header advert
Results 1 - 20 of 24
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 102-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 106 - 106
1 Dec 2020
Thimmaiah R Ali O Mathur K
Full Access

The Hospital (Trust) guidelines generally recommend 40mg of Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) twice daily (BD) for all patients over 100kg for those undergoing total hip (THR) and knee replacements (TKR) respectively. British National Formulary (BNF) recommends 40mg of LMWH once daily (OD) for all patients regardless of their overall weight or body mass index (BMI). We evaluated the outcome of prophylactic LMWH dosage for patients undergoing THR and TKR by monitoring surgery related venous-thromboembolic events up to a minimum of three months after surgery. A retrospective audit was carried out after obtaining institutional approval and all consecutive elective patients weighing over 100kg and undergoing THR and TKR were included. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 3 months after their operation to investigate the dose of prophylactic LMWH received, and whether they had developed any venous thromboembolic events (VTE) post operatively. This was done using a combination of electronic notes, drug charts and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or computed tomography pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) reports on the hospital/trust database. A total of 53 patients underwent elective THR (18) and TKR (35) between the period of March 2017 and September 2017. Forty-four patients received 40 mg OD and 9 patients had 40 mg BD. None of the patients developed a confirmed DVT or pulmonary embolism in the 3 months following surgery regardless of the dose received. We demonstrate that there is no clinical benefit in having patients over 100kg on twice daily LMWH with the aim of preventing post-op thromboembolic complications. This conclusion is in line with the BNF recommendations for VTE prophylaxis


Bone & Joint Research
Vol. 1, Issue 5 | Pages 71 - 77
1 May 2012
Keurentjes JC Van Tol FR Fiocco M Schoones JW Nelissen RG

Objectives. We aimed first to summarise minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) after total hip (THR) or knee replacement (TKR) in health-related quality of life (HRQoL), measured using the Short-Form 36 (SF-36). Secondly, we aimed to improve the precision of MCID estimates by means of meta-analysis. Methods. We conducted a systematic review of English and non-English articles using MEDLINE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (1960–2011), EMBASE (1991–2011), Web of Science, Academic Search Premier and Science Direct. Bibliographies of included studies were searched in order to find additional studies. Search terms included MCID or minimal clinically important change, THR or TKR and Short-Form 36. We included longitudinal studies that estimated MCID of SF-36 after THR or TKR. Results. Three studies met our inclusion criteria, describing a distinct study population: primary THR, primary TKR and revision THR. No synthesis of study results can be given. Conclusions. Although we found MCIDs in HRQoL after THR or TKR have limited precision and are not validated using external criteria, these are still the best known estimates of MCIDs in HRQoL after THR and TKR to date. We therefore advise these MCIDs to be used as absolute thresholds, but with caution


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 12 - 12
1 Apr 2018
Marques EM Blom AW Erik L Vikki W Sian N
Full Access

Background. The Arthroplasty Pain Experience (APEX) studies are two randomised controlled trials in primary total hip (THR) and knee replacement (TKR) at a large UK orthopaedics centre. APEX investigated the effect of local anaesthetic wound infiltration (LAI), administered before wound closure, in addition to standard analgesia, on pain severity at 12 months. This abstract reports results of the within-trial economic evaluations. Methods. Cost-effectiveness was assessed from the health and social care payer perspective in relation to quality adjusted life years (QALYs). Resource use was collected from hospital records and patient-completed postal questionnaires, and valued using unit cost estimates from local NHS Trust and national tariffs. Missing data were imputed using chained equations. Costs and outcomes were compared per trial arm and plotted in cost-effectiveness planes. The economic results were bootstrapped incremental net monetary benefit statistics (INMB) and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. One-way deterministic sensitivity analyses explored any methodological uncertainty. Results. In both trials, LAI was cost-saving and more effective than standard care. Using the £20,000 per QALY threshold, in THR, the INMB was £1,125 (95%BCI, £183 to £2,067) and the probability of being cost-effective was over 98%. In TKR, the INMB was £264 (95%BCI, −£710 to £1,238), with only 62% probability of being cost-effective. Considering an NHS perspective only, LAI was no longer dominant in THR, but still highly cost-effective, with an INMB of £961 (95%BCI, £50 to £1,873). Conclusions. Administering LAI is a cost-effective treatment option in THR and TKR surgeries. The evidence is stronger for THR, because of larger QALY gain. In TKR, there is more uncertainty around the economic result, and smaller QALY gains, but results point to LAI being cheaper than standard analgesia, which includes a femoral nerve block. Trial Registration. ISRCTN96095682, 29/04/2010. Funding. NIHR Programme Grant for Applied Research RP-PG-0407-10070


