self-retaining in the event that the suture is cut or pulls out of the tissue. Proposed advantages include the avoidance of knots, less needles required, improved efficiency, and creation of a “watertight” seal. Numerous studies have shown decreased times for wound closure with the use of barbed vs. interrupted sutures with no difference in infection or complication rates. With less needles and improved efficiency, there is the potential for cost savings with the use of barbed sutures. However, there have been two studies raising concerns of arthrotomy failure with their use in total knee arthroplasty. In addition, several reports have noted the potential for increased superficial wound complications when barbed sutures are used for a subcutaneous closure. Therefore, what remains clear is that there is no proven, optimal method of wound closure in total joint arthroplasty and that every closure method remains technique dependent

Overall, hip and knee total joint replacement (TJR) patients experience marked benefit, with reported satisfaction rates of greater than 80% with regard to pain relief and improved function. However, many patients experience ‘nuisance’ symptoms, an annoyance which may cause discomfort, which can negatively impact postoperative satisfaction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of nuisance symptoms among TJR patients and impact on overall patient satisfaction. A prospective survey study to assess type and prevalence of primary hip/knee TJR related nuisance symptoms, and impact on patient satisfaction at six-months to one-year post-TJR was conducted. The survey was administered over a one-year period at one academic arthroplasty centre. Survey questions tapped occurrence of commonly reported nuisance symptoms (e.g. localized pain, swelling, stability, incision appearance/numbness, stiffness, clicking/noise, ability to perform activities of daily living), and impact of the symptom on overall hip/knee satisfaction rated on a 10-point visual analogue scale (VAS), (0=no impact, 10=to a great extent). Overall VAS satisfaction with TJR was also assessed (0=not at all satisfied, 10=extremely satisfied). Survey responses were analysed using descriptive statistics. The sample comprised of 974 primary TJR patients, including 590 knees (61%) and 384 hips 39%) who underwent surgery over a one-year period. Among knees, the most commonly reported nuisance symptoms and associated impact to satisfaction per mean VAS scores included: difficulty kneeling (78.2%, mean VAS 4.3, ±3.3), limited ability to run or jump (71.6%, VAS 3.3, ±3.3), numbness around incision (46.3%, VAS 3.8, ±3.3), clicking/noise from the knee (44.2%, VAS 2.7, ±2.7) and stiffness (43.3%, 3.3, ±2.7) following knee arthroplasty. Overall, 88.1% of knee patients surveyed experienced at least one self-reported nuisance symptom at one-year postoperative. Mean overall VAS satisfaction with knee TJR was reported as 9/10 (±1.7). Among hip TJR patients, the most commonly reported nuisance symptoms and associated impact to satisfaction per VAS scores were: limited ability to run or jump (68.6%, VAS 3.4, ±3.4), muscular pain in the thigh (44.8%, VAS 3 ±2.7), limp when walking (37.6%, VAS 4.1, ±3.2), hip stiffness (31%, VAS 3.1, ±2.4), and new or worsening low back pain (24.3%, VAS 2.9, ±2.5). Overall, 93.7% of patients experienced at least one self-reported nuisance symptom at one-year postoperative. Mean overall VAS satisfaction following total hip arthroplasty at one year was reported as 8.9/10 (±1.7). Nuisance symptoms following primary total hip and knee arthroplasty are very common. Despite the high prevalence of such symptoms, impact of individual symptoms to overall TJR satisfaction is minimal and overall TJR patient satisfaction remains high. Careful preoperative counselling regarding the prevalence of such symptoms is prudent and will help establish realistic expectations following primary hip and knee TJR

