Various studies have demonstrated that the necessity for reversal of Warfarin through the use of Vitamin K (Vit K) in neck of femur fracture patients introduces increased duration of stay and poorer outcomes as measured by operative complications and mortality rate. One reason for this delay may be the time latency between admission and the clinicians decision to investigate the INR. In this study we aim to explore the different causes of latency which contribute to a delay to theatre and ascertain whether point of care testing may negate this. We carried out an audit of a cohort of neck of femur fracture patients between 2012 and 2015. Between September 2011 and September 2013, paper notes of 25 patients who were on warfarin at the time of sustaining a Neck of femur fracture (NOF) was obtained within Addenbrookes hospital archives. An additional 80 patients records from the year 2015 were retrieved from EPIC digital records. Time intervals were recorded as follows (from time of A&E assessment by Medical doctor); Interval to orthopaedic specialist assessment, Interval to first INR order, Interval to first INR result seen by specialist, Interval to first Vit K prescribed, Interval to first Vit K given, Interval to Second INR ordered, Interval to second INR seen by specialist, Interval to operation time (as determined by time of team briefing). Analysis of the time intervals as a proportion of total time elapsed between A&E assessment and Time to theatre was performed. Point of care (POC) testing of INR on admission to A&E was introduced and a symmetrical time period was analysed for the same intervals. The latency generated by time taken for a NOF to be assessed by an orthopaedic specialist occupied 8.60% of the total time, the interval between ordering and recording an INR value accounted for 7.96% of time to theatre, the interval between an INR being recorded and subsequently seen by a clinician accounted for 13.4% of time to theatre, the time between orthopaedic specialist assessment and prescription of Vit K took up 7.83% of the total time and the percentage time between Vit K prescription and administration was 12.3%. The time between the first dose of Vit K prescription and arriving at theatre accounted for 76.1% of latency and the time between viewing a second INR and time to theatre occupied 33% of the total time. Following introduction of POC INR testing, there was a statistically significant decrease in time taken for warfarin reversal and consequently a reduction between time of admission to time to theatres. NOF patients who are on warfarin at time of injury introduces complexity to surgical management and planning for theatre. In our audit we demonstrate that causes of delay are distributed throughout the pathway of care and there are several stages. POC INR testing represents an effective method of reducing this latency and improves patient outcome

Background. Best practice tariff (BPT) for hip fracture was introduced in April 2010, offering financial incentive to encourage trusts to implement best practice and improve quality of care. This equates to £1335. An early indicator of a patient's outcome is the time to operation from admission, with best practice targets of <36hours as a key marker of quality. As well as being detrimental to patient experience, delays in the time to operation have clear links to increased mortality rates. Method. We performed a retrospective audit of neck of femur fracture patients from 01.01.14 for 12 months, investigating time to theatre, other BPT targets, and attainment of BPT. A cost analysis was also performed from financial data. Results. Of 471 patients, 461 operations were performed. Our median time to surgery was 24.9 hours. 140 (30%) of patients were not operated on within 36 hours. 134 of these (96%) would have met the BPT had they been operated on within the 36 hour target i.e. all other BPT targets were met. This equates to a loss of £178,890. Conclusions. We achieved time to theatre target for 70% of patients (compared to 71.7% reported nationally), which is suboptimal. A solution is to dedicate more theatre time to hip fractures on theatre lists or lengthened daily trauma lists. However, at £1200 per hour running theatre, this on its own would not be cost effective. Improved theatre utilisation by 10% can potentially save the trust £3,960,000 in a year. We have put forward plans to audit our current theatre usage, potentially improving utilisation and efficiency (e.g. planned hip fracture first on list from previous day to avoid start delay). Additionally we have introduced a “Time of breach” onto our trauma board to concentrate attention on this part of best practice. Level of Evidence. Level 3

