Purpose

The introduction of alternate care provider roles is at the forefront of many new health human resource strategies and is one of the key approaches in reducing orthopaedic wait times in Canada. The present study was part of a formal evaluation of an expanded role for physiotherapists which included referral triage, comprehensive assessment and development of a management plan and post-surgical follow-ups. Specifically, we examined the efficacy and role of an Advanced Practice Physiotherapist (APP) with respect to reduction in wait times to care for patients with shoulder complaints referred to an orthopaedic surgeon with subspecialty in shoulder reconstruction.

The age spectrum for patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty is broadening. Many younger patients now demonstrate shoulder pathology precluding non-arthroplasty reconstruction. The senior population is living longer and “younger”. Therefore, the demands of this patient population to participate in an active lifestyle are growing. Patients with osteoarthritis, cuff tear arthropathy, post-traumatic arthropathy, avascular necrosis, and even forms of inflammatory arthropathy present seeking not only return to simple activities of daily living but the ability to participate in aerobic recreational activities and even work activities which can stretch the limits of shoulder arthroplasty in the physiologic environment of the shoulder. This presentation will provide an overview of patient demands, concerns and activity level following shoulder arthroplasty. We will provide a prospective of allowable, recommended and discouraged activities depending on the underlying source of pathology in the type of arthroplasty implants employed. An overview of our four phases of rehabilitation protocol will be presented focusing on phase four, “work in sports hardening”

A variety of challenging shoulder pathology will be presented to a panel of expert shoulder surgeons for their diagnostic evaluation, decision making, surgical management and aftercare. They will discuss the decision making processes and management options to consider in striving to obtain optimal outcomes

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has improved the lives of many patients with complex shoulder pathology including rotator cuff arthropathy, glenoid bone defects, post-traumatic arthritis and failed non-constrained total shoulder arthroplasty. However, this non-anatomic replacement has a very different complication profile than has been observed with non-constrained shoulder arthroplasty and the revision of RTSA can be extremely challenging. The purpose of this talk is to review some of the typical complications observed in RTSA including instability, infection, stress fractures, peri-prosthetic fractures and glenoid failures, and discuss the treatment options for dealing with these difficult problems

Athletes involved in repetitive overhead shoulder rotation demonstrate increased external rotation and decreased internal rotation range of motion. Deficits in internal rotation have been linked to the development of shoulder pathology. The purpose of this study is to determine if a posterior shoulder stretch program is effective in increasing dominant arm internal rotation and horizontal adduction range of motion in overhead athletes identified as having reduced mobility and posterior shoulder tightness. Thirty-seven overhead athletes in volleyball, swimming and tennis, with internal rotation range of motion deficits greater than or equal to 15°, were randomised into intervention or control groups. The intervention group performed the “sleeper stretch” daily for eight weeks while the control group performed usual activities. Independent t-tests determined whether internal rotation and horizontal adduction range of motion differences between groups were significant and two-way repeated measures analysis of variance tests measured the rate of shoulder range of motion change. Reported shoulder pain and function were also obtained at each evaluation. Significant differences were found between the intervention and control groups' internal rotation and horizontal adduction range of motion at eight weeks (p<0.001 and p=0.003 respectively) compared to baseline (zero weeks) (p=0.19 and p=0.82 respectively). Significant changes in internal rotation were detected in the intervention group at four weeks (p<0.001) with further adaptations noted at eight weeks. Horizontal adduction improved at a slower rate demonstrating significant changes at eight weeks (p=0.003). Reported shoulder pain and functional ability (p=0.002) were different between the study groups at eight weeks. Overhead, collegiate-level athletes with an internal rotation deficit greater than or equal to 15° are able to significantly increase internal rotation and horizontal adduction range of motion by performing a posterior shoulder stretch exercise for eight weeks

