Objective. To analyze the short-term outcome after medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with a 3D-printing technology in early medial keen osteoarthritis and varus malalignment. Design and Method. 32 knees(28 cases) of mOWHTO (fixation with an angular-stable TomoFix implant(Synthes)) with a 3D-printing technology combined with arhtroscopy were prospectively surveyed with regard to functional outcome(Hospital for special knee score [HSS] score). Pre- and postoperative tibial bone varus angle (TBVA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and alignment were analyzed with regard to the result. Results. 32 knees were included (28 patients; mean age 46.5±9.3 years). The follow-up rate was 100% at 1.7±0.6 years (range, 1.2–3.2 years). Pre- and postoperative mechanical tibiofemoral axis were 6.8°±2°of varus and 1.2°± 3.4° of valgus, respectively. HSS score significantly improved from 46.0±18.3 preoperatively to 84±12 at one, 80±7 at two years (P<0.01). Conclusions. Medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with a 3D-printing technology combined with arthroscopy in medial keen osteoarthritis and varus malalignment is an accurate and good treatment option. High preoperative TBVA and appropriate corrected angle(0–3° of valgus)) was associated with better functional outcome at final follow-up

Summary

The M2a-38^tm metal on metal total hip arthroplasty showed a high incidence of pseudotumors and an unexpected high revision rate in our thoroughly screened cross sectional cohort.

Despite widespread use, the benefit of knee arthroscopy for symptomatic osteoarthritis (OA) remains controversial. The theoretical benefit of removal of particulate debris and washout of inflammatory cytokines has not been supported by strong evidence. Arguments exist for its short term benefit in well selected patients. We sought to determine if arthroscopy provided any short term symptomatic relief in patients with a clinical diagnosis of OA in our unit.

A total of 20 patients were listed for routine arthroscopy over a one year period for OA. Mean age was 60 (range 48–74) years and 3 in 5 patients were female. 9 patients were listed by registrars, 6 by locum consultants and 5 by substantive consultants. One procedure was cancelled on the day of surgery due to lack of indication, with 19 knees proceeding to surgery. There was evidence of significant arthritis in 17 knees, 6 of which had associated degenerate meniscus tears. Two knees had meniscus tears without significant arthritis. All patients had washout and debridement and in addition, 8 partial menisectomies were carried out together with 3 loose body removals. Patients were followed up after an average of 12 weeks. The 2 patients (both male, mean age 52) with meniscus tears in the absence of significant arthritis fully recovered. Both had symptoms of true locking. 2 patients with loose bodies also fully recovered. With the exception of 2 patients with partial relief, the remainder had no symptomatic relief. One reported a worsening of symptoms and progressed to total knee arthroplasty.

These results suggest that arthroscopic debridement and washout plays a limited role in the short term symptomatic relief of OA. Surgeons should limit its use to younger patients with mild radiographic disease and true mechanical symptoms who are otherwise unsuitable for arthroplasty and not keen on undergoing joint conserving surgery.

Surgical debridement for medial epicondylitis (ME) is indicated for patients with refractory ME. The clinical efficacy of simple debridement has not been studied sufficiently. Moreover, authors experienced surgical outcome of ME was not as good as lateral epicondylitis. In this regard, authors have combined the atelocollagen injection in the debridement surgery of ME. The purpose of study was to compare clinical outcomes between simple debridement and debridement combined with atelocollagen injection in the ME. Twenty-five patients with refractory ME and underwent surgical debridement were included in the study. Group A (n=13) was treated with isolated debridement surgery, and group B (n=12) was treated with debridement combined with 1.0 mL of type I atelocollagen. Pain and functional improvements were assessed using visual analogue scale, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scale respectively before surgery, at 3, 6 months after surgery and at the final follow-up. Demographic data did not show significant difference between two groups before surgical procedures. Both groups showed improvement in pain and functional score postoperatively. However, at the 3 months after surgery, group B showed significantly better improvement as compared to group A(VAS 3.1 / 2.0, MEPS 71/82 qDASH 29/23). At the 6 months after surgery and final follow-up, both groups did not show any difference. Surgical debridement combined with atelocollagen is effective treatment option in refractory ME and showed better short-term outcomes compared to isolated surgery

Various arthroscopic techniques using differing graft materials have been described and present a potential alternative to arthroplasty for rotator cuff arthropathy. We describe the short-term outcomes of allograft reconstruction, having evolved of our surgical technique from graft interposition to superior capsule reconstruction (SCR). All patients with an irreparable tear, in the absence of clinical and radiograph evidence of osteoarthritis, who underwent an allograft (Graft Jacket. TM. ) reconstruction with either an arthroscopic interposition or SCR technique within our institution were included. A retrospective case note analysis was performed to ascertain perioperative details including total operating and consumable implant costs. 15 patients were in the interposition group, mean age 66 years (48–77). Mean postoperative follow-up time was 17 months (1.9 −27.8). The mean OSS improved from 30.6 to 35.7 (p<0.05). Additionally, mean pain scores out of 10 improved from 7.7 to 1.5 (p<0.01). Mean satisfaction for the surgery was 7.8 out of 10. Complications included 2 re-ruptures (13.3%), 1 infection (6.7%) and 1 case of no improvement (6.7%). In the SCR group, there were 10 patients, mean age 64.5 (56– 68 years). Half of these patients had previous rotator cuff surgery. Mean postoperative follow-up time was 8.7 months (1.9 – 16.3). The mean OSS improved from 24 to 32.9 (p<0.01). Similarly, pain scores decreased from 7.9 to 3.5 (p<0.01). Mean satisfaction was 7.2. Complications included 1 case of no improvement (10%) resulting in a reverse TSR and 1 re-rupture (10%). A formal, prospective comparison trial is advocated to determine if SCR is superior

Background. While many studies have investigated long-term outcomes after lower limb arthroplasty, rather less is known about the trajectory of short-term outcomes in the first post-operative year. It is difficult for a surgeon to know when, in terms of disease severity, it is best to operate, or to make an accurate prediction of the patient pattern of post-operative recovery. We explored the trajectory of change in pain and function following primary hip and knee arthroplasty and the influence of pre-operative self-reported symptoms on post-operative improvements. Methods. A prospective UK cohort study of 164 patients undergoing primary hip (n=80) or knee (n=84) arthroplasty. WOMAC pain and function measures were collected pre-operatively and at 3 and 12 months post-operatively. Hip and knee arthroplasties were analysed separately, and patients were split into two groups: those with high or low symptoms pre-operatively. Multilevel regressions were used for each outcome (pain and function), and the trajectory of change (0–3 months and 3–12 months) charted. The study was approved by Southwest 4 Research Ethics Committee (09/H0102/72) and all patients provided informed, written consent. The authors have no competing interests to disclose. Results. Most improvement after hip arthroplasty occurred within the first 3 months post-operative. One year after surgery there was no difference in the outcomes between patients with high or low pain/function scores pre-operatively. Similarly, most improvement after knee arthroplasty occurred in the first 3 months. Improvement was greater for those patients with worse pre-operative functional disability and pain, although these patients never ‘caught-up’ with those with less severe pre-operative symptoms. Conclusions. Earlier intervention may be warranted for patients undergoing knee arthroplasty compared to hip arthroplasty to achieve the best post-operative patient-reported outcomes. Level of evidence. 2b, Individual cohort study