Telehealth has the potential to change the way we approach patient care. From virtual consenting to reducing carbon emissions, costs, and waiting times, it is a powerful tool in our clinical armamentarium. There is mounting evidence that remote diagnostic evaluation and decision-making have reached an acceptable level of accuracy and can safely be adopted in orthopaedic surgery. Furthermore, patients’ and surgeons’ satisfaction with virtual appointments are comparable to in-person consultations. Challenges to the widespread use of telehealth should, however, be acknowledged and include the cost of installation, training, maintenance, and accessibility. It is also vital that clinicians are conscious of the medicolegal and ethical considerations surrounding the medium and adhere strictly to the relevant data protection legislation and storage framework. It remains to be seen how organizations harness the full spectrum of the technology to facilitate effective patient care. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(8):843–849

Telemedicine is the delivery of healthcare from a remote location using integrated computer/communication technology. This systematic review aims to explore evidence for telemedicine in orthopaedics to determine its advantages, validity, effectiveness and utilisation particularly during our current pandemic where patient contact is limited.

Databases of PubMed, Scopus and CINHAL were systematically searched and articles were included if they involved any form of telephone or video consultation in an orthopaedic population. Findings were synthesised into four themes: patient/clinician satisfaction, accuracy and validity of examination, safety and patient outcomes and cost effectiveness. Quality assessment was undertaken using Cochrane and Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools.

Twenty studies were included consisting of nine RCTs across numerous orthopaedic subspecialties including fracture care, elective orthopaedics and oncology. Studies revealed high patient satisfaction with telemedicine for convenience, less waiting and travelling time. Telemedicine was cost effective particularly if patients had to travel long distances, required hospital transport or time off work. No clinically significant differences were found in patient examination nor measurement of patient reported outcome measures. Telemedicine was reported to be a safe method of consultation. However, studies were of variable methodological quality with selection bias.

In conclusion, evidence suggests that telemedicine in orthopaedics can be safe, cost effective, valid in clinical assessment with high patient/clinician satisfaction. Further work with high quality RCTs is required to elucidate long term outcomes. This systematic review presents up-to-date evidence on the use of telemedicine and provides data for organisations considering its use in the current COVID-19 pandemic and beyond.

Aims. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a swift adoption of telehealth in orthopaedic surgery. This study aimed to analyze the satisfaction of patients and surgeons with the rapid expansion of telehealth at this time within the division of adult reconstructive surgery at a major urban academic tertiary hospital. Methods. A total of 334 patients underging arthroplasty of the hip or knee who completed a telemedicine visit between 30 March and 30 April 2020 were sent a 14-question survey, scored on a five-point Likert scale. Eight adult reconstructive surgeons who used telemedicine during this time were sent a separate 14-question survey at the end of the study period. Factors influencing patient satisfaction were determined using univariate and multivariate ordinal logistic regression modelling. Results. A total of 68 patients (20.4%) and 100% of the surgeons completed the surveys. Patients were “Satisfied” with their telemedicine visits (4.10/5.00 (SD 0.98)) and 19 (27.9%) would prefer telemedicine to in-person visits in the absence of COVID-19. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression modelling revealed that patients were more likely to be satisfied if their surgeon effectively responded to their questions or concerns (odds ratio (OR) 3.977; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.260 to 13.190; p = 0.019) and if their visit had a high audiovisual quality (OR 2.46; 95% CI 1.052 to 6.219; p = 0.042). Surgeons were “Satisfied” with their telemedicine experience (3.63/5.00 (SD 0.92)) and were “Fairly Confident” (4.00/5.00 (SD 0.53)) in their diagnostic accuracy despite finding the physical examinations to be only “Slightly Effective” (1.88/5.00 (SD 0.99)). Most adult reconstructive surgeons, seven of eight (87.5%) would continue to use telemedicine in the future. Conclusion. Telemedicine emerged as a valuable tool during the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients undergoing arthroplasty and their surgeons were satisfied with telemedicine and see a role for its use after the pandemic. The audiovisual quality and the responsiveness of physicians to the concerns of patients determine their satisfaction. Future investigations should focus on improving the physical examination of patients through telemedicine and strategies for its widespread implementation. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):196–204