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 39 - 39
17 Nov 2023
FARHAN-ALANIE M Gallacher D Kozdryk J Craig P Griffin J Mason J Wall P Wilkinson M Metcalfe A Foguet P
Full Access

Abstract

Introduction

Component mal-positioning in total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) can increase the risk of revision for various reasons. Compared to conventional surgery, relatively improved accuracy of implant positioning can be achieved using computer assisted technologies including navigation, patient-specific jigs, and robotic systems. However, it is not known whether application of these technologies has improved prosthesis survival in the real-world. This study aimed to compare risk of revision for all-causes following primary THR and TKR, and revision for dislocation following primary THR performed using computer assisted technologies compared to conventional technique.

Methods

We performed an observational study using National Joint Registry data. All adult patients undergoing primary THR and TKR for osteoarthritis between 01/04/2003 to 31/12/2020 were eligible. Patients who received metal-on-metal bearing THR were excluded. We generated propensity score weights, using Sturmer weight trimming, based on: age, gender, ASA grade, side, operation funding, year of surgery, approach, and fixation. Specific additional variables included position and bearing for THR and patellar resurfacing for TKR. For THR, effective sample sizes and duration of follow up for conventional versus computer-guided and robotic-assisted analyses were 9,379 and 10,600 procedures, and approximately 18 and 4 years, respectively. For TKR, effective sample sizes and durations of follow up for conventional versus computer-guided, patient-specific jigs, and robotic-assisted groups were 92,579 procedures over 18 years, 11,665 procedures over 8 years, and 644 procedures over 3 years, respectively. Outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and expressed using hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 13 - 13
1 Apr 2018
Giesinger J Loth F McDonald D Giesinger K Patton J Simpson H Howie C Hamilton D
Full Access

Aim

To investigate the validity of threshold values for the Oxford Hip and Knee Score (OHS and OKS) for treatment success 12 months after total knee or hip replacement.

Methods

Questionnaires were administered to patients undergoing total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) replacement before and 12 months after surgery alongside questions assessing key accepted aspects of treatment success (satisfaction, pain relief, functional improvement) to form a composite criterion of success and assessed using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis. Thresholds providing maximum sensitivity and specificity for predicting treatment success were determined for the total sample and subgroups defined by pre-surgery scores.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_3 | Pages 6 - 6
1 Apr 2018
Beswick A Wylde V Artz N Lenguerrand E Jepson P Sackley C Gooberman-Hill R Blom A
Full Access

Background

To aid recovery, rehabilitation is an important adjunct to surgery. Acknowledging the MRC framework for complex interventions we assessed the evidence-base for components of comprehensive rehabilitation in total hip (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) pathways.

Methods

We conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCT) of pre-surgical exercise and education, occupational therapy and post-operative physiotherapy. In feasibility RCTs we explored acceptability of pain self-management and occupational therapy before THR, and physiotherapy after TKR. We searched trial registers for ongoing RCTs.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 9 - 9
1 Apr 2017
Wylde V Lenguerrand E Gooberman-Hill R Beswick A Marques E Noble S Horwood J Pyke M Dieppe P Blom A
Full Access

Background

Total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) are usually effective at relieving pain; however, 7–23% of patients experience chronic post-surgical pain. These trials aimed to investigate the effect of local anaesthetic wound infiltration on pain severity at 12 months after primary THR or TKR for osteoarthritis.

Methods

Between November 2009 and February 2012, 322 patients listed for THR and 316 listed for TKR were recruited into a single-centre double-blind randomised controlled trial. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive local anaesthetic infiltration and standard care or standard care alone. Participants and outcomes assessors were masked to group allocation. The primary outcome was pain severity on the WOMAC Pain scale at 12 months post-surgery. Analyses were conducted using intention-to-treat and per-protocol approaches. Ethics approval was obtained from Southampton and South West Hampshire Research Ethics Committee.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 106-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 82 - 82
2 Jan 2024
Özer Y Karaduman D Karanfil Y Çiftçi E Balci C Doğu B Halil M Cankurtaran M Korkusuz F
Full Access