Troponin I is a widespread used blood test to confirm myocardial damage, usually attributable to myocardial infarction. Troponin tests require to be taken 12 hours after the initial event, and thus may be a potential cause for delay. SIGN and Hip Fracture Audit guidelines recommend 98% of patients obtaining surgery within 24hrs of admission. A population of 347 neck of femur patients presenting to Glasgow Royal Infirmary were assessed over a one year period. 44 (13%) Patients were identified as having a pre-operative Troponin I test. Retrospective case note review of this patient cohort who had pre operative troponin testing was undertaken to identify timing of TnI testing, admission, surgery and medical comorbidies. Time to theatre was compared with the 24hr guideline. From the cohort, 32 Patients had case notes which were located, of which 4 had no filed notes from the admission giving a 28 patient sample population. 18 (64%) had a Troponin of ‘negative’ value (<0.04 μg/l) of which the mean delay to theatre from admission was 46.4 hrs (median 44.5hrs). All 18 breached the 24hr target, 5 were delayed >48hrs. Of the 10 ‘postive’ patients, mean TnI was 0.4 and time to theatre was 85hrs (median 69hrs) with one excluded as treated conservatively. Only one patient was treated within the 24hr target (3.7% of sample group treated operatively) p=<0.001. Scottish Hip Fracture Audit shows GRI to have an overall 98.6% compliance with the 24hr target. The data presented shows significant (near complete) failure to meet the 24hr target in patients tested preoperatively for Troponin I. Almost three-quarters of these patients have normal TnI, but delay may be attributable to additional comorbidities

Delay to theatre after hip fracture is common in order to medically optimise the patient prior to surgery. The association between delay to surgery and mortality after hip fracture remains a contentious issue. We aimed to investigate how medical postponement, time to surgery and correction of medical abnormalities prior to surgery affect peri-operative mortality after hip fracture. From February to December 2007 prospective data was collected from all acute trauma units in Scotland relating to hip fracture patients' fitness for theatre, reasons for postponement of surgery and subsequent plans of action. The data-set recorded whether medical abnormalities were identified following criteria reported by McLaughlin et al. Survival at 30-days post-operation was used as primary outcome measure. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to control for differences in case-mix between patients. Data were available for 4284 patients. Patients postponed for medical reasons were less likely to survive to 30 days compared to patients who were not postponed (87% (122/947) versus 93% (3098/3337)). Survival also decreased as time to theatre increased - 92% of patients operated on during the same/next day vs. 89% of those operated on admission day four. However, after controlling for differences in case-mix variables and co-morbidities, neither variable significantly affected survival. We then analysed whether delaying surgery to resolve medical problems improved survival. Adjusted survival was not significantly different between those patients who had their medical problem resolved prior to surgery compared to those patients who were not postponed. Individuals who were postponed but did not have their clinical abnormality resolved prior to surgery had significantly lower adjusted 30 day survival. The possible benefits of postponement need to be weighed against prolonged discomfort and the possibility of developing other complications. Postponing patients who cannot be medically improved should be avoided

Hip fracture is a common and serious injury affecting the elderly. Many patients have co-morbidities which may need to be investigated and treated before surgery but, conversely, delay in surgical management of these patients leads to increased morbidity and mortality. The Scottish Hip Fracture Audit (SHFA). 1. conducted in 2007 showed variations between hospitals in postponement rates for medical reasons. The report referred to 11 major clinical abnormalities described by McLaughlin. 2. that were associated with poor postoperative outcomes and should be corrected before surgery. This prospective audit took place in Monklands hospital for a duration of 6 weeks. All patients admitted to the orthopaedic firm from 14. th. Oct 2012 to 26. th. November 2012 with confirmed fracture neck of femur were prospectively included in the audit. A detailed review of the notes took place to identify whether delays were appropriate according to McLaughlin. There were a total of 23 patients admitted during the audit period of which 21 were operated on and 2 patients treated conservatively. The mean age of this cohort was 82.8 (range 55–91) with a male to female ratio of 1:1.3. Sixteen cases (76%) were operated on within 48 hours of admission (11 cases – 52% within 24 hours). Five cases (24%) were delayed by more than 48 hours. Three cases (14%) were delayed due to lack of theatre time. Two patients (9.5%) were delayed due to request of ECHO for ?new murmur. Our practice of managing hip fracture patients is similar to other units in Scotland with a deferral rate of approximately 25%. The patients who have a major clinical abnormality were appropriately investigated and treated before the surgery. Further improvement in management of the theatre time is needed as surgery is delayed for >24 hours in approximately 15% of medically fit hip fracture patients