Purpose. With growing attention being paid to quality and cost effectiveness in healthcare, outcome evaluations are becoming increasingly important. This determination can be especially difficult in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) given the complex pathology and extensive disabilities in this patient population. Several different scoring systems have been developed and validated for use in various shoulder pathologies. The purpose of this study was to assess the use three outcome scores in a population of patients undergoing RSA. We aim to demonstrate the validity of three outcome scores in patients undergoing RSA, and to determine if one score or a combination of scores is superior to others. Methods. Using a database of patients treated with RSA, we assessed preoperative and postoperative Constant Scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores, and subjective shoulder values (SSV) in 148 shoulders. The outcomes at each scoring period were described and the scores were compared to one another as well as to active range of motion using linear regression modeling. Results. There were no significant differences in the mean improvement of any of the scores. All of the outcome scales improvements were correlated with each other and improvement in forward elevation but not with external rotation. Using multivariate regression analysis all 3 outcome measures were able to predict 38.9% of the variation in improvement in functional outcomes (forward elevation). This was only slightly greater than that provided by improvements in the outcome variable CS alone (36.7%). Conclusion. The three shoulder outcome scores evaluated, regardless of whether they were patient reported or physician based, appear to appropriately reflect improvements after RSA with equal validity. The objective physician assessed Constant score had the strongest correlation with function of the arm, and use of a combination of all 3 outcome scores does not increase the ability to predict range of motion compared to using the Constant Score alone

Introduction. Hypoplasia of the glenoid is a rare condition caused by incomplete ossification of the postero-inferior aspect of the developing glenoid. It may be isolated or associated with a more generalised condition. The clinical symptomatology is variable depending on the age at time of presentation. Materials and Methods. We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who presented with shoulder complaints, and in whom a radiographic diagnosis of glenoid hypoplasia had been made. From January 2002 to December 2012, 8 patients (9 shoulders) with radiological signs of glenoid hypoplasia were identified. The mean age at presentation was 39 years (range 23 to 77) and the mean symptom duration was 12.5 months (range 1 to 48). Results. The diagnoses encountered included: impingement with rotator cuff tendonitis (2 shoulders), rotator cuff dysfunction with biceps tendonitis (1 shoulder), a SLAP lesion (2 shoulders), calcific tendonitis (1 shoulder), a posterior labral tear (1shoulder), multidirectional instability (1 shoulder), and adhesive capsulitis (1 shoulder). Of these nine, six shoulders were managed non-operatively and three were managed surgically, all with satisfactory results. The mean follow-up period was 30 months (range 5 to 60) and the mean Oxford shoulder score was 46.7 (range 42 to 48). Conclusion. We present a series of patients, who have been managed for a variety of shoulder pathologies, and in whom underlying glenoid hypoplasia has been diagnosed. NO DISCLOSURES

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) has been widely accepted for the treatment of rotator cuff arthropathy. There are a number of other shoulder pathologies where the reverse shoulder prosthesis can salvage previously untreatable shoulder conditions and restore function to the shoulder. This is a series of cases where RSA has been used to treat shoulder fractures. Material. Our indications for the reverse prosthesis in fracture management were:. Revision of failed fracture fixation with a deficient rotator cuff – 2 patients;. Acute 3 and 4 part fractures in the elderly, osteoporotic – 1 patient;. Acute 4 part fracture dislocation in elderly, osteoporotic – 1 patient;. Revision of non-union and malunions – 5 patients;. Revision of hemiarthroplasties which were initially done for fracture management – 5 patients. Results. There were a total of 14 cases treated for fractures out of 123 reverse shoulder arthroplasties performed. The average age for the fracture cases was 68 years (range 47–87) and for non-fracture RSA cases 73 years (range 51–88). The average follow-up Constant Score was 53 for fracture cases and 67 for non-fracture RSA cases. Complications included 1 dislocation and 1 deep infection. The problem with treatment of complex cases is there is an increased risk of complications. Problems encountered in the use of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in complex diagnoses include: instability, notching of scapula, scapula fractures, sepsis, lack of bone stock, poor quality soft-tissue and deficient deltoid muscle due to numerous previous surgical procedures, distortion of anatomy due to trauma, subscapularis deficiency and problems encountered from metal implants in situ. Conclusion. RSA is a good salvage procedure for cuff deficient shoulder fracture cases

