Lisfranc injuries were previously described as fracture-dislocations of the tarsometatarsal joints. With advancements in modern imaging, subtle Lisfranc injuries are now more frequently recognized, revealing that their true incidence is much higher than previously thought. Injury patterns can vary widely in severity and anatomy. Early diagnosis and treatment are essential to achieve good outcomes. The original classification systems were anatomy-based, and limited as tools for guiding treatment. The current review, using the best available evidence, instead introduces a stability-based classification system, with weightbearing radiographs and CT serving as key diagnostic tools. Stable injuries generally have good outcomes with nonoperative management, most reliably treated with immobilization and non-weightbearing for six weeks. Displaced or comminuted injuries require surgical intervention, with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) being the most common approach, with a consensus towards bridge plating. While ORIF generally achieves satisfactory results, its effectiveness can vary, particularly in high-energy injuries. Primary arthrodesis remains niche for the treatment of acute injuries, but may offer benefits such as lower rates of post-traumatic arthritis and hardware removal. Novel fixation techniques, including suture button fixation, aim to provide flexible stabilization, which theoretically could improve midfoot biomechanics and reduce complications. Early findings suggest promising functional outcomes, but further studies are required to validate this method compared with established techniques. Future research should focus on refining stability-based classification systems, validation of weightbearing CT, improving rehabilitation protocols, and optimizing surgical techniques for various injury patterns to ultimately enhance patient outcomes.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2024;106-B(12):1431–1442.

The diagnosis of Lisfranc ligament disruption is notoriously difficult. Radiographs and MRI scans are often ambiguous therefore a stress-test examination under anaesthesia is commonly required. Two midfoot stress-tests are in current practice, namely the varus first ray stress-test and the pronation abduction test. The optimal type of stress-test is not however evaluated in the literature. We hypothesised that after the loss of the main plantar stabiliser (the Lisfranc ligament) the patient would demonstrate dorsal instability, not the classic 1. st. /2. nd. metatarsal diastasis commonly described. We therefore devised a push-up test (placement of a force under the 2. nd. metatarsal in an attempt to elevate the base away from the middle cuneiform on the lateral radiograph). We aimed to initially test our hypothesis on a cadaveric model. Twelve fresh frozen cadaveric specimens without previous foot injury were used. The 2. nd. tarsometatarsal joint was exposed and the Lisfranc ligament and dorsal capsule were incised. An image intensifier was positioned and standard anteroposterior (AP) and lateral views were obtained. Two previously reported AP stress-tests (varus first ray stress test, pronation abduction test) and the novel test under investigation (‘Lisfranc Push-Up’ test) were duly performed. Images were obtained once the investigator felt the appropriate views were achieved. All twelve of the Lisfranc Push-Up tests showed dorsal subluxation of the 2. nd. metatarsal on the middle cuneiform of greater than 2mm on the lateral radiograph. No diastasis of the 1. st. /2. nd. metatarsals was seen in any of the specimens on the AP radiograph for either of the other two stress-tests. The authors have described a novel way of demonstrating the dorsal instability associated with the ligamentous Lisfranc injury. Our results support the Lisfranc Push-Up test as a reproducible and sensitive method for assessing ligamentous Lisfranc injuries. In our cadaveric model the previously described stress-tests do not work

Aims

The ideal management of acute syndesmotic injuries in elite athletes is controversial. Among several treatment methods used to stabilize the syndesmosis and facilitate healing of the ligaments, the use of suture tape (InternalBrace) has previously been described. The purpose of this study was to analyze the functional outcome, including American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores, knee-to-wall measurements, and the time to return to play in days, of unstable syndesmotic injuries treated with the use of the InternalBrace in elite athletes.

Ankle sprains in the athlete are one of the most common injuries, and syndesmosis type sprains seem to becoming diagnosed at an increasing rate. There still exists a paucity of information on optimal conservative and operative management. Treatment. Because of the spectrum of injury, there is a spectrum of treatment. if there is mortise widening, operative stabilization is required. if the mortise is normal, even with external rotation stress test positive, conservative treatment has been employed. staged conservative regimen directed at reducing pain and swelling acutely, at regaining range of motion and strength subacutely, and then progressed to functional training and finally return to sport. The timeframe for these was in the range of 2 to 6 weeks without very specific progression criteria. In the athlete, pain with rotational stress, greater severity of sprain, may treat operatively to stabilize the syndesmosis and aggressive rehab with earlier return to sport. Tightrope vs screw fixation vs both. Use of arthroscopy. Chronic sprains with recalcitrant pain and functional instability usually require operative treatment. very poor evidence exists as to the timing or type of procedure. Arthroscopy is required to confirm the diagnosis, treat intraarticular problems, and provide fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. The postoperative regimen used is generally the same as the one used when treating an acute syndesmosis disruption. Tight rope vs Screw Fixation. clinical studies tightrope fixation has been acceptable and comparable to screw fixation. laboratory studies demonstrate comparable construct stability in the laboratory/cadaveric setting. indications for tightrope fixation are becoming more clear with more experience. my indications:. syndesmotic sprains with complete or incomplete disruption. fractures with syndesmotic disruption augment with screws, leave in place following screw removal. Summary and Controversies. Syndesmotic or high ankle sprains continue to be a common injury that result in significant time lost from sport. The conclusion that can be drawn from the current evidence is that the current diagnostic process probably fails to clearly assess the severity of the injury, which reduces the likelihood of accurately predicting the time lost from sport. Syndesmosis sprains can be a significant injuries that result in an inability to play sports for significant periods of time(up to 137 days). We need to be able to identify the more severe ones earlier in order to improve their treatment, perhaps lead to operative stabilization. Tightrope fixation avoids screw removal, minimally invasive, permanent stabilization

Injuries to the foot in athletes are often subtle and can lead to a substantial loss of function if not diagnosed and treated appropriately. For these injuries in general, even after a diagnosis is made, treatment options are controversial and become even more so in high level athletes where limiting the time away from training and competition is a significant consideration.

In this review, we cover some of the common and important sporting injuries affecting the foot including updates on their management and outcomes.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1299–1311.