Up to one-third of patients experience limited benefit following surgical intervention for LS-OA. Thus, identifying contributing factors to this is important. People with OA often have multijoint involvement, yet this has received limited attention in this population. We documented the occurrence and evaluated the influence of multijoint symptoms on outcome following surgery for LS-OA.

141 patients undergoing decompression surgery+/−fusion for LS-OA completed the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) pre- and 12-months post-surgery. Also captured pre-surgery: age, sex, education, BMI, smoking, depressive symptoms and comorbidities. Any joints with “pain/stiffness/swelling most days of the month” were indicated on a homunculus. A symptomatic joint site count (e.g. one/both knees= one site), excluding the back, was derived (range zero to nine) and considered as a predictor of magnitude of ODI change, and likelihood of achieving minimally clinically important improvement in ODI (MCID=12.8) using multivariable adjusted linear and log-Poisson regression analyses.

Mean age: 66 years (range:42–90), 46% female. 76% reported one+ joint site other than the back, 43% reported three+, and nearly 10% reported six+. (< MCID) for those with three sites, and four units for those with six+ sites. Associated with a greater likelihood of not achieving MCID were increasing joint count (11% increase per site (p=0.012)), higher BMI, current/former smoker, and worse baseline ODI tertile.

Results suggest there is more than just the back to consider to understand patient-reported back outcomes. Multijoint symptoms directly contribute to disability, but there is potential they may contribute to systemic, largely inflammatory, effects in OA as well.

Introduction

From 2004 to 2015, elective lumbar fusions increased by 62% in the US. The largest increases were for among age 65 or older (139% in volume) and scoliosis (187%) [1]. Age is a well known factor of osteoporosis. The load-sharing may exceed the pedicular screws constructs in aging spine and lead to non-union and re-do. Surgical options may increase the screw purchase (e.g.: augmentation, extensions) at supplementary risks. Pedicular screw are known to cause vascular, nerve root or cord injuries. Facing these pitfalls, the surgeon's experience and rule of thumbs are the most deciding factors for the surgical planning. The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of a patient specific tool, designed to plan a safe pedicular trajectory and to provide an intraoperative screw pullout strength estimate.

Pelvic tilt (PT) is always described as the pelvic orientation along the transverse axis, yet four PT definitions were established based on different radiographic landmarks: anterior pelvic plane (PT. a. ), the centres of femoral heads and sacral plate (PT. m. ), pelvic outlet (PT. h. ), and sacral slope (SS). These landmarks quantify a similar concept, yet understanding of their relationships is lacking. Some studies referred to the words “pelvic tilt” for horizontal comparisons, but their PT definitions might differ. There is a demand for understanding their correlations and differences for education and research purposes. This study recruited 105 sagittal pelvic radiographs (68 males and 37 females) from a single clinic awaiting their hip surgeries. Hip hardware and spine pathologies were examined for sub-group analysis. Two observers annotated four PTs in a gender-dependent manner and repeated it after six months. The linear regression model and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were applied with a 95% significance interval. The SS showed significant gender differences and the lowest correlations to the other parameters in the male group (-0.3< r <0.2). The correlations of SS in scoliosis (n = 7) and hip implant (female, n = 18) groups were statistically different, yet the sample sizes were too small. PT. m. demonstrated very strong correlation to PT. h. (r > 0.9) under the linear model PT. m. = 0.951 × PT. h. - 68.284. The PT. m. and PT. h. are interchangeable under a simple linear regression model, which enables study comparisons between them. In the male group, SS is more of a personalised spinal landmark independent of the pelvic anatomy. Female patients with hip implant may have more static spinopelvic relationships following a certain pattern, yet a deeper study using a larger dataset is required. The understanding of different PTs improves anatomical education

