Abstract. Objectives. Unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty (UKA and TKA) are successful treatments for osteoarthritis, but monolithic implants disrupt the natural homeostasis of bone which leads to bone loss over time. This can cause problems if the implant needs to be revised. This study aimed to demonstrate that tibial implants made from titanium lattice could replace the tibial condyle surface while minimising disruption of the bone's natural mechanical loading environment. A secondary aim was to determine whether implants perform better if they replicate more closely bone's mechanical modulus, anisotropy and spatial heterogeneity. This study was conducted in a human cadaveric model. Methods. In a cadaveric model, UKA and TKA procedures were performed on 8 fresh-frozen knee specimens by a board-certified consultant orthopaedic surgeon, using tibial implants made from conventional monolithic material and titanium lattice structures. Stress at the bone-implant interfaces was measured with pressure film and compared to the native knee. Results. Titanium lattice implants were able to restore the mechanical environment seen in the native tibia for both UKA and TKA designs. Maximum stress at the bone-implant interface ranged from 1.2–3.3MPa compared to 1.3–2.7MPa for the native tibia. The conventional UKA and TKA implants reduced the maximum stress in the bone by a factor of 10 and 9.7 respectively. The conventional UKA and TKA implants caused 71% and 77% of bone surface area to be underloaded compared to the native tibia. Conclusions. Titanium lattice implants can maintain the natural mechanical loading in the proximal tibia after UKA and TKA. This may help maintain normal bone homeostasis throughout the life of the implant. These encouraging data indicate normal bone homeostasis can be maintained after arthroplasty using manufacturing methods already in widespread use. This would maintain bone quality throughout the life of the implant and alleviate complications at revision surgery

Miniscrew implants (MSIs) are widely used to provide absolute anchorage for the orthodontic treatment. However, the application of MSIs is limited by the relatively high failure rate (22.86%). In this study, we wished to investigate the effects of amorphous and crystalline biomimetic calcium phosphate coating on the surfaces of MSIs with or without the incorporated BSA for the osteointegration process with an aim to facilitate the early loading of MSIs. Amorphous and crystalline coatings were prepared on titanium mini-pin implants. Characterizations of coatings were examined by Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Confocal laser-scanning dual-channel-fluorescence microscopy (CLSM) and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The loading and release kinetics of bovine serum albumin (BSA) were evaluated by Enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Activity of alkaline phosphate (ALP) was measured by using the primary osteoblasts. In vivo, a model of metaphyseal tibial implantation in rats was used (n=6 rats per group). We had 6 different groups: no coating no BSA, no coating but with surface adsorption of BSA and incorporation of BSA in the biomimetic coating in the amorphous and crystalline coatings. Time points were 3 days, 1, 2 and 4 weeks. Histological and histomorphometric analysis were performed and the bone to implant contact (BIC) of each group was compared. In vitro, the incorporation of BSA changed the crystalline coating from sharp plates into curly plates, and the crystalline coating showed slow-release profile. The incorporation of BSA in crystalline coating significantly decreased the activity of ALP in vitro. In vivo study, the earliest significant increase of BIC appeared in crystalline coating group at one week. The crystalline coating can serve as a carrier and slow release system for the bioactive agent and accelerate osteoconductivity at early stage in vivo. The presence of BSA is not favorable for the early establishment of osteointegration

