Introduction and aims. Low back pain is a common complaint, affecting up to one third of the adult population costing over £1 billion to the NHS each year and £3.5 billion to the UK economy in lost production. The demand for spinal injections is increasing allowing for advanced spinal physiotherapists to perform the procedure. The objective of this study was to investigate outcome following spinal injections performed by consultant spinal surgeon (n=40) and advanced spinal physiotherapists (ASP) (n=40) at our centre. Method and Materials. Data on 80 patients who had received caudal epidural (n=36), nerve root block (n=28) and facet joint injections (n=16) form August 2010 to October 2011 consented to be in the study. 40 patients in each group completed Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scores (VAS) before and 6 weeks after the procedure and patient satisfaction questionnaire investigating their experience and any complications related to the spinal injection retrospectively. The study included 32 males and 48 females. Mean age 57 years, range 21–88. [Consultant group M:17, F:23 mean age: 55, range 21–81. ASP group M:15, F:25 mean age 59, range 22–88]. Measures of patient satisfaction and outcome were obtained; using 2 tailed independent samples t-test with 95% confidence interval, statistical significance was investigated. Results. Data analysis shows that there are no significant differences (p>0.05) in either overall patient satisfaction or outcomes between patients of the surgeon vs physiotherapists. Patients of the surgeon were found to be more satisfied with the procedure itself (p< 0.05). Conclusion. Physiotherapists are able to provide spinal injections with equal efficacy to spinal surgeons, with no reduction in overall patient outcome. Benefits of this scheme include greater number of spinal injections performed. Therefore, reducing the overall waiting times. Further, multi-centre studies on larger populations are required to investigate injection treatment by physiotherapists

The minimisation of errors incurred during the learning process is thought to enhance motor learning and improve performance under pressure or in multitasking situations. If this is proven in surgical skills learning, it has the potential to enhance the delivery of surgical education. We aimed to compare errorless and errorful learning using the high-speed burr. Medical students (n=30) were recruited and allocated randomly to an errorless or errorful group. The errorless learning group progressively learnt tasks from easy to difficult on cedar boards simulating bone. The errorful learning group also progressed through the same tasks but not in order of difficulty. Transfer tasks assessed students’ performance of cervical laminoplasty on saw bone models to assess their level of learning from previous stages. During transfer task 2, students completed the procedure under time pressure and in the presence of distractors, in order to simulate real-life stressors in theatre. Accuracy, precision and safety of the procedure were scored by expert opinions from spine surgeons blinded to the grouping of the participants. Both errorless and errorful learners demonstrated improvements in performance with increasing amounts of practice (demonstrated by the decreased time taken for the task as well as improvement in accuracy of the cuts (depth, width and smoothness). The performance of both groups was not impaired by the incorporation of a secondary task which required participants to multitask. No statistically significant difference in performance was noted between the two groups. In contrast to previous research, there was no significant difference between errorless or errorful learning to develop skills with a high-speed, side-cutting burr. In both groups, practical learning during the session has led to improvement in overall performance with the burr relevant to cervical laminoplasty

Abstract. Purpose. Intracanal rib head penetration is a well-known entity in dystrophic scoliotic curves in neurofibromatosis type 1. There is potential for spinal cord injury if this is not recognised and managed appropriately. No current CT-based classification system is currently in use to quantify rib head penetration. This study aims to propose and evaluate a novel CT-based classification for rib head penetration primarily for neurofibromatosis but which can also be utilised in other conditions of rib head penetration. Materials and methods. The grading was developed as four grades: normal rib head (RH) position—Grade 0, subluxed ext-racanal RH position—Grade 1, RH at pedicle—Grade 2, intracanal RH—Grade 3. Grade 3 was further classified depending on the head position in the canal divided into thirds. Rib head penetration into proximal third (from ipsilateral side)—Grade 3A, into the middle third—Grade 3B and into the distal third—Grade 3C. Seventy-five axial CT images of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 patients in the paediatric age group were reviewed by a radiologist and a spinal surgeon independently to assess interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the novel CT classification. Agreement analysis was performed using the weighted Kappa statistic. Results. There was substantial interobserver correlation with mean Kappa score (k = 0.8, 95% CI 0.7–0.9) and near perfect intraobserver Kappa of 1.0 (95% CI 0.9–1.0) and 0.9 (95% CI 0.9–1.0) for the two readers. Conclusion. The novel CT-based classification quantifies rib head penetration which aids in management planning