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee joint is a complex peripheral joint disorder with multiple risk factors. We aimed to examine the relationship between the grade of knee OA and anterior thigh length (ATL). A total of 64 geriatric patients who had no total hip or knee replacement with a BMI of ≥30 were evaluated. Patients' OA severity was determined by two independent experts from bilateral standing knee radiographs according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade. Joint cartilage structure was assessed using ultrasonography (US). The ATL, the gastrocnemius medialis (GC), the rectus femoris (RF) and the rectus abdominis (RA) skeletal muscle thicknesses as well as the RF cross-sectional area (CSA) were measured with US. Sarcopenia was diagnosed using the handgrip strength (HGS), 5× sit-to-stand test (5xSST) and bioelectrical impedance analysis. The median (IQR) age of participants was 72 (65–88) years. Seventy-one per cent of the patients (n=46) were female. They were divided into the sarcopenic obese (31.3 %) and the non-sarcopenic obese (68.8%) groups. KL grade of all patients correlated negatively with the ATL (mm) and the thickness of GC (mm) (r= -0,517, p<0.001 and r= -0.456, p<0.001, respectively). In the sarcopenic obese and the non-sarcopenic obese groups, KL grade of the all patients was negatively correlated with ATL (mm) and thickness of GC (mm) (r= -0,986, p<0.001; r= -0.456, p=0.05 and r= -0,812, p=0.002; r= −0,427, p=0.006). KL grade negatively correlated with the RF thickness in the sarcopenic obese group (r= -0,928, p=0.008). In conclusion, OA risk may decrease as the lower extremity skeletal muscle mass increases. Acknowledgments: Feza Korkusuz MD is a member of the Turkish Academy of Sciences (TÜBA)


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_14 | Pages 122 - 122
1 Nov 2018
McFadden R Chan C Carson L Buchanan F
Full Access

With an ever-increasing aging population, total hip and knee arthroplasty is projected to increase by 137% and 601%, respectively, between the period; 2005–2030. Prosthetic Join Infection (PJI) occurs in approximately 2% of total joint replacements (TJRs) in the U.S. PJI is primarily caused by adherence of bacteria to the surface of the prosthesis, ultimately forming an irreversibly attached community of sessile bacteria, known as a biofilm, highly tolerant to antibiotic treatment. Often the only resolution if the ensuing chronic infection is surgical removal of the implant – at high cost for the patient (increased morbidity), and for healthcare resources. Strategies to prevent bacterial adherence have significant potential for medical impact. Laser surface treatment using an automated continuous wave (CW) fiber laser system has shown promise in producing anti-adherent and bactericidal surfaces. Work presented here aims to investigate the effect of this approach on orthopaedic metals as a proof of concept, specifically Ti-6Al-4V (kindly supplied by Stryker Orthopaedics, Limerick). A coupon was surface treated using a laser (MLS-4030; Micro Lasersystems BV, Driel). Samples were incubated in Müller Hinton Broth (MHB) inoculated with methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA; ATCC 43300) for 24h before Live/Dead staining (BacLight™ solution; Molecular Probes) and inspection by fluorescence microscopy (GXM-L3201 LED; GX Optical). Images were analysed using ImageJ software (NIH) and a significant reduction (p > 0.05, n=24) in total biofilm coverage and Live/Dead ratio was observed between the laser treated and as received surfaces. This data demonstrates the anti-adherent, and indeed bactericidal, effect of Laser-surface treatment


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 96 - 96
1 Apr 2017
Sayers A Wylde V Lenguerrand E Gooberman-Hill R Dawson J Beard D Price A Blom A
Full Access

Background. This article reviews four commonly used approaches to assess patient responsiveness to a treatment or therapy [Return To Normal (RTN), Minimal Important Difference (MID), Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID), OMERACT-OARSI (OO)], and demonstrates how each of the methods can be formulated in a multi-level modelling (MLM) framework. Methods. Data from the Arthroplasty Pain Experience (APEX) cohort study was used. Patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement completed the Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) questionnaire prior to surgery and then at 3, 6 and 12 months after surgery. We compare baseline scores, change scores, and proportion of individuals defined as “responders” using traditional and multi-level model (MLM) approaches to patient responsiveness. Results. Using existing approaches, baseline and change scores are underestimated, and the variance of baseline and change scores overestimated in comparison to MLM approaches. MLM increases the proportion of individuals defined as responding in RTN, MID, and OO criteria compared to existing approaches. Using MLM with the MCID criteria reduces the number of individuals identified as responders. Conclusion. MLM improves the estimation of the standard deviation of baseline and change scores by explicitly incorporating measurement error into the model, and avoiding regression to the mean when making individual predictions. Using refined definitions of responsiveness may lead to a reduction in misclassification when attempting to predict who does and does not respond to an intervention, and clarifies the similarities between existing methods. Approvals. The APEX trials were registered as an International Standardised Randomised Controlled Trial (96095682), approved by Southampton and South West Hampshire Research Ethics Committee (09/H0504/94) and all participants provided informed written consent