Low back pain is the single most common cause for disability in individuals aged 45 years or younger, it carries tremendous weight in socioeconomic considerations. Degenerative aging of the structural components of the spine can be associated with genetic aspects, lifetime of tissue exposure to mechanical stress & loads and environmental factors. Mechanical consequences of the disc degenerative include loss of disc height, segment instability and increase the load on facets joints. All these can lead to degenerative changes and osteophytes that can narrow the spinal canal. Surgery is indicated in patients with spinal stenosis who have intractable pain, altered quality of life, substantially diminished functional capacity, failed non-surgical treatment and are not candidates for non-surgical treatment. The aim was to determine the reasons for refusal of surgery in patients with established degenerative lumber spine pathology eligible for surgery. All patients meeting the study criteria, patients older than 18 years, patients with both clinical and radiological established symptomatic degenerative lumbar spine pathology and patients eligible for surgery but refusing it were recruited. Questionnaire used to investigate reasons why they are refusing surgery. Results 59 were recruited, fifty-one (86.4 %) females and eight (13.6 %) males. Twenty (33.8 %) were between the age of 51 and 60 years, followed by nineteen (32.2 %) between 61 and 70 years, and fourteen (23.7 %) between 71 and 80 years. 43 (72 %) patients had lumber spondylosis complicated by lumber spine stenosis, followed by nine (15.2 %) with lumbar spine spondylolisthesis and four (6.7 %) had adjacent level disease. 28 (47.4 %) were scared of surgery, fifteen (25.4 %) claimed that they are too old for surgery and nine (15.2 %) were not ready. Findings from this study outlined that patients lack information about the spinal surgery. Patients education about spine surgery is needed

Aims

Tissue adhesives (TAs) are a commonly used adjunct to traditional surgical wound closures. However, TAs must be allowed to dry before application of a surgical dressing, increasing operating time and reducing intraoperative efficiency. The goal of this study is to identify a practical method for decreasing the curing time for TAs.

The range of allograft products for spinal fusion has been extended with the development of cellular bone matrices (CBMs). Most of these combine demineralized bone with viable cancellous bone prepared in a manner that retains cells with differentiation potential. The purpose of this study was to compare commercially-available human CBMs in the athymic rat model of posterolateral spinal fusion. The products compared were Trinity ELITE® (TEL, OrthoFix), ViviGen (VIV, DePuy Synthes), Cellentra (CEL, Zimmer Biomet), Osteocel® Pro (OCP, NuVasive), Bio4 (BIO, Stryker) and map3 (MAP, RTI Surgical). Bone from the ilia of syngeneic rats was used as a control to approximate the human gold standard. All implants were stored, thawed, and prepared per manufacturer's instructions and all implantations occurred within the manufacturer's time allowance for use after preparation. In total, fifteen 9–10 week old male rats were implanted per implant type, with three different lots of each implant used per five rats to account for lot-to-lot variability. Under anesthesia, a posterior midline longitudinal skin and subcutaneous incision was made, followed by bilateral longitudinal paraspinal myofascial incisions to expose the transverse processes at the L4–5 level. Implants (0.3 cc of allograft or freshly harvested syngeneic iliac bone graft) were placed bilaterally. Surgeons were blinded as to CBM implant type. Incisions were closed with sutures and in vivo microCT scans performed within 48 hours of surgery. A second microCT scan was taken at euthanasia, six weeks after surgery, and the lumbar spines harvested. Fusion was evaluated by manual palpation by three independent, blinded reviewers. MicroCT analysis was performed by an independent CRO (ImageIQ, Cleveland OH). Anonymity of implant type was rigorously kept to avoid bias. By manual palpation, 5/15 (33%) spines of the syngeneic bone group were fused at 6 weeks. The TEL (8/15, 53%) and CEL (11/15, 73%) groups were not significantly different from each other but were from all other CBM groups. Only 2/15 (13%) of VIV-implanted spines fused and none (0/15, 0%) of the OCP, BIO and MAP CBMs produced stable fusion. The mineralized cancellous bone component of the allografts confounded radiographic analysis but microCT analysis indicated bone volume increased over six weeks for all groups except the syngeneic bone (−4.3%). TEL (+65%) and CEL (+73%) were not different from each other but were significantly increased over all other groups (VIV 29%, OCP 37%, BIO 19%, and MAP 45%, respectively). CBMs have distinct formulations and are likely processed differently. The claimed live cell and stem cell contents differ between products. Additionally, map3 has cells added at the time of surgery, whereas the other CBMs are processed to retain matrix-adherent cells. Given the wide range of formulations, differences in performance were not surprising, and Trinity ELITE and Cellentra did significantly better than other implants at both forming new bone and achieving fusion. The other CBMs did not have greater bone formation than the control and were very poor at forming a solid fusion. These findings suggest more careful consideration of these allograft products is needed at the clinical level