Lumbar fusion surgery is an established procedure for the treatment of several spinal pathologies. Despite numerous techniques and existing devices, common surgical trends in lumbar fusion surgery are scarcely investigated. The purpose of this Canada-based study was to provide a descriptive portrait of current surgeons’ practice and implant preferences in lumbar fusion surgery while comparing findings to similar investigations performed in the United Kingdom. Canadian Spine Society (CSS) members were sampled using an online questionnaire which was based on previous investigations performed in the United Kingdom. Fifteen questions addressed the various aspects of surgeons’ practice: fusion techniques, implant preferences, and bone grafting procedures. Responses were analyzed by means of descriptive statistics. Of 139 eligible CSS members, 41 spinal surgeons completed the survey (29.5%). The most common fusion approach was via transforaminal lumber interbody fusion (TLIF) with 87.8% performing at least one procedure in the previous year. In keeping with this, 24 surgeons (58.5%) had performed 11 to 50 cases in that time frame. Eighty-six percent had performed no lumbar artificial disc replacements over their last year of practice. There was clear consistency on the relevance of a patient specific management (73.2%) on the preferred fusion approach. The most preferred method was pedicle screw fixation (78%). The use of stand-alone cages was not supported by any respondents. With regards to the cage material, titanium cages were the most used (41.5%). Published clinical outcome data was the most important variable in dictating implant choice (87.8%). Cage thickness was considered the most important aspect of cage geometry and hyperlordotic cages were preferred at the lower lumbar levels. Autograft bone graft was most commonly preferred (61.0%). Amongst the synthetic options, DBX/DBM graft (64.1%) in injectable paste form (47.5%) was preferred. In conclusion, findings from this study are in partial agreement with previous work from the United Kingdom, but highlight the variance of practice within Canada and the need for large-scale clinical studies aimed to set specific guidelines for certain pathologies or patient categories

During the pandemic of COVID-19, some patients with COVID-19 may need emergency surgeries. As spine surgeons, it is our responsibility to ensure appropriate treatment to the patients with COVID-19 and spinal diseases. A protocol for spinal surgery and related management on patients with COVID-19 has been reviewed. Patient preparation for emergency surgeries, indications, and contraindications of emergency surgeries, operating room preparation, infection control precautions and personal protective equipments (PPE), anesthesia management, intraoperative procedures, postoperative management, medical waste disposal, and surveillance of healthcare workers were reviewed. It should be safe for surgeons with PPE of protection level 2 to perform spinal surgeries on patients with COVID-19. Standardized and careful surgical procedures should be necessary to reduce the exposure to COVID-19

Aims. Medical comorbidities are a critical factor in the decision-making process for operative management and risk-stratification. The Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCC) risk adjustment model is a powerful measure of illness severity for patients treated by surgeons. The HCC is utilized by Medicare to predict medical expenditure risk and to reimburse physicians accordingly. HCC weighs comorbidities differently to calculate risk. This study determines the prevalence of medical comorbidities and the average HCC score in Medicare patients being evaluated by neurosurgeons and orthopaedic surgeon, as well as a subset of academic spine surgeons within both specialities, in the USA. Methods. The Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Database, which is based on data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ National Claims History Standard Analytic Files, was analyzed for this study. Every surgeon who submitted a valid Medicare Part B non-institutional claim during the 2013 calendar year was included in this study. This database was queried for medical comorbidities and HCC scores of each patient who had, at minimum, a single office visit with a surgeon. This data included 21,204 orthopaedic surgeons and 4,372 neurosurgeons across 54 states/territories in the USA. Results. Orthopaedic surgeons evaluated patients with a mean HCC of 1.21, while neurosurgeons evaluated patients with a mean HCC of 1.34 (p < 0.05). The rates of specific comorbidities in patients seen by orthopaedic surgeons/neurosurgeons is as follows: Ischemic heart disease (35%/39%), diabetes (31%/33%), depression (23%/31%), chronic kidney disease (19%/23%), and heart failure (17%/19%). Conclusion. Nationally, comorbidity rate and HCC value for these Medicare patients are higher than national averages for the US population, with ischemic heart disease being six-times higher, diabetes two-times higher, depression three- to four-times higher, chronic kidney disease three-times higher, and heart failure nine-times higher among patients evaluated by orthopaedic surgeons and neurosurgeons. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-6:257–260

