Controversy remains as to whether the contralateral hip should be fixed in patients presenting with unilateral slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). This study compares the outcomes of those patients who had prophylactic fixation with those who did not. We identified 90 consecutive patients with a mean age of 12.3 years presenting to the study centre with SCFE from a prospective operative database. The patient's notes and radiographs were retrospectively analysed for post-operative complications, re-presentation with a contralateral slip, and the presence of a cam lesion. The mean length of follow-up was 8 years (range 3 to 13). Fifty patients (56%) underwent unilateral fixation and 40 patients underwent bilateral fixation, of which 4 (4%) patients had simultaneous bilateral SCFE and 36 (40%) had prophylactic fixation of the contralateral hip. Twenty-three patients (46%) that underwent unilateral fixation, went onto have contralateral fixation for a further SCFE. Two patients from this group had symptomatic femoracetabular impingement from cam lesions and one patient required a Southwick osteotomy for a severe slip. Five patients (10%) that had unilateral fixation only demonstrated cam lesions on radiographic analysis, being suggestive of an asymptomatic slip. No post-operative complications were observed for the contralateral hip in patients that had prophylactic screw fixation and no cam lesions were identified on radiographic assessment. This study suggests that the contralateral hip in patients presenting with unilateral SCFE should be routinely offered prophylactic fixation to avoid a further slip, which may be severe, and the morbidity associated with a secondary cam lesion

The initial management of slipped upper femoral epiphysis (SUFE) can determine the occurrence of longterm disability due to complications. Previous surveys have concentrated on orthopaedic surgeons with a specialist paediatric interest. In many units in Scotland, the initial responsibility for management may be an admitting trauma surgeon with a different subspecialty interest. All Orthopaedic surgeons in Scotland participating in acute admitting were invited to complete a web based survey to ascertain current practice in the initial management of adolescents presenting with SUFE. 92/144 (64%) of surgeons approached responded. When faced with a severe stable slip, 53% of respondents were happy to pin in situ, whilst 47% would refer either to a colleague or specialist paediatric unit. With an unstable slip of similar magnitude, 38% would self-treat, 18% refer to a colleague and 44% refer to a paediatric orthopaedic unit. Of those treating, 58% stated their treatment was selected irrespective of timing of presentation. 79% of respondents had treated 5 or less cases in the preceding 5 years with 7% more than 10 cases. Universal prophylactic pinning was supported in 29%, selective in 62% and never in 9%. The responses obtained confirm the variance in management of SUFE that exists amidst acute admitting units in Scotland. Management of a stable slip is uncontroversial except possibly in severe cases. This contrasts with the acute unstable slip, in which various factors are thought to influence the outcome, such as instability and the issue of timing, which are not universally appreciated