National Institute of Clinical Excellence guidelines on Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression recommend urgent consideration of patients with spinal metastases and imaging evidence of structural spinal failure with spinal instability for surgery to stabilise the spine and prevent Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression. We aimed to compare neurological outcomes of patients managed operatively and non-operatively. Prospective collection of 397 patients' data over a 4-year period. Males represented 59.2% of patients. Median age was 69 years. Non-operative intervention in 62.2% of patients. Prostate, lung, Breast, Myeloma, Renal Cell Carcinoma and Lymphoma accounted for over 75% of all primary tumours (n=305). Median Length of hospital stay was longer in the operative group of 15 days compared to 10 days in the non-operative group (p<0.0001). Patients who were ambulating on presentation maintained their ambulation in 70.2% of cases in the operative group compared to 90.9% in the non-operative group (p<0.0001). However, upon discharge 41% of patients managed operatively were ambulatory compared to the non-operative group rate of 36.5% (p<0.0001). In Prostate, Breast, Myeloma, RCC and Lymphoma 100% of patients managed non-operatively maintained ambulation. Lung primaries managed operatively had an 80% chance of maintaining ambulation compared to 76.9% in the non-operative group (p<0.05). A higher proportion of patients managed non-operatively maintained ambulation than those managed operatively. With operative intervention, more patients regained ambulatory status. Whilst we have mainly focused on ambulatory status in this paper there are other factors to consider including pain relief and spinal stability which may be an indication for surgical intervention

Corynebacterium Jeikeium is a pathogen rarely involved in orthopaedic infections. Till date only 14 cases of osteomyelitis are described in the literature, envolving the tibia, foot and prosthethic (hip and joint) infection. To our knowledge, Corynebacterium Jeikeium as not been reported as an infectious agent of the spine. Our goal is to describe a case of scoliosis surgical site infection by a Corynebacterium Jeikeium specimen. This is a retrospective and descriptive case report based on data from clinical records, patient observation and analysis of complementary exams. We present a 24 year old female with a history of premature birth, West syndrome, spastic cerebral palsy and spina bifida. She was sent to our consult for evaluation of dorsolombar scoliosis. In October of 2014, she was submitted to surgery – posterior spine arthrodesis and instrumentation (D10 to L5) with bilateral pedicle screws and two chromium-cobalt bars. The early post-operative period was without complications. She was discharge at the seventh day of internment and was seen, fifteen days postoperative, at the consultation office, where the dressings were changed, with no signs of surgical site infection. One month post-operative, she recurs to the office because of an apparent seroma at the surgical site wound. There was no reference to fever or other signs of local/systemic infection. A swabbing of the wound was done and the patient was medicated with Ciprofloxacine, 500mg 12/12 hours – the culture came back negative. Seven days later she was seen again, maintaining the seroma with purge of a serous-aspect fluid. Antibiotic therapy was maintained and another swabbing was collected – culture came back negative. Because of suspected surgical site infection, she was re-operated at December of 2014. Surgical wound debridement was performed; three tissue samples and one exudate were sent to the microbiological department. In all samples but one was identified a Corynebacterium Jeikeium. No sensitivity test was performed. Intravenous Vancomicine, 1 gram 12/12 hours was started and maintained during 8 days. Eleven days post-operative she was discharged with oral Vibramicin, 100 milligrams 12/12 hours for two weeks. She is currently being followed at the doctor's office, with no sign of reinfection of the surgical site. This is the first reported case describing an infection of the spine by a Corynebactereium Jeikeium. Isolation of the causative agent of infection and literature-based directed antibiotherapy are important for a successful outcome

We evaluated the top 13 journals in trauma and orthopaedics by impact factor and looked at the longer-term effect regarding citations of their papers.

All 4951 papers published in these journals during 2007 and 2008 were reviewed and categorised by their type, subspecialty and super-specialty. All citations indexed through Google Scholar were reviewed to establish the rate of citation per paper at two, four and five years post-publication. The top five journals published a total of 1986 papers. Only three (0.15%) were on operative orthopaedic surgery and none were on trauma. Most (n = 1084, 54.5%) were about experimental basic science. Surgical papers had a lower rate of citation (2.18) at two years than basic science or clinical medical papers (4.68). However, by four years the rates were similar (26.57 for surgery, 30.35 for basic science/medical), which suggests that there is a considerable time lag before clinical surgical research has an impact.

We conclude that high impact journals do not address clinical research in surgery and when they do, there is a delay before such papers are cited. We suggest that a rate of citation at five years post-publication might be a more appropriate indicator of importance for papers in our specialty.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2014;96-B:414–19.