Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 7 of 7
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_8 | Pages 59 - 59
11 Apr 2023
Chitto M Chen B Kunisch F Wychowaniec J Onsea J Post V Richards G Zeiter S Wagemans J Trampuz A D'Este M Moreno M Lavigne R Moriarty F
Full Access

Fracture related infection remains a major challenge in musculoskeletal trauma surgery. Despite best practice, treatment strategies suffer from high failure rates due to antibiotic resistance and tolerance. Bacteriophages represent a promising alternative as they retain activity against such bacteria. However, optimal phage administration protocols remain unknown, although injectable hydrogels, loaded with phage and conventional antibiotics, may support conventional therapy. In this study we tested the activity of meropenem, and two newly isolated bacteriophages (ϕ9 and ϕ3) embedded within alginate-chitosan microbeads and a hydrogel. Antibiotic and phage stability and activity were monitored in vitro, over a period of 10 days. In vivo, the same material was tested in treatment of a 5-day old Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection of a tibial plate osteotomy in mice. Treatment involved debridement and 5 days of systemic antibiotic therapy plus: i- saline, ii-phages in saline, iii-phages and antibiotics loaded into a hydrogel (n=7 mice/group). To assess the efficacy of the treatments, the infection load was monitored during revision surgery with debridement of the infected tissue after 5,10 and 13 days (euthanasia) by CFU and PFU quantification. In vitro testing confirmed that the stability of meropenem and activity of ϕ9 and ϕ3, was not affected within the alginate beads or hydrogel over 10 days. The in vivo study showed that all mice receiving phages and antibiotics loaded into a hydrogel survived the infection with a reduction of the bacterial load in the soft tissue. Active phages could be recovered from the infected site at euthanasia (10. 4. PFU/g). The hydrogel loaded with bacteriophages and meropenem showed a positive result in locally reducing the infection load indicating a synergistic effect of the selected antimicrobials. Overall, our new strategy shows encouraging results for improving the treatment of antibiotic-resistant biofilm infections that are related to medical implants


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 20 - 20
1 Jan 2017
Mohammad H Pillai A
Full Access

We describe a case series using calcium sulphate bio composite with antibiotics (Cerament/Stimulan) in treating infected metalwork in the lower limb. Eight patients aged 22–74 (7 males, 1 female) presented with clinical evidence of infected limb metal work from previous orthopaedic surgery. Metal work removal with application of either cerement in 5 cases (10–20ml including 175mg–350mg gentamycin) or stimulan in 3 cases (10–20ml including either 1g vancomycin or clindamycin 1.2g or 100mg tigecycline) into the site was performed. Supplemental systemic antibiotic therapy (oral/intravenous) was instituted based on intraoperative tissue culture and sensitivity. Four patients had infected ankle metalwork, 2 patients infected distal tibial metalwork and 2 had infected external fixators. Metal work was removed in all cases. The mean pre operative CRP was 15.8mg/l (range 1–56mg/l). The mean postoperative CRP at 1 month was 20.5mg/l (range 2–98mg/l). The mean pre op WCC was 7.9×10. 9. (range 4.7–10.5 ×10. 9. ). Mean post op WCC at 1 month was 7.1×10. 9. (range 5.0–9.2×10. 9. ). The organisms cultured included enterobacter, staphylococcus aureus, staphylococcus epidermidis, staphylococcus cohnii, stenotrophomonas, acinetobacter, group B streptococcus, enterococcus and escherichia coli. No additional procedures were required in any case. All surgical wounds went on to heal uneventfully. Infection control and union was achieved both clinically and radiologically in all cases. Our results support the use of a calcium sulphate bio composite with antibiotic as an adjuvant for effective local infection control in cases with implant related bone sepsis. The technique is well tolerated with no systemic or local side effects. We believe that implant removal, debridement and local antibiotic delivery can minimise the need for prolonged systemic antibiotic therapy in such cases


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 103-B, Issue SUPP_13 | Pages 100 - 100
1 Nov 2021
Papadia D Comincini F Pirchio P Puggioni V Bellanova G
Full Access

