Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 95-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 24 - 24
1 Jan 2013
Sandiford N Doctor C Ahmed S East D Miles K Butler-Manuel A Shepperd J
Full Access

Introduction

The ideal method of fixation for femoral components in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is unknown. While good results have been reported for cemented and uncemented components, there is relatively little published prospective data with twenty years or more of follow up.

Results of the Furlong femoral component have been presented at an average of 17 years follow up. We have extended this follow up period to an average of 22.5 years with a minimum of 22 years and a maximum of 25 years.

Methods

This study included all patients treated using the Furlong femoral component between 1986 and 1991. Patients were reviewed preoperatively and then at 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks post operatively and annually thereafter.

They were assessed clinically and radiographically and the Merle d'Aubigne Postel hip score was calculated at each visit. A Visual Analog Score (VAS) was also recorded to assess patient satisfaction with their procedure. A Kaplan Meier survival analysis was performed.


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 97-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 53 - 53
1 Feb 2015
Whiteside L
Full Access

Revision of the total hip femoral component in the presence of significant bone loss requires a variety of implants as well as fixation devices and bone substitute materials. Rule 1: Fix the implant into the best remaining bone. A variety of stem shapes and sizes are needed to fill the bone cylinder. Stem modularity is helpful to fashion a good fit, but every taper junction is a liability as a potential source of metal debris and a weak spot in the stem. Rather, fully porous-coated titanium femoral components with a tapered stem design are safe, convenient, and reasonably inexpensive. Rule 2: Reconstruct the bone to accept a rigidly fixed intramedullary stem. Cables, strut allograft, plates, and screws are needed to support the remaining bone. Rule 3: Manage the bone so that it is still viable after the implant is inserted. As much intraosseous and extraosseous blood supply as possible should be maintained, so broaching rather than extensive reaming is the best choice for maintaining bone viability. Rarely more exotic procedures such as reduction osteotomy must be done to achieve rigid fixation of implants


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 94-B, Issue SUPP_XLI | Pages 129 - 129
1 Sep 2012
Horne G Murray R
Full Access

Revision total hip replacement may be technically challenging, with component selection being one of the challenges. Modular titanium femoral components have some advantages, and our aim was to assess the medium term outcome of the use of such a component [Revitan or PFM]. We reviewed 323 patients undergoing revision with one of these femoral stems. We applied the Oxford Hip Score, the Charnley Class, and the Devane Patient Activity Level to each patient. The average follow up time was 6.58 years. The mean Oxford score was 35.74.39.8% of the patients were Charnley Class B. 52.4% of patients had an activity score indicating a moderate level of activity ie they could participate in gardening, swimming and other leisure pursuits. The overall outcome was good with this prosthesis. The Oxford scores were comparable with the national mean for revision THR on the NZ National Joint Register