Introduction. Sling immobilization of the upper limb may affect balance. Computerized dynamic posturography (CDP) provides a validated, objective assessment of balance control and postural stability under dynamic test conditions. We tested the balance of individuals with a shoulder stabilization sling (SSS) using an Equitest Machine to objectively assess imbalance wearing a sling. Methods. 42 right hand dominant (RHD) adults (16 females, 26 males; average age 22; range 20–35 years) were included in the study. 6 controls and two SSS groups with 18 Dominant Hand (DH) and 18 Non Dominant Hand (NDH). CDP assessed balance by Sensory Organization Test (SOT), Motor Control Test (MCT) and Adaptation Test (ADT). Results. Composite Equilibrium Scores (CES): Controls 80.8% Sling DH 71.1 versus sling NDH 69.6% (95% CI). Sling use has lower CES compared to controls (p=0.025). Use of sling caused 31% of subjects to have decreased CES. 22.9% of sling users had imbalances. DH had 19.1% and NDH had 26.8% imbalances (p = 0.044). 6 Absolute falls in DH versus 12 in NDH group. Conclusions. Wearing a sling causes balance decompensation in almost one third of healthy volunteers and this is greater when worn in the non dominant hand with double the falls. This has significant implications for patients with prolonged use of a sling. Consideration should be given to operative procedures or conservative management of shoulder pathology where sling use is required with promotion of early discontinuation of sling can be considered. v

Introduction. The Constant Score (CS) and the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) are shoulder scoring systems routinely used in the UK. Patients with Acromio-Clavicular Joint (ACJ) and Sterno-Clavicular Joint (SCJ) injuries and those with clavicle fractures tend to be younger and more active than those with other shoulder pathologies. While the CS takes into account the recreational outcomes for such patients the weighting is very small. We developed the Nottingham Clavicle Score (NCS) specifically for this group of patients. Methods. We recruited 70 patients into a cohort study in which pre-operative and 6 month post-operative evaluations of outcome were reviewed using the CS, the OSS the Imatani Score (IS) and the EQ-5D scores which were compared with the NCS. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha. Reproducibility of the NCS was assessed using the test/re-test method. Each of the 10 items of the NCS was evaluated for their sensitivity and contribution to the total score of 100. Validity was examined by correlations between the NCS and the CS, OSS, IS and EQ-5D scores pre-operatively and post-operatively. Results. Significant correlations were demonstrated post-operatively between the NCS and OSS (p< 0.001), CS (p=0.001), IS (p< 0.001) and the ‘self-care’ (p=0.013), ‘pain’ (p< 0.001) and ‘usual activities’ (p< 0.001) sub-categories of EQ-5D. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha=0.87). Removal of an item measuring cosmetic satisfaction improved the alpha to 0.90. Significant agreement was found on test/re-test examination. Differences in NCS were directly related to differences in all 4 comparative outcome measures and 91% of patients with improved post-op NCS values reported improvements in their symptoms. Conclusions. The NCS has been proven to be a valid, reliable and sensitive outcome measure that can accurately measure the level of function and disability in the joint, SC joint and clavicle. We recommend its future use for clinical evaluation