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 54 - 54
1 Apr 2017
Voorn V Marang- van de Mheen P van der Hout A Vlieland TV Nelissen R van Bodegom L
Full Access

Backgroud: Allogeneic transfusion rates after primary hip and knee arthroplasty are used as quality indicators for hospitals, but hospital comparisons may be hampered by low event rates. Extended hospital stay is often used and may be more suitable as an alternative. This study aims to assess whether transfusion rates and extended hospital stay can be used to reliably rank hospitals. Methods. We used the baseline data from the LISBOA implementation trial, where data on patient characteristics and outcomes were collected in a sample of approximately 100 patients undergoing elective primary total hip or knee arthroplasty for each of the 23 participating hospitals. We calculated the reliability of ranking (Rankability) of transfusion rates and extended hospital stay (> 4 postoperative days), using fixed and random effects logistic regression analysis, by dividing the between-hospital variation to the sum of within and between-hospital variation. Rankability thus shows which part of the hospital differences are true differences and not due to random variation. Results. 1163 total hip and 986 total knee procedures were assessed. After adjustment for patient characteristics the odds ratio (OR) of receiving a transfusion in a hospital after total hip ranged from 0.72 to 1.38 and from 0.30 to 3.30 in total knee. Rankability was 17% for hip and 36% for knee arthroplasty, meaning that only 17% and 36% are true hospital differences. Larger hospital variation was found for extended hospital stay (OR range [0.28–3.51] for hip and [0.10–9.95] for knee arthroplasty), and better rankability. Conclusion. Although allogeneic transfusion rates are useful for monitoring quality within hospitals, they should not be used for ranking hospitals. A large proportion of differences in transfusion rates between hospitals is due to random variation, suggesting that this outcome is not suitable for ranking hospitals contrary to extended hospital stay. Level of evidence. Level 2. Financial disclosure. This study was funded by a grant from The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development and by a grant from Sanquin Blood Supply. Conflict of interest. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest. Approval. The Medical Ethical Committee of the Leiden University Medical Center decided that ethical approval was not required under Dutch National law for this type of study


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 95 - 95
1 Jan 2017
Moore A Kunutsor S Beswick A Peters T Gooberman-Hill R Whitehouse M Blom A
Full Access

Joint arthroplasty is a common surgical procedure, with over 185,000 primary hip and knee arthroplasties performed in England, Wales and Northern Ireland in 2014. After total hip or knee arthroplasty, about 1% of patients develop deep prosthetic joint infection (PJI), which usually requires further major operations to clear the infection. Although PJI affects only a small percentage of patients it is one of the most devastating complications associated with this procedure. Research evidence has focussed on clinical effectiveness of revision surgery while there has been less focus on the impact on patients and support needs. Using a systematic review approach, the aim of this study was to assess support needs and evaluate what interventions are routinely offered to support patients undergoing treatment for PJI following hip or knee arthroplasty. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Cinahl, Social Science Citation Index, and The Cochrane Library from 1980 to February 15, 2015 for observational (prospective cohort, nested case-control, case-control, and retrospective cohort) studies, qualitative studies, and clinical trials that report on the support needs and interventions for patients being treated for PJI or other major adverse occurrences following joint arthroplasty. Data were extracted by two independent investigators and consensus reached with involvement of a third. Of 4,161 potentially relevant citations, we identified one case-control, one prospective cohort and two qualitative studies for inclusion in the synthesis. Patients report that PJI and treatment had a profoundly negative impact affecting physical, emotional, social and economic aspects of their lives. No study evaluated support interventions for PJI or other major adverse occurrences following hip and knee arthroplasty. The interpretation of study results is limited by variation in study design, outcome measures and the small number of relevant eligible studies. Findings show that patients undergoing treatment for PJI have extensive physical, psychological, social and economic support needs. Our review highlights a lack of evidence about support strategies for patients undergoing treatment for PJI and other adverse occurrences. There is a need to design, implement and evaluate interventions to support these patients