Abstract. In the pediatric population, scoliosis is classified into congenital, syndromic, idiopathic, and neuromuscular in aetiology. Syndromic scoliosis represents a wide range of systemic anomalies associated with scoliosis. The primary challenge for a clinician is to think beyond the scoliotic curve, as the underlying pathology is multisystemic. The aim of this review is to identify the systemic anomalies, associated with syndromic scoliosis. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases were searched, dating from 1990–2020, relevant to the purpose of our study. Keywords used: “scoliosis”+ “syndrome” + “genetic”. Retrospective, prospective studies were included. Case reports that had fewer than 4 patients were not included. Delineating 60 articles, we found a total of 41 syndromes to be associated with scoliosis. Thoracic region was the most common level of scoliosis curve, being noted in 28 syndromes. Mental retardation, seizures, and ataxia were the commonly noticed CNS anomalies. VSD, ASD, and TGA were the anomalies associated with CVS; Hypotonia, rib and vertebral malformations were the most identified neuromuscular anomalies; pulmonary hypoplasia, renal agenesis, and strabismus were other associations. A multidisciplinary approach, involving spinal surgeons, paediatricians, geneticists, anesthesiologists, and allied health professionals, is vital for the best care of patients with syndromic scoliosis. The location of the scoliotic curve reflects the associated anomalies, as thoracic curvature is more closely linked with cardiac anomalies, while lumbosacral curvature is seen to be often linked with genitourinary anomalies. We hope that this article provides a clear overview of the systemic associations in syndromic scoliosis and thus, facilitates and streamlines the management protocol

Introduction. Following the publication of our original survey in 2000 (Eur. Sp. J. 11(6):515-8 2002) we have sought to re-evaluate the perceptions and attitudes towards spinal surgery of the current UK orthopaedic Specialist Registrars (SpRs), and to identify factors influencing an interest in spinal surgery. At that time 175 orthopaedic spinal surgeons in the UK needed to increase by 25% to satisfy parity with other European countries. Methods. A postal questionnaire was sent to all 917 SpRs. The questionnaire sought to identify perceptions in spinal surgery, levels of current training and practice, and intentions to pursue a career in spinal surgery. Results. A 61% response rate has confirmed that 74% of trainees intend to avoid spinal surgery (69% in 2000). However 10% are committed to become a Specialist Spinal Surgeon (6.5% in 2000). Their perceptions were wide ranging but most concluded that the intellectual challenge and opportunities for research are widely recognised. However enthusiasm is dampened by poor perceptions of outcomes from surgery, negative somatisation and depression associations, complications and the fear of litigation. In some areas there is inadequate exposure to spinal surgery during the first 4 years of training. Conclusions. Spinal surgery remains a career choice for 10% of surgical trainees (up 3.5% since 2000). With a large SpR expansion (578 to 917 SpRs in the last 5 years) an average of 9 new spinal surgeons annually will be produced over the next six years. This has improved on the figure of 6 per year from 2000. These figures suggest that by 2011 and allowing for retirement, there should be enough spinal surgeons to meet the desired UK/Europe ratio