Accurate and reproducible measurement of three-dimensional shoulder kinematics would contribute to better understanding shoulder mechanics, and therefore to better diagnosing and treating shoulder pathologies. Current techniques of 3D kinematics analysis use external markers (acromial cluster or scapula locator) or medical imaging (MRI or CT-Scan). However those methods present some drawbacks such as skin movements for external markers or cost and irradiation for imaging techniques. The EOS low dose biplanar X-Rays system can be used to track the scapula, humerus and thorax for different arm elevation positions. The aim of this study is to propose a novel method to study scapulo-thoracic kinematics from biplanar X-rays and to assess its reliability during abduction in the scapular plane. This study is based on the EOS™ system (EOS Imaging, Paris, France), which allows acquisition of 2 calibrated, low dose, orthogonal radiographs with the subject standing at 30 to 40° angle of coronal rotation to the plane of one of the X-ray beams, in order to limit superimposition with the ribcage and spine. Seven abduction positions in the scapular plane were maintained by the subjects for 10 seconds, during X-ray acquisition. Between two positions, the subjects returned at rest position. Arm elevations were approximately 0, 10, 20, 30, 60, 90 and 150° (position 1 to 7). Six subjects were enrolled to perform a reproducibility study based on the 3D reconstructions of 2 experienced observers three times each. For each subject, a personalised 3D reconstruction of the scapula was created. The observer digitises clearly visible anatomical landmarks on both stereoradiographs for each arm position. These landmarks are used to make a first adjustment of a parameterised 3D model of the scapula. This provides a pre-personalised model of the subject's scapula which is then rigidly registered on each pair of X-rays until its retroprojection fits best on the contours that are visible on the X-rays. The thorax coordinate system (CS) was built following the ISB (International Society of Biomechanics) recommendations. The CS associated to the scapula was a glenoid centred CS based on the ellipse which fit on the glenoid rim on the 3D model of scapula. Scapular CS orientation and translation in the thorax CS was calculated following a Y,X,Z angle sequence for each position. Each 3D reconstruction of the scapula was performed in approximately 30 minutes. The most reproducible rotation was upward/downward rotation (along X axis) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) from 2.71° to 3.61°. Internal/external rotation and anterior/posterior tilting were comprised respectively between 5.18° to 8.01° and 5.50° to 7.23° (CI 95%). The most reproducible translation was superior-inferior translation (along Y axis) with a 95% CI from 1.22mm to 2.46mm. Translation along X axis (antero-posterior) and Z axis (medio-lateral) were comprised respectively between 2.49mm to 4.26mm and 2.47mm to 3.30mm (CI 95%). We presented a new technique for 3D functional quantitative analysis of the scapulo-thoracic joint. This technique can be used with confidence; uncertainty of the measures seems acceptable compared to the literature. Main advantages of this technique are the very low dose irradiation compared to the CT-Scan and the possibility to study arm elevation above 120°

Background:. The balance between the subscapularis muscle and the infraspinatus/teres minor muscles, often referred to as the rotator cuff ‘force couple’, has been proposed to be critical component for glenohumeral stability. Function of these muscles can be estimated with the evaluation of muscle atrophy. In clinical practice, muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) rather than 3D muscle volume measurement have been used because it is less time consuming. Because combined anthropometric measures of length and width more accurately define the muscular volume it seems logical to study the transversal rotator cuff force couple in the transversal plane an not in the sagittal plane of the body because both parameters can be included. But is it not clear which transversal CSA has the best correlation with muscle volume. Purpose:. To determine the optimal transversal CSA that has the best correlation with muscle volume. Material and Methods:. A total of 30 CT images containing the full scapula were used. Using Mimics® and 3-Matic® the correlation between CSA's and volume has been evaluated. Two methods have been evaluated. The first method was the CSA measured on transversal plane without 3D editing. The second method is a CSA measured on a new defined transversal plane using 3D reconstruction and reslice editing techniques. Results. Both techniques showed a very high inter and intraobserver reliability (ICC for single measures in both techniques > 0.97, p < 0.001). Correlation of the muscle volume/CSA of the subscapularis showed a high correlation in both the non-reconstructed (ρ = 0,699, p = 0,002) and reconstructed technique (ρ = 0,842, p < 0,001). Correlation of the muscle volume/CSA of the infraspinatus/teres minor showed a moderate correlation in the non-reconstructed (ρ = 0,591, p = 0,013) and a high correlation in reconstructed technique (ρ = 0,779, p < 0,001). There is a significant higher correlation with the volume with the reconstructed technique compared to the non-reconstructed technique (ρ = 0.638, p < 0.001 for the conventional transversal section versus ρ = 0.818, p < 0.001 for the resliced section). Conclusion. Muscular volume of the rotator cuff force couple can be quantified using a non-reconstructed CSA, but is significant more accurately quantified by a 3D reconstructed technique. In the future, balance of the force couple in different shoulder pathologies can be quantified with this measurement technique