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 98-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 7 - 7
1 Oct 2016
Ayre WN Scott T Hallam K Blom A Denyer S Bone H Mansell J
Full Access

In England and Wales in 2012 over 160,000 primary total hip and knee replacements were performed with 57% of hip replacements utilising uncemented prostheses. The main cause of failure, affecting approximately 10% of patients, is aseptic loosening. Previous research has found that functionalising titanium with lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) induces an increase in human osteoblast maturation on the implant surface through co-operation with active metabolites of vitamin D3. This feature, the small size of the LPS molecule and its affinity to readily bind to titanium and hydroxylapatite makes it an especially desirable molecule for bone biomaterials. Nevertheless biomaterials that also demonstrate anti-microbial properties are highly desirable. To test the antimicrobial efficacy of the LPA-functionalised titanium, a clinical isolate of Staphylococcus aureus, obtained from an infected revision surgery, was cultured on the surface of titanium discs functionalised with 0, 0.1. 0.5, 1, 2 and 5μM LPA. Bacterial adhesion was quantified at 1, 2, 6, 12 and 24 hours by live/dead counts and biofilm mass quantified by crystal violet staining after 24, 48, 72 and 96 hours culture. To elucidate the mechanisms of action of LPA, proteomic analysis of adhered bacteria was performed using SDS-PAGE and Western blots. 500nM to 1μM LPA were the optimum concentrations to significantly inhibit bacterial adhesion (ANOVA, p<0.001). These concentrations also reduced biofilm mass on the surface of the titanium. Proteomic analysis highlighted an increase in low molecular weight proteins as a result of optimal LPA surface concentrations. Fatty acid chains as found in LPA have previously been associated with causing leakage of low molecular weight proteins through increased cell membrane permeability. LPA coatings have the potential to enhance implant osseointegration whilst simultaneously reducing bacterial attachment. This technology may reduce both septic and aseptic failure of cementless joint prostheses, ultimately prolonging implant longevity and patient quality of life


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 115 - 115
1 Jan 2017
Ezzat A Chakravarty D Cairns D Craig N
Full Access

Newer irreversible oral anticoagulants such as rivaroxaban, a direct factor 10a inhibitor, are increasingly employed to prevent thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, and to manage venous thromboembolism (VTE). Unlike warfarin, these agents require no monitoring and involve infrequent dose adjustment. We report the case of a patient treated with rivaroxaban for AF. Patient presented with unprovoked sudden onset right shoulder pain which clinically resembled shoulder haemarthrosis. A single case was anonymised and retrospectively reviewed through examination of clinical and radiographic data. A 70 year old female with known AF presented to Accident and Emergency with sudden onset of right shoulder pain and limited movement, which developed over one hour. The pain was constant, localised to the shoulder and without trauma. Past medical history included severe aortic regurgitation and associated thoracic aortic aneurysm, heart failure, atrial fibrillation and hypertension. Observations were normal upon admission with no haemodynamic compromise or pyrexia. Examining the right shoulder demonstrated distension of shoulder joint capsule, tenderness and a reduced range of movement. Temperature and neurovascular status in the right arm were normal. Investigations upon admission included an INR of 1.2. An anteroposterior right shoulder radiograph showed no evidence of fracture. Patient was managed conservatively with simple oral analgesia. Importantly, rivaroxaban was withheld for 5 days and symptoms resolved. Warfarin therapy was subsequently commenced instead as treatment for AF. Patient was discharged one week later and seen in clinic two weeks post-discharge. A full recovery occurred and with a full range of movement in the right shoulder. In the UK, current National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend the use of factor 10a inhibitors, for prevention of stroke in AF patients, and following elective total hip and knee replacement operations to prevent VTE. In turn, rivaroxaban is increasingly prescribed as first line therapy. Whereas warfarin has a documented association with haemarthrosis, there is no primary literature evaluating the incidence of factor 10a therapy associated haemarthrosis. In our case, the unprovoked shoulder haemarthrosis resolved following rivaroxaban cessation. In comparison with warfarin, rivaroxaban is irreversible. With warfarin and a high INR, vitamin K can be used to reverse the anticoagulation. There is no equivalent for rivaroxaban. We suggest further studies into incidence of haemarthrosis associated with oral anticoagulant therapy be undertaken, and treating physicians be aware of such complication