Screw fixation is an established method for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, although with a high rate of implant-related complications. An allograft system for implant fixation in ACL reconstruction, the Shark Screw ACL (surgebright GmbH) could overcome some of the shortcomings of bioabsorbable screws, such as foreign body reaction, need for implant removal and imaging artefacts. However, it needs to provide sufficient mechanical stability. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the biomechanical stability, especially graft slippage, of the novel allograft system versus a conventional bioabsorbable interference screw (BioComposite Interference Screw; Arthrex Inc.) for tibial implant fixation in ACL reconstruction. Twenty-four paired human proximal tibiae (3 female, 9 male, 72.7 ± 5.6 years) underwent ACL reconstruction. The quadrupled semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft were fixed in one specimen of each pair using the allograft fixation system Shak Screw ACL and the contralateral one using an interference screw. All specimens were cyclically loaded at 1 Hz with peak load levels monotonically increased from 50 N at a rate of 0.1 N/cycle until catastrophic failure. Relative movements of the graft versus the tibia were captured with a stereographic optical motion tracking system (Aramis SRX; GOM GmbH). The two fixation methods did not demonstrate any statistical difference in ultimate load at graft slippage (p = 0.24) or estimated survival at slippage (p = 0.06). Both, the ultimate load and estimated survival until failure were higher in the interference screw (p = 0.04, and p = 0.018, respectively). Graft displacement at ultimate load reached values of up to 7.2 mm (interference screw) and 11.3 mm (Shark Screw ACL). The allograft screw for implant fixation in ACL reconstruction showed similar behavior in terms of graft slippage compared to the conventional metal interference screw but underperformed in terms of ultimate load. However, the ultimate load may not be considered a direct indicator of clinical failure

Aims. Metaphyseal tritanium cones can be used to manage the tibial bone loss commonly encountered at revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). Tibial stems provide additional fixation and are generally used in combination with cones. The aim of this study was to examine the role of the stems in the overall stability of tibial implants when metaphyseal cones are used for rTKA. Methods. This computational study investigates whether stems are required to augment metaphyseal cones at rTKA. Three cemented stem scenarios (no stem, 50 mm stem, and 100 mm stem) were investigated with 10 mm-deep uncontained posterior and medial tibial defects using four loading scenarios designed to mimic activities of daily living. Results. Small micromotions (mean < 12 µm) were found to occur at the bone-implant interface for all loading cases with or without a stem. Stem inclusion was associated with lower micromotion, however these reductions were too small to have any clinical significance. Peak interface micromotion, even when the cone is used without a stem, was too small to effect osseointegration. The maximum difference occurred with stair descent loading. Stress concentrations in the bone occurred around the inferior aspect of each implant, with the largest occurring at the end of the long stem; these may lead to end-of-stem pain. Stem use is also found to result in stress shielding in the bone along the stem. Conclusion. When a metaphyseal cone is used at rTKA to manage uncontained posterior or medial defects of up to 10 mm depth, stem use may not be necessary. Cite this article:Bone Joint Res. 2020;9(4):162–172

Summary Statement. Uptake of robotically-assisted orthopaedic surgery may be limited by a perceived steep learning curve. We quantified the technological learning curve and 5 surgeries were found to bring operating times to appropriate levels. Implant positioning was as planned from the outset. Introduction. Compared to total knee replacement, unicondylar knee replacement (UKR) has been found to reduce recovery time as well as increase patient satisfaction and improve range of motion. However, contradictory evidence together with revision rates concern may have limited the adoption of UKR surgery. Semi-active robotically-assisted orthopaedic tools have been developed to increase the accuracy of implant position and subsequent mechanical femorotibial angle to reduce revision rates. However, the perceived learning curve associated with such systems may cause apprehension among orthopaedic surgeons and reduce the uptake of such technology. To inform this debate, we aimed to quantify the learning curve associated with the technological aspects of the NavioPFS™ (Blue Belt Technologies Inc., Pittsburgh, USA) with regards to both operation time and implant accuracy. Methods. Five junior orthopaedic trainees volunteered for the study following ethical permission. All trainees attended the same initial training session and subsequently each trainee performed 5 UKR surgeries on left-sided synthetic femurs and tibiae (model 1146–2, Sawbones-Pacific Research Laboratories Inc, Vashon, WA, USA). A few days lapsed between surgeries, which were all completed in a two week window. Replica Tornier HLS Uni Evolution femoral and tibial implants (Tornier, France) were implanted without cementation. Each surgery was videoed and timings taken for key operation phases, as well as the overall operative time. A ball point probe with four reflective spherical markers attached was used to record the position of manufactured divots on the implant, which allowed the 3D position of the implant to be compared to the planned position. Absolute translational and rotational deviations from the planned position were analysed. Results. Total surgical time decreased significantly with surgery number (p < 0.001) from an initial average of 85 minutes to 48 minutes after 5 surgeries. All stages, except the cutting tool set up, demonstrated a significant difference in operative time with increasing number of surgeries performed (all p < 0.05) with the cutting phase decreasing from 41 to 23 minutes (p < 0.001). The translational and rotational accuracy of the implants did not significantly vary with surgery number. Discussion and Conclusion. The accuracy in implant position obtained by trainee surgeons on synthetic bones were similar to published data for experienced orthopaedic surgeons on other systems on cadavers. Whilst cadaver operations increase the complexity of operation, this should not theoretically affect the robotic system in preventing innaccurate implantation. Moreover, the fact that this accuracy was obtainable on the first surgery clearly demonstrates the system's ability in ensuring accurate implantation. Five surgeries dramatically reduced the total operative time, and moreover, the trend suggests that more surgeries would further decrease the total operation time. It was not the intention of the study to compare absolute trainee times on synthetic bones to surgeons with cadavers, but the learning curve of the protocol and technology suggests a halving of the operation time after 5 sessions would not be unrealistic