Background:. While reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has shown successful outcomes for a variety of shoulder pathologies, postoperative scapula fractures continue to be one of the most common complications limiting outcomes with rates reported between 0.8–7.2%. Previous literature has shown that postoperative scapula fractures have a deleterious effect on elevation and outcomes scores, however these studies were all performed at short-term follow-up from the fracture. It has also not been shown whether postoperative scapular fractures increases risk of revision surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of postoperative scapula fracture on the outcomes following RSA at minimum 1 year follow-up from the fracture. Methods:. A retrospective, case-control study of 25 nonoperatively treated postoperative scapula fractures following RSA in a single surgeon's practice was analyzed with minimum 2 year follow-up from surgery and 1 year follow-up from fracture. Patients with postoperative scapula fractures were matched 1: 4 to a control group for age, sex, total follow-up time, indication for surgery, and primary versus revision surgery. Outcome measures including revision surgery, ASES score, and change in range of motion were compared between fracture cases and controls. Radiographic features including fracture location (acromion vs. scapular spine) and healing of fracture was also analyzed with respect to outcome. Results:. The incidence of postoperative scapula fracture following RSA in this series was 3.1% (32/1018). Fractures occurred from 1–94 months postoperatively, at an average of 16 months. Revision rate was higher in the fracture group (8%, 2/25) than in controls (2%, 2/100) but did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.18). Patients with fractures had inferior clinical outcomes with a postoperative ASES score of 58.0 compared to 74.2 in controls (p = 0.001), but were clinically improved from preoperative scores with an average improvement of 21 points. Improvement in range of motion was also decreased in the fracture group with a mean gain of forward elevation of 26° compared to 76° in controls (p < 0.001). Fracture location (acromion versus scapular spine) (p = 0.54) or healing (p = 0.40) did not affect outcome. Conclusion:. Postoperative scapula fractures may occur at any point during the postoperative period therefore increasing incidence is likely as longer follow-up becomes available. This complication leads to inferior clinical results compared to controls, however patients show improvement compared to their preoperative measurements, even at longer term follow-up. Patients sustaining postoperative scapula fractures may have increased risk of revision surgery

Background:. While reverse shoulder arthroplasty has shown successful outcomes for a variety of shoulder pathologies, postoperative instability continues to be one of the most common complications limiting outcomes. In the literature, reports of instability range from 2.4%–31%. Many authors recommend an initial attempt at closed reduction followed by a period of immobilization for management of the initial dislocation episode while others may seek to rule out infection or other secondary causes; however there is little data to support either practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients with postoperative dislocation following reverse shoulder arthroplasty managed with closed reduction. Methods:. A retrospective review of all reverse shoulder arthroplasties performed by a single surgeon (MF) from 2002-present was performed to identify all patients treated for postoperative dislocation treated with closed reduction, either in the office setting or under anesthesia in the operating room. A total of 21 patients were identified. Preoperative patient characteristics, implant selection, and time to initial dislocation episode were recorded. Final outcomes including recurrent instability need for revision surgery, ASES outcome score, and range of motion were evaluated. Results:. There were 9 male and 12 female patients. Nearly 50% (10/21) cases had previous surgery, with the vast majority of these being previous arthroplasty (8/10). The average time to first dislocation was 200 days (range: 2 days–961 days), with 62% (13/21) occurring in the first 90 days. At average follow-up of 28 months following the dislocation episode, 62% of these shoulders remained stable (13/21). Six shoulders (29%) required revision surgery for recurrent instability. The revision procedure included a larger glenosphere and socket in all cases. All of these patients remained stable at final follow-up (Ave 25.5 months). In those cases successfully treated with closed reduction the average time to dislocation was 188 days, whereas the average time to initial dislocation in cases requiring revision surgery was 224 days (p = 0.82). All of these patients remained stable at final follow-up. Two shoulders (9%) remained unstable and either declined or were medically unfit to undergo revision surgery. The average ASES score in patients treated with closed reduction for instability was 68.0, and 62.7 for those treated with revision surgery (p = 0.64). Conclusion:. This study shows that an initial dislocation episode following reverse shoulder arthroplasty can be successfully managed with closed reduction and temporary immobilization in over half of cases. The time to dislocation is not related to the likelihood of a successful closed reduction. Given that outcomes following revision surgery are not different from closed treatment we would continue to recommend an initial attempt at closed reduction in all cases of postoperative reverse shoulder arthroplasty dislocation