Introduction. Sagittal pelvic tilt (SPT) can change with spinal pathologies and fusion. Change in the SPT can result in impingement and hip instability. Our aim was to determine the magnitude of the SPT change for hip instability to test the hypothesis that the magnitude of SPT change for hip instability is less than 10° and it is not similar for different hip motions. Methods. Hip implant motions were simulated in standing, sitting, sit-to-stand, bending forward, squatting and pivoting in Matlab software. When prosthetic head and liner are parallel, femoral head dome (FHD) faces the center of the liner. FHD moves toward the edge of the liner with hip motions. The maximum distance between the FHD and the center in each motion was calculated and analyzed. To make the results more reliable and to consider the possibility of bony impingement, when the FHD approached 90% of the distance between the liner-center and liner-edge, we considered the hip “in danger for dislocation”. The implant orientations and SPT were modified by 1-degree increments and we used linear regression with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) to determine the magnitude of SPT change that could cause instability. Results. SPT modification as low as 7° could result in dislocation during pivoting (AUC: 87.5; sensitivity: 87.9; specificity 79.8; p=0.0001). This was as low as 10° for squatting (AUC: 91.5; sensitivity: 100; specificity 75.9; p=0.0001) and as low as 13° for sit-to-stand (AUC: 94.6; sensitivity: 98; specificity 83; p=0.0001). SPT modification affects hip stability more in pivoting than sit-to-stand and squatting. Discussion. Our results show the importance of close collaboration between the hip and spine surgeons in treating patients who undergo THA and spinal fusion. The postoperative SPT modification should be considered for preoperative computer simulation for determining the implant safe zone

We present an analysis of manual and computer-assisted preoperative pedicle screw placement planning. Preoperative planning of 256 pedicle screws was performed manually twice by two experienced spine surgeons (M1 and M2) and automatically once by a computer-assisted method (C) on three-dimensional computed tomography images of 17 patients with thoracic spinal deformities. Statistical analysis was performed to obtain the intraobserver and interobserver variability for the pedicle screw size (i.e. diameter and length) and insertion trajectory (i.e. pedicle crossing point, sagittal and axial inclination, and normalized screw fastening strength). In our previous study, we showed that the differences among both manual plannings (M1 and M2) and computer-assisted planning (C) are comparable to the differences between manual plannings, except for the pedicle screw inclination in the sagittal plane. In this study, however, we obtained also the intraobserver variability for both manual plannings (M1 and M2), which revealed that larger differences occurred again for the sagittal screw inclination, especially in the case of manual planning M2 with average differences of up to 18.3°. On the other hand, the interobserver variability analysis revealed that the intraobserver variability for each pedicle screw parameter was, in terms of magnitude, comparable to the interobserver variability among both manual and computer-assisted plannings. The results indicate that computer-assisted pedicle screw placement planning is not only more reproducible and faster than, but also as reliable as manual planning

Dislocation and accelerated wear have been the nemesis of hip surgeons. No study has been able to correlate cup position to instability. In recent years the influence of the spine-pelvis-hip construct has emerged as important to understand the shift in component position with postural change. Using measurements familiar to spine surgeons, we have correlated the pelvic incidence (PI), a static measurement of pelvic width and hip position; the static tilt, a dynamic measure of pelvic-spine mobility. For THR we have measured the sagittal cup position as the fixed angular change of the cup shifts with pelvic tilt, and this is named anteinclination; and the sacral acetabular angle (SAA) which is the relationship of the acetabulum to the absolute value of sacral tilt (ST) in both standing and sitting. The pelvic femoral angle (PFA) is a measure of femur/hip flexion/internal rotation correlated to pelvic mobility. Dislocation is most common in patients with low PI combined with an ST change <15 degrees. With normal PI and high PI, it occurs much less commonly and only in patients with ST change <5 degrees (very stiff). In patients with stiff pelvis (ST<13) the cup needs increased inclination and anteversion (45/20–25) to compensate for absence of cup opening by posterior tilt of pelvis. For patients with low PI and stiff pelvis we recommend constraint (such as dual mobility articulation)