Summary Statement. A prospective randomised evaluation of primary TKA utilizing patient specific instruments demonstrated great accuracy of bone resection, improved sagittal alignment and the potential to improve functional outcomes and reduce operating room costs when compared to standard TKA instrumentation. Introduction. Patient specific instruments (PSI), an alternative to standard total knee arthroplasty (TKA) technology, have been proposed to improve the accuracy of TKA implant placement and post-operative limb alignment. Previous studies have shown mixed results regarding the effectiveness of PSI. The purposes of this study were (1) to evaluate the accuracy of the pre-operative predicted PSI plan compared to intra-operative TKA resection measurements, (2) to compare patient-reported outcome measures of PSI and standard TKA patients, and (3) to compare the incremental cost savings with PSI. Patients and Methods. This randomised, prospective pilot study of 19 patients undergoing primary TKA with a cruciate-retaining cemented prosthesis (NexGen, Zimmer Inc.) was conducted by a single high-volume arthroplasty surgeon (DCA). Patients were randomised to PSI or standard instrumentation. Patients randomised to the PSI cohort received a pre-operative knee MRI for PSI fabrication using Zimmer proprietary software. 10 standard TKA and 9 PSI TKA were completed. Pre-operative baseline SF-36 and WOMAC scores were collected. Operative data collected included operating room times, implant details, femoral (medial/lateral distal and posterior) and tibial (medial/lateral) cut thicknesses, and number of instrument trays used. Hospitalization data collected included length of stay, blood loss, drain output, and transfusion requirements. Follow-up occurred at 2 weeks, 6–8 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year, with SF-36 and WOMAC scores collected at each time point. Routine radiographic analysis was carried out in both cohorts. Extensive financial data was collected including costs of operating room use and anesthesia, implants, and hospitalization. Statistical analyses included t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Results. All femoral and tibial implant sizes used during TKA matched the component sizes predicted by the PSI software. Flexion gap bone resection (posterior medial/lateral femoral cuts) was extremely accurate (<1 mm on average) when compared with PSI predictions. PSI proximal tibial bone resection was also extremely accurate and within 1 mm on average of predicted values. Sagittal plane tibial component posterior slope in PSI TKA was significantly more accurate (7.33 degrees) in comparison to standard instrumentation (4.20 degrees) (p<0.025). No significant differences in coronal mechanical limb alignment existed between the two cohorts (p>0.05). There were no differences in operating room times, length of stay, or transfusions between the two groups. PSI patients used 4 fewer instrument trays per case (p<0.0001). There were no significant differences in functional outcome scores between the two groups (p>0.05). Discussion/Conclusion. PSI TKA demonstrated outstanding accuracy in bone resection when compared with the custom operative plan. There was no difference in post-operative coronal limb alignment or individual component alignment between the two groups, but an improvement in tibial component alignment in the sagittal plane in the PSI cohort was statistically significant. The number of instrument trays in PSI TKA's were significantly less than standard TKA which led to less cost for instrument sterilization and assembly, and quicker room set-up. PSI instrumentation resulted in accurate bone resection and appropriate limb and component alignment after primary TKA in this prospective randomised evaluation

