Shoulder septic arthritis is uncommon and frequently misdiagnosed, resulting in severe consequences. This study evaluated the demographics, bacteriological profile, antibiotic susceptibility, treatment regimens, and clinical outcomes. This is a 10-year retrospective observational analysis of 30 patients (20 males and 10 females) who were treated for septic arthritis of the shoulder. The data collecting process utilised clinical records, laboratory archives, and x-ray archives. We gathered demographic information, pre- and post-intervention clinical data, serum biochemical markers, and the results of imaging examinations. All patients had a surgical arthrotomy and joint debridement in the operating room, and specimens were taken for culture and sensitivity testing. The specimens were cultivated for at least seventy-two hours. Shoulder joint ranges of motion, comorbidities, and the presence of osteomyelitis were assessed clinically to determine the outcome. All statistical analyses were conducted using the STATA 17 statistical software. Analysis of correlation between categorical variables was performed using the chi-squared test. The majority of the study patients were black Africans (97%). The age range of the group was from 8 days to 17 years. At presentation, 33% of patients had a low-grade fever, whereas the majority (60%) had normal body temperature. The average length of symptoms was 3.9 days (ranged from 1 day to 15 days), and the majority of patients had an increased white cell count (83%) and C-reactive protein (98%). There was accumulation of fluid in the joint of all individuals who received shoulder ultrasound imaging. We noted a significant incidence of gram-positive cocci, which were mostly susceptible to first-line antibiotics. Shoulder stiffness affected 63% of patients and chronic osteomyelitis affected 50% of individuals. Neither the severity nor the duration of the symptoms was related to an increased risk of osteomyelitis. The results of this study revealed that the clinical characteristics and bacterial profile of septic arthritis of the shoulder conform to typical patterns. The likelihood of osteomyelitis and an unfavourable prognosis is considerable

Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) are excellent surgical options for individuals with shoulder arthritis, providing good to excellent results in the vast majority of patients. Complications are rare, but can be devastating for both the patient and surgeon. An uncommon, but extremely problematic complication following shoulder arthroplasty is shoulder stiffness. While substantial literature discussing post-arthroplasty stiffness is available for other joints such as the hip, knee, and elbow, there is a paucity of research available discussing this complication in the shoulder. As noted in multiple reviews, diminished range of motion following TSA or RSA may be due to a number of factors, including pre-operative diagnosis of proximal humerus fracture, inadequate post-operative rehabilitation, implant-related factors such as malpositioning and/or inappropriate-sized implants, and heterotopic ossification. Often, pathology leading to post-arthroplasty stiffness involves scarring of the long head of the biceps tendon, rotator cuff impingement, as well as cuff tendonitis. Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is also important to recognise, and may be difficult to diagnose, especially in cases of Propionibacterium acnes infections. Importantly, PJI may present with stiffness as well as instability, and thus a high index of suspicion with a low threshold to aspirate is necessary in these challenging patients. Treatment of patients with stiffness following arthroplasty is challenging, and may involve arthroscopic intervention with or without manipulation, as well as manipulation under anesthesia alone. This paper will discuss the etiology, work-up, and treatment of patients with shoulder stiffness following TSA and RSA

Surgeries for reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) significantly increased in the last ten years. Initially developed to treat patients with cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) and pseudoparalysis, wider indications for RTSA were described, especially complex proximal humerus fractures. We previously demonstrated in patients with CTA a different sequence of muscular activation than in normal shoulder, with a decrease in deltoid activation, a significant increase of upper trapezius activation and slight utility of the latissimus dorsi. There is no biomechanical study describing the muscular activity in patients with RTSA for fractures. The aim of this work is to describe the in vivo action of RTSA in patients with complex fractures of the proximal humerus. We conducted an observational prospective cohort study comparing 9 patients with RTSA for complex humerus fracture (surgery more than 6 months, healed tuberosities and rehabilitation process achieved) and 10 controls with normal shoulder function. Assessment consisted in a synchronized analysis of range of motion (ROM) and muscular activity on electromyography (EMG) with the use of 7 bipolar cutaneous electrodes, 38 reflective markers and 8 motion-recording cameras. Electromyographic results were standardized and presented in muscular activity (RMS) adjusted with maximal isometric contractions according to the direction tested. Five basic movements were evaluated (flexion, abduction, neutral external rotation, external rotation in 90° of abduction and internal rotation in 90° of abduction). Student t-test were used for comparative descriptive analysis (p < 0,05). The overall range of motion with RTSA is very good, but lower than the control group: flexion 155.6 ± 10 vs 172.2 ± 13.9, p<0.05, external rotation at 90° 55.6 ± 25 vs 85.6 ± 8.8, p<0,05, internal rotation at 90° 37.8 ± 15.6 vs 52.2 ± 12, p<0,05. The three heads of the deltoid are more stressed during flexion and abduction in the RTSA group (p. The increased use of the 3 deltoid chiefs does not support the hypothesis proposed by Grammont when the RTSA is performed for a complex proximal humerus fracture. This can be explained by the reduced dispalcement of the rotation center of the shoulder in these patients compared to those with CTA. These patients also didn't present shoulder stiffness before the fracture. The maximal muscle activity of the trapezius in flexion and of the latissimus dorsi in flexion and abduction had not been described to date. These new findings will help develop better targeted rehabilitation programs. In addition, the significant role of the latissimus dorsi must question the risks of its transfer (L'Episcopo procedure) to compensate for external rotation deficits

Midshaft clavicle fractures can be classified into simple or complex/comminuted. The hardest fracture to treat is the severely comminuted and displaced fracture. We retrospectively compared 286 consecutive operatively treated simple (2 and 3 part) fractures with the more complex comminuted (>=4 part) midshaft clavicle fractures, looking at outcome, complication rate and union rate. Between 2008 and 2010 the senior author operated on 286 displaced midshaft clavicle fractures using a plate and screws. In this cohort there were 173 simple (2 and 3 part) fractures and 99 complex (>=4 part) fractures. The operation was performed through a limited incision technique and was standardized. All fractures were fixed with at least 3 screws on either side of the comminution. All patients were up until radiological and clinical union. A standardized questionnaire was used to assess patient satisfaction, return to work, sport and outcome at each postoperative visit. All complications were documented. All fractures eventually went onto union. There were 242 males and 44 females with the average age being 33. The complex fractures had a larger scar, took longer to return to normal motion, work and sport, and took on average 10 weeks to unite compared to 6 weeks in the simple fractures. The infection rate in the simple fractures was 1% and in the complex fractures was 2%. The big difference was the incidence of non union in the complex fractures of 10% compared to 1%; the other main difference was postoperative shoulder stiffness of 3% at 3 months in the complex fractures compared to 1 % in the simple fractures. Plate elevation/irritation was also more prevalent in the complex fractures of 10% compared to 3%. This study clearly shows there is a higher complication rate in complex fractures. Particular attention must be placed on surgical technique and anatomical reduction of these difficult fractures followed closely by postoperative rehabilitation. Future studies of clavicle fractures should specify the type of fracture being treated to give a better understanding of the potential outcome