Background. Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) has achieved favorable effects in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH), as a new surgical procedure. With its wide range of applications, a series of complications related to the operation has gradually emerged. Objective. To describe the type, incidence and characteristics of the complications following PEID and to explore preventative and treatment measures. Study Design. Retrospective, observational study. Setting. A spine center affiliated with a large general hospital. Method. In total, 479 cases of patients with LDH received PEID, which was performed by an experienced spine surgeon between January 2010 and April 2013. Data concerning the complications were recorded. Result. All of the 479 cases successfully received the procedure. A total of 482 procedures were completed. The mean follow-up time was 44.3 months, ranging from 24 to 60 months. The average patient age was 47.8 years, ranging from 16 to 76 years. There were 29 (6.0%) related complications that emerged, including 3 cases (0.6%) of fragment omission, and the symptoms gradually eased following 3–6 weeks of conservative treatment; 2 cases (0.4%) of nerve root injury, and the patients recovered well following 1–3 months of taking neurotrophic drugs and functional exercise; 15 cases (3.1%) of paresthesia, and this condition gradually improved following 3–6 weeks of rehabilitation exercises and treatment with mecobalamin and pregabalin; and recurrence occurred in 9 cases (1.9%), and the condition was controlled in 4 of these cases by using a conservative method, while 5 of the cases underwent reoperation, including 3 traditional open surgeries and 2 PEID. Furthermore, the complication rate for the first 100 cases was 16%. This rate decreased to 3.4% (for cases 101–479), and the incidence of L4–5 (8.2%) was significantly higher than L5-S1 (4.5%). Limitations. This is a retrospective study, and some bias exists due to the single-center study design. Conclusion. PEID is a surgical approach, which has a low complication rate. Fragment omission, nerve root injury, paresthesia and recurrence are relatively common. Some effective measures can prevent and reduce the incidence of the complications, such as strict indications for surgery, a thorough action plan and skilled operation skills

Adverse events (AEs) following spine surgery are very common. It is important to monitor the incidence of AEs to ensure that appropriate practices are implemented to minimise AEs and improve patient outcomes. The Spine Adverse Events Severity System (SAVES) is a validated AE recording tool specifically designed for spine surgery and the Orthopaedic Surgical Adverse Events Severity System (OrthoSAVES) is a similar tool intended for general orthopaedic surgery. The main objective was to prospectively collect AE data from spine surgery patients using SAVES and OrthoSAVES and compare their viability and applicability for use. The longterm objective is to enhance patient safety by tracking AEs with a view towards potentially changing future healthcare practices to eliminate the risk factors for AEs. For a 10-week period in June-September 2015, three spine surgeons used SAVES to record AEs experienced by any elective spine surgery patients. In addition, a trained independent clinical reviewer with access to electronic records, medical charts, and allied health professionals (e.g. nurses, physioterhapists) used SAVES and OrthoSAVES to record AEs for the same patients. At discharge, the SAVES forms from the surgeons and SAVES and OrthoSAVES forms from the independent reviewer were collected and all AEs were recorded in a database. In 48 patients, the independent reviewer recorded a total of 45 AEs (4 intra-operative, 41 post-operative), compared to the surgeons who recorded a total of 8 AEs (2 intra-operative, 6 post-operative) (P2) were recorded by both the independent reviewer and surgeons. OrthoSAVES had the capacity to directly record 3 additional AEs that had to be included in the “Other” section on SAVES. SAVES and OrthoSAVES are valuable tools for recording AEs. Use of SAVES and OrthoSAVES has the potential to enhance patient care and safety by ensuring AEs are followed by the surgeon during their in-hospital stay and prior to discharge. Independent reviewers are more effective at capturing AEs following spine surgery, and thus, could be recruited in order to capture more AEs and maximise different complication diagnoses in alignment with proposed diagnosis-based funding models. The next step is to analyse AE data identified by the hospital discharge abstract to determine whether retrospective administrative coding can adequately record AEs compared to prospectively-collected AE data with SAVES/OrthoSAVES

The Spine Adverse Events Severity System (SAVES) and Orthopaedic Surgical Adverse Events Severity System (OrthoSAVES) are standardised assessment tools designed to record adverse events (AEs) in orthopaedic patients. The primary objective was to compare AEs recorded prospectively by orthopaedic surgeons compared to trained independent clinical reviewers. The secondary objective was to compare AEs following spine, hip, knee, and shoulder orthopaedic procedures. Over a 10-week period, three orthopaedic spine surgeons recorded AEs following all elective procedures to the point of patient discharge. Three orthopaedic surgeons (hip, knee, and shoulder) also recorded AEs for their elective procedures. Two independent reviewers used SAVES and OrthoSAVES to record AEs after reviewing clinical notes by surgeons and other healthcare professionals (e.g. nurses, physiotherapists). At discharge, AEs recorded by the surgeons and independent reviewers were recorded in a database. AE data for 164 patients were collected (48 spine, 52 hip, 33 knee, and 31 shoulder). Overall, 98 AEs were captured by the independent reviewers, compared to 14 captured by the surgeons. Independent reviewers recorded significantly more AEs than surgeons overall, as well as for each individual group (i.e. spine, hip, knee, shoulder) (p2), but surgeons failed to record minor events that were captured by the independent reviewers (e.g. urinary retention and cutaneous injuries; AEs Grade 0.05). AEs were reported in 21 (43.8%), 19 (36.5%), 12 (36.4%), and five (16.1%) spine, hip, knee, and shoulder patients, respectively. Nearly all reported AEs required only simple or minor treatment (e.g. antibiotic, foley catheter) and had no effect on outcome. Two patients experienced AEs that required invasive or complex treatment (e.g. surgery, monitored bed) that had a temporary effect on outcome. Similar complication rates were reported in spine, hip, knee, and shoulder patients. Independent reviewers reported more AEs compared to surgeons. These findings suggest that independent reviewers are more effective at capturing AEs following orthopaedic surgery, and thus, could be recruited in order to capture more AEs, enhance patient safety and care, and maximise different complication diagnoses in alignment with proposed diagnosis-based funding models

Summary. Optimum position of pedicle screws can be determined preoperatively by CT based planning. We conducted a comparative study in order to analyse manually determined pedicle screw plans and those that were obtained automatically by a computer software and found an agreement in plans between both methods, yet an increase in fastening strengths was observed for automatically obtained plans. Hypothesys. Automatic planning of pedicle screw positions and sizing is not inferior to manual planning. Design. Prospective comparative study. Introduction. Preoperative planning in spinal deformity surgery starts by a proper selection of implant anchors throughout the instrumented spine, where pedicle screws provide the optimum choice for bone fixation. In the case of severe spinal deformities, dysplastic pedicles can limit screw usage, and therefore studying the anatomy of vertebrae from preoperative images can aid in achieving the safest screw position through optimal fastening strength. The purpose of this study is to compare manually and automatically obtained preoperative pedicle screw plans. Materials and Methods. CT scans of 17 deformed thoracic spines were studied by two experienced spine deformity surgeons, who placed 316 pedicle screws in 3D using a software positioning tool by aiming for the safest trajectory that permitted the largest possible screw sizes. The resulting manually obtained screw sizes, trajectory angles, entry points and normalised fastening strengths were compared to those obtained automatically by a dedicated computer software that, basing on vertebral anatomy and bone density in 3D, determined optimal screw sizes and trajectories. Results. Statistically significant differences were observed between manually and automatically obtained plans for screw sizes (p < 0.05) and trajectory angles (p < 0.001). However, for automatically obtained plans, screws were not smaller in diameter (p < 0.05) or shorter in length (p < 0.001), while screw normalised fastening strengths were higher (p < 0.001). Conclusions. In comparison to manual planning, automatically obtained plans did not result in smaller screw diameters or shorter screw lengths, which is in agreement with the definition of the pull-out strength, but in different screw trajectory angles, which is reflected by higher normalised fastening strengths. Captions. Fig. 1. Visual comparison among automatically obtained (green colour) and manually defined pedicle screw placement plans by two experienced spine surgeons (red and blue colour) for three different patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, shown from top to bottom in a three-dimensional view, left sagittal, right sagittal and coronal view. Fig. 2. Histograms of differences between observers and (left column), between observer and automated method (middle column), and between observer and automated method (right column), shown from top to bottom for differences in pedicle screw pedicle screw diameter, sagittal inclination, and normalised fastening strength. For figures/tables, please contact authors directly.

To investigate clinical outcome scores in surgically treated patients with either spontaneous or postoperative pyogenic spondylodiscitis after 3, 12 and 24 month. 70 consecutive patients (mean age 64y; male n=33 female n=27) underwent surgical treatment due to pyogenic spondylodiscitis with or without epidural abscess at our department from 2011 to 2013. We performed either microsurgical debridement or debridement in combination with ventral support employing dorsally instrumented spondylodesis followed by bracing and antibiotic therapy up to 12 weeks. European life quality score (EQ-5D), Oswestry disability index (ODI) and visual analogue scale for pain (VAS) were recorded 3, 12 and 24 month after surgery. Length of hospital stay (LOS) was 25,3 days. The Mean time to presentation at our spine center and diagnosis was 3,8 weeks. Distribution of inflammation was lumbar in 66 (94%) and thoracic in 4 (6%) patients. Thirtyfour patients (49%) had isolated spondylodiscitis (SD). Epidural abscess (ED) was found in 26 patients (37%). Ten patients (14%) showed a combination of SD and ED. SD or ED were predominantly found after previous surgery at the same or contiguous level 38 (54%). Nine patients (13%) suffered from ED or SD after previous lumbar epidural steroid injections (LESI). Spontaneous idiopathic inflammation was found only in 13 cases (19%). Standardized follow-up (FU) protocol was scheduled at 3, 12, and 24 month. FU rate was 60%. Healing of the inflammation was the rule. In our study cumulative EQ-5D increased from 0.47 to 0,80. ODI decreased from 41.1 to 24.3 and VAS concerning back pain decreased from 58.4 to 22.6 VAS according sciatica decreased from 46.8 to 20.5. Due to an increasing number of spine surgeries and spinal interventions as well as the increasing age and morbidity of patients, spinal surgeons have to deal more often with the diagnosis pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Standardized conservative or radical surgical treatment strategies in order to achieve good results according to patients life quality are gaining more importance

While image guidance and neuro-navigation have enabled a more accurate positioning of pedicle implants, robot-assisted placement of pedicle screws appears to overcome the disadvantages of the two first systems. However, recent data concerning the superiority of robots currently available to assist spinal surgeons in the accurate positioning of implants are conflicting. The aim of our study was to evaluate the percentage of accurate positioning of pedicle screws inserted using a new robotic-guidance system. Patients were operated on successively by the same surgeon using robotic-assistance (RA; n=40) or by the freehand conventional technique (FH; n=54). Ten and eleven patients from the robot (RG) and freehand (FHG) groups respectively, age-matched and all suffering from degenerative lumbar spine disease were compared. Patient characteristics as well as the duration of the operation and of exposure to X-rays were recorded. The Gertzbein Robbins classification was used to evaluate implant placement. Data wer compared between the groups. Pedicle screw placement in RG patients was achieved using the ROSA™ (Medtech) robot comprising a compact robotic arm on a floor-fixable mobile base. By permanently monitoring the patient's movements, this image-guided tool helps more accurately to pinpoint the pedicle entry point and to control the trajectory. The mean age of patients in each group (RG and FHG) was 63 years. Mean BMI and operating time among the RG and FHG were respectively 26 and 27 kg/m. 2. , and 187 and 119 min. Accurate placement of the implant (score A-B) was achieved in 97.2% of patients in the RG (n=36) and in 92.6% of those in the FHG (n=54). Four implants in the RG were placed manually following failed robotic assistance. The mean duration of X-ray exposure per patient was 1 min 42s in the RG and 41s in the FHG. We report a higher rate of accuracy with robotic assistance as compared to the FH technique. Exposure time was greater in the RG partly due to the fluoroscopic control of the implants required for this pilot study of feasibility. Limitations of the study include its small sized and non-randomised sample. Nevertheless, these preliminary results are encouraging for the development of new robotic techniques for spinal surgery