Introduction. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a swift adoption of telehealth in orthopedic surgery. The purpose of this study was to analyze patient and surgeon satisfaction with a rapid expansion of telehealth use during COVID-19 pandemic within the division of adult reconstructive surgery at a major urban academic hospital. Methods. 334 hip and knee arthroplasty patients who completed a telemedicine visit from March 30th, 2020 through April 30th, 2020 were sent a 14-question survey. Eight adult reconstructive surgeons who used telemedicine were sent a separate 14-question survey at the end of the study period. Factors influencing patient satisfaction were determined using univariate and multivariate ordinal logistic regression modeling. Results. 20.4% of patients (68/334) and 100% of surgeons (8/8) completed the surveys. Patients were on average “Satisfied” with their telemedicine visits (4.10/5.00 ± 0.98), 54.4% considered themselves high-risk for COVID-19 complications, and 27.9% reported that they preferred future visits to be conducted using telemedicine for reasons unrelated to COVID-19. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression modeling revealed that patients reported higher satisfaction if their surgeon effectively responded to their questions/concerns (OR 3.977; 95% CI 1.260 to 13.190, p=0.019) and if their visit had higher audiovisual quality (OR 2.46; 95% CI 1.052 to 6.219, p=0.042). Surgeons were “Satisfied” with their telemedicine experience (3.63/5.00 ± 0.92), felt that physical exams conducted via telemedicine were “Slightly Effective” (1.88/5.00 ± 0.99), and believed that 43.5% of visits required an in-person component. Most adult reconstructive surgeons would continue to use telemedicine in the future (87.5%). Conclusion. Telehealth emerged as a valuable tool during the COVID-19 pandemic. Arthroplasty patients and surgeons were generally satisfied with telehealth and see a role for telehealth after the pandemic. Future investigations should explore how to improve telehealth physical examinations and identify which types of visits and patient concerns are reliably addressed using telehealth

Introduction. Surface sensor technology provides useful information about the status of an individual's health and been available for many years, but has not been widely adopted by orthopaedic surgeons. However, its usage may be become more prominent as COVID-19 has created a shift towards telemedicine. This study reports the use of a joint specific surface sensor to remotely monitor the recovery of patients who underwent knee replacement surgery prior to the enforced stay-at-home social distancing necessitated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods. The study group consisted of 29 patients who underwent primary, unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A knee joint specific surface sensor (TracPatch™) was placed following surgery and kept on patients for 3 weeks postoperatively. The patients’ range of motion (ROM), exercise compliance, distance walked, pain, skin temperature, and incision appearance were monitored and transmitted electronically to health care providers. Patients were grouped by gender, age and BMI for analysis of functional outcome measurements. Results. Patients tolerated wearing the device without complications. Additionally, both patients and physicians were able to monitor patient data in real time via a mobile phone or web application. The mean maximum flexion and minimum extension did not significantly change from postoperative week 1 to postoperative week 2 and week 3. However, the mean number of steps taken increased from 4,923 steps in postoperative week 1 to 8,163 steps week 2 (p=0.01) and 11,615 steps week 3 (p<0.001) postoperatively. There were no statistically significant differences in ROM or number of steps between the different gender, age, and BMI groups. Conclusion. The use of a joint specific surface sensor that provides novel pre- and postsurgical information is a valuable addition to surgeons’ remote care capability. These devices promise to accelerate the adoption of telehealth by orthopedic surgeons

Aims. COVID-19 has changed the practice of orthopaedics across the globe. The medical workforce has dealt with this outbreak with varying strategies and adaptations, which are relevant to its field and to the region. As one of the ‘hotspots’ in the UK , the surgical branch of trauma and orthopaedics need strategies to adapt to the ever-changing landscape of COVID-19. Methods. Adapting to the crisis locally involved five operational elements: 1) triaging and workflow of orthopaedic patients; 2) operation theatre feasibility and functioning; 3) conservation of human resources and management of workforce in the department; 4) speciality training and progression; and 5) developing an exit strategy to resume elective work. Two hospitals under our trust were redesignated based on the treatment of COVID-19 patients. Registrar/consultant led telehealth reviews were carried out for early postoperative patients. Workflows for the management of outpatient care and inpatient care were created. We looked into the development of a dedicated operating space to perform the emergency orthopaedic surgeries without symptoms of COVID-19. Between March 23 and April 23, 2020, we have surgically treated 133 patients across both our hospitals in our trust. This mainly included hip fractures and fractures/infection affecting the hand. Conclusion. The COVID-19 pandemic is not the first disease outbreak affecting the UK, nor will it be the last. The current crisis has necessitated rapid development of new hospital guidelines and early adaptive strategies in our services. Protocols and directives need to be formalized keeping in mind that COVID-19 will have a long and protracted course until a definitive cure is discovered

