Background. Stem cell therapy has been suggested as a potential regenerative strategy to treat IVD degeneration and GDF6 has been shown to differentiate adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) into an NP-like phenotype. However, for clinical translation, a delivery system is required to ensure controlled and sustained GDF6 release. This study aimed to investigate the encapsulation of GDF6 inside novel microparticles (MPs) to control delivery and assess the effect of the released GDF6 on NP-like differentiation of human ASCs. Methods. GDF6 release from PLGA-PEG-PLGA MPs over 14 days was determined using BCA and ELISA. The effect of MP loading density on collagen gel formation was assessed through SEM and histological staining. ASCs were cultured in collagen hydrogels for 14 days with GDF6 delivered exogenously or via microspheres. ASC differentiation was assessed by qPCR for NP markers, glycosaminoglycan production (DMMB) and immunohistochemistry. Results. GDF6 release from MPs was controlled over 14 days equivalently to exogenous addition. SEM and histology confirmed that MPs were distributed throughout gels and that gel formation was not disrupted. In 3D cultures, GDF6 release from microspheres elicited equivalent ASC differentiation and NP-like matrix formation compared to exogenous delivery in media, indicating activity was not affected by MP encapsulation. Conclusions. This study demonstrates the effective encapsulation and controlled delivery of GDF6, which was able to maintain its activity and induce ASC differentiation into an NP-like phenotype and production of an NP-like ECM. Delivery of GDF6 microspheres in combination with ASCs is a promising strategy for IVD regeneration and treatment of back pain. Conflicts of interest. No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding. We would like to acknowledge UKRMP Acellular Hub, MRC, NIHR Musculoskeletal BRU and The Rosetrees Trust for funding this research

Background. Currently, there is a focus on the development of cell based therapies to treat intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration, particularly for regenerating/repairing the central region, the nucleus pulposus (NP). Recently, we demonstrated that GDF6 promotes NP-like differentiation in mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). However, bone marrow- (BM-MSCs) and adipose- (Ad-MSCs) showed differential responses to GDF6, with Ad-MSCs adopting a more NP-like phenotype. Here, we investigated GDF6 signalling in BM-MSCs and Ad-MSCs, with the aim to improve future IVD stem cell therapies. Methods. GDF6 receptor expression in patient-matched BM-MSCs and Ad-MSCs (N=6) was profiled through western blot and immunocytochemistry (ICC). GDF6 signal transduction was investigated through stimulation with 100 ng ml. −1. GDF6 for defined time periods. Subsequently smad1/5/9 phosphorylation and alternative non-smad pathway activation (phospho-p38; phospho-Erk1/2) was analysed (western blot, ELISA). Their role in inducing NP-like gene expression in Ad-MSCs was examined through pathway specific inhibitors. Results. Western blot and ICC established that BMPR profiles differed between MSC populations; specifically, BMPR2 (a GDF6 receptor) expression, was significantly higher in Ad-MSCs (p<0.05). ELISA and western blot analysis showed that smad1/5/9 phosphorylation was significantly higher in Ad-MSCs following GDF6 stimulation (p<0.05). GDF6 stimulation also phosphorylated p38 and Erk1/2 pathways. Blocking of both smad and non-smad pathways resulted in variation of GDF6 induced NP-like gene expression. Conclusions. The upregulation of BMPR2 in Ad-MSCs and corresponding differences in smad1/5/9 and non-smad pathway phosphorylation in response to GDF6 indicates an enhanced discogenic potential in Ad-MSCs, suggesting they may be more suitable for GDF6 mediated cellular IVD regeneration. Conflicts of interest. No conflicts of interest. Sources of funding. We would like to acknowledge UKRMP Acellular Hub, MRC, NIHR Musculoskeletal BRU and The Rosetrees Trust for funding this research

This review provides a concise outline of the advances made in the care of patients and to the quality of life after a traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) over the last century. Despite these improvements reversal of the neurological injury is not yet possible. Instead, current treatment is limited to providing symptomatic relief, avoiding secondary insults and preventing additional sequelae. However, with an ever-advancing technology and deeper understanding of the damaged spinal cord, this appears increasingly conceivable. A brief synopsis of the most prominent challenges facing both clinicians and research scientists in developing functional treatments for a progressively complex injury are presented. Moreover, the multiple mechanisms by which damage propagates many months after the original injury requires a multifaceted approach to ameliorate the human spinal cord. We discuss potential methods to protect the spinal cord from damage, and to manipulate the inherent inhibition of the spinal cord to regeneration and repair. Although acute and chronic SCI share common final pathways resulting in cell death and neurological deficits, the underlying putative mechanisms of chronic SCI and the treatments are not covered in this review.