BACKGROUND. Since 1996, the Scottish Hip Fracture Audit (SHFA) group have published reports on the outcomes of patients with hip fractures. In the 2008 report, the group outlined the target standard that “98% of medically fit patients who have sustained a hip fracture should be operated on within 24 hours of ‘safe operating time’ (i.e. between 8 am and 8pm, seven days a week).”. 1. . AIM. We aim to investigate the compliance of our unit to the SHFA target standard. METHODS. We prospectively examined patients who were admitted with hip fractures between 1. st. April to 31. st. July 2011. These included admissions from A&E and inpatients. Patients who did not receive surgical treatment were excluded. Information was collected using the same pro forma as the SHFA group. RESULTS. There were 72 patients with hip fractures in that period. One patient (1.4%) was considered unfit for surgery and therefore excluded. Sixty-five patients were considered fit for surgery on first assessment and 61 (93.8%) had surgery within the target time. There were three patients (4.6%) whose diagnosis was delayed waiting for MRI. The waiting period included a weekend in two patients, when there were no MRI facilities. Only one patient (1.5%) had surgery delayed due to lack of theatre availability. DISCUSSION. Having surgery performed as early as possible is associated with a beneficial impact on morbidity, complications and length of hospital stay. 2–4. , reflected with SIGN guidelines stating “surgery should be performed as soon as the medical condition allows”. 5. and NICE recommending surgery within 48 hours of admission. 6. . CONCLUSION. Although our rate of 93.8% does not meet the target standard, it represents an improvement from the published rate (91.2%) in 2008. It also highlights the areas for improvement in patient care, particularly in getting MRIs swiftly to avoid delays

Tourniquet is a commonly used tool in orthopaedic practice. Incidence of complications is low but if any develops, it is devastating. Transient nerve damage, ischemia or skin burns are the possible tourniquet related complications. There is big variation in practice regarding the limb occlusion pressure. 51 procedures in 50 patients were reviewed retrospectively in our district general hospital. We looked at quality of documentation guided by the BOAST standard (The Safe Use of Intraoperative Tourniquets, published in October 2021). Limb occlusion pressure and ischemic time were analysed. Intra-operative and post-operative notes were reviewed to assess quality of documentation and post-operative complications. Although limb occlusion pressure was above the recommended range in more than 75% of cases, there were no significant complications observed. Two cases only developed transient neuropraxia in common peroneal nerve and median nerve following tibial plateau ORIF and trapeziectomy simultaneously. Tibial ORIF fixation case had prolonged ischemic time (more than 120 minutes) and the limb occlusion pressure for the hand case was above the recommended range. Both have recovered within few days with no long-term consequences. Minimum documentation threshold was not met with regarding tourniquet site condition, method of skin isolation and padding, and exsanguination method. This relatively new standard with no previous similar guidance needs time until it is followed by the health care professionals especially when there is no high incidence of complications related to the use of the tourniquet. However, it is crucial to increase the theatre staff awareness of such standards. This will prevent devastating complications specifically in vulnerable patients. Adjustments to theatre checklist have been suggested to improved documentation. Additionally, local teaching sessions will be delivered to theatre personnel aiming at improving our compliance to this standard

The National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) is a clinically led web based audit used to inform national policy guidelines. The aim of this audit was to establish the accuracy of completion of NHFD v13.0 theatre collection sheets, identify common pitfalls and areas of good practice, whilst raising awareness of the importance of accuracy of this data and the manner in which it reflects performance of CAH Trauma & Orthopaedic unit in relation to national guidelines. Our aim was to improve completion up to >80% by the operating surgeon and improve overall accuracy. The methodology within both cycles of the audit were identical. It involved reviewing the NHFD V13.0 completed by the operating surgeon and cross-checking their accuracy against clinical notes, operation notes, imaging, anaesthetic charts and A&E admission assessment. Following completion of cycle 1 these results were presented, and education surrounding V13.0 was provided, at the monthly trust audit meeting. At this point we introduced a sticker onto the pre-operative checklist for Hip fractures. This included time of admission and reason for delay. We then completed a re-audit. Cycle-1 included 25 operations, 56% (n=14) had a completed V13.0 form. Of these 21% (n=3) were deemed to be 100% accurate. Cycle-2 included 31 operations (between April – June 21) 81% (n=25) had a completed intra-operative from and showed an increase in accuracy to 56% (n=14). Through raising awareness, education and our interventions we have seen a significant improvement in the completion and accuracy of v13.0. Although 100% accuracy was not achieved its clear that education and intervention will improve compliance over time. Through the interventions that we have implemented we have shown that it is possible to improve completion and accuracy of the NHFD V13.0 theatre collection sheet locally and feel this could be implemented nationally

