Post-traumatic elbow stiffness is a disabling condition that remains challenging for upper limb surgeons. Open elbow arthrolysis is commonly used for the treatment of stiff elbow when conservative therapy has failed. Multiple questions commonly arise from surgeons who deal with this disease. These include whether the patient has post-traumatic stiff elbow, how to evaluate the problem, when surgery is appropriate, how to perform an excellent arthrolysis, what the optimal postoperative rehabilitation is, and how to prevent or reduce the incidence of complications. Following these questions, this review provides an update and overview of post-traumatic elbow stiffness with respect to the diagnosis, preoperative evaluation, arthrolysis strategies, postoperative rehabilitation, and prevention of complications, aiming to provide a complete diagnosis and treatment path. Cite this article:
The reasons for failure of a hemirthroplasty (HA) when used to
treat a proximal humeral fracture include displaced or necrotic
tuberosities, insufficient metaphyseal bone-stock, and rotator cuff
tears. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is often the only
remaining form of treatment in these patients. The aim of this study
was to evaluate the clinical outcome after conversions from a failed
HA to rTSA. A total of 35 patients, in whom a HA, as treatment for a fracture
of the proximal humerus, had failed, underwent conversion to a rTSA.
A total of 28 were available for follow-up at a mean of 61 months
(37 to 91), having been initially reviewed at a mean of 20 months
(12 to 36) postoperatively. Having a convertible design, the humeral
stem could be preserved in nine patients. The stem was removed in
the other 19 patients and a conventional rTSA was implanted. At
final follow-up, patients were assessed using the American Shoulder
and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Constant Score, and plain radiographs.Aims
Material and Methods