During the development and early use of the First Generation of Universal Total Knee Replacement Instruments, those instruments supplied with the PCA knee and also available for use with the Kinematic and Total Condylar knees, David Hungerford and I noticed our imperfection in balancing some varus and valgus deformed total knee patients. We decided to start ligament tightening procedures to address this problem. I became impressed with the potential difficulty of simply grasping the medial capsular ligamentous sleeve and pulling it distally on the proximal tibia so that it could be stapled in place. I thought that use of a suture and then incorporation of that suture with a staple or screw could enhance the fixation. The tissue we were working with and are now talking about is rather thin, 1mm to 2mm, flat and broad with longitudinal fibers running in a caudad-cephalad direction. I wanted some way to grab these longitudinal fibers and exert a distal pull without having the suture material pull through. This suggested the use of a locking loop, analogous to what I had seen in my training when locking stitches were commonly used on different layers of wound closure. I developed in my head the picture of a row of locking loops and then saw the cross-over to the other side which revealed the entire structure with trailing tails. At this writing, I am uncertain of the year, but I am thinking it was 1982. Soon after that I illustrated it with OR suture thru paper and then began using it in surgery. I felt that publication would require studies of relative pull-out strength, and we added an injection study to look at possible influence of the tissue vascularity. For tensile strength we used #5 Ethibond in bovine xenograft material, stapled and sewn to wood. In summary, different from individual stitches or stapling without stitching, The K-stitch fails at the suture material and not by pulling the tissue. This statement is true when the suture reasonably matches the heft or thickness and strength of the soft tissue. Otherwise one is dealing with suture that is overpoweringly stronger than the tissues being fixed or held. Clearly this stitch has found common application in Achilles tendon repair and a wide variety of other applications. My own most common use is with re-attachment of the gluteus minimus tendon after an anterolateral total hip exposure. I imagine that this suture is used or at least known by all orthopaedic surgeons with one exception, spine surgeons. I just do not see an application in their surgery. However, some of the younger ones will know it from their general orthopaedic training. A video is shown of the technique and it is emphasised that the suture need not be used so that it loops the edge of a tendon. It may just as easily and helpfully be used on a broader surface as shown

Purpose. MRI wait times for patients with back related complaints are disturbingly long despite the common consensus that axial imaging is not required to diagnose and treat a majority of these problems. This wait often delays appropriate treatment. Many unhelpful MRI scan reports lead to unnecessary apprehension for referring doctors and their patients and frequently stimulate additional surgical consultation requests. This problem is aggravated by surgeons requiring axial imaging before scheduling consultation. Most spine surgeons appreciate that an expert interview and exam can identify those patients for whom axial imaging would be useful in diagnosis and treatment. The purpose of this project was to test the hypothesis: “Advanced practice Orthopaedic physiotherapists with surgical screening training possess the skills in spine specific interview and exam to identify those patients for whom axial imaging would be useful.”. Method. To test this hypothesis 75 patients from three separate clinical cohorts were evaluated. The physiotherapist and Orthopaedic surgeon independently predicted from the clinical interview and exam whether they believed that an MRI scan would be helpful in patient management. The level of agreement was calculated using chance corrected agreement or kappa values. Subsequently the completed MRI scans were reviewed to evaluate whether each prediction was correct. Results. Minimum kappa values of 0.80 indicate near perfect agreement in the prediction of MRI usefulness and review of the MRI scans themselves confirmed the predictive accuracy. Conclusion. A qualified Advanced Practice Orthopaedic Physiotherapist can accurately predict those back patients whose care would benefit from an MRI scan. Screening of patients with back related complaints by these qualified non-physician experts could reduce the number of patients undergoing unhelpful MRI scan thereby helping to diminish the overall waits for appropriate care

Aims. Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a rare condition which requires urgent treatment to reduce the risk of long term neurological morbidity. Most authors recommend surgical decompression within 24–48 hours of the onset of symptoms, which may not be possible if there are delays in referral to hospital, performance of diagnostic imaging or poor access to a spine surgeon. We present a snap shot of referrals of patients with suspected cauda equina syndrome to the Orthopaedic department in a district general hospital including the diagnoses, management and outcome. Methods. A retrospective review of 20 consecutive patients (mean age 49, 11 males, 9 females) referred via Primary Care to the orthopaedic on call team between April and December 2010 was carried out. Data were recorded including the clinical symptoms and signs on admission, time taken to undergo MRI, diagnosis and treatment. Results. 18/20 patients had red flag symptoms. Two patients with convincing neurological evidence of CES were transferred to the local neurosurgical unit for urgent assessment and surgical intervention. 12 patients required urgent inpatient MRI scans; mean time to MRI for these patients was 22 hours from the initial Orthopaedic assessment. Of these, none showed cauda equina and 3 were offered elective surgery for spinal nerve root compression. 14 out of 20 patients presented outside normal working hours when immediate access to MRI was unavailable. Conclusions. The majority of patients in this study had red flag symptoms, although few actually had CES. Usually patients present in the evening when access to MRI is unavailable, potentially delaying the diagnosis. Such information may be useful to radiology departments to help plan out of hours services or help district hospital Orthopaedic departments develop protocols with nearby neurosurgical units for rapid patient transfer when CES is suspected