Introduction. Interest in platelet-derived growth factors has been increasing as an adjunct in surgical techniques for tissue repair. Its use in ligament injuries repair has been studied mainly in animals. The authors intend to study growth factors influence in ACL repair using BTB graft. Material. 20 individuals underwent ACL rupture BTB arthroscopic repair, using Double Incision Mini-Invasive Technique. MRI (3-Tesla) images. GPSIII ® System to obtain Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) thrombin activated. Methods. Prospective study consisting of 2 groups of 10 patients each. Surgical technique, fixation method and postoperative protocol were the same. In the study group (SG-10 patients) graft was imbued with PRP and the remaing plasma was intra-articularly injected. The MRIs took place 6 weeks and 6 months after the procedure with and without gadolinium-DTPA enhancement. Evaluation was performed blindly by independent radiologists concerning femoral tunnel integration, sinovialization process and nonspecific synovitis. Clinical and functional status evaluation: IKDC. Statistical analysis in SPSS®. Results. Radiological evaluation was similar in both groups. In the Study Group at 6 weeks we verified less joint effusion and synovitis. At 6 months: no diference in integration in femoral tunnel, and in granulation tissue around the femoral tunnel in graft sinovialization. IKDC (mean ± SD) with PRP: pre-operative −45,66 ±6,98, post-operative −94,35 ±3,54 (Age-29 ± 10), without PRP: preoperative −48,02 ±12,68, post-operative −91,7 ±6,99 (Age −31 ±10). There are no statistical differences between the groups with and without PRP in clinical and functional assessments and MRI images. Discussion. The use of technology to accelerate and improve the processes of tissue repair and integration is of great interest in repairing the ACL. Studies in humans are rare, with low level of evidence and contradictory results. Although the limitations of this study, it seems to us that the use of growth factors has no advantages in the process of PT graft integration at 6 months. Conclusion. PRP doesn't seem to contribute to enhancement of the ligamentation process and articular rehabilitation when used as a step of BTB technique

Most fractures of the radial head are stable undisplaced or minimally displaced partial fractures without an associated fracture of the elbow or forearm or ligament injury, where stiffness following non-operative management is the primary concern. Displaced unstable fractures of the radial head are usually associated with other fractures or ligament injuries, and restoration of radiocapitellar contact by reconstruction or prosthetic replacement of the fractured head is necessary to prevent subluxation or dislocation of the elbow and forearm. In fractures with three or fewer fragments (two articular fragments and the neck) and little or no metaphyseal comminution, open reduction and internal fixation may give good results. However, fragmented unstable fractures of the radial head are prone to early failure of fixation and nonunion when fixed. Excision of the radial head is associated with good long-term results, but in patients with instability of the elbow or forearm, prosthetic replacement is preferred.

This review considers the characteristics of stable and unstable fractures of the radial head, as well as discussing the debatable aspects of management, in light of the current best evidence.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2013;95-B:151–9.