Aims. The aim of the current study was to assess the reliability of the Ottawa classification for
Aims. There has been limited literature regarding outcomes of acetabular rim syndrome (ARS) with persistent acetabular os in the setting of acetabular dysplasia. The purpose of this study was to characterize a cohort of adolescent and young adult patients with ARS with persistent os and compare their radiological and clinical outcomes to patients with acetabular dysplasia without an os. Methods. We reviewed a prospective database of patients undergoing periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for
Aims. Social media is a popular resource for patients seeking medical information and sharing experiences. periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the gold-standard treatment for
Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the preferred treatment for
Introduction. Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the preferred treatment for
The periacetabular osteotomy(PAO) is an effective common hip-preserving procedure to treat
The periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a well-described procedure for
Introduction. The role for hip arthroscopy (HS) in combination with periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for the treatment of
Although periacetabular osteotomies are widely used for the treatment of
We report patient-reported outcomes and complications
associated with contemporary periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) surgery
in treating
We followed up 76 consecutive hips with
Introduction. Acetabular dysplasia is associated with an increased risk of hip pain and early development of osteoarthritis (OA). The Bernese peri-acetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the most well-established technique in the Western world for the treatment of
Peri-acetabular osteotomy is an established surgical
treatment for
Reorientation of the acetabulum may be required in adolescents and young adults with developmental dysplasia of the hip. We have carried out a retrospective review of 51 hips after triple osteotomy with an average follow-up of ten years (8 to 15). Forty-eight hips (94%) were available for review and of these 39 (81%) were improved compared with before operation, 29 (60%) scoring good or excellent. Radiographic assessment showed improvement of the average centre-edge angle by 19°, the acetabular index by 12° and the anterior centre-edge angle by 26°. The degree of osteoarthritis progressed by one grade in ten hips (21%) over a period of ten years. The satisfactory long-term clinical and radiographic results have encouraged us to continue this treatment for
We assessed the long-term outcomes of a large cohort of patients who have undergone a periacetabular osteotomy (PAO), and sought to validate a patient satisfaction questionnaire for use in a PAO cohort. All patients who had undergone a PAO from July 1998 to February 2013 were surveyed, with several patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and radiological measurements of preoperative acetabular dysplasia and postoperative correction also recorded. Patients were asked to rate their level of satisfaction with their operation in achieving pain relief, restoration of activities of daily living, ability to perform recreational activity, and their overall level of satisfaction with the procedure.Aims
Methods
The aims of this study were to characterize the incidence and risk factors associated with stress fractures following periacetabular osteotomy, and to determine their effect on osteotomy union. We retrospectively reviewed all periacetabular osteotomies (PAOs) performed for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) at one institution over a six-year period between 2012 and 2017. Perioperative factors were recorded, and included demographic and surgical data. Postoperatively, patients were followed for a minimum of one year with anteroposterior and false profile radiographs of the pelvis to monitor for evidence of stress fracture and union of osteotomies. We characterized the incidence and locations of stress fractures, and used univariate and multivariable analysis to identify factors predictive of stress fracture and the association of stress fracture on osteotomy union.Aims
Methods
A borderline dysplastic hip can behave as either stable or unstable and this makes surgical decision making challenging. While an unstable hip may be best treated by acetabular reorientation, stable hips can be treated arthroscopically. Several imaging parameters can help to identify the appropriate treatment, including the Femoro-Epiphyseal Acetabular Roof (FEAR) index, measured on plain radiographs. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability and the sensitivity of FEAR index on MRI compared with its radiological measurement. The technique of measuring the FEAR index on MRI was defined and its reliability validated. A retrospective study assessed three groups of 20 patients: an unstable group of ‘borderline dysplastic hips’ with lateral centre edge angle (LCEA) less than 25° treated successfully by periacetabular osteotomy; a stable group of ‘borderline dysplastic hips’ with LCEA less than 25° treated successfully by impingement surgery; and an asymptomatic control group with LCEA between 25° and 35°. The following measurements were performed on both standardized radiographs and on MRI: LCEA, acetabular index, femoral anteversion, and FEAR index.Aims
Patients and Methods
The aim of this study was to compare patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), radiological measurements, and total hip arthroplasty (THA)-free survival in patients who underwent periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) for mild, moderate, or severe developmental dysplasia of the hip. We performed a retrospective study involving 336 patients (420 hips) who underwent PAO by a single surgeon at an academic centre. After exclusions, 124 patients (149 hips) were included. The preoperative lateral centre-edge angle (LCEA) was used to classify the severity of dysplasia: 18° to 25° was considered mild (n = 20), 10° to 17° moderate (n = 66), and < 10° severe (n = 63). There was no difference in patient characteristics between the groups (all, p > 0.05). Pre- and postoperative radiological measurements were made. The National Institute of Health’s Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) outcome measures (physical function computerized adaptive test (PF CAT), Global Physical and Mental Health Scores) were collected. Failure was defined as conversion to THA or PF CAT scores < 40, and was assessed with Kaplan–Meier analysis. The mean follow-up was five years (2 to 10) ending in either failure or the latest contact with the patient.Aims
Patients and Methods
Acetabular dysplasia is frequently associated with intra-articular
pathology such as labral tears, but whether labral tears should
be treated at the time of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) remains
controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical
outcomes and radiographic corrections of PAO for acetabular dysplasia
between patients with and without labral tears pre-operatively. We retrospectively reviewed 70 hips in 67 patients with acetabular
dysplasia who underwent PAO. Of 47 hips (45 patients) with labral
tears pre-operatively, 27 (25 patients) underwent PAO alone, and
were classified as the labral tear alone (LT) group, and 20 (20
patients) underwent combined PAO and osteochondroplasty, and were
classified as the labral tear osteochondroplasty (LTO) group. The
non-labral tear (NLT) group included 23 hips in 22 patients.Aims
Patients and Methods
Obesity is a risk factor for complications following
many orthopaedic procedures. The purpose of this study was to investigate
whether obesity was an independent risk factor increasing the rate
of complications following periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) and to
determine whether radiographic correction after PAO was affected
by obesity. We retrospectively collected demographic, clinical and radiographic
data on 280 patients (231 women; 82.5% and 49 men; 17.5%) who were
followed for a mean of 48 months (12 to 60) after PAO. A total of
65 patients (23.2%) were obese (body mass index (BMI) >
30 kg/m2).
Univariate and multivariate analysis demonstrated that BMI was an independent
risk factor associated with the severity of the complications. The
average probability of a patient developing a major complication
was 22% (95% confidence interval (CI) 11.78 to 38.21) for an obese
patient compared with 3% (95% CI 1.39 to 6.58) for a non-obese patient
The odds of a patient developing a major complication were 11 times
higher (95% CI 4.71 to 17.60, p <
0.0001) for an obese compared
with a non-obese patient. Following PAO surgery, there was no difference in radiographic
correction between obese and non-obese patients. PAO procedures
in obese patients correct the deformity effectively but are associated
with an increased rate of complications. Cite this article: