Infections in spine surgery are relatively common and devastating complications, a significant burden to the patient and the healthcare system. Usually, the treatment of SSIs consists of aggressive and prolonged antibiotic therapy, multiple debridements, and in chronic cases, hardware removal. Infections are correlated with worse subjective outcomes and even higher mortality. Depending on the type of spine surgery, the infection rate has been reported to be as higher as 20%. Recently silver-coated implants have been introduced in spine surgery to reduce the incidence of post-operative infections and to improve implant survivorship. The aim of the present study is to evaluate complications and outcomes in patients treated with silver-coated implants because of spine infection. All consecutive patients who had spine stabilization with a silver-coated implant from 2018 to 2021 were screened for inclusion in the study. Inclusion criteria were: (1) six months of minimum follow-up; (2) previous surgical site infection; hematogenous spondylodiscitis requiring surgical stabilization. Demographic and surgical information were obtained via chart review, all the device-related complications and the reoperation rate were also reported. A total of 57 patients were included in the present study. The mean age was 63.4 years, and there were 36 (63%) males and 21 (37%) females. Among the included cases, 57% were SSIs, 33% were spondylodiscitis, and 9% were hardware mobilization. Comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, obesity, smoke, and oncological history were significant risk factors. In addition, the organisms cultured were Staphylococcus species in most of the cases. At six months of follow-up, 40% of patients were considered free from infection, while 20% needed multiple surgeries. The present research showed satisfactory results of silver-coated implants for the treatment of spine infection

The surgical treatment of spinal deformities and degenerative or oncological vertebral diseases is becoming more common. However, this kind of surgery is complex and associated to a high rate of early and late complications. We retrospectively collected all the major complications observed in the perioperative and post-operative period for surgeries performed at our Division of Spine Surgery in the 2010–2012 period,. 285 surgeries were registered in 2010, 324 in 2011 and 308 in 2012. All the complications observed during the procedure and the follow-up period were recorded and classified according to the type (mechanical complications, neurological complications, infection, hematoma, cerebrospinal fluid fistula, systemic complications, death related to the surgery). In 2010, on 285 surgeries 47 patients (16.5 %) had 69 complications (24.2%): 25.7% for the treatment of oncological diseases, 23% for the treatment of degenerative diseases, 27% for the treatment of pathologies of traumatic origin, 11% for the treatment of spondylodiscitis (infectious diseases). In 2011, on 324 surgeries 35 patients (10.8 %) had 54 complications (16.7%): 16.3% for the treatment of oncological diseases, 16.3% for the treatment of degenerative diseases, 20% for the treatment of pathologies of traumatic origin, 28.6% for the treatment of spondylodiscitis. In 2012, on 308 surgeries, 25 patients (8.1 %) had 36 complications (11.7%): 14.4% for the treatment of oncological diseases, 7.2% for the treatment of degenerative diseases, 16.7% for the treatment of pathologies of traumatic origin, 20% for the treatment of spondylodiscitis. On 917 spinal surgeries performed from January 2010 to December 2012, 159 complications (17.3%) were recorded, with a prevalence of mechanical complications and infections. We are also prospectively collecting complications related to 2013–2015, in order to have a larger amount of data and try to detect potential risk factors to be taken into consideration in the decision-making process for complex spinal surgery

Summary. Pyogenic spondylodiscitis is an uncommon but severe spinal infection. In majority of cases treatment is based on intravenous antibiotics and rigid brace immobilization. Posterior percutaneous spinal instrumentation is a safe alternative procedure in relieving pain, preventing deformity and neurological compromise. Introduction. Pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PS) is an uncommon but severe spinal infection. Patients affected by a non-complicated PS and treatment is based on intravenous antibiotics and rigid brace immobilization with a thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) suffices in most cases in relieving pain, preventing deformity and neurological compromise. Since January 2010 we started offering patients percutaneous posterior screw-rod instrumentation as alternative approach to TLSO immobilization. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and effectiveness of posterior percutaneous spinal instrumentation for single level lower thoracic (T9-T12) or lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Materials and Methods. Retrospective cohort analysis on 27 patients diagnosed with PS who were offered to choose between 24/7 TLSO rigid bracing for 3 to 4 months and posterior percutaneous screw-rod instrumentation bridging the infection level followed by soft bracing for 4 weeks after surgery. All patients underwent antibiotic therapy. Fifteen patients chose conservative treatment, 12 patients chose surgical treatment. Patients were seen at 1, 3, 6, 9 months after diagnosis. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) and complete blood count were measured at each follow-up visit. Segmental kyphosis was measured at diagnosis and at 9 months. VAS, SF-12, and EQ-5D questionnaires were recorded at each follow-up visit. Baseline groups’ demographic characteristics were assessed using independent sample t-tests for continuous variables and χ2 tests for frequency variables. Results. Complete healing was achieved in all patients, no difference was observed in healing time between the two groups (77.3±7.2 days vs 80.2±4.4). Instrumentation failure and screw loosening was not observed in any patient. In both group CRP and ESR decreased accordingly with response to antibiotic therapy. Surgically treated patients had significantly lower VAS scores at 1 month (3.05±0.57 in surgery group vs 5.20±1.21 in TLSO group) and 3 months (2.31±0.54 in surgery group vs 2.85±0.55 in TLSO group) post-diagnosis. Both groups had similar trends toward fast recovery in both mental (MCS) and physical components (PCS) of SF-12 questionnaire, surgically treated patients showed steeper and statistically significative improvement at 1 month (37.83±4.57 MCS in surgery group vs 24.52±3.03 MCS in TLSO group and 35.46±4.43 PCS in surgery group vs 27.07±4.45 PCS in TLSO group, p<0.001), 3 months (52.94±3.82 MCS in surgery group vs 39.45±4.92 MCS in TLSO group and 44.93±3.73 PCS in surgery group vs 35.33±6.44 PCS in TLSO group, p<0.001), and 6 months (54.93±3.56 MCS in surgery group vs 49.99±5.82 MCS in TLSO group) post-diagnosis, no statistically significant differences were detected at the other time points (9 months post-diagnosis). EQ-5D index was significantly higher in surgery patients at 1 month (0.764±0.043 in surgery group vs 0.458±0.197 in TLSO group) and 3 months (0.890±0.116 in surgery group vs 0.688±0.142 in TLSO group); no statistically significant changes were observed in segmental kyphosis between the two groups. Conclusion. Posterior percutaneous spinal instrumentation is a safe, feasible, and effective procedure in relieving pain, preventing deformity and neurological compromise. Surgical stabilization was associated with faster recovery, lower pain scores, and improved quality of life compared with TLSO conservative treatment at 1 and 3 months after diagnosis