The inmate population is a unique cohort with several healthcare-related challenges. International studies have demonstrated higher rates of infectious diseases, chronic diseases and psychiatric disorders in inmates when compared to general population. However, little is known about the outcomes following total joint arthroplasty in this population. This retrospective chart review aims to outline the differences in clinical outcomes after hip and knee total joint arthroplasty in the Kingston inmate population compared to the national population standard. A list of all inmate inpatient hospital visits with diagnostic/procedure codes pertaining to total joint arthroplasty within the last ten years was obtained through a computer-based search of the Kingston General Hospital Discharge Abstract Database(DAD). The patient charts were reviewed and demographic and outcome data pertinent to our study was collected. Data was compiled using Excel and imported into IBM SPSS for descriptive analysis. Twenty male inmate patients underwent 24 primary Total Hip Arthroplasties(THA) or Total Knee Arthroplasties(TKA) and one medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty from May 2003 to January 2013. The average age was 58 with mean Body Mass Index(BMI) of 34. Median American Society of Anesthesiologist(ASA) score was 3 and mean Charlston Comorbidity Index was 3.92. The rates of HCV and HIV were 35%(n=5) and 0%, respectively. Average length of stay from time of initial procedure was 4.2 days. The overall revision rate was 24% (n=6). Reasons for revision included deep prosthetic infection (50%, n=3), aseptic loosening (17%, n=1), arthrofibrosis (17%, n=1) and late periprosthetic fracture (17%, n=1). Infection rates were reported at 16% (n=4); 75% of which were deep prosthetic infections requiring revision surgery. Other complications included ST-elevation myocardial infarction(STEMI) (n=1), and postoperative knee stiffness requiring manipulation under anesthesia(MUA) (n=1). Compared to Correctional Services Canada(CSC) data on male inmate health in 2012, our study population demonstrated a higher rate of HCV (35% vs. 9.4%), diabetes (30% vs. 4.2%) and overall cardiovascular and respiratory comorbidities. This may reflect the higher rate of comorbidities associated with osteoarthritis, such as BMI>25, which was evident in 95% of our study population vs. 64.5% in Canadian inmates. Total joint revision rates in our inmate study population was 24%, which is higher than the 2014 Canadian Joint Replacement Registry's yearly revision rate of 8.7% in THA and 5.2% in TKA. Our study population also demonstrated infection as the leading cause for revision at 50%, compared to 14.5% for THA and 19.6% for TKA in the general Canadian population. Further study of the complex biopsychosocial risk factors in the inmate population is warranted to better define pre-surgical risk assessment criteria

Background. Post-operative deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and subsequent pulmonary embolism (PE) remain a serious complication after total joint replacement. Although with modern chemical and mechanical prophylaxis and rapid rehabilitation the rate of symptomatic DVT and PE has reduced, isolation of pre-operative DVT, especially in patients with prior history of DVT remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of pre-operative dopplers as a tool to screen and reduce DVT/PE rate in patients undergoing total joint replacement. Methods. Between January 2014 and December 2014, 211 elective primary hip and knee arthroplasty were identified from our prospective institutional database as two consecutive cohorts (115 cases had pre-operative dopplers and 96 did not). All cases were performed by two adult reconstruction specialists. All primary total hip arthroplasties (THA) were non-cemented and all primary total knee arthroplasties (TKA) were cemented with similar implant and technique. In the first cohort, all cases underwent routine pre-operative doppler screening and in the control cohort, only patients with prior history of DVT or PE underwent pre-operative dopplers. All patients with clinical symptoms of calf pain underwent post-operative dopplers. Patients were followed for a minimum of 3 month post-operatively. All emergency room (ER) visits for role out DVT were identified. No patient was lost to follow. Results. In the cohort with pre-operative dopplers, none of the pre-operative dopplers were positive for DVT, including three patients that had a history of prior DVT. 34 patients in this group (29%) underwent post-operative dopplers, either during the hospital stay or in the ER within 3 month after index surgery. Only one patient (no prior history of DVT) developed symptomatic DVT/PE (0.8%) after total knee arthroplasty. In the control cohort, 3 of which (3%) had symptomatic DVT, one of which had PE (1%) during hospital stay, all after total knee arthroplasty. There was no statistical difference for rate of symptomatic DVT/PE between the two groups (p=0.3). There was no correlation between DVT and age, gender or BMI. Discussion and Conclusions. Utilization of routine pre-operative dopplers for all patients did not lower the rate of symptomatic DVT/PE and are not helpful in early detection and prevention in asymptomatic patients prior to routine total joint replacement. Pre-operative dopplers should be used in selected patients with high risk of DVT

