Cervical spine facet tropism (CFT) defined as the facets’ joints angles difference between right and left sides of more than 7 degrees. This study aims to investigate the relationship between cervical sagittal alignment parameters and cervical spine facets’ tropism. A retrospective cross-sectional study carried out in a tertiary center where cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiographs of patients in orthopedics/spine clincs were included. They had no history of spine fractures. Images’ reports were reviewed to exclude those with tumors in the c-spine. A total of 96 patients was included with 63% of them were females. The mean of age was 45.53± 12.82. C2-C7 cobb's angle (CA) and C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) means were −2.85±10.68 and 1.51± 0.79, respectively. Facet tropism was found in 98% of the sample in at least one level on either axial or sagittal plane. Axial C 2–3 CFT and sagittal C4-5 were correlated with CA (r=0.246, P 0.043, r= −278, P 0.022), respectively. In addition, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) was moderately correlated with axial c2-3 FT (r= −0.330, P 0.006) Also, several significant correlations were detected in our model Cervical vertebral slopes and CFT at the related level. Nonetheless, high BMI was associated with multi-level and multiplane CFT with higher odd's ratios at the lower levels. This study shows that CFT at higher levels is correlated with increasing CA and decreasing SVA and at lower levels with decreasing CA. Obesity is a risk factor for CFT

Odontoid fracture of the second cervical vertebra (C2) is the most common spinal fracture type in elderly patients. However, very little is known about the biomechanical fracture mechanisms, but could play a role in fracture prevention and treatment. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical competence and fracture characteristics of the odontoid process. A total of 42 human C2 specimens (14 female and 28 male, 71.5 ± 6.5 years) were scanned via quantitative computed tomography, divided in 6 groups (n = 7) and subjected to combined quasi-static loading at a rate of 0.1 mm/s until fracturing at inclinations of −15°, 0° and 15° in sagittal plane, and −50° and 0° in transverse plane. Bone mineral density (BMD), specimen height, fusion state of the ossification centers, stiffness, yield load, ultimate load, and fracture type according to Anderson and d'Alonzo were assessed. While the lowest values for stiffness, yield, and ultimate load were observed at load inclination of 15° in sagittal plane, no statistically significant differences could be observed among the six groups (p = 0.235, p = 0.646, and p = 0.505, respectively). Evaluating specimens with only clearly distinguishable fusion of the ossification centers (n = 26) reveled even less differences among the groups for all mechanical parameters. BMD was positively correlated with yield load (R² = 0.350, p < 0.001), and ultimate load (R² = 0.955, p < 0.001), but not with stiffness (p = 0.070). Type III was the most common fracture type (23.5%). These biomechanical outcomes indicate that load direction plays a subordinate role in traumatic fractures of the odontoid process in contrast to BMD which is a strong determinant of stiffness and strength. Thus, odontoid fractures appear to result from an interaction between load magnitude and bone quality

Background. Back pain is a common orthopaedic problem which results in hospital admissions in severe cases. The aim of our study was to identify the reasons for back pain admissions and role of further investigations in the treatment of severe back pain. Methods. We collected data prospectively for all admissions between January and March 2011. Demographic details were recorded along with the reasons for admissions, time of admission, further investigations and treatment offered. Results. Total admissions were 850 and 58 (6.8%) had severe back pain.13 patients (22%) had fractures (Group-A); 16 patients (27%) did not require MRI scan (Group-B); 27 patients (50%) needed MRI scan of the lumbosacral spine (Group-C). The mean age of Group-A was 67 years (15–93). 3 were male and 10 females. 10 patients had lumbar and 3 had thoracic spine fractures. The mean age of Group-B was 59 years (32–87). 8 were male and 8 females. The mean age of Group-C was 47 years (23–79). 9 were male and 18 females. The mean hospital stay for Group-C was 5days (0–29). 16 patients (59%) were referred by GP, 5(18%) by emergency department and 3(11%) by physiotherapist. 9(43%) were admitted for pain control, 8(38%) with suspected Cauda Equina syndrome and 2(9%) for further investigations. 20 patients (83%) were admitted during the day, 3(12%) in the evening and 1(4%) during the night. No patient had Cauda equina syndrome on clinical and radiological examination. 12 patients(44%) had nerve root compression on the MRI scan and 7(58%) were offered surgery. Conclusions. Patients were older in group-A with a mean age of 67 years. 27% did not require MRI scan. 67% females admitted with back pain required an MRI scan. No patient had Cauda Equina Syndrome. 55% patients had no nerve root compression. MRI scan was performed to reassure the patients and clinicians with negative results in the presence of severe back pain and unclear neurological signs. Conflicts of interest. None. Sources of funding. None

