Construction of a functional skeleton is accomplished through co-ordination of the developmental processes of chondrogenesis, osteogenesis, and synovial joint formation. Infants whose movement in utero is reduced or restricted and who subsequently suffer from joint dysplasia (including joint contractures) and thin hypo-mineralised bones, demonstrate that embryonic movement is crucial for appropriate skeletogenesis. This has been confirmed in mouse, chick, and zebrafish animal models, where reduced or eliminated movement consistently yields similar malformations and which provide the possibility of experimentation to uncover the precise disturbances and the mechanisms by which movement impacts molecular regulation. Molecular genetic studies have shown the important roles played by cell communication signalling pathways, namely Wnt, Hedgehog, and transforming growth factor-beta/bone morphogenetic protein. These pathways regulate cell behaviours such as proliferation and differentiation to control maturation of the skeletal elements, and are affected when movement is altered. Cell contacts to the extra-cellular matrix as well as the cytoskeleton offer a means of mechanotransduction which could integrate mechanical cues with genetic regulation. Indeed, expression of cytoskeletal genes has been shown to be affected by immobilisation. In addition to furthering our understanding of a fundamental aspect of cell control and differentiation during development, research in this area is applicable to the engineering of stable skeletal tissues from stem cells, which relies on an understanding of developmental mechanisms including genetic and physical criteria. A deeper understanding of how movement affects skeletogenesis therefore has broader implications for regenerative therapeutics for injury or disease, as well as for optimisation of physical therapy regimes for individuals affected by skeletal abnormalities.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2015;4:105–116

Osteoarthritis is a global problem and the treatment of early disease is a clear area of unmet clinical need. Treatment strategies include cell therapies utilising chondrocytes e.g. autologous chondrocyte implantation and mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) e.g. microfracture. The result of repair is often considered suboptimal as the goal of treatment is a more accurate regeneration of the tissue, hyaline cartilage, which requires a more detailed understanding of relevant biological signalling pathways. In this study, we describe a modulator of regulatory pathways common to both chondrocytes and MSCs. The chondrocytes thought to be cartilage progenitors are reported to reside in the superficial zone of articular cartilage and are considered to have the same developmental origin as MSCs present in the synovium. They are relevant to cartilage homeostasis and, like MSCs, are increasingly identified as candidates for joint repair and regenerative cell therapy. Both chondrocytes and MSCs can be regulated by the Wnt and TGFβ pathways. Dishevelled Binding Antagonist of Beta-Catenin (Dact) family of proteins is an important modulator of Wnt and TGFβ pathways. These pathways are key to MSC and chondrocyte function but, to our knowledge, the role of DACT protein has not been studied in these cells. DACT1 and DACT2 were localised by immunohistochemistry in the developing joints of mouse embryos and in adult human cartilage obtained from knee replacement. RNAi of DACT1 and DACT2 was performed on isolated chondrocytes and MSCs from human bone marrow. Knockdown efficiency and cell morphology was confirmed by qPCR and immunofluorescence. To understand which pathways are affected by DACT1, we performed next-generation sequencing gene expression analysis (RNAseq) on cells where DACT1 had been reduced by RNAi. Top statistically significant (p < 0 .05) 200 up and downregulated genes were analysed with Ingenuity® Pathway Analysis software. We observed DACT1 and DACT2 in chondrocytes throughout the osteoarthritic tissue, including in chondrocytes forming cell clusters. On the non-weight bearing and visually undamaged cartilage, DACT1 and DACT2 was localised to the articular surface. Furthermore, in mouse embryos (E.15.5), we observed DACT2 at the interzones, sites of developing synovial joints, suggesting that DACT2 has a role in cartilage progenitor cells. We subsequently analysed the expression of DACT1 and DACT2 in MSCs and found that both are expressed in synovial and bone marrow-derived MSCs. We then performed an RNAi knockdown experiment. DACT1 knockdown in both chondrocyte and MSCs caused the cells to undergo apoptosis within 24 hours. The RNA-seq study of DACT1 silenced bone marrow-derived MSCs, from 4 different human subjects, showed that loss of DACT1 has an effect on the expression of genes involved in both TGFβ and Wnt pathways and putative link to relevant cell regulatory pathways. In summary, we describe for the first time, the presence and biological relevance of DACT1 and DACT2 in chondrocytes and MSCs. Loss of DACT1 induced cell death in both chondrocytes and MSCs, with RNA-seq analysis revealing a direct impact on transcript levels of genes involved in the Wnt and TFGβ signalling, key regulatory pathways in skeletal development and repair