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 8 - 8
1 Apr 2014
Bell S Anthony I Jones B Blyth M
Full Access

The number of primary Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) and primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) procedures carried out in England and Wales is increasing annually. The British Orthopaedic Association guidelines for follow up currently differ for patients with TKA and THA. In THA the BOA recommends that Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) 10A rated implants should be followed up in the first year, once at seven years and three yearly thereafter. The BOA guidelines for TKA minimum requirement is radiographs at 5 years and each five years thereafter. Few studies have investigated if early follow up affects patient management following total hip and knee arthroplasty. We carried out a retrospective review of all revision procedures carried out in our institution between April 2010 to April 2013. The medical notes and radiographs for each patient were examined to determine the operative indications and patients symptoms. 92 knee revisions and 143 hip revisions were identified. Additionally we retrospectively reviewed the outcome of 300 one year routine arthroplasty follow up appointments. The mean time of hip revision was 8.5years (range 0 to 27years) and 5.6years (range 0 to 20years) for knee revisions. The commonest cause for revision was aseptic loosening associated with pain in 49 (53%) of knee revision patients and 89 (63%) of hip revisions. Infection accounted for 26 (28%) knee revisions and 16 (12%) hip revisions. Only 1% of hip and knee revisions was carried out in asymptomatic patients with aseptic loosening. We did not identify any cases were a patients management was altered at the routine arthroplasty review clinic and none were referred on for further surgical treatment. The findings of our study suggest there is no evidence for a routine one year arthroplasty review and revisions were carried out in asymptomatic patients in 1% of patients


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_31 | Pages 6 - 6
1 Aug 2013
Boyd A Soon V Sapare S McAllister J Deakin A Sarungi M
Full Access

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important for assessing the results of lower limb arthroplasty. Unrealistic or uneducated expectations may have a significant negative impact on PROMs even when surgery is technically successful. This study's aim was to quantify pre-operative expectations of Scottish patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement (THR/TKR). 100 THR and 100 TKR patients completed validated questionnaires (from the Hospital for Special Surgery) prior to their operation after receiving standard pre-operative information (booklet, DVD, consultations). Each patient rated expectations from very important to not having the expectation. A total score was calculated using a numerical scale for the grading of each expectation. Univariate regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between demographics and expectation score. The THR cohort had mean age 66.2 (SD 10.5), 53% female, mean BMI 29.0 (SD 5.1) and mean Oxford score 44 (SD 7). The TKR cohort had mean age 67.6 (SD 8.5), 59% female, mean BMI 32.8 (SD 5.8) and mean Oxford score 44 (SD 8). 100% THR and 96% TKR patients had 10 or more expectations of their operation. All expected pain relief. Other improvements expected were: walking for 100% THA and 99% TKA patients; daily activities for 100% THAs and 96% TKAs; recreational activities for 96% THAs and 93% TKAs; sexual activity for 66% THAs and 59% TKAs; psychological well-being for 98% THAs and 91% TKAs. Regression analysis showed increasing age lowered expectations in both THR (p=0.025) and TKR (p=0.031) patients but that gender, BMI and Oxford score were not significantly related to expectations. This study highlights that patients expect far more than pain relief and improved post-operative mobility from their operation. It is important to discuss and manage these expectations with patients prior to surgery. By doing so, patient satisfaction and PROMs should further improve


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 154 - 154
1 Jul 2014
Kurtz S Zielinska O MacDonald D Cates H Mont M Malkani A Parvizi J Kraay M Rimnac C Klein G
Full Access