BACKGROUND. Telerehabilitation has been shown to both promote effective recovery after shoulder arthroplasty and may improve adherence to treatment. Such systems require demonstration of feasibility, ease of use, efficacy, patient and clinician satisfaction, and overall cost of care, and much of this data has yet to be provided. Few augmented reality rehabilitation approaches have been developed to date. Evidence suggests augmented reality rehabilitation may be equivalent to conventional methods for adherence, improvement of function, and relief of pain seen in these musculoskeletal conditions. We proposed that the development of an augmented reality rehabilitation platform during the pre and postoperative period (including post-shoulder arthroplasty) could be used to track patient activity and range of motion as well as promote recovery. METHODS. A prototype augmented reality platform equipped with a motion sensor system optimised for the upper arm was developed to be used to validate 4 arcs of shoulder motion and complete directed upper arm exercises designed for post-shoulder arthroplasty rehabilitation was built and tested. This system combined augmented reality instructions and motion tracking to follow patients over the course of their therapy, along with a telehealth patient-clinician interface. FINDINGS. The augmented reality platform was tested to validate shoulder range of motion examination similar to that of standard goniometer measurements. Healthy test subjects without shoulder pain or prior shoulder surgery performed the arcs of motion for 5 repetitions as part of a home therapy program. Each motion was measured with angular measurements as a proof of concept with high degree precision (less than 5 degrees). Remote patient-clinician interface testing was also conducted along with a clinician established therapy plan. DISCUSSION. Augmented reality systems that track patients' complex movements, including clinical shoulder range of motion, suggest the promising future of telerehabilitation in arthroplasty, particularly in telemonitoring before and after surgery. As this technology continues to gain acceptance, further studies that evaluate the outcomes of augmented reality rehabilitation for long-term follow-up are needed

Introduction. Employer-sponsored travel surgery programs for commonly performed procedures like total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are increasing, as employers try to more effectively manage the healthcare costs of their employees. This new approach by employers to direct their employees to designated “Centers of Excellence” (COEs) creates a need to characterize the “travel patient” population that commutes long distances to receive their surgical care and returns home for their rehab shortly after surgery. Electronic patient rehabilitation platforms (EPRA) facilitate communication, patient navigation, and care coordination across this complex episode of care and may contribute to improved outcomes after TJA. The aim of this study is to evaluate patient satisfaction, functional outcomes and engagement with the use of an EPRA among two TJA cohorts: 1) travel and 2) non-travel TJA patients. Methods. A retrospective review was performed on total knee (TKA) and total hip (THA) arthroplasty patients at a single institution during the first 6 months following implementation of an EPRA. All patients were offered internet based access to an EPRA which provided instant messaging with the care team, algorithmic navigation of the patient during the pre and post-op phases, and access to an extensive library of educational videos regarding their surgery, rehab, and FAQs. Primary outcome measures were the pre-op and 12 week post op HOOS Jr. and KOOS Jr. Patient satisfaction at 12 weeks after surgery and engagement metrics for the EPRA were also examined. Cases were separated into two groups: travel and non-travel, and the groups were compared in terms of engagement, improvement in functional outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Chi-square test and t-test statistics were used for analysis. Results. 634 TJA cases (100 travel; 534 non-travel) were included in this study. Age and BMI differed significantly between these cohorts (p<0.001). The mean age and BMI were 59.17 and 33.01, respectively for travel patients and 69.27 and 29.56, respectively for non-travel patients. 97% of the travel patients initially opted-in to use the electronic rehabilitation program compared to 87.6% of the non-travel patients. The number of travel patients logging in, watching videos, and messaging was significantly higher than that of non-travel patients (p<0.01). On average, travel patients generated double the number of sessions than non-travel patients (71.5 vs 31.5, p<0.001). Among TKA cases, travel patients reported significantly lower pre-op mean KOOS Jr. scores than non-travel patients (43.11 vs. 47.78, p< 0.01). By 12 weeks, there was no difference between the groups (67.11 vs. 70.05, p=0.15). THA cases exhibited similar increases in patient reported outcomes(PROs). Mean pre-op HOOS Jr scores for travel and non-travel patients were 42.64 and 48.16 respectively (p=0.07) and mean post-op HOOS Jr. scores at 12 weeks were 75.93 and 80.12, respectively (p=0.15). Comparing 12 week procedure satisfaction (0–5), travel THA patients reported significantly higher mean satisfaction than non-travel THA cases (4.93 vs 4.32, p<0.001). There was no difference in satisfaction between travel TKA and non-travel TKA cases (4.31 vs 4.35, p=0.85). Conclusion. This study revealed higher engagement among travel patients in comparison to non-travel patients as measured by utilization of EPRA. Patients participating in these programs are typically incentivized financially in terms of enhanced insurance coverage and elimination of out-of-pocket expenses when they obtain care at an employer designated COE which may contribute to this increased degree of engagement. Increased utilization of EPRA may have also contributed to higher 12 week patient satisfaction. Despite the logistical challenges of travel TJA surgery, the EPRA used in this study appears to facilitate effective patient navigation and care coordination in the travel patient population, resulting in patient reported outcomes and satisfaction that is comparable to our non-travel patient population. Considering the projected increased growth of these employer directed COE programs, further understanding of these travel surgery patients and the role of electronic patient engagement platforms and telehealth technologies is warranted. For figures, tables, or references, please contact authors directly

We aim to explore the potential technologies for monitoring and assessment of patients undergoing arthroplasty by examining selected literature focusing on the technology currently available and reflecting on possible future development and application. The reviewed literature indicates a large variety of different hardware and software, widely available and used in a limited manner, to assess patients’ performance. There are extensive opportunities to enhance and integrate the systems which are already in existence to develop patient-specific pathways for rehabilitation.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(10):1104–1109.

The April 2024 Spine Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Lengthening behaviour of magnetically controlled growing rods in early-onset scoliosis: a multicentre study; LDL, cholesterol, and statins usage cause pseudarthrosis following lumbar interbody fusion; Decision-making in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis of L4/L5; Does the interfacing angle between pedicle screws and support rods affect clinical outcomes after posterior thoracolumbar fusion?; Returning to the grind: how workload influences recovery post-lumbar spine surgery; Securing the spine: a leap forward with s2 alar-iliac screws in adult spinal deformity surgery.

Aims

This study assesses patient barriers to successful telemedicine care in orthopaedic practices in a large academic practice in the COVID-19 era.

Literature surrounding artificial intelligence (AI)-related applications for hip and knee arthroplasty has proliferated. However, meaningful advances that fundamentally transform the practice and delivery of joint arthroplasty are yet to be realized, despite the broad range of applications as we continue to search for meaningful and appropriate use of AI. AI literature in hip and knee arthroplasty between 2018 and 2021 regarding image-based analyses, value-based care, remote patient monitoring, and augmented reality was reviewed. Concerns surrounding meaningful use and appropriate methodological approaches of AI in joint arthroplasty research are summarized. Of the 233 AI-related orthopaedics articles published, 178 (76%) constituted original research, while the rest consisted of editorials or reviews. A total of 52% of original AI-related research concerns hip and knee arthroplasty (n = 92), and a narrative review is described. Three studies were externally validated. Pitfalls surrounding present-day research include conflating vernacular (“AI/machine learning”), repackaging limited registry data, prematurely releasing internally validated prediction models, appraising model architecture instead of inputted data, withholding code, and evaluating studies using antiquated regression-based guidelines. While AI has been applied to a variety of hip and knee arthroplasty applications with limited clinical impact, the future remains promising if the question is meaningful, the methodology is rigorous and transparent, the data are rich, and the model is externally validated. Simple checkpoints for meaningful AI adoption include ensuring applications focus on: administrative support over clinical evaluation and management; necessity of the advanced model; and the novelty of the question being answered.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(12):1292–1303.