Background. Fracture of an osteoporotic vertebral body reduces vertebral stiffness and decompresses the nucleus in the adjacent intervertebral disc. This leads to high compressive stresses acting on the annulus and neural arch. Altered load-sharing at the fractured level may influence loading of neighbouring vertebrae, increasing the risk of a fracture ‘cascade’. Vertebroplasty has been shown to normalise load-bearing by fractured vertebrae but it may increase the risk of adjacent level fracture. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of fracture and subsequent vertebroplasty on the loading of neighbouring (non-augmented) vertebrae. Methods. Fourteen pairs of three-vertebra cadaver spine specimens (67-92 yr) were loaded to induce fracture. One of each pair underwent vertebroplasty with PMMA, the other with a resin (Cortoss). Specimens were then creep loaded at 1.0kN for 1hr. In 17 specimens where the upper or lower vertebra fractured, compressive stress distributions were measured in the disc between adjacent non-fractured vertebrae by pulling a pressure transducer through the disc whilst under 1.0kN load. These ‘stress profiles’ were obtained at each stage of the experiment (in flexion and extension) in order to quantify intradiscal pressure (IDP), the size of stress concentrations in the posterior annulus (SP) and compressive load-bearing by anterior (FA) and posterior (FP) halves of the vertebral body and by the neural arch (FN). Results. No differences were found between Cortoss and PMMA so all data were pooled. Following fracture, IDP fell by 26% in extension (P=0.004) and SP increased by more than 200% in flexion (P=0.01). FA decreased from 55% to 36% of the applied load in flexion (P=0.002) and from 36% to 27% in extension (P=0.002). FN increased from 17% to 31% in flexion (P=0.006) and from 22% to 37% in extension (P=0.008). Vertebroplasty reduced stress concentrations in the disc and restored load-bearing towards pre-fracture values. Conclusion. Vertebral fracture transfers compressive load from the anterior vertebral body to the posterior vertebral body and neural arch of adjacent (non-fractured) vertebrae. Vertebroplasty largely restores normal load-sharing at both the augmented and adjacent levels and in doing so may help reduce the risk of a spinal fracture cascade

Summary Statement. Using abdominal CT scans to evaluate bone mineral density following acute fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine demonstrates significant levels of osteoporosis in older patients; this approach may help save on time and resources, and reduce unnecessary radiation exposure. Introduction. While a reduction in bone mineral density (BMD) is associated with aging, relatively few patients have formal dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to quantify the magnitude of bone loss, as they age. This loss of bone may predispose to fractures. Recent data, which correlates mean Hounsfield units (HU) in an area of the L1 vertebra with BMD, now makes it possible to screen for osteoporosis using incidental abdominal Computed Tomography (CT) scans to measure bone density. This innovation has the potential to reduce both cost and radiation exposure, and also make it easier to identify patients who may be at risk. The aims of this study were to evaluate the utility of this approach in patients with acute thoracic and lumbar spine fractures and to evaluate the impact of aging on BMD, using CT screening. Patients & Methods. Following institutional review board approval, we performed a retrospective study of patients who presented to a level I trauma center with acute fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine between 2010 and 2013; patients also had to have had an abdominal (or L1) CT scan either during the admission or in the 6 months before or after their injury. Using a picture archiving and communication (PACS) system, we generated regions of interest (ROI) of similar size in the body of L1 (excluding the cortex) and computed mean values for HU. Values derived were compared against threshold values which differentiate between osteoporosis and osteopenia - for specificity of 90%, a threshold of 110 was set; for balanced sensitivity and specificity, a threshold of <135 HU was set and for 90% sensitivity a threshold of <160 HU was set. A student's t test was used to compare the age stratified mean HU (younger than 65yrs; 65yrs and older), while Fisher's exact test was used to perform aged stratified comparisons between the proportions of patients above and below the thresholds outlined (in each of the three threshold groups). Results. A total of 124 patients were evaluated, with 74 having thoracic and 50 having lumbar fractures. Among those with thoracic fractures, there were 33patients in the younger cohort, who also had a mean BMD of 196.51HU and 41 in the older cohort, who had mean BMD of 105.90HU (p<0.001). In patients with lumbar fractures, 27 patients were in the younger cohort, with mean BMD of 192.26HU and 23 patients in the older cohort with mean BMD of 114.31HU (p<0.001). At the threshold of 110 HU, set for specificity, the magnitude of difference between the age stratified cohorts was greater in the thoracic spine (p<0.001 vs. p=0.003). At the other thresholds: 135HU (balanced for sensitivity and specificity) and 160 HU (90% sensitivity), age of 65 years or older was significantly associated with reduction in CT derived measure of BMD (p<0.001 in all cases). Discussion. This study demonstrates the relative frequency of osteoporosis in acute fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine, and how this changes with age; it is also the first study to do this using opportunistic CT scans. There seems to be a strong association between a reduction in bone mineral density and advanced age, in patients presenting with acute fractures of the spine. This approach may save on the extra cost and additional radiation exposure that may be associated with DXA scanning; in addition, it may help provide clinicians and patients with an approach to monitor developing problems with BMD before it becomes clinically apparent, especially in younger patients