The costs related to the treatment of infected total joint arthroplasties represent an ever groving burden to the society. Different patient-adapted therapeutic options like débridement and retention, 1- or 2-step exchange can be used. If a 2-step exchange is used we have to consider short (2–4 weeks) or long (>4–6 weeks) interval treatment. The Swiss DRG (Diagnose related Groups) determines the reimboursement the hopsital receives for the treatment of an infected total arthroplasty. The review assesses the cost-effectiveness of hospitalisation practices linked to surgical treatment in the two-stage exchange of a prosthetic-joint infection. The aim of this retrospectiv study is to compare the economical impact between a short (2 to 4 weeks) versus a long (6 weeks and above) interval during a two-satge procedure to determine the financial impact. Retrospectiv study of the patients with a two-stage procedure for a hip or knee prosthetic joint infection at CHUV hospital Lausanne (Switzerland) between 2012 and 2013. The review analyses the correlation between the interval length and the length of the hospital stay as well as with the costs and revenues per hospital stay. In average there is a loss of 40′000 Euro per hospitalisation for the treatment of prosthetic joint infection. Revenues never cover all the costs, even with a short interval procedure. This economical loss increases with the length of the hospital stay if a long-term intervall is choosen. The review explores potential for improvement in reimbourement practices and hospitalisation practices in the current Swiss healthcare setting. There should be alternative setups to decrease the burden of medical costs by a) increase the reimboursment for the treatment of infected total joints or by b) splitting the hospital stay with partners (rapid transfer after first operation from center hospital to level 2 hospital and retransfer for second operation to center) in order to increase revenues

Background. There is a recent interest and focus on reducing the length of stay and early discharge after total joint replacement (TJR). However, safety criteria for same-day (SD) or next-day (ND) home discharge are not well defined. We implemented a screening questionnaire to identify patients that qualify for early home discharge. The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of this questionnaire and short-term outcomes including re-admission and peri-operative complications after TJR. Methods. Between January 2016 and July 2017, 423 consecutive primary hip and knee arthroplasties were performed by the two senior surgeons at our institution. All cases were followed for a minimum of 3-month prospectively after institutional review board approval. Patients were divided based on using a pre-operative questionnaire to determine their disposition after surgery. Group 1 includes 121 cases as control and group 2 includes 302 cases with pre-operative questionnaire. Spinal anesthesia and multimodal pain management including peri-articular injection was used in all cases. The pre-operative questionnaire (PQ, Swiftpath, Inc) included an overall score based on age, comorbidities, body mass index, physical assessment, motivation, comprehension, family support, home setup (i.e. easy access/stairs), proximity to the hospital and lack of serious barriers to early home discharge. Patients were divided into 3 categories based on the score: SD/ND home, regular home discharge and rehabilitation/subacute nursing facility (SNF) discharge. Length of stay (LOS), post-operative complications, readmissions, and discharge destination were assessed. Correlation the questionnaire score and outcomes were assessed. Results. In group 1, 29% of the patients were discharged home after minimum 2 days after surgery with home services and 71% were discharged to short- or long-term rehabilitation center. The mean length of stay was 4.6 ± 2.5 days (range 2 to 7 days). 3% had symptomatic DVT and one patient pulmonary embolism during hospital stay, all after total knee arthroplasty. There was one re-operation for acute periprosthetic infection (0.8%), two cardiopulmonary events (1.6%), and 4 other ER visits for inadequate pain control (3%). In group 2, 51% of the patients were discharged home, 6% of which (10 patients) were same-day discharge. The mean length of stay was 2.2 ± 0.8 days (range 0 to 5 days). One patient (1%) had symptomatic DVT. There were 5 (1.6%) ER visits for wound concerns and pain. There were no acute re-admissions, infections or re-operations. Conclusions. Implementation of a screening questionnaire for SD/ND early discharge is safe and results in significant reduction of length of stay, higher discharge to home, lower rate of DVT/PE/cardiopulmonary complications and less ER visits

