BACKGROUND:. Although most radiographs used for polyethylene wear measurements have been taken with the patient in the supine position in order to assess penetration by the femoral head into the acetabular polyethylene socket, we have questioned the effect of weight-bearing on the position of the head within the socket. The current study aimed to determine the effect of weight bearing, i.e. standing on the two-dimensional radiographic position of the femoral head within the socket. PATIENTS AND METHODS:. A total of three hundred and fifty patients (three hundred and eighty three hips) who had had a total hip arthroplasty had digital radiographs made a set of anteroposterior radiographs for each patient: one radiograph was made with the patient supine and one was made with the patient standing in full weight bearing on the replaced hip. The patients were divided into the following two groups: 1) seventy-five patients (eighty-three hips) with conventional polyethylene (CON) (group-1); 2) two hundred and seventy-five patients (three hundred hips) with highly cross-linked polyethylene (XPL) (group-2). The set of radiograph was taken at three weeks postoperatively and at the time of semiannual follow-up. The average ceramic femoral head penetration was measured with radiographs taken in the standing or supine position at the final follow-up and compared with those of three weeks postoperatively. A single researcher with use of a computerized measurement system performed all measurements on the radiographs of the two-dimensional position of the head. Follow-up period were 13.5 ± 1.0 (range. 11.0–15.5) years in group-1 and 7.6 ± 2.1 (range. 5.0–12.6) years in group-2. RESULTS:. Linear penetration rates in group-1 were 0.172 ± 0.069 mm/year in supine position and 0.178 ± 0.069 mm/year in standing position (p < 0.05, paired t-test; r. 2. = 0.88), and the rates in group-2 were 0.029 ± 0.024 mm/year and 0.035 ± 0.027 mm/year respectively (p < 0.0005, paired t-test; r. 2. = 0.16). The mean ceramic head penetration rate in XPL socket showed 80 to 83% reduction compared with those in CON. CONCLUSIONS:. We found significant difference between the average total ceramic femoral head penetration between supine and standing radiographs in using both CON and XPL socket. Standing radiographs were useful and recommended for polyethylene
BACKGROUND. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty (THA) commonly recognized as cementless hemi-spherical acetabular component combined with cemented femoral stem. We have done so called “reverse” hybrid THA with cemented socket and cementless stem and compared with all-cemented THAs. PATIENTS AND METHODS. We have been collecting data on total hip arthroplasty since November, 1993. Reverse hybrid hip replacements were used mainly from February, 2001. We evaluated data on 272 reverse hybrid THAs (223 patients) from this year onward until May, 2010, and compared the results with those from 283 all-cemented THAs (237 patients) between 1993 and May, 2010. Eighty percent or more of patients had diagnosed as secondary osteoarthritis of the hip joint due to dysplasia in our hospitals. Highly cross linked ultrahigh molecular polyethylene (CLP) socket was introduced in October, 1999. We used conventional (not cross linked polyethylene) socket for 82 hips (cemented group-1) operated before October, 1999 and CLP socket for 201 hips (cemented group-2) in all-cemented cases. We used the Kaplan-Meier method for estimation of prosthesis survival and relative risk of revision. The endpoint was radiological loosening or revision.
Introduction. The long-term wear performance of highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) in cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) has rarely been reported. Here we report a prospective randomized comparative analysis of radiographic wear after a minimum follow-up of 10 years in cemented THAs with either HXLPE or conventional polyethylene (CPE), and assess its clinical relevance. Patients and Methods. From 1999 to 2001, we conducted 94 primary cemented THAs with a 22.225-mm head at our hospital as part of a prospective randomized trial. All surgeries were performed using a direct lateral approach with a trochanteric osteotomy (Dall's approach). The patients were divided into 4 groups. Twenty-six hips in group A were implanted with CPE sockets against zirconia heads and Charnley-type stems. HXLPE sockets (Aeonian, Kyocera Medical Corp) were implanted in all hips in the other 3 groups. Twenty-five hips in group B were implanted with zirconia heads and KC stems (Kyocera Medical Corp), 23 hips in group C with zirconia heads and distal cylindrical stems, and 20 hips in group D with stainless steel heads and C-stem (DePuy Inc). The sockets were highly cross-linked by gamma irradiation at a dose of 35 kGy, heat annealed at 110ºC, and sterilized with 25 kGy of gamma irradiation in nitrogen. For radiographic evaluation, anteroposterior radiograms were taken for each patient annually, and every two years postoperatively for wear analyses. Two-dimensional head penetration was measured on each postoperative radiogram using a computer-aided technique. Results. Wear measurements were performed for 59 cases followed up over 10 years. Linear wear rates were 0.138±0.074 (mm/year±SD) for group A, 0.010±0.015 for group B, 0.013±0.020 for group C, and 0.012±0.027 for group D. Linear wear rates differed significantly between group A and other groups, and no significant difference was found among groups B, C, and D. There were four revision cases. Among them, two sockets of group A were revised for aseptic loosening at 7 and 14 years postoperatively with linear wear rates of 0.749 and 0.153 mm, respectively. Two stems of group B and C were revised for aseptic loosening at 10 and 9 years postoperatively with linear wear rates of 0.007 and 0.041 mm, respectively. There were no other cases with aseptic loosening in any group. Osteolysis was found in 10 cases (group A: 7, group B: 1, group C: 1, group D: 1), and there was a significant difference in linear wear rates between the cases with and without osteolysis (0.157±0.083 and 0.030±0.053 mm/year±SD respectively). Discussion. The two revision cases of HXLPE did not have aggressive