Abstract. Background. Post operative radiographs following total joint arthroplasty are requested as part of routine follow up in many institutions. These studies have a significant cost to the local departments, in terms of financial and clinic resources, however, previous research has suggested they may not alter the course of the patients treatment. The purpose of this study was to assess the significance of elective post operative radiographs on changes in management of patients who underwent total joint arthroplasty. Method. All patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty at a District General Hospital from 2019 to 2020 were included. Data was collected retrospectively from medical records and radiograph requests. Alterations to clinical management based on radiographic findings were reviewed in clinic letters. Results. A total of 227 Total joint arthroplasty were retrieved. With 111(49%) total hip arthroplasty and 116 (51%) total knee arthroplasty. 54 were excluded due to having no clinical follow up and 173 met inclusion criteria. 56 (32%) had their post operative elective radiograph, while 93 (53.8%) patients had none. There were no abnormalities detected from the elective radiographs and none of the patients returned to the theatre. 24 patients (13%) presented with symptoms and had non-elective radiographs, 16 (67%) did not have any interventions and 8 (4.6%) required intervention and were taken to theatre. Discussion: Not performing these radiographs saves time, cost, and prevents unnecessary radiation exposure. In our institution, a 2-view joint radiograph costs £29 and takes roughly 15 minutes. This does not include indirect costs of additional clinic time and patient waiting time. In the larger context, the cost associated with elective radiographs is significant and our data suggests that routine post-operative radiographs are not beneficial as part of standard post-operative protocol for asymptomatic patients. However, performing imaging remains beneficial for patients who re-present with symptoms. Conclusion. Routine elective post-operative joint radiographs did not detect any true abnormalities. Information from elective radiographs has no clinical significance and did not change management. Therefore, this study recommends that there is no rationale requesting elective post-operative joint radiographs. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Our aim was to ascertain if K-wire configuration had any influence on the infection and complication rate for base of 4th and 5th metacarpal fractures. We hypothesised that in individuals whose wires crossed the 4th and 5th carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ), the rate of complications and infection would be higher. Data was retrospectively analysed from a single centre. 106 consecutive patients with a base of 5th (with or without an associated 4th metacarpal fracture) were analysed between October 2016 and May 2021. Patients were split into two groups for comparison; those who did not have K-wires crossing the CMCJ's and those in whose fixation had wires crossing the joints. Confounding factors were accounted for and Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 20 software. Of 106 patients, 60 (56.6%) patients did have K-wires crossing the CMCJ. Wire size ranged from 1.2-2.0 with 65 individuals (65.7%) having size 1.6 wires inserted. The majority of patients, 66 (62.9%) underwent fixation with two wires (range 1-4). The majority of infected cases (88.9%) were in patients who had k-wires crossing the CMCJ, this trended towards clinical significance (p=0.09). Infection was associated with delay to theatre (p=0.002) and longer operative time (p=0.002). In patients with a base of 4th and 5th metacarpal fractures, we have demonstrated an increased risk of post-operative infection with a K-wire configuration that crosses the CMCJ. Biomechanical studies would be of use in determining the exact amount of movement across the CMCJ, with the different K-wire configuration in common use, and this will be part of a follow-up study