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has had rapidly increasingly utilization since its approval for U.S. use in 2004. RTSA accounted for 11% of extremity market procedure growth in 201. Although RTSA is widely used, there remain significant challenges in determining the location and configuration of implants to achieve optimal clinical and functional results. The goal of this study was to measure the 3D position of the shoulder joint center, relative to the center of the native glenoid face, in 16 subjects with RTSA of three different implant designs, and in 12 healthy young shoulders. CT scans of 12 healthy and 16 pre-operative shoulders were segmented to create 3D models of the scapula and humerus. A standardized bone coordinate system was defined for each bone (Figure 1). For healthy shoulders, the location of the humeral head center was measured relative to the glenoid face center. For the RTSA shoulders, a two-step measurement was required. First, 3D models of the pre-operative bones were reconstructed and oriented in the same manner as for healthy shoulders. Second, 3D model-image registration was used to determine the post-operative implant positioning relative to the bones. The 3D position and orientation of the implants and bones were determined in a sequence of six fluoroscopic images of the arm during abduction, and the mean implant-to-bone relationships were used to determine the surgical positioning of the implants (Figure 2). The RTSA center of rotation was defined as the offset from the center of the implant glenosphere to the center of the native glenoid face. The center of rotation in RTSA shoulders varied over a much greater range than the native shoulders (Table 1 (Figure 3)). Lateral offset of the joint center in RTSA shoulders was at least 6 mm smaller than the smallest joint center offset in the healthy shoulders. The center of rotation in RTSA shoulders was significantly more inferior than in healthy shoulders. The range of anterior/posterior placement of the rotation center for RTSA shoulders was bounded by the range for normal shoulders. How to best position RTSA implants for optimal patient outcomes remains a topic of great debate and research interest. We found that the 3D joint center position can vary over a supraphysiologic range in shoulders with RTSA, and that this variation is primarily in the coronal plane. By relating these geometric variations to muscle, shoulder and clinical function, we hope to establish methods and strategies for predictably obtaining the best clinical and functional outcomes for RTSA patients on a per-subject basis

Subacromial corticosteroid injections are a well-recognised management for chronic shoulder pain and are routinely used in general practice and musculoskeletal clinics. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) of a joint is a rare presentation in the United Kingdom. International literature exists for cases of reactivated latent tuberculosis following intra-articular corticosteroid injections in a knee; however there are no reports of a primary presentation of undiagnosed TB in a joint following therapeutic corticosteroid injections. A seventy-four year old lady presented with a one-year history of a painful shoulder, which clinically manifested as a rotator cuff tear with impingement syndrome. Following three subacromial depo-medrone injections, the patient developed a painless “cold” lump which was investigated as a suspicious, possibly metastatic lesion. This lump slowly developed a sinus and a subsequent MRI scan identified a large intra-articular abscess formation. The sinus then progressed to a large intra-articular 5×8 cm cavity with exposed bone (picture available). The patient had no diagnosis of TB but had pathogen exposure as a child via her parents. The patient underwent three weeks of multiple débridement and intravenous amoxicillin/flucloxacillin to treat Staphylococcus aureus grown on an initial culture. Despite best efforts the wound further dehisced with a very painful and immobile shoulder. Given the poor response to penicillin and ongoing wound breakdown there was a suspicion of TB. After a further fortnight, Mycobacterium tuberculosis was eventually cultured and quadruple antimicrobial therapy commenced. Ongoing débridement of the rotator cuff and bone was required alongside two months of unremitting closed vacuum dressing. The wound remained persistently open and excision of the humeral head was necessary, followed by secondary wound closure. There were no extra-articular manifestations of TB in this patient. At present the shoulder is de-functioned, the wound healed and shoulder pain free. This unique case study highlights that intra-articular corticosteroid can precipitate the first presentation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis septic arthritis. The evolution of symptoms mimic many other shoulder complaints making confident diagnosis a challenge. The infective bone and joint destruction did not respond to the management described in the current literature. There remains a further management issues as to whether arthroplasty surgery can be offered to post-TB infected shoulder joints. Taking a TB exposure history is indicated prior to local immunosuppressant injection, particularly in the older age group of western populations and ethnicities with known risk factors