Abstract. Introduction. Traumatic knee dislocations are devastating injuries and there is no single best accepted treatment. This study looked at functional outcome of a single surgeon case series of patients who underwent surgical management of their knee dislocation. Methods. Eighty-seven patients with knee dislocation were treated at a major trauma centre. Acute surgical repair and reconstruction with fracture fixation within 4 weeks was preferred unless the patient was too unstable (Injury severity score>16). The collaterals were repaired and augmented using a variety of autografts, allografts or synthetic grafts. PCL was primarily braced and reconstructed subsequently, if required. Outcome was collected prospectively using IKDC score, KOOS and Tegner score. Results. The mean age of the patients was 33.6yrs (SD 11.9), 66 males and 21 females. According to Schenck classification, 26 were KD-I (30%), 6 KD-II (7%), 13 were KD-III (15%), 7 were KD-IV (8%) and 35 were KD-V (40%). 7 patients had CPN injury (8%), 3 had vascular injury (3.4%), 2 had combined CPN and vascular injury (2.3%). Acute surgical treatment was done in 62 patients while 10 had staged reconstruction. 22 patients had delayed reconstruction. The mean follow-up period was 5.8 years (1- 12 yrs), mean IKDC score was 57.6 (SD 23.6). The mean Tegner activity scale postoperatively was 4.5(SD 2) and the mean KOOS score was 74.9 (SD 19.6). Conclusion. A large proportion of cases were KD-V but still had a good outcome with surgical management. Current classification systems do not cover all dislocation patterns and a modification is proposed

Purpose. We conducted a prospective study to investigate the role of the LARS ligament system to reconstruct the posterior cruciate ligament and the postero-lateral corner of the knee. We present a prospective single surgeon case series to evaluate early clinical and functional outcomes of postero-lateral corner and posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the knee using the LARS (ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System) artificial ligament. 23 patients with multi-ligament knee injuries or isolated PCL injuries were treated with a mean follow up of 8 months (range: 2-37 months). Outcomes were assessed using the modified International Knee Documentation Committee score, and a modified Tegner- Lysholm score. 2 patients had acute reconstructive surgery within 7 days of injury, 5 patients within 3 months (semi-acute) and 16 were chronic cases that were operated on after three months from the date of injury. The LARS ligament reconstruction achieved a significant improvement between preoperative and postoperative assessment in relation to knee stability, function and patient satisfaction. The sooner the patients were treated the greater the improvements in functional scores were noted. Most patients achieved a full functional range of movement within six months. We had 2 complications, one superficial wound infection and one stiff knee requiring a manipulation. To date we have had no LARS ligament failures. In the short term the LARS functions well, with high clinical patient satisfaction, no signs of progressive laxity, synovitis or failure. We found no significant difference in functional score post reconstruction between the isolated PCL reconstructions and the multi ligament reconstructions. Our results show no early signs of the problems associated with synthetic grafts used in the past. Such grafts appear to be an attractive alternative to the use of autografts and allografts

Aims

The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) following isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), with those following ACLR and concomitant meniscal resection or repair.

Aims

Options for the treatment of intra-articular ligament injuries are limited, and insufficient ligament reconstruction can cause painful joint instability, loss of function, and progressive development of degenerative arthritis. This study aimed to assess the capability of a biologically enhanced matrix material for ligament reconstruction to withstand tensile forces within the joint and enhance ligament regeneration needed to regain joint function.

Disruption of the extensor mechanism in total knee arthroplasty may occur by tubercle avulsion, patellar or quadriceps tendon rupture, or patella fracture, and whether occurring intra-operatively or post-operatively can be difficult to manage and is associated with a significant rate of failure and associated complications. This surgery is frequently performed in compromised tissues, and repairs must frequently be protected with cerclage wiring and/or augmentation with local tendon (semi-tendinosis, gracilis) which may also be used to treat soft-tissue loss in the face of chronic disruption. Quadriceps rupture may be treated with conservative therapy if the patient retains active extension. Component loosening or loss of active extension of 20° or greater are clear indications for surgical treatment of patellar fracture. Acute patellar tendon disruption may be treated by primary repair. Chronic extensor failure is often complicated by tissue loss and retraction can be treated with medial gastrocnemius flaps, achilles tendon allografts, and complete extensor mechanism allografts. Attention to fixing the graft in full extension is mandatory to prevent severe extensor lag as the graft stretches out over time.

We reviewed 87 patients who underwent revision reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. The incidence of meniscal tears and degenerative change was assessed and related to the interval between failure of the primary graft and revision reconstruction. Patients were divided into two groups: early revision surgery within six months of graft failure, and delayed revision. Degenerative change was scored using the French Society of Arthroscopy system.

There was a significantly higher incidence of articular cartilage degeneration in the delayed group (Mann-Whitney U-test, 53.2% vs 24%, p < 0.01). No patient in the early group had advanced degenerative change, compared to 9.2% of patients in the delayed group. There was no significant difference (Mann-Whitney U-test, p = 0.3) in the incidence of meniscal tears between the two groups.

We conclude that revision reconstruction should be carried out within six months of primary graft failure, in order to minimise the risk of degenerative change.