Since the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, the NHS has been under unprecedentedpressure. Elective surgery had ceased, and trauma surgery has decreased dramatically. Surgical training is multi-faceted and requires a specialist trainee to have a timetable which includes regular elective non-emergency operating, trauma operating and training in outpatient clinics. Consequently, training in theatre and the achievement of operative numbers and index procedures had not been possible for Trauma and Orthopaedic (T&O) specialist trainees. The Joint Committee on Surgical Training (JCST) has clear training index requirements for all T&O specialist trainees. In this study, we surveyed specialist trainees in the North West London deanery against the annual requirements set by the JCST guidelines. In addition, we retrospectively assessed the total number of trauma referrals and operations scheduled in our unit during the COVID-19 outbreak compared to that one year previously. The aim of this study is to objectively assess the effect the pandemic has on T&O specialist training. A total of 24 responses were collected from specialist trainees. The results of the survey showed 87% of trainees believed that their training had been affected. 75% of trainees felt they were not on track to meet operative numbers for the year, and 71% felt index number achievement had been affected. Trauma case numbers dropped by 20% compared to that one year previously. We recommend timely, planned and conscientious remediation for specialist trainees’ educational requirements. Specialist trainees must take responsibility for their training and use of additional educational opportunities. Clinical supervisors and training programme directors must provide additional support and guidance to achieve ARCP outcomes however in some scenarios extension of training may be necessary

There has been extensive research into neck of femur fractures in the elderly. Fragility non-hip femoral fractures share many of the same challenges [1]. Surgical management is complex, patients are frail and mortality rates have been reported as high as 38% [2]. Despite this, relatively little data is available evaluating the level of MDT care provided to non-hip femoral fractures. This audit aimed to evaluate the standard of MDT care provided for patients with non-hip femoral fractures according to the NHFD key performance indicators. The following fractures were included in the dataset: distal femoral, femoral shaft and peri-prosthetic femoral. Patients under 65 were excluded. Data was retrospectively collected using post-operative and medical documentation. Performance was assessed according to five key performance indicators:. Did orthogeriatrics review the patient within 72-hours?. Was surgery performed within 36-hours?. Was the patient weight bearing post-operatively?. Was a confusion assessment completed?. Was the patient discharged home?. 38 patients met the inclusion criteria. 84% of patients were seen by orthogeriatrics within 72 hours of admission. 32% of patients were operated on within 36-hours of admission, with time to theatre exceeding 36-hours in 92% of peri-prosthetic fractures. 37% of patients were not advised to full weight bear post operatively. 84% of patients received a confusion assessment whilst 61% of patients were discharged to their prior place of living. Our results suggest that non-hip femoral fractures do not receive the same standard of MDT care as neck of femur fractures. Greater prioritisation of resources should be given to this patient subset so that care is equivalent to hip-fracture patients. Time to surgery is a particular area for improvement, particularly in peri-prosthetic fractures, a trend that is mirrored nationally. Greater emphasis should be placed on encouraging full-weight bearing post-operatively to prevent post-surgical complications

