Introduction. We present a series of patients who have had secondary reconstruction of war injuries to the upper and lower limbs, sustained during the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts. Material and Methods. All patients were seen at the combined Peripheral Nerve Injuries Clinic at the Defence Medical Centre for Rehabilitation, Headley Court. All surgery was performed at Odstock Hospital. Procedures include scar excision and neurolysis (all patients), release of scar contractures, tenolysis, tendon transfers, revision nerve grafts, excision of neuroma, and soft tissue reconstruction using pedicled or free flaps. Results. 24 patients have been treated at the time of submission. We have using 13 free flaps (1 free groin flap, 9 anterolateral thigh, 3 parascapular, with 4 as through-flow flaps) and 1 pedicled groin flap, with no flap losses. There were 6 amputation stump revisions (1 above elbow, 5 below knee). The majority (n=23) have had nerve recovery distal to the level of injury following revision surgery. Conclusions. Nerve repairs recover following neurolysis (and revision nerve graft if necessary) with provision of good soft tissue cover. Release of scar contractures with flap cover allows healing of chronic wounds and permits mobilisation of joints. Thin fasciocutaneous flaps provide good contour and can be elevated more easily than skin grafted muscle flaps for secondary surgery. Free or regional flaps are preferable to local flaps in high energy-transfer military wounds. Immediate complex reconstruction is not always appropriate in multiply-injured patients

We performed a prospective, randomised trial to evaluate the outcome after surgery of displaced, unstable fractures of the distal radius. A total of 280 consecutive patients were enrolled in a prospective database and 88 identified who met the inclusion criteria for surgery. They were randomised to receive either bridging external fixation with supplementary Kirschner-wire fixation or volar-locked plating with screws. Both groups were similar in terms of age, gender, hand dominance, fracture pattern, socio-economic status and medical co-morbidities.

Although the patients treated by volar plating had a statistically significant early improvement in the range of movement of the wrist, this advantage diminished with time and in absolute terms the difference in range of movement was clinically unimportant. Radiologically, there were no clinically significant differences in the reductions, although more patients with AO/OTA (Orthopaedic Trauma Association) type C fractures were allocated to the external fixation group. The function at one year was similar in the two groups.

No clear advantage could be demonstrated with either treatment but fewer re-operations were required in the external fixation group.