Synthetic bone substitutes provide an alternative to autograft but do not give equivalent clinical results. Their performance may be enhanced by adding osteogenic growth factors. In this study, TGFβ1 was absorbed on to a carrier of β tricalcium phosphate and Gelfoam® and used to fill a defect around a tibial implant in a rat model of revision arthoplasty. We added 0.0, 0.02 μg, 0.1 μg or 1.0 μg of TGFβ1 to the carrier and then implanted it around an hydroxyapatite-coated stainless-steel pin in the proximal tibia of rats. The tibiae were harvested at three, six or 26 weeks and the amount of bone formation and ceramic resorption were assessed. TGFβ1 had no effect on the amount of bone in the defect, the amount of fluorescent label incorporated or the rate of mineral apposition. The growth factor did not significantly affect the amount of β TCP remaining in the tissue at any of the time points

UKA with mobile bearing is a one of the treatment of medial osteoarthritis. However, some reports refer to the risk of dislocation of the mobile bearing. Past reports pointed out that medial gap might be enlarged in deep flexion position (over 120 degrees), and says that it will lead to instability of the mobile bearing. The purpose of this study is to research the risk factors of enlargement of medial gap in deep flexion position. We performed 81 UKAs with mobile bearing system from November 2013 to December 2015, and could evaluate 41 knees. This study of 41 knees included 9 males and 32 females, with average operation age of 75.4years(63–89years). The diagnosis was osteoarthritis in 39 knees and osteonecrosis in 2 knees. The UKA(Oxford partial knee microplasty, Biomet, Warsaw, IN) was used in all cases. We performed distal femur and proximal tibia osteotomy using CT-Free navigation system(Stryker Navigation System II/precision Knee Navigation ver4.0). And we inserted femoral and tibial trial component, then we placed an UKA tensioner on the medial component of the knee. Using tensioner under 30 lbs, we measured joint medial gap at 0,20,45,90,130(deep flexion) degrees. When we compared medial gap at 90 degrees position with at 130 degrees, we defined it as ‘instability group’ if there was gap enlargement more than 1mm, and defined it as ‘stability group’ if there wasn't. We compared this two groups with regard to age, BMI, femoro-tibial angle (FTA), the diameter of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), tibial angle and tibial posterior slope angle of the implant. We evaluated preoperative and postoperative FTA by weightbearing long leg antero-posterior alignment view X-rays. We measured ACL diameter at its condyle level in coronal view of MRI. Also we evaluated tibial component implantation angle by postoperative CT using 3D template system. These measurement were analyzed statistically using t test. The stability group contained 26 knees, and the instability group contained 15 knees. Compared with the stability group, the instability group indicated higher FTA (p=0.001). Between 20 and 90 degrees flexion position, there was no change of medial gap. Dislocation of the mobile bearing is one of the complications of UKA and it will need re-operation. It is said to be caused by impingement of the bearing and osteophyte of femur. However, some reports said that dislocation was happened when the knee was flexed deeply or twisted, and there was no impingement. We think it may means that dislocation could be caused by medial gap enlargement. This study indicates that higher FTA could be risk factor of dislocation of mobile bearing. It is important to evaluate preoperatively FTA by X-ray