Introduction and Objective. Management of bone loss associated with bone contamination or infection represents a double biological and clinical challenge frequent in traumatology. The advent of new biomaterials can allow a different approach in the treatment of bone gap. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prophylactic and therapeutic effectiveness of addition of a new absorbable bone substitute (BS) eluting different antibiotics in reconstruction of bone defects after infections and fractures with soft tissue damage. Materials and Methods. We conducted a review of patients with contaminated or infected bone defects treated using a new biomaterial, a porous composite of collagen matrices and Beta tricalcium phosphate (β TCP), able to provide a long-term release of different antibiotics. We have included treatment of osteomyelitis and osteosynthesis of exposed fracture (Gustilo Anderson 1–3b) or fractures with soft tissue damage and high risk of contamination. Surgical technique included debridement filling bone defect with BS eluting antibiotics, osteosynthesis (plate, nail, external fixator, kirschner wire), soft tissue coverage, and systemic antibiotic therapy. Radiographic and clinical data including complications (wound dehiscence, superficial or deep infection, osteomyelitis) were collected. Results. We treated 25 patients (21 male, 4 female) with mean age 47 yrs. (range 21–83). The locations treated (for incidence) was: 9 femurs (7 plates, 2 nail), 7 calcanei (one bilateral), 3 tibias, 2 forearms, 2 metatarsi, 2 hands, 1 elbow. 6 patients had large bone loss. 7 patients had bone infections (4 were Cierny Madern 4); 8 patients had osteosynthesis of exposed fractures Gustilo Anderson 1–3b (9 plate, one bilateral calcaneus). 8 patients had treatment for pseudoarthrosis of exposed fractures (6 femurs, 1 forearm, 1 metatarsus) and 3 patients a prophylactic treatment for calcaneal fractures with soft tissue damage. 4 deep infection were treated with multiple surgical debridement and new filling bone defect with BS eluting antibiotic with infection eradication. We have used a combination of vancomycin and gentamicin on 15 cases, vancomycin alone on 4 cases, combination of vancomycin and amikacin on 1 case and amikacin and Linezolid in a targeted multi drug resistance. At final follow-up functional outcome was good in all cases with bone healing. Conclusions. Extensive debridement is a fundamental requisite for eradication of bone infections and contamination. Filling of the bone void with loaded bio-composite eluting diversifiable local antibiotics with synergistic anti-biofilm activity is desirable. Treatment of this bone defects are advantaged when combining his reconstruction with BS and the possibility of release high antibiotic concentration at least for 10 days. This is an important complementing prophylactic and therapeutic antimicrobial option with adjuvant role to systemic therapy that enlarges the success rate


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 100-B, Issue SUPP_16 | Pages 33 - 33
1 Nov 2018
Moriarty F
Full Access

Device-associated infection remains a serious clinical problem in orthopaedic and trauma surgery. The emergence of resistant organisms such as methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has further exacerbated this problem by limiting the range of treatment options. Currently, systemic antibiotic therapy is the cornerstone of treatment, alongside surgical resection of infected tissues and implant removal. The potential for antibiotic loaded biomaterials to support the prevention and treatment of infection is significant, although the currently available options are limited in number and often re-purposed from other applications e.g. antibiotic loading of bone cement. The first part of the talk will cover the basic concepts involved in antibiotic treatment, with an emphasis on the ideal antibiotic release kinetics from biomaterials, and how bacterial biofilms and antibiotic resistance influence antimicrobial efficacy. The next generation of biomaterials for antibiotic delivery should be specifically designed with this knowledge in mind. Regulatory approval of antimicrobial combination devices, however, is an evolving process as regulatory bodies seek more robust and clinically relevant efficacy data. Approval will require preclinical efficacy using standardized animal models that recapitulate the key features of the clinical disease. The second part of this talk will cover best practice in this important stage of development


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_2 | Pages 96 - 96
1 Jan 2017
Thorrez L Putzeys G Duportail C Croes K Boudewijns M
Full Access

