Advertisement for orthosearch.org.uk
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Results per page:
Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 105-B, Issue SUPP_7 | Pages 105 - 105
4 Apr 2023
Kale S Mehra S Bhor P Gunjotikar A Dhar S Singh S
Full Access

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) improves the quality of life of osteoarthritic and rheumatoid arthritis patients, however, is associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain. There are multiple methods of managing postoperative pain that include epidural anesthesia but it prevents early mobilization and results in postoperative hypotension and spinal infection. Controlling local pain pathways through intra-articular administration of analgesics is a novel method and is inexpensive and simple. Hence, we assess the effects of postoperative epidural bupivacaine injection along with intra-articular injection in total knee replacement patients. The methodology included 100 patients undergoing TKA randomly divided into two groups, one administered with only epidural bupivacaine injection and the other with intra-articular cocktail injection. The results were measured based on a 10-point pain assessment scale, knee's range of motion (ROM), and Lysholm knee score. The VAS score was lower in the intra-articular cocktail group compared to the bupivacaine injection group until the end of 1-week post-administration (p<0.01). Among inter-group comparisons, we observed that the range of motion was significantly more in cocktail injection as compared to the bupivacaine group till the end of one week (p<0.05). Lysholm's score was significantly more in cocktail injection as compared to the bupivacaine group till the end of one week (p<0.05). Our study showed that both epidural bupivacaine injection and intra-articular injection were effective in reducing pain after TKA and have a comparable functional outcome at the end of 4 weeks follow up. However, the pain relief was faster in cases with intra-articular injection, providing the opportunity for early rehabilitation. Thus, we recommend the use of intra-articular cocktail injection for postoperative management of pain after total knee arthroplasty, which enables early rehabilitation and faster functional recovery of these patients


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 99-B, Issue SUPP_1 | Pages 121 - 121
1 Jan 2017
Girolami M Babbi L Gasbarrini A Barbanti Brodano G Bandiera S Terzi S Ghermandi R Boriani S
Full Access

Spinal infections are rare diseases, whose management highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. Although treatment is based on antibiotics, always selected on coltural and antibiogram tests, surgery is required in case of development of spinal instability or deformity, progressive neurological deficits, drainage of abscesses, or failure of medical treatment. The first step of the algorithm is diagnosis, that is established on MRI with contrast, PET/CT scan, blood tests (CRP and ESR) and CT-guided needle biopsy. Evaluation of response to the specific antibiotic therapy is based on variations in Maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) after 2 to 4 weeks of treatment. In selected cases, early minimally invasive surgery was proposed to provide immediate stability and avoid bed-rest. From 1997 to 2014, 182 patients affected by spinal infections have been treated at the same Institution (Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli – Bologna, Italy) according to the proposed algorithm. Mean age was 56 years (range 1 – 88). Male to female ratio was 1.46. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. Infections were mostly located in the lumbar spine (57%) followed by thoracic (37%) and cervical spine (6%). Conservative treatment based on antibiotics needed surgery (open and/or percuteneous minimally invasive) as an adjuvant in 83 patients out of 182 (46%). Management of spinal infections still remains a challenge in spinal surgery and a multisciplinary approach is mandatory. This algorithm represents the shared decision- making process from diagnosis to the most appropriate treatment and it led to successful outcomes with a low-complication rate. We present this algorithm developed to organize the various professionals involved (orthopaedic surgeons, nuclear medicine and infective disease specialists, interventional radiologists and anaestesiologists) and set a shared pathway of decision making in order to uniform the management of this complex disease


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 276 - 276
1 Jul 2014
Nasto L Colangelo D Sernia C Di Meco E Fabbriciani C Fantoni M Pola E
Full Access