The purpose of this study is to evaluate accuracy of tibia cutting and tibia implantation in UKA which used navigation system for tibia cutting and tibia component implantation, and to evaluate clinical results. We performed 72 UKAs using navigation system from November, 2012. This study of 72 knees included 56 females and 16 males with an average operation age of 74.2 years and an average body mass index (BMI) of 24.8 kg/m2. The diagnosis was osteoarthritis (OA) in 67 knees and osteonecrosis (ON) in 5 knees. The UKA (Oxford partial knee microplasty, Biomet, Warsaw, IN) was used all cases. We evaluated patients clinically using the Japanese orthopaedic association (JOA) score, range of motion (ROM), operation time, the amount of bleeding and complications. Patients were evaluated clinically at preoperation and final follow up in JOA score and ROM. As an radiologic examination, we evaluated preoperative and postoperative lower limb alignment in FTA (femoro-tibial angle) by weightbearing long leg antero-posterior alignment view X-rays. Also we evaluated a tibial component implantation angle by postoperative CT, and tibia cutting angle by intraoperative navigation system. We defined the tibial angle which a tibia functional axis and the tibia component made in coronal plane, also tibial posterior slope angle which a tibia axis and tibia component made in sagittal plane by CT. We measured tibial angle and tibial posterior slope angle by 3D template system. We performed UKA in all cases mini-midvastus approach. At first we performed osteotomy of the proximal medial tibia using CT-Free navigation. At this procedure we performed osteotomy to do re-cut if check did cutting surface in navigation, and there was cutting error (>3°), and then to do check again in navigation. Next we did not use navigation and went the osteotomy of the distal femur with an IM rod and drill guide of microplasty system. And then we performed a trial and decided bearing gap and moved to cementing. At first we went cementing of the tibia component. At this procedure we went to drive implant again if check did implant surface in navigation, and there was implantation error(>3°), and to do check. We checked did tibia cutting, tibia implantation carefully in navigation. In addition, We sterilize a clips and use it came to be in this way possible for the check of the first osteotomy side exactly. ROM was an average of 122.7° of preoperation became an average of 128.2° at final follow up, and JOA score was an average of 50.5 points of preoperation improved an average of 86.6 points at final follow up after UKA. An average of the operation time was 94 minutes, an average of the amount of bleeding was 137.7ml, and complications were one proximal type deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and one pin splinter joining pain by navigation, .Asetic loosening(tibial component) was one case, and this conversed the TKA. In the radiologic evaluation, FTA was an average of 182.1° of preoperation corrected an average of 175.9°after UKA. In other words, an average of 6.2° were corrected by UKA. The tibia component implantation angle was an average of 90.18° in a measurement by the CT after UKA, intoraoperative tibia component implantation angle was an average of 90.32° in a measurement by the navigation system. These two differences did not accept the significant difference at an average of 1.33°.(P=0.5581). Similarly, the posterior slope angle were as follow; average of 5.65°by CT and average of 5.75°by navigation. These two differences did not accept the significant difference at an average of 1.33°. (P=0.6475). Discussion: We performed UKA using navigation and evaluated the implantation accuracy for tibia osteotomy, tibia implantation. They were good alignment with an average of 90.18°, and outliers more than 3° were two cases(2.8%). It will be necessary to examine long-term progress including clinical results complications in future. We are performed UKA now in femur side using PSI(patient specific instruments) and tbia side using Navigation

Objectives

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a demanding procedure, with tibial component subsidence or pain from high tibial strain being potential causes of revision. The optimal position in terms of load transfer has not been documented for lateral UKA. Our aim was to determine the effect of tibial component position on proximal tibial strain.

Objectives

The Attune total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been used in over 600 000 patients worldwide. Registry data show good clinical outcome; however, concerns over the cement-tibial interface have been reported. We used retrieval analysis to give further insight into this controversial topic.

Objectives

This study reports on a secondary exploratory analysis of the early clinical outcomes of a randomised clinical trial comparing robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for medial compartment osteoarthritis of the knee with manual UKA performed using traditional surgical jigs. This follows reporting of the primary outcomes of implant accuracy and gait analysis that showed significant advantages in the robotic arm-assisted group.