There has been a reluctance, until relatively recently, to consider replacement of the hip in patients with substantial neuromuscular imbalance. This relates to many factors, including the young age of many (such as cerebral palsy in the older teen and young adult), developmental anatomic abnormality, oft-present poor bone health, neuromuscular imbalance, and the risk of complication; especially dislocation. Mental retardation also introduces challenges with rehabilitation and an increased burden on the family and societal support systems if the outcome is to be maximised. With the development of newer techniques and technology, and the emergence of encouraging outcome studies, these patients can be more easily offered predictable relief of pain, a reasonable chance of improved function, longevity of the reconstruction, and an acceptable risk of complication. A large number of background neurological diagnoses can lead to hip degeneration, or can introduce increased complexity during management of hip degeneration unrelated to that background. Be that as it may, a short list of fundamental questions is common to all and will help guide management:. Important questions to be addressed include:. 1. Did the NV imbalance precede skeletal development? This relates to the dependence of skeletal shape and size on the loads being placed upon it: hence “Form Follows Function”. The shape and size of the hip, and location of the femoral head, will be much different in the young adult with spastic dislocation due to cerebral palsy, when compared with the elderly adult with a late onset CVA-related spasticity superimposed on hip degeneration. 2. Is the muscle tone which will support the hip arthroplasty predominantly spastic or flaccid? In each there is a risk of dislocation, which needs to be addressed at the index procedure, but in spasticity there is the added question as to what tissues need to be released or de-functioned so as to alter the magnitude and direction of the joint reaction forces. 3. Is pain the main reason for consultation? Because pain relief is the most predictable outcome that we can offer, it should guide the indications and timing of intervention. Replacement of the NM hip to improve function, in the absence of pain, should be approached with great caution

Purpose. Internal fixation of fractures in the presence of osteopenia has been associated with a failure rate as high as 25%. Enhancing bone formation and osseointegration of orthopaedic hardware is a priority when treating patients with impaired bone regenerative capacity. Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) 18 regulates skeletal development and could therefore have applications in implant integration. This study was designed to determine if FGF 18 promotes bone formation and osseointegration in the osteopenic FGFR3−/− mouse and to examine its effect on bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Method. In Vivo: Intramedullary implants were fabricated from 0.4 × 10mm nylon rods coated with 300nm of titanium by physical vapour deposition. Skeletally mature, age matched female FGFR3−/− and wild type mice received bilateral intramedullary femoral implants. Left femurs received an intramedullary injection of 0.1μg of FGF 18 (Merck Serono), and right femurs received saline only. Six weeks later, femurs were harvested, radiographed, scanned by micro CT, and processed for undecalcified for histology. In Vitro: MSCs were harvested from femurs and tibiae of skeletally mature age matched FGFR3−/− and wild type mice. Cells were cultured in Alpha Modified Eagles Medium (αMEM) to monitor proliferation or αMEM supplemented with ascorbic acid and sodium beta-glycerophosphate to monitor differentiation. Proliferation was assessed through cell counts and metabolic activity at days 3, 6 and 9. Differentiation was assessed through staining for osteoblasts and mineral deposition at days 6, 9 and 12. Results. Wild type mice exhibited more peri-implant bone formation compared to FGFR3−/− mice. Peri-implant bone formation at the proximal metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction was increased in FGF18 treated femurs compared with contralateral control femurs in wild type (p = NS) and FGFR3−/− (p = 0.04) mice. Histological analysis corroborated micro CT findings, with FGF 18 treated FGFR3−/− femurs forming peri-implant bone instead of the fibrous response seen in controls. In vitro studies showed that FGF18 significantly increased MSC proliferation and metabolism in a dose dependent manner in wild type and FGFR3−/− mice. Osteoblast differentiation was inhibited by FGF18 in wild type MSCs, but was increased at physiological concentrations in cells harvested from FGFR3−/− mice. Conclusion. FGF 18 increases bone formation and osseointegration of intramedullary implants in osteopenic mice and increases MSC proliferation in both the presence and absence of FGFR3. FGF18 also promoted osteoblast differentiation in the absence of FGFR3 signalling, most likely via FGFR1 or 2. Additional work is needed to confirm the identity of the alternate FGFR and to evaluate its capacity to improve osseous healing in unfavourable in-vivo environments