Abstract. Background. 1. 63,284 patients presented with neck of femur fractures in England in 2020 (NHFD report 2021)2. To maximise theatre efficiency during the first wave of COVID-19, NHSE guidance recommended the use of HA for most patients requiring arthroplasty.3. The literature reports an incidence of Hemiarthroplasty dislocations of 1–15%. Aims. 1. To study the number and possible causes of dislocations in patients with Primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture neck of femur2. To compare our data with national and international data in terms of dislocation and revision rates for Hemiarthroplasty. Methods. Retrospective study Duration- 1st April 2021–31st March 20223. Inclusion criteria- Patients with neck of femur fracture treated with Hemiarthroplasty. Exclusion criteria- Patients treated with other surgical options for neck of femur fractures. Results. 1. No. of neck of femur patients- 4442. No. of patients treated with Hemiarthroplasty- 2143. No. of dislocations- 44. 75% were female, 75% had AMTS>7, 50% were operated within 36 hours of trauma, 75% dislocated within a month of surgery, 75% of the dislocations were revised. 5. One dislocation was due to >72 hour delay to surgery, second dislocation was due to smaller offset and shortening, third was due to acetabular dysplasia, fourth was due to larger head used. Discussion-1. Our 1.86% dislocation rate matches that in the literature of 1–6%2. 75% dislocated within a month of surgery matches that in the literature that maximum dislocations occur within one month. 3. Closed reduction as definitive method of management of dislocation 25% matches that in the literature of 22–25%4. 75% dislocations revised similar to literature of 75–80% revision rate. Conclusion. Pre-operative templating can reduce surgical error involving limb length discrepancy and shortening to prevent dislocations. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Introduction. Inaccurate identification of implants on X-rays may lead to prolonged surgical duration as well as increased complexity and costs during implant removal. Deep learning models may help to address this problem, although they typically require large datasets to effectively train models in detecting and classifying objects, e.g. implants. This can limit applicability for instances when only smaller datasets are available. Transfer learning can be used to overcome this limitation by leveraging large, publicly available datasets to pre-train detection and classification models. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of deep learning models in implant localisation and classification on a lower limb X-ray dataset. Method. Firstly, detection models were evaluated on their ability to localise four categories of implants, e.g. plates, screws, pins, and intramedullary nails. Detection models (Faster R-CNN, YOLOv5, EfficientDet) were pre-trained on the large, freely available COCO dataset (330000 images). Secondly, classification models (DenseNet121, Inception V3, ResNet18, ResNet101) were evaluated on their ability to classify five types of intramedullary nails. Localisation and classification accuracy were evaluated on a smaller image dataset (204 images). Result. The YOLOv5s model showed the best capacity to detect and distinguish between different types of implants (accuracy: plate=82.1%, screw=72.3%, intramedullary nail=86.9%, pin=79.9%). Screw implants were the most difficult implant to detect, likely due to overlapping screw implants visible in the image dataset. The DenseNet121 classification model showed the best performance in classifying different types of intramedullary nails (accuracy=73.7%). Therefore, a deep learning model pipeline with the YOLOv5s and DenseNet121 was proposed for the most optimal performance of automating implants localisation and classification for a relatively small dataset. Conclusion. These findings support the potential of deep learning techniques in enhancing implant detection accuracy. With further development, AI-based implant identification may benefit patients, surgeons and hospitals through improved surgical planning and efficient use of theatre time

Current evidence suggests that superior surgical team performance is linked to fewer intra-operative errors, reductions in mortality and even improved patient outcomes. Virtual reality has demonstrated excellent efficacy in training surgeons and scrub nurses individually, however its impact on training teams is currently unknown. This study aimed to assess if training together (scrub nurse and surgeon) in an innovative multiplayer virtual reality program was superior to single player training for novices learning anterior approach total hip arthroplasty (AA-THA). 40 participants (20 novice surgeons (CT1-ST3 level) and 20 novice scrub nurses) were enrolled in this study and randomised to individual or team virtual reality training. Individually-trained participants played with virtual avatar counterparts, whilst teams trained live in pairs (surgeon and scrub nurse). Both groups underwent 5 VR training sessions over 6 weeks. Subsequently, they underwent a real-life assessment in which they performed AA-THA on a high-fidelity model with real equipment in a simulated operating theatre. Teams performed together and individually-trained participants were randomly paired up with a solo player of the opposite role. Videos of the assessment were marked by two blinded expert assessors. The primary outcome was team performance as graded by the validated NOTECHs II score. Secondary outcomes were procedure time and number of technical errors from an expert pre-defined protocol. Teams outperformed individually-trained participants for non-technical skills in the real-world assessment (NOTECHS-II score 50.3 ± 6.04 vs 43.90 ± 5.90, p=0.0275). They completed the assessment 28.1% faster (31.22 minutes ±2.02 vs 43.43 ±2.71, p=0.01), and made close to half the number of technical errors when compared to the individual group (12.9 ± 8.3 vs 25.6 ± 6.1, p=0.001). Multiplayer, team training appears to lead to faster surgery with fewer technical errors and the development of superior non-technical skills

Anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) is a growth modulating procedure used to manage idiopathic scoliosis by applying a flexible tether to the convex surface of the spine in skeletally immature patients. The purpose of this study is to determine the preliminary clinical outcomes for an adolescent patient cohort. 18 patients with scoliosis were selected using a narrow selection criteria to undergo AVBT. Of this cohort, 11 had reached a minimum follow up of 2 years, 4 had reached 18 months, and 3 had reached 6 months. These patients all demonstrated a primary thoracic deformity that was too severe for bracing, were skeletally immature, and were analysed in this preliminary study of coronal plane deformity correction. Using open-source image analysis software (ImageJ, NIH) PA radiographs taken pre-operatively and at regular follow-up visits post-operatively were used to measure the coronal plane deformity of the major and compensatory curves. Pre-operatively, the mean age was 12.0 years (S.D. 10.7 – 13.3), mean Sanders score 2.6 (S.D. 1.8-3.4), all Risser 0 and pre-menarchal, with mean main thoracic Cobb angle of 52° (S.D. 44.2-59.8°). Post-operatively the mean angle decreased to 26.4° (S.D. 18.4-32°) at 1 week, 30.4° (S.D. 21.3-39.6°) at 2 months, 25.7° (S.D. 18.7-32.8°) at 6 months, 27.9° (S.D. 16.2-39.6°) at 12 months, and 36.8° (S.D. 22.6– 51.0°) at 18 months and 38.2° (S.D. 27.6-48.7°) at 2 years. The change in curve at 2 years post-operative was statistically significant (P=0.004). There were 4 tether breakages identified that did not require return to theatre as yet, one patient underwent a posterior spinal instrumented fusion due to curve progression. AVBT is a promising new growth modulation technique for skeletally immature patients with progressive idiopathic scoliosis. This study has demonstrated a reduction in scoliosis severity

Abstract. Objectives. The need to accurately forecast the injury burden has never been higher. With an aging, ever expanding trauma population and less than half of the beds available compared to 1990, the National Health Service (NHS) is stretched to breaking point1,2. Resultantly, we aimed to determine whether it is possible to predict the proportionality of injuries treated operatively within orthopaedic departments based on their number of Neck of Femur fracture (NOF) patients reported both in our study and the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD). Methods. We utilised the ORthopaedic trauma hospital outcomes - Patient operative delays (ORTHOPOD) dataset of 22,585 trauma patients across the four countries of the United Kingdom (UK) admitted to 83 hospitals between 22/08/22 – 16/10/22. This dataset had two arms: arm one was assessing the caseload and theatre capacity, arm two assessed the patient, injury and management demographics. Results. Our results complied with the data reported to the NHFD in over 80% of cases for both the 2022 and five-year average reported numbers. More operations were performed for elderly hip fractures alone than for the combined totals of the next four most common fractures: ankle, distal radius, tibial shaft and forearm (6387 vs 5922). Conversely, 10 out of the 13 fracture types were not encountered by at least one hospital and 93% of hospitals encountered less than 2 fractures of a certain type.60% of trauma is treated within Trauma Units (TUs) however, per unit, Major Trauma Centres (MTCs) treat approximately 43% more patients. Similarly, 11 out of the 14 fracture types examined presented more frequently to a MTC however 3 of the most common fractures had a preponderance for TUs (elderly hip, distal radius and forearm fractures). After excluding NOF, lower limb fractures accounted for approximately 57% of fractures in all countries and ankle and distal radius fracture combined comprised more than 50% in 74% of regions. There were few outliers across the study regarding number of fractures treated by a hospital with tibial shaft fractures demonstrating the highest number of outliers with 4. Conclusions. The number of hip fractures seen on average by an individual unit remains relatively consistent as does the regional variation of any given fracture; resultantly, it is possible to predict injury proportionality based off a unit's hip fracture numbers. This powerful tool could transform both resource allocation and recruitment. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Chronic Achilles tendinopathy is characterised by sub-acute inflammation with pro-inflammatory type 1 macrophages (M1), tissue degeneration and consequent partial or total tendon injury. Control of the inflammatory response and M1-to-M2 macrophage polarisation can favour tendon healing both directly and indirectly, by allowing for the regenerative process driven by local mesenchymal stem cells. Ten patients (3 females and 7 males aged between 32 and 71 years old) with partial Achilles tendon injury were treated with injections of autologous peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PB-MNCs). The cell concentrate was obtained from 100-120 cc of each patient's blood with a selective point-of-care filtration system. PB-MNCs remained trapped in the filter and were injected immediately after sampling. Around 60% of the PB-MNC concentrate was injected directly into the injured area, while the remaining 40% was injected in smaller amounts into the surrounding parts of the Achilles tendon affected by tendinosis. All patients were evaluated both clinically with the help of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale, and radiologically (MRI examination) at baseline and 2 months after the PB-MNC injection. A clinical reassessment with the AOFAS scale was also performed 6 months after the intervention. The rehabilitation protocol implied full weight-bearing walking immediately after the procedure, light physical activity 3-4 days after the injection, and physiotherapist-assisted stretching exercises and eccentric training. In all patients, functional and radiological signs of tendon healing processes were detected as early as 2 months after a single treatment and the AOFAS scale rose from the initial mean value of 37.5 (baseline) to 85.4 (6 months). Our preliminary results indicate that regenerative therapies with PB-MNCs can prove useful for partial Achilles tendon injuries as a valid alternative to surgical options, especially when other conservative approaches have failed. Advantages of this therapy include rapid execution, no need for an operating theatre, easy reproducibility, quick recovery and good tolerability regardless of the patient's age (the procedure is not to be performed in subjects who are below 18 years old). Further studies on the topic are recommended to confirm these observations

Abstract. Background. Recurrent patellar dislocation in combination with cartilage injures are difficult injuries to treat with confounding pathways of treatment. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of patients operated for patellofemoral instability with and without cartilage defects. Methods. 82 patients (mean age-28.8 years) with recurrent patellar dislocations, who underwent soft-tissue or bony procedures, were divided into 2 matched groups (age, sex, follow-up and type of procedure) of 41 each based on the presence or absence of cartilage defects in patella. Chondroplasty, microfracture, osteochondral fixation or AMIC-type procedures were done depending on the nature of cartilage injury. Lysholm, Kujala, Tegner and Subjective Knee scores of both groups were compared and analysed. Complications and return to theatre were noted. Results. With a mean follow-up of 8 years (2 years-12.3 years), there was a significant improvement observed in all the mean post-operative Patient Reported Outcome Measures (p<0.05) of both the groups, as compared to the pre-operative scores. Comparing the 2 groups, post-operative Lysholm, Kujala and Subjective knee scores were significantly higher in patients operated without cartilage defects (p<0.05). 3 patients operated for PFJ instability with cartilage defects had to undergo patellofemoral replacement in the long term. Odds ratio for developing complications is 2.6 for patients operated with cartilage defects. Conclusion. Although there is a significant improvement in the long term outcome scores of patients operated for recurrent patellar dislocation with cartilage defects, the results are significantly inferior as compared to those without cartilage defects, along with a higher risk of developing complications and returning to theatre. Declaration of Interest. (b) declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported:I declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research project

Background. Recurrent patellar dislocation in combination with cartilage injures are difficult injuries to treat with confounding pathways of treatment. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of patients operated for patellofemoral instability with and without cartilage defects. Methods. 82 patients (mean age-28.8 years) with recurrent patellar dislocations, who underwent soft-tissue or bony procedures, were divided into 2 matched groups (age, sex, follow-up and type of procedure) of 41 each based on the presence or absence of cartilage defects in patella. Chondroplasty, microfracture, osteochondral fixation or Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis(AMIC)-type procedures were done depending on the nature of cartilage injury. Lysholm, Kujala, Tegner and Subjective Knee scores of both groups were compared and analysed. Complications and return to theatre were noted. Results. With a mean follow-up of 8 years (2 years-12.3 years), there was a significant improvement observed in all the mean post-operative Patient Reported Outcome Measures (p<0.05) of both the groups, as compared to the pre-operative scores. Comparing the 2 groups, post-operative Lysholm, Kujala and Subjective knee scores were significantly higher in patients operated without cartilage defects (p<0.05). 3 patients operated for patellofemoral instability with cartilage defects had to undergo patellofemoral replacement in the long term. Odds ratio for developing complications is 2.6 for patients operated with cartilage defects. Conclusion. Although there is a significant improvement in the long term outcome scores of patients operated for recurrent patellar dislocation with cartilage defects, the results are significantly inferior as compared to those without cartilage defects, along with a higher risk of developing complications and returning to theatre