To prevent infections after orthopedic surgery, intravenous antibiotics are administered perioperatively. Cefazolin is widely used as the prophylactic antibiotic of choice. Systemic antibiotic therapy may however be less effective in longstanding surgery where bone allografts are used. Bone chips have been shown to be an effective carrier for certain types of antibiotics. Bone allografts impregnated with antibiotics may therefore provide the necessary local antibiotic levels for prophylaxis. To be efficient, a prolonged release from these bonechips is required. In contrast to vancomycin, for which prolonged release has clearly been proven effective from Osteomycin®, a commercially available impregnated bone allograft, no prolonged release bone chip preparations have been described so far for cefazolin. We developed a protocol to bind cefazolin in the porous structure of bone chips by means of a hydrogel composed of proteins naturally present in the human body. Three types of bone chips were evaluated: fresh frozen, decellularized frozen and decellularized lyophilized. Bone chips were incubated with 20 mg/ml cefazolin or treated with liquid hydrogel containing either 1 mg/ml fibrin or 1 mg/ml collagen and 20 mg/ml cefazolin. The cefazolin hydrogel was distributed in the porous structure by short vacuum treatment. Bone chips with cefazolin but without hydrogel were either incubated for 20 min- 4h or also treated with vacuum. Cefazolin elution of bone chips was carried out in fetal bovine serum and analyzed by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography – Diode Array Detection. Soaking of bone chips without hydrogel resulted in a quick release of cefazolin, which was limited to 4 hours. When vacuum was applied elution of >1 µg/ml cefazolin was measured for up to 36 hours. Combination with collagen hydrogel resulted in a higher cefazolin concentration released at 24 hours (3.9 vs 0.3 µg/ml), but not in a prolonged release. However, combination of decellularized frozen bone chips with fibrin hydrogel resulted in an initial release of 533 µg/ml followed by a gradual decline reaching the minimal inhibitory concentration for S. aureus at 72 hours (1.7 µg/ml), while not measurable anymore after 92 hours. Processed bone chips with hydrogel-cefazolin showed a markedly prolonged cefazolin release. When combined with a fibrin hydrogel, high initial peak levels of cefazolin were obtained, followed by a decreasing release over the following three days. This elution profile is desirable, since high initial levels are important to maximize anti-bacterial action whereas low levels of antibiotic for a limited time may stimulate osteogenesis. It is important that antibiotic release is ending after a few days as prolonged low levels of antibiotics are not clinically helpful and may lead to antibiotic resistance. Further preclinical studies are warranted to show effectiveness of hydrogel-cefazolin impregnated bone chips


The Bone & Joint Journal
Vol. 96-B, Issue 6 | Pages 845 - 850
1 Jun 2014
Romanò CL Logoluso N Meani E Romanò D De Vecchi E Vassena C Drago L

The treatment of chronic osteomyelitis often includes surgical debridement and filling the resultant void with antibiotic-loaded polymethylmethacrylate cement, bone grafts or bone substitutes. Recently, the use of bioactive glass to treat bone defects in infections has been reported in a limited series of patients. However, no direct comparison between this biomaterial and antibiotic-loaded bone substitute has been performed.

In this retrospective study, we compared the safety and efficacy of surgical debridement and local application of the bioactive glass S53P4 in a series of 27 patients affected by chronic osteomyelitis of the long bones (Group A) with two other series, treated respectively with an antibiotic-loaded hydroxyapatite and calcium sulphate compound (Group B; n = 27) or a mixture of tricalcium phosphate and an antibiotic-loaded demineralised bone matrix (Group C; n = 22). Systemic antibiotics were also used in all groups.

After comparable periods of follow-up, the control of infection was similar in the three groups. In particular, 25 out of 27 (92.6%) patients of Group A, 24 out of 27 (88.9%) in Group B and 19 out of 22 (86.3%) in Group C showed no infection recurrence at means of 21.8 (12 to 36), 22.1 (12 to 36) and 21.5 (12 to 36) months follow-up, respectively, while Group A showed a reduced wound complication rate.

Our results show that patients treated with a bioactive glass without local antibiotics achieved similar eradication of infection and less drainage than those treated with two different antibiotic-loaded calcium-based bone substitutes.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014; 96-B:845–50.


The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery British Volume
Vol. 91-B, Issue 8 | Pages 1106 - 1109
1 Aug 2009
Branstetter JG Jackson SR Haggard WO Richelsoph KC Wenke JC

We used a goat model of a contaminated musculoskeletal defect to determine the effectiveness of rapidly-resorbing calcium-sulphate pellets containing amikacin to reduce the local bacterial count. Our findings showed that this treatment eradicated the bacteria quickly, performed as well as standard polymethylmethacrylate mixed with an antibiotic and had many advantages over the latter. The pellets were prepared before surgery and absorbed completely. They released all of the antibiotic and did not require a subsequent operation for their removal. Our study indicated that locally administered antibiotics reduced bacteria within the wound rapidly. This method of treatment may have an important role in decreasing the rate of infection in contaminated wounds.