Summary. Pyogenic spondylodiscitis is an uncommon but severe spinal infection. In majority of cases treatment is based on intravenous antibiotics and rigid brace immobilization. Posterior percutaneous spinal instrumentation is a safe alternative procedure in relieving pain, preventing deformity and neurological compromise. Introduction. Pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PS) is an uncommon but severe spinal infection. Patients affected by a non-complicated PS and treatment is based on intravenous antibiotics and rigid brace immobilization with a thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) suffices in most cases in relieving pain, preventing deformity and neurological compromise. Since January 2010 we started offering patients percutaneous posterior screw-rod instrumentation as alternative approach to TLSO immobilization. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and effectiveness of posterior percutaneous spinal instrumentation for single level lower thoracic (T9-T12) or lumbar pyogenic spondylodiscitis. Materials and Methods. Retrospective cohort analysis on 27 patients diagnosed with PS who were offered to choose between 24/7 TLSO rigid bracing for 3 to 4 months and posterior percutaneous screw-rod instrumentation bridging the infection level followed by soft bracing for 4 weeks after surgery. All patients underwent antibiotic therapy. Fifteen patients chose conservative treatment, 12 patients chose surgical treatment. Patients were seen at 1, 3, 6, 9 months after diagnosis. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) and complete blood count were measured at each follow-up visit. Segmental kyphosis was measured at diagnosis and at 9 months. VAS, SF-12, and EQ-5D questionnaires were recorded at each follow-up visit. Baseline groups’ demographic characteristics were assessed using independent sample t-tests for continuous variables and χ2 tests for frequency variables. Results. Complete healing was achieved in all patients, no difference was observed in healing time between the two groups (77.3±7.2 days vs 80.2±4.4). Instrumentation failure and screw loosening was not observed in any patient. In both group CRP and ESR decreased accordingly with response to antibiotic therapy. Surgically treated patients had significantly lower VAS scores at 1 month (3.05±0.57 in surgery group vs 5.20±1.21 in TLSO group) and 3 months (2.31±0.54 in surgery group vs 2.85±0.55 in TLSO group) post-diagnosis. Both groups had similar trends toward fast recovery in both mental (MCS) and physical components (PCS) of SF-12 questionnaire, surgically treated patients showed steeper and statistically significative improvement at 1 month (37.83±4.57 MCS in surgery group vs 24.52±3.03 MCS in TLSO group and 35.46±4.43 PCS in surgery group vs 27.07±4.45 PCS in TLSO group, p<0.001), 3 months (52.94±3.82 MCS in surgery group vs 39.45±4.92 MCS in TLSO group and 44.93±3.73 PCS in surgery group vs 35.33±6.44 PCS in TLSO group, p<0.001), and 6 months (54.93±3.56 MCS in surgery group vs 49.99±5.82 MCS in TLSO group) post-diagnosis, no statistically significant differences were detected at the other time points (9 months post-diagnosis). EQ-5D index was significantly higher in surgery patients at 1 month (0.764±0.043 in surgery group vs 0.458±0.197 in TLSO group) and 3 months (0.890±0.116 in surgery group vs 0.688±0.142 in TLSO group); no statistically significant changes were observed in segmental kyphosis between the two groups. Conclusion. Posterior percutaneous spinal instrumentation is a safe, feasible, and effective procedure in relieving pain, preventing deformity and neurological compromise. Surgical stabilization was associated with faster recovery, lower pain scores, and improved quality of life compared with TLSO conservative treatment at 1 and 3 months after diagnosis


Orthopaedic Proceedings
Vol. 96-B, Issue SUPP_11 | Pages 283 - 283
1 Jul 2014
Post V Wahl P Uckay I Zimmerli W Corvec S Loiez C Ochsner P Moriarty F
Full Access

Summary. Staphylococcus aureus isolates from Fracture fixation device related infections contained fewer isolates that form a strong biofilm in comparison with isolates from Prosthetic joint infections. Both orthopaedic implant related infection groups possessed fnbB and sdrE more frequently than the non-implant related infection groups. Introduction. One of the most common pathogen causing musculoskeletal infections is Staphylococcus aureus. The aim was to characterise S. aureus isolated from these infections and to look for differences between the isolates from orthopaedic implant related infections (OIRI) and those in non-implant related infections (NIRI). The OIRI are further differentiated in those associated with fracture fixation (FFI) devices and those found in prosthetic joint infections (PJI). Methods. Three-hundred and five S. aureus isolates were collected from different Swiss and French hospitals (FFI, n=112; PJI, n=105; NIRI, n=88). The cases of NIRI were composed of 27 osteomyelitis (OM), 23 diabetic foot infections (DFI), 27 soft tissue infections (STI) and 11 postoperative spinal infections (SI). Isolates were tested for their ability to form a biofilm. They were typed by agr (accessory gene regulator) group and genes coding for the 13 most relevant MSCRAMMs, Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), PIA (polysaccharide intercellular adhesin), γ-haemolysin, the five most relevant Staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEA-SEE), exfoliative toxins A and B (ETA and ETB) and toxic shock protein (TST) were screened for by PCR. Results. The majority of the S. aureus isolates were methicillin susceptible (MSSA) with 83.4% for the OIRI and 93.2% for the NIRI. All isolates were able to produce a biofilm. A strong biofilm was produced in 13.8% of the OIRI isolates compared to 10.2% of the NIRI isolates. The difference between the isolates of the PJI versus the FFI was statistically significant (20% vs 8%; p=0.011). All four agr types were present in all groups. agrI predominated in the OIRI (42.4%) as well as in the NIRI (44.4%). Comparing OIRI with NIRI, agrII was present in a higher prevalence in OIRI (30.9% vs 14.8%) and agrIII in a lower incidence (21.2% vs 30.7%). Genes cna, clfA and bbp were exhibited predominantly by isolates from the NIRI, while the fnbB and the sdrE gene were more frequently observed among OIRI. Conclusions. Methicillin susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) was more prevalent than methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in this collection. Possible trends for the orthopaedic device associated infection groups FFI and PJI could be observed whereby isolates from PJI produced stronger biofilm than isolates from the FFI group. The agr type agrII, the fnbB gene and sdrE gene were more prevalent present in the OIRI compared to the NIRI. In contrast, agrIII, and the bbp gene were more prevalent in the NIRI than in the OIRI


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 5 | Pages 36 - 37
1 Oct 2014
Di Martino A


Bone & Joint 360
Vol. 3, Issue 4 | Pages 35 - 38
1 Aug 2014
Hammerberg EM