The US obesity epidemic has transcended into the arthroplasty patient population and surgeons must assess whether obesity is a risk factor for poor outcomes in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and determine how it should be managed in order to insure good clinical outcomes. In the United States, 34.9% of adults are currently obese (BMI > 30). In a recent study, 54.5% of patients reporting to arthroplasty clinics in the US were obese. We performed a recent literature review to determine how obesity impacts outcomes in total hip and knee arthroplasty and what must be done to improve outcomes in the obese arthroplasty patient. We know that obesity and its associated comorbid conditions do have worse outcomes and increased complications in TJA patients. We also know that complications proportionately increase with increasing severity of obesity. The super-obese population is at the greatest risk of complication following TJA and pre-operative screening and management is essential in reducing complications. Although weight loss is important, our bariatric data has shown that it does not solve the problem of obesity in itself and the patient's metabolic state is likely a more important issue. Implant selection is important and strong consideration should be given to avoiding direct anterior approach in the THA obese patient. Understanding of obesity specific complications and treatment options is crucial for patient counseling and optimisation to ensure successful treatment in obese TJA patients

The selection of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has been controversial. Although the aspirin controversy is presumably resolved, there is no medical evidence for the “optimal” VTE prophylaxis regime for individual patients. A risk-stratified multi-modal VTE prophylaxis protocol was developed and adopted by consensus. VTE risk factors and bleeding risk factors were categorised into six VTE/bleeding risk levels: (1) pre-operative vitamin K antagonists (VKA) use, (2) bleeding risk factors, (3) hypercoagulable state, (4) pre-operative anti-platelet therapy [clopidogrel use], (5) VTE risk factors, (6) no VTE or bleeding risk factors. The pharmacologic agents used for each risk level were: (1) resume VKA with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) bridge, (2) pharmacologic agents contra-indicated and mechanical prophylaxis only, (3) VKA for 90 days with LMWH bridge, (4) resume anti-platelet therapy, (5) LMWH in hospital and discharge on aspirin for 90 days, (6) aspirin for 90 days (starting in hospital). In addition to pharmacologic treatment, all patients received multi-modal prophylaxis including early mobilisation, mechanical foot pumps, and neuraxial anesthesia when not contra-indicated. Prior to surgery, a VTE/bleeding risk factor checklist was completed determining the risk level. The intervention cohort included all TJA patients from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2012. The comparison cohort included all TJA patients from the year prior to implementation of the protocol at the same community hospital. Thirty day all-cause non-elective re-admissions, 30 day same-site re-operations, 90 day VTE events, and protocol compliance were abstracted from the electronic medical record. The intervention group consisted of 2679 patients (1075 hip arthroplasty patients and 1604 knee arthroplasty patients). The comparison group consisted of 1118 patients (323 hip arthroplasty patients and 795 knee arthroplasty patients). The 30 day all cause non-elective re-admission rate was 2.72% (73/2679) in the intervention group and 4.29% (48/1118) in the comparison group (p=0.0148). The 30 day same-site re-operation rate was 1.38% (37/2679) in the intervention group and 1.25% (14/1118) in the comparison group (p=0.8773). The 90 day VTE event rate was 1.57% (42/2679) in the intervention group and 3.40% (38/1118) in the comparison group (p=0.0007). The VTE rate was higher for knee arthroplasty patients 2.00% (32/1604) than for hip arthroplasty patients 0.93% (10/1075) (p=0.0379). The rate of VTE events was higher for patients that deviated from the VTE protocol 5.03% (10/199) than for all risk groups treated per the protocol 1.29% (32/2481) (p=0.0007). The risk-stratified multi-modal VTE prophylaxis protocol simultaneously reduced 30 day all-cause non-elective re-admissions and 90 day VTE events. The possible causes for reducing 30 day re-admissions and reducing 90 day VTE events are: (1) reducing bleeding events by using aspirin for VTE prophylaxis in more than 80% of patients, (2) extending VTE prophylaxis to 90 days, and (3) using multi-modal prophylaxis. The risk-stratified multi-modal VTE prophylaxis protocol for total joint arthroplasty is consistent with 9 of the 10 recommendations in the AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline. The risk-stratification checklist provides a standardised tool to assess risks, discuss risks, and make shared decision with patients. Patient treatment that deviated from the protocol had a significantly higher VTE rate (5.03%). Protocol compliance increased each year from 91.1% in 2010 to 94.2% in 2012