Aims

The purpose of this study was to determine the access to and ability to use telemedicine technology in adult patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to determine associations with the socioeconomic characteristics of the patients, including age, sex, race, and education. We also sought to understand the patients’ perceived benefits, risks, and preferences when dealing with telemedicine.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to unprecedented challenges to healthcare systems worldwide. Orthopaedic departments have adopted business continuity models and guidelines for essential and non-essential surgeries to preserve hospital resources as well as protect patients and staff. These guidelines broadly encompass reduction of ambulatory care with a move towards telemedicine, redeployment of orthopaedic surgeons/residents to the frontline battle against COVID-19, continuation of education and research through web-based means, and cancellation of non-essential elective procedures. However, if containment of COVID-19 community spread is achieved, resumption of elective orthopaedic procedures and transition plans to return to normalcy must be considered for orthopaedic departments. The COVID-19 pandemic also presents a moral dilemma to the orthopaedic surgeon considering elective procedures. What is the best treatment for our patients and how does the fear of COVID-19 influence the risk-benefit discussion during a pandemic? Surgeons must deliberate the fine balance between elective surgery for a patient’s wellbeing versus risks to the operating team and utilization of precious hospital resources. Attrition of healthcare workers or Orthopaedic surgeons from restarting elective procedures prematurely or in an unsafe manner may render us ill-equipped to handle the second wave of infections. This highlights the need to develop effective screening protocols or preoperative COVID-19 testing before elective procedures in high-risk, elderly individuals with comorbidities. Alternatively, high-risk individuals should be postponed until the risk of nosocomial COVID-19 infection is minimal. In addition, given the higher mortality and perioperative morbidity of patients with COVID-19 undergoing surgery, the decision to operate must be carefully deliberated. As we ramp-up elective services and get “back to business” as orthopaedic surgeons, we have to be constantly mindful to proceed in a cautious and calibrated fashion, delivering the best care, while maintaining utmost vigilance to prevent the resurgence of COVID-19 during this critical transition period.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:222–228.

Aims

Psychoeducative prehabilitation to optimize surgical outcomes is relatively novel in spinal fusion surgery and, like most rehabilitation treatments, they are rarely well specified. Spinal fusion patients experience anxieties perioperatively about pain and immobility, which might prolong hospital length of stay (LOS). The aim of this prospective cohort study was to determine if a Preoperative Spinal Education (POSE) programme, specified using the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System (RTSS) and designed to normalize expectations and reduce anxieties, was safe and reduced LOS.

Virtual encounters have experienced an exponential rise amid the current COVID-19 crisis. This abrupt change, seen in response to unprecedented medical and environmental challenges, has been forced upon the orthopaedic community. However, such changes to adopting virtual care and technology were already in the evolution forecast, albeit in an unpredictable timetable impeded by regulatory and financial barriers. This adoption is not meant to replace, but rather augment established, traditional models of care while ensuring patient/provider safety, especially during the pandemic. While our department, like those of other institutions, has performed virtual care for several years, it represented a small fraction of daily care. The pandemic required an accelerated and comprehensive approach to the new reality. Contemporary literature has already shown equivalent safety and patient satisfaction, as well as superior efficiency and reduced expenses with musculoskeletal virtual care (MSKVC) versus traditional models. Nevertheless, current literature detailing operational models of MSKVC is scarce. The current review describes our pre-pandemic MSKVC model and the shift to a MSKVC pandemic workflow that enumerates the conceptual workflow organization (patient triage, from timely care provision based on symptom acuity/severity to a continuum that includes future follow-up). Furthermore, specific setup requirements (both resource/personnel requirements such as hardware, software, and network connectivity requirements, and patient/provider characteristics respectively), and professional expectations are outlined. MSKVC has already become a pivotal element of musculoskeletal care, due to COVID-19, and these changes are confidently here to stay. Readiness to adapt and evolve will be required of individual musculoskeletal clinical teams as well as organizations, as established paradigms evolve.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:272–280.

Aims

The purpose of our study was to determine which groups of orthopaedic providers favour virtual care, and analyze overall orthopaedic provider perceptions of virtual care. We hypothesize that providers with less clinical experience will favour virtual care, and that orthopaedic providers overall will show increased preference for virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic and decreased preference during non-pandemic circumstances.

The April 2015 Children’s orthopaedics Roundup³⁶⁰ looks at: Reducing the incidence of DDH – is ‘back carrying’ the answer?; Surgical approach and AVN may not be linked in DDH; First year routine radiographic follow up for scoliosis not necessary; Diagnosis of osteochondritis dessicans; Telemedicine in paediatrics; Regional anesthesia in supracondylar fractures?