Summary Statement. This study assesses oxidation, mechanical behavior and revision reasons of 2. nd. generation HXLPE used in total hip and knee arthroplasty. While oxidation was low for both X3 and E1 HXLPEs, oxidative regional variations were detected in the sequentially annealed cohort. Introduction. First generation highly crosslinked polyethylenes (HXPLEs) have proven successful in lowering both penetration and osteolysis rates. However, 1. st. generation annealing and remelting thermal stabilization have been associated with in vivo oxidation or reduced mechanical properties. Thus, 2. nd. generation HXLPEs were developed to improve oxidative stability while still maintaining material properties. Little is known about the in vivo clinical failure modes of these 2. nd. generation HLXPEs. The purpose of this study was to assess the revision reasons, wear, oxidative stability, and mechanical behavior of retrieved sequentially annealed Vitamin E diffused HXLPE in THA and TKA. Methods. 251 2. nd. Generation HXLPE hip and knee components were consecutively retrieved during revision surgeries and continuously analyzed in a prospective, IRB approved, multicenter study. 123 acetabular liners (Implanted 1.2y; Range 0–5.0y) and 117 tibial inserts (Implanted 1.6y; Range 0–5.8y) were highly crosslinked and annealed in 3 sequential steps (X3). Five acetabular liners (Implanted 0.6y; Range 0–2.0y) and six tibial inserts (Implanted 1.3y; Range 0.5–1.8y) were diffused with Vitamin E (E1). Patient information was collected from medical records. Linear penetration of liners was measured using a calibrated digital micrometer (accuracy: 0.001 mm). Surface damage of tibial components was assessed using the Hood method. Thin sections were taken from the acetabular liners (along the superior/inferior axis) and the tibial components (along the medial condyle and central spine) for oxidation analysis and analyzed according to ASTM 2102. Mechanical behavior was assessed via the small punch test (ASTM 2183). Results. The liners and tibial components fabricated from both HXLPEs were revised predominantly for loosening, instability, and infection. The average penetration rate for the Sequentially Annealed group was low (PR=0.045mm/yr). Pitting, scratching and burnishing were the predominant damage mechanisms of the tibial inserts within both material groups, with no evidence of delamination. Oxidation indices were low (Mean OI≤0.3) and similar between liners and inserts of the Sequentially Annealed components at the bearing and backside surface (p≥0.15). Oxidation was positively correlated with implantation time at the bearing surface of the Sequentially Annealed groups (Rho>0.29, p<0.005). The Ultimate Load of the Sequentially Annealed acetabular liners was statistically higher than the tibial components (p<0.001), however the mean difference was minimal (∼6N). Discussion. This study evaluated the properties of 2. nd. generation HXLPEs used in THA and TKA. Sequentially Annealed liners had penetration rates comparable with 1. st. generation HXLPEs. While oxidation was low for both sequentially annealed and Vitamin E HXLPEs, we were able to detect regional variations in the oxidative in the sequentially annealed cohort. Longer-term retrievals are necessary to fully assess the oxidative stability of Vitamin E diffused HXLPE used in TKA and THA


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 10, Issue 4 | Pages 49 - 51
1 Aug 2021
Evans JT Welch M Whitehouse MR


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 10, Issue 2 | Pages 57 - 59
1 Apr 2021
Evans JT Whitehouse MR Evans JP


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_31 | Pages 39 - 39
1 Aug 2013
Lavery J Anthony I Blyth M Jones B
Full Access

To validate the Modified Forgotten Joint Score (MFJS) as a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) in hip and knee arthroplasty against the UK's gold standard Oxford Hip and Knee Scores (OHS/OKS). The original Forgotten Joint Score was created by Behrend et al to assess post-op hip/knee arthroplasty patients. It is a new assessment tool devised to provide a greater discriminatory power, particularly in the well performing patients. It measures an appealing concept; the ability of a patient to forget about their artificial joint in everyday life. The original FJS was a 12-item questionnaire, which we have modified to 10-items to improve reliability and missing data. Postal questionnaires were sent out to 400 total hip/knee replacement (THR/TKR) patients who were 1–2 years post-op, along with the OHS/OKS and a visual pain analog score. The data collected from the 212 returned questionnaires (53% return rate) was analysed in relation to construct and content validity. A sub-cohort of 77 patients took part in a test-retest repeatability study to assess reliability of the MFJS. The MFJS proved to have an increased discriminatory power in high-performing patients in comparison to the OHS and OKS, highlighted by its more normal frequency of distribution and reduced ceiling effects in the MFJS. 30.8% of patients (n=131) scored 42–48 (equivalent to 87.5–100 in the MFJS) or more in the OKS compared to just 7.69% in the MFJS TKR patients. The MFJS proved to have an increased test-retest repeatability based upon its intra-class correlation coefficient of 0.968 compared to the Oxford's 0.845. The MFJS provides a more sensitive tool in the assessment of well performing hip and knee arthroplasties in comparison to the OHS/OKS. The MFJS tests the concept of awareness of a prosthetic joint, rather than pain and function and therefore should